German navy divers sabotaged the Nordstream pipeline in an attempt to force NATO member states to wage Germany’s WWIII military campaigns against Russia

Investigators have found compelling evidence that implicates German Navy divers for blowing up, sabotaging, the Nordstream pipeline.

German news media SPIEGEL stated that “a commando of divers and explosives specialists chartered the Andromeda … and sailed unnoticed from Warnemünde in northern Germany across the Baltic Sea before, on September 26, 2022, blowing holes in three pipes belonging to the natural gas pipelines Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2.”

Unnoticed by many is the fact that Warnemünde is the base of operations for Germany’s Warnemünde Naval Base, also called Hohe Düne. A German naval base for vessels of 1 Corvette Squadron.

All the evidence points to Germany. The German government had motive to sabotage the Nordstream pipeline. Germany attempted to force NATO member states to wage Germany’s WWIII military campaign against Russia. Germany wanted everyone to believe that the sabotaging of the Nordstream pipeline was an act of war? Why? According to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an attack on the critical infrastructure of a NATO member state can trigger the mutual defense clause.

The operation was aimed at “inflicting lasting damage to the functionality of the state and its facilities. In this sense, this is an attack on the internal security of the state.” magistrates at the German Federal Court of Justice

Even though countless criminal investigators, intelligence agents and prosecutors from a dozen countries have been searching for those behind the attack – no one has presented the compelling evidence that implicates Germany. The majority of incriminating evidence is coming from German officials. All of the evidence are strictly confidential. Nothing is to be revealed to the public. On orders from the German Chancellery.

Germany’s proxy, the World Economic Forum boasting that Justin Trudeau and more than half of his cabinet are double agents

“What we are very proud of now are the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, president of Argentina … so we penetrate the cabinets. … I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum” Germany’s proxy Klaus Schwab

Note that the head of the World Economic Forum outright stated that “we penetrate the cabinets”. In the video clip Klaus Schwab outed Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and more than half of Trudeau’s cabinet as foreign agents.

NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada

“The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates redaction or deletion of information by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction amd deletion by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada”

The NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada was delivered to Justin Trudeau on September 3, 2019. 8 days later Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election on September 11, 2019.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

NSICOP repeated in its annual report 2020 titled – Espionage and Foreign Interference, that foreign states or individuals acting on their behalf, “penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives”.

Public Safety Canada is aware of the World Economic Forum’s foreign interference activities.

Foreign governments and entities regularly seek to influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in lawful and transparent ways in Canada, including through routine diplomatic engagement. However, some foreign states engage in acts of foreign interference to advance foreign political interests and influence federal officials and decision-makers. As part of these efforts, they may employ individuals, some of whom may be high profile, to act on their behalf without disclosing ties to the foreign state.

One such person who is employed by Germany’s proxy, “to act on their behalf” is Chrystia Freeland – active World Economic Forum Board of Trustees member. Chrystia Freeland joined the World Economic Forum and officially became a double agent on January 25, 2019.

“The Forum is chaired by Founder and Executive Chairman Professor Klaus Schwab. It’s guided by a Board of Trustees, exceptional individuals who act as guardians of its mission and values” World Economic Forum

MP Chrystia Freeland involved in ArriveCan

MP Chrystia Freeland is personally involved in the ArriveCan scandal. She was involved from day one. An email NCIO sent to RCMP HQ, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and Canada’s mass media, the CBC Ottawa and the National Post on March 7, 2024 explained how Chrystia Freeland was involved in the mass misappropriation/misuse of public funds.

Content of email:

Testimony given at the Standing Committee on Government Operations & Estimates provides evidence Chrystia Freeland & her chief of staff were involved in ArriveCan.

https://www.noscommunes.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/OGGO/meeting-81/evidence

House of Commons Committee Meeting transcripts:

“Was there ever any mention of a minister, or communication with a minister about a ministerial decision for this pilot project?” Mrs. Stephanie Kusie

“It was Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland.” Ms. Ritika Dutt

Committee testimony also stated that GC Strategies communicated directly with Chrystia Freeland and her chief of staff via email. The initial email sent by GC Strategies to Chrystia Freeland and her chief of staff was a marketing letter. That means Chrystia Freeland was involved in ArriveCan from the startup.

Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates

Wednesday, January 17, 2024

“I was asked to draft a marketing letter addressed to Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland. The letter was amended by Botler and GC Strategies, at which point we talked about sending it to Minister Freeland’s chief of staff as well.” Mr. Vaughn Brennan

There’s an ongoing coverup because Chrystia Freeland is involved. Investigate Chrystia Freeland. Start with her record in the United States. Record filed under an alias Chrystia Freela. Look into why Chrystia Freeland has a record in the US when she worked at Reuters. Look into why Chrystia Freeland used an alias while living and working in the US. It isn’t a pen name. Chrystia Freeland left Reuters abruptly. Reasonable suspicion she left abruptly because she was being investigated. Freeland was “Managing Director and Editor, Consumer News” at Reuters. The cost of the project she headed at Reuters cost more that what was initially estimated.

BuzzFeed article – How Chrystia Freeland Hastened Reuters Next’s Demise

“After Freeland committed to Reuters Next, she set about clearing out many existing Thomson Reuters employees to make room for her own people. Between Reuters.com employees and people brought on to Reuters Next, around 60 people were working under Freeland. And that’s not including the consultants she hired.”

“Costs steadily rose with new hires and payments to vendors and consultants as the project dragged on and the launch date was continually postponed. While earlier articles estimated the cost at around $5 million, sources close to the project said that actual figure was three to four times that amount, or between $15 and $20 million. Moreover, the first former Reuters employee said that Activate itself was paid $300,000 a month.”

“In July, Freeland herself left Reuters, announcing in stunning fashion in an article in the Canadian Globe and Mail that came out at midnight that she would be running for a Canadian parliamentary seat.”

“To people below her it was something of a shock, it was sudden,” says the Reuters employee.

Blackmail used to obtain $millions from the Trudeau government.

House of Commons Comittee hearing testimony provided evidence that GC Strategies may have blackmailed MP Chrystia Freeland and/or other “senior government officials with contracting authorities” to obtain $millions from the Trudeau government.

“In our interactions with GC Strategies, Mr. Firth routinely boasted that he and his friends, senior government officials with contracting authorities, have “dirt” on each other, essentially guaranteeing silence through mutually assured destruction. While external contractors are engaged in misconduct and do the actual dirty work, I want to emphasize that their conduct would not be possible without backing from factions within the government. At least in our case, their conduct was fully directed by the faction within the government that we have encountered” Mr. Amir Morv (Chief Technology and Security Officer, Botler)

If blackmail was indeed used to obtain $millions Canadians need to know and have a right to know what dirt GC Strategies has on Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland. After all, GC Strategies only initiated contact with Chrystia Freeland via an email to obtain $millions in public funds.

MP Chrystia Freeland continues to blatantly violate federal conflict of interest and breach of trust laws

Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers

Published: Dec 15, 2023
Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Justin Trudeau had motive. At the very least Justin Trudeau counseled an offence that resulted in the murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Accordingly, Justin Trudeau could be charged with murder.

Person counselling offence

22 (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.

Idem

(2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence that the other commits in consequence of the counselling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.

Definition of “counsel”

(3) For the purposes of this Act, “counsel” includes procure, solicit or incite.

The December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman has everything to do with Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

The August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser was deemed a “prohibited gift” by 2 federal laws – the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. MP Justin Trudeau violated the 2 federal laws by attending the fundraiser because Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company Apotex had registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before he and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

Accordingly, the Office of Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau for violating the Lobbying Act. Because the Lobbying Commissioner implicated Barry Sherman by having the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Barry Sherman filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner and REDACTED third party defendant Justin Trudeau.

The lawsuit was filed because the Lobbying Commissioner concealed that Justin Trudeau was the one who broke federal laws, not Barry Sherman. The Lobbying Commissioner concealed Justin Trudeau’s Lobbying Act offence by redacting Justin Trudeau’s name.

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,”

The above statement informs Canadians that the REDACTED name wasn’t Barry Sherman because his name is included “unredacted” in the statement above. The REDACTED name could only be either 2015 election campaign candidates Michael Levitt or Justin Trudeau because the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser that was being investigated by the RCMP was for Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Phil McIntosh, director of investigations at the Office of the Lobby Commissioner stated:

“while conducting the administrative review, the directorate found evidence indicating that Mr. Sherman engaged in political activities that risk creating a sense of obligation on the part of one or more public office holders” through the fundraising event held at his home on Aug. 26, 2015.

We know Justin Trudeau was the subject of the RCMP investigation because:

1) the Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

“Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the private interests of Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

2) the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying initiated the investigation based on a tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, … ” Macleans

Justin Trudeau tried to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit just days before the targeted murders by giving the Lobbying Commissioner $400,000 to fight the lawsuit.

The Lobbying Commissioner receiving access to a “special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges” eliminated Michael Levitt as the name of the person the Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED.

Despite having received $400,000 in misappropriated public funds the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t quash the Apotex lawsuit and a court order requiring her to unredact Justin Trudeau‘s name – the third party and “a defendant” in the Apotex lawsuit.

Because the Lobbying Commissioner failed to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit Justin Trudeau had her removed as the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders – December 13, 2017.

On December 13, 2017 Justin Trudeau committed the offence of obstruction of justice by having both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones.

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from lobbyists.

It is imperative Canadians know and realized that the Apotex lawsuit threatened Justin Trudeau’s political career. The lawsuit could have resulted in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

Canada Elections Act

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; …

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

Justin Trudeau went to great lengths to quash the Apotex lawsuit (Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review) days before Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered.

Obstruction of justice is committed when the accused (Justin Trudeau) wilfully attempts to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in an existing or proposed judicial proceeding. The most extreme form of obstruction is the killing of a witness or a plaintiff in a judicial proceeding.

On December 13, 2017 “Apotex lawsuit plaintiff Barry Sherman” and his wife Honey Sherman were targeted and killed.

Motives for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman:

1) Terminate the RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau for accepting a prohibited gift (26 Aug 2015 campaign fundraiser) from registered government lobbyist (registered 24 Aug 2015) Barry Sherman.

2) Terminate an Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit in which Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) was a third party defendant.

Booster shots used to prolong COVID-19

The WHO is using a technique they used in developing genocide vaccines for Africa, India and Asia to prolong COVID-19. The technique was used in test trials (WHO conducted medical experiments) for vaccines the WHO developed to prevent births in underdeveloped countries. The technique they used is vaccine booster shots. Vaccine booster shots maintains the presence of antibody titers. Maintaining the presence of antibodies is essential for the WHO and Germany to prolong COVID-19. COVID-19 tests were developed by Germany for the WHO to only detect the presence of antibodies. They don’t detect the virus itself.

Government of Canada website:

COVID-19 “tests do not detect the virus itself. Instead, they detect the antibodies produced in response to an infection. Serology tests are also known as antibody tests.”

“Serological tests are not appropriate for diagnosing COVID-19.”

A 1994 Immunology report “A vaccine that prevents pregnancy in women” informs you that booster injections are used in order to maintain antibody titers:

Immunization consisted of three primary injections of the vaccine at 6-week intervals. Booster injections were given subsequently as and when necessary in order to maintain a antibody titers above 50 ng/ml (hCG bioneutralization capacity) to those desiring to continue in the study.

COVID-19 would die out naturally simply by stop injecting the World’s civilian population with COVID-19 vaccine booster shots. The first SARS epidemic that originated in China died out naturally in 2003. There have been no outbreaks of SARS since 2003. No outbreaks of SARS in the past 20 years. Why not? No vaccines or vaccine booster shots were developed or administered in China or anywhere else in the World.

The Government of Canada website provides compelling evidence to support the assertion that people are testing positive for COVID-19 in 2023 and 2024 because of the COVID-19 vaccine booster shots.

“If you have a positive serology test result, it’s likely that you previously had a COVID-19 infection and that you developed an antibody response to the virus. It may also indicate that you developed antibodies in response to vaccination.”

The 1994 WHO sponsored immunology report states:

Reversibility. The response to the vaccine was reversible; antibody titers declined in all cases in the absence of booster injections.

Anti-fertility Vaccines, 1989 National Library of Medicine publication.

“The principle of anti-hCG vaccine is to induce antibodies which can bind to hCG and render it biologically inactive.”

Oxford Academic publication:

“The study of Talwar et al. also provided evidence that the circulating anti-hCG antibodies prevented pregnancy in 1224 cycles, and that booster injections were required to maintain antibody titers.”

UK’s 1919 abolished monarchy aided Nazi Germany throughout WWII

A November 10, 2022 CBC documentary suggested that the Duke of Windsor – Edward VIII, was a traitor during WWII. The CBC reported that UK’s 1919 abolished monarch actively collaborated with Nazis Germany prior to and during the Second World War.

The CBC unearthed documents that showed that the Duke of Windsor may have passed war secrets to Nazi Germany throughout WWII. Edward’s treachery were covered up by the British government after the war because Edward wasn’t the only 1919 abolished royal who collaborated with Nazi Germany. Kraut George VI also collaborated with Nazi Germany. So did George VI’s father, George V.

Kraut George V aided his German cousins in WWI. George V assumed the fake name/alias Windsor in 1917 to conceal the fact that he and his family were German (Krauts). After the Armistice George V aided Adolf Hitler rise to power.

After neo-Nazi Edward VIII was forced to abdicate George VI assumed the throne under color of law and color of right. The UK government used and has been using color of law and color of right (defined as abuse of power) since 1919 to deceive the British and Canadian people by keeping the UK’s illegitimate German monarchy in power. In 1919 all German monarchies were forever abolished, including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy.

In August 1919, at the beginning of the Weimar Republic (1919–1933), Germany’s first democratic constitution officially abolished royalty and nobility, and the respective legal privileges and immunities appertaining to an individual, a family or any heirs. All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy and Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from.

Article 109: All Germans are equal before the law. Men and women have the same fundamental civil rights and duties. Public legal privileges or disadvantages of birth or of rank are abolished. Titles of nobility shall be regarded merely as part of the name and may no longer be bestowed. Titles may only be bestowed when they indicate an office or profession; academic degrees are not affected hereby. Orders and decorations shall not be conferred by the state. No German shall accept titles or orders from a foreign government.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : annul (to declare or make legally invalid or void)

If someone in authority abolishes a system or practice, they formally put an end to it.

Academic Law Dictionary:

abolish: verb abate, abolere, abrogate, annihilate, annul, cancel, declare null and void, delere, delete, deprive of force, destroy, disannul, discontinue, disestablish, dispense with, dispose, dissolve, eliminate, eradicate, exstinguere, exterminate, extinguish, extirpate, invalidate, negate, nullify, obliterate, override, overrule, overturn, prohibit, quash, raze, render null and void, …

Collins dictionary of law. W. J. Stewart. 2001

abolish

to terminate the legal effect of some provision or doctrine.

In law, void means of no legal effect. An action, document or transaction which is void is of no legal effect whatsoever: an absolute nullity — the law treats it as if it had never existed or happened.

That means there is no lawful line of succession. Lawful line of succession ended when the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha and Germany’s House of Hanover monarchies were both forever abolished (made legally invalid or void) in 1919.

Edward VIII wasn’t the only UK royal to assist Canada and the UK’s WWII enemy. There are declassified documents in Ottawa and London that shows Kraut George VI funneled military secrets to Adolf Hitler through Edward during WWII. Edward was living in exile in Portugal during WWII. He was acting as a liaison between Kraut George VI and Adolf Hitler.

There are documents on Canada’s Parliament Hill that showed that both George VI and the Duke of Windsor assisted Nazi Germany during WWII. Operation Overlord was delayed for a year so that Adolf Hitler could prepare for the Allied D-Day invasion of Nazi Germany occupied France.

American, British and Canadian forces were ready in 1943 to launch a full scale invasion of the coast of France. However, Kraut George VI delayed the liberation of Nazi Germany occupied Europe.

The majority of Canadians, Americans and Britains have yet to know that the Allied liberation of Europe was planned for April 1943 – 1 year before D-Day. A large cross Channel landing called Operation Roundup was planned for April 1943. In 1943 the beaches of Normandy weren’t fortified. The 1 year delay gave Adolf Hitler time to fortify the beaches.

“In fact, the German Army in the West was weaker in the summer of 1943 than it was in mid 1944, while Germany’s overall war production in 1944 was 50 percent greater than in 1943 and 126 percent greater than in 1942. In other words, the Allies faced a stronger and better prepared enemy in 1944 than they would have in 1943 under any circumstances.” U.S. Navy Institute

There were documents on the Parliament Hill Precinct in 1984 – the year CSIS was formed (July 16, 1984). Officially formed 16 days after PM Pierre Trudeau was forced to resign. Pierre Trudeau officially resigned 40 years ago on June 30, 1984.

Duke of Windsor implicated in the murder of Kraut George V

Edward VIII, explicitly told the king’s physician, Lord Dawson, that they did not want King George’s life needlessly prolonged if his condition was fatal. There was no explicit command to commit a killing, but the way was left clear for Dawson to “do the right thing”, and he clearly understood this. He actually telephoned his wife an hour before killing George to get her to tell the Times to hold back its front page for the desired formal announcement. It was premeditated.

Related NCIO briefing

It is treason to pledge allegiance to and serve Kraut Charles

Report on Germany funded and developed COVID-19 tests provides ample evidence that millions were intentionally misdiagnosed for financial gain

Published on: December 9, 2022

The tests the WHO used and still uses today to claim millions were infected with and/or died of COVID-19 were designed, developed and distributed worldwide without having SARS-CoV-2 virus isolates or original patient specimens.

The COVID-19 tests that were/are used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 infection don’t detect the SARS-CoV-2 itself.

Government of Canada website:

COVID-19 “tests do not detect the virus itself. Instead, they detect the antibodies produced in response to an infection. Serology tests are also known as antibody tests.”

“Serological tests are not appropriate for diagnosing COVID-19.”

Yet, the WHO, Justin Trudeau‘s minority government and governments worldwide used and are still using those bogus tests to test for/diagnose COVID-19 infection. Because those tests don’t detect SARS-CoV-2 millions were intentionally misdiagnosed so that Germany and the insolvent UN could obtain $billions.

Germany funded COVID-19 test developers stated in a January 2020 published report why the tests don’t detect SARS-CoV-2 and why millions were intentionally misdiagnosed as testing positive for COVID-19.

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

published on 23 Jan 2020

Background: The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as VIRUS ISOLATES ARE UNAVAILABLE while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur.

Aim: We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings WITHOUT HAVING VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE.

Methods: Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.

“In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

Development of the bogus COVID-19 tests was funded by European Union DG Research through projects Prepare (GA602525), Compare (GA643476), and EVAg (GA653316); by European Union DG SANCO through EVD-LabNet, as well as by the German Ministry of Research through projects RAPID (01KI1723A) and DZIF (301-4-7-01.703).

Germany funded, developed and deployed these bogus COVID-19 test to make $billions. To intentionally misdiagnose a patient for financial gain is a criminal offence – health care fraud.

Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain the human herpes virus protein ORF10

Herpes test kit that can prove Germany added SARS-CoV-2’S unique human herpes virus protein ORF10 to its COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

There is material evidence that supports the assertion that Germany’s mRNA vaccines are biological weapons – used by Germany to infect the World’s population with SARS-CoV-2’s unique human herpes virus protein ORF10.

On August 12, 2021 Europe’s drug regulator EMA published new updates on the safety of mRNA vaccines after it investigated a possible link between mRNA vaccines and a skin reaction called erythema multiforme. Erythema multiforme is a hypersensitivity reaction usually triggered by infections, most commonly herpes simplex virus (HSV).

The human herpes virus protein ORF10 is the only protein that is present exclusively in SARS-CoV-2 and not in SARS or any other human coronaviruses.

The WHO’s COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease suggested the severity of COVID-19 is enhanced by the human herpes virus protein ORF10.

“Could the severity of COVID-19 be enhanced by ORF10 accessory proteins?” …

“uniqueness of ORF10 and predicted intrinsic characteristics support possible involvement of ORF10 protein in giving COVID-19 its specific characteristics like spread and virulence” the World Heath Organization

Since 1972 the WHO/UN has called for/recommended virologists develop the means to prolong virus/coronavirus infections. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Volume 47, p.259, 1972, Recommendations (3):

An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. e.g. by depressing (to diminish the activity, strength, or yield of) 7S (IgG) versus 19S (IgM) antibody, or by affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens. If this proves to be the case, virus-induced immunodepression might conceivably be highly instrumental in prolonging certain virus infections, such as murine leukemia, hepatitis, …

Virologists did that by genetically engineering/modifying the SARS coronavirus. The human herpes virus protein ORF10 was encoded into the SARS coronavirus to make the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

A 2003 patent informs us when the herpes virus protein ORF10 was added to the SARS virus by virologists to create the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The 2003 Patent US-2006257852-A1 assigned to CHIRON CORP (US), which was acquired by Novartis (Switzerland) on April 20, 2006 specifically names the ORF10 protein – a protein that is exclusively found in SARS-CoV-2 genome and not in SARS-CoV, being used/encoded in the fusion protein of the patented novel SARS coronavirus.

2021 published study “SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy” informs you why Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine ingredients includes a bioengineered or synthesized component of SARS-CoV-2, the viral protein that causes COVID-19 – ORF10.

“ORF10 plays a vital role at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our study, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the degradation of MAVS and the replication of SARS-CoV-2. Consistent with these results, when ORF10 was knocked down by shRNA, MAVS was not degraded and viral replication was weakened, suggesting that ORF10 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication via degradation of MAVS.”

ORF10 was included because it facilities/causes new SARS-CoV-2 infections. Causing new SARS-CoV-2 infections generates more vaccine sales for Germany.

Related NCIO briefing:

Germany informed World that its COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are biological weapons

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are misusing tax dollars to buy votes

Published: July 6, 2023

Since September 2022 Justin Trudeau has been misusing tax dollars to buy votes. The latest campaign of buying votes is Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s Grocery Rebate.

The Grocery rebate was purposely attached to Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s budget. Its is a blatant attempt at vote buying. A federal election wasn’t called, yet, however the House of Commons (your elected representatives) had to vote to either pass or defeat the March 28, 2023 tabled budget. A budget is automatically a confidence measure that would force an election if defeated.

The Grocery Rebate is one of many vote buying measures Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are using to stay in office. A cheque is in the mail if your elected representatives passes the “Vote for Us” budget. If the House of Commons didn’t pass their budget voters wouldn’t get the money.

In the meantime, since September 2022 Justin Trudeau has been misusing tax dollars to buy votes. Over $4.5 billion was taken to fund Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s vote buying campaign.

Justin Trudeau initiated his vote buying campaign September 13, 2022 by announcing that he was going to put “more money back in the pockets of the middle class”. The Canadian government defines “middle class” as a four-person family earning $45,000–130,000.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s $4.5 billion vote buying measures include:

Increase the Goods and Services Tax Credit

Dental Benefit to children under 12 who do not have access to dental insurance

The one-time top-up to the Canada Housing Benefit

An increase to the Old Age Security (OAS) pension for seniors 75 years and older.

doubling the Canada Student Grant amount and waiving interest on Canada Student Loans.

All have one purpose. Help Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland stay in office and/or get re-elected.

What Canadians don’t realize is that the vote buying money is being taken from your tax dollars to help Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland stay in office. They’re essentially pickpocketing. They’re taking your money and giving it to someone else.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are campaigning for an election that hasn’t been called yet. They’re misusing tax dollars for buying votes before an election is called because their actions is defined by the Canada Elections Act as offering bribe. Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are skirting federal election laws.

Canada Elections Act

Offering bribe

282.7 (1) No person shall, during an election period, directly or indirectly, offer a bribe to influence an elector to vote or refrain from voting, or to vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate or registered party, at the election.

Canada and the UK’s German enemy hiding in plain sight

False identity is when someone pretends to be something they are not. Generally speaking it is NOT against the law to use a false name, an alias. Using an alias in order to commit fraud or other criminal acts, however, is definitely illegal.

Since 1917 the UK’s illegitimate German monarchy have used a false identity, an alias, to defraud and wage wars against the UK and Canadian people. The German oligarchy, Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor to deceive the British and Canadian people.

What Kraut George V did by assuming a forged name, an alias, is defined by Canada’s criminal code as false pretence. Kraut George V claimed he adopted the Windsor name because his birth surname Saxe-Coburg & Gotha sounded German. The truth is, his surname was German and he and his family were German. His father was German. His grandmother, Queen Victoria was German. German was the first language she spoke. His grandfather, Queen Victoria’s consort Prince Albert “Saxe-Coburg & Gotha” was German.

361 (1) A false pretence is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.

Kraut George V didn’t forge and adopt a new surname called Windsor. Families in the UK, Canada and the USA bore the surname Windsor long before Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor during WWI to conceal the fact that he and his family were German. To conceal the fact that he too was Canada and Britain’s WWI enemy. Kraut George V conspired with his German cousin to wage WWI for the Crown.

The Windsor family surname was found in the USA, the UK, Canada, and Scotland between 1840 and 1920. The most Windsor families were found in United Kingdom in 1891. In 1840 there were 26 Windsor families living in New York. New York had the highest population of Windsor families in 1840.

Kraut George V purposefully assumed an English alias with German origins. The town of Windsor was founded by Saxons. The Saxons were a group of Germanic peoples whose name was given in the early Middle Ages to a large country near the North Sea coast of northern Germania, in what is now Germany.

By assuming an alias with German origins Kraut George V continued to rule England during WWI as a German monarchy.

It’s imperative Canadians know that the UK’s monarchy are German and that they are German today despite what Kraut George V did in 1917. Because, in 1919 all German monarchies, all German kings, grand dukes, dukes, and princes, were abolished, including Kraut George V’s Saxe-Coburg & Gotha/alias Windsor monarchy.

On August 19, 1919, when the Weimar Constitution went into effect, all the German nobility’s legal privileges and titles were forever abolished.

All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy and Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : annul (to declare or make legally invalid or void)

If someone in authority abolishes a system or practice, they formally put an end to it.

Carbon tax illegal because it’s being collected based on a false premise

Published: September 1, 2023

The UN and the Vatican’s claim that global warming is caused by man is true. However, it isn’t CO2 emissions that is causing climate change. Global warming/climate change is being caused by ionosphere heaters. The Vatican and the UN claim that global warming is caused by CO2 emissions is defined as a false premise. They induced national leaders to sign the Paris Agreement based on that false premise. Any agreement that is based on a false premise is invalided.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation:

A contract is not considered valid unless all parties are in agreement to the terms. If the expressed terms are not accurate, then any agreement is based on a false premise and the contract is invalid. Knowingly making false statements — whether in writing, verbally, through a simple gesture, or even silence — constitutes false misrepresentation if it has a material effect on the deal.

If a misrepresentation is discovered, the contract/agreement can be declared void. Lincoln & Rowe:

“If the court finds fraudulent misrepresentation, then it can order rescission of the contract and damages for any losses caused. The losses do not have to be reasonably foreseeable.”

A carbon tax is being imposed and collected illegally because the taxation is based entirely on the false premise that global warming is caused by carbon emissions. Since the 1990s the rise in global temperatures coincides with the development and usage of ionosphere heaters. They were developed to conduct electronic warfare. They have since been funded and used to assist Pope Francis and the UN defraud the World by fabricating climate change.

Imposing and collecting a carbon tax has nothing to do with saving the planet. It is being collected to fund the insolvent Fourth Reich EU and the perpetually insolvent UN. It is a financial scheme that is based entirely on a false premise.

In 1989 the UN started claiming that global warming posed a significant and imminent threat. 1989 was also the year that the UN declared that it was facing a financial crisis.

To obtain more funding the cash strapped UN started terrorizing the World with claims that entire nations would disappear due to global warming. The UN made that outlandish claim in 1989. Note the date on the Los Angeles Times article.

The UN’s claim was an outright lie. The same claim (false premise) was made 100 years ago, in 1922.

In 1990 the UN published a report on climate change and in that report investigators refutted the UN claim that global warming posed a significant and imminent threat. The UN’s own report stated that the threat of global warming is based entirely on assumptions and suggestions.

Concern about a substantial rise in sea level as a result of the projected global warming stemmed originally from Mercer (1968), who suggested that The Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves might disintegrate, causing a deglaciation of the West Antarctic ice sheet and a resulting 6 to 7 meter rise in sea level, possibly over a period as short as 40 years.

Subsequent investigations have concluded that such a rapid rise is unlikely. Hughes (1983) and Bentley (1983) estimated that such a disintegration would take at least 200 or 500 years, respectively. Other researchers have estimated that this process would take considerably longer (Fastook, 1985; Lingle, 1985).

There is ample evidence available online that shows that global warming is being caused by ionosphere heaters, not CO2 emissions.

The patent that was used by BAE to build the HAARP Alaska ionosphere heater states that ionosphere heaters can cause climate change by altering the jet stream or by focusing vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the earth.

Bernard J. Eastlund’s US patent US4686605A, Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere, states:

“Weather modification (climate change) is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device … A moving plume could also serve as a means for supplying a space station or for focusing vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the earth.”

The rise in global temperatures since the 1990s coincided with Bill Clinton and Al Gore building the HAARP Alaska ionosphere heater in the 1990s. It was initially used and controlled by the US Air Force and the US Navy.

“Between 1990 and 2014, HAARP was a jointly managed program of the United States Air Force (USAF) and United States Navy.” University of Alaska Fairbanks

The US military abandoned it once the US Air Force built the orbital ionosphere heater called the X-37B and the US Navy built the sea based ionosphere heater called the SBX-1.

“Construction on the HAARP Research Station began in 1993. The first functional facility was completed by the winter of 1994 with three passive, diagnostic instruments and an evaluation prototype HF transmitter consisting of 18 antenna elements with a net radiated power of 360 kW. By 1999, HAARP had been developed to an intermediate level capable of high-quality ionospheric research with the addition of several additional instruments to the diagnostic suite and an improved HF transmitter with 48 antenna elements and a net radiated power capability of 960 kW. Between 2003 and 2006, new instruments were added to the facility, including a UHF ionospheric radar and a telescopic dome for optical observations. Final buildout was completed in 2007, with the HF transmitter now consisting of 180 antenna elements having a net radiated power capability of 3,600 kW or 3.6 MW.” University of Alaska Fairbanks

A 2006 NASA briefing has confirmed that Germany’s EISCAT ionosphere heater HF-radio wave injections are causing a significant rise in atmosphere temperatures.

NASA Tech Brief November 2006

“In recent years, large electron temperature increases of 300% (3000 K above background) caused by powerful HF-radio wave injection have been observed during nighttime using the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar near Tromsø in northern Norway.”

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

“It has been estimated that through radio frequency heating at a power of 10 kW for one day, it should be possible to increase the temperature of a soil volume of about 1 cubic m by about 200 C”

Keep in mind that the melting point at which ice turns to water is 32°F (0°C). Now imagine how quickly 200°C could melt the glaciers (ice). Most of the ionosphere heating operations beam powerful HF-radio waves (RF radiation) for days. All of the ionosphere heaters transmit a lot more power than 10 kW when they heat up the atmosphere or a targeted portion of the earth. HAARP Alaska stated that it’s ionosphere heater has a “net radiated power capability of 3,600 kW or 3.6 MW”.

Since the 1990s ionosphere heaters have been developed to cause climate change in a targeted area. The rise in temperatures since the 1990s is the direct result of ionosphere heater experiments. Now that they’re fully operational they are being funded by he UN, the Vatican and Germany for financial gain. Ionosphere heaters are being used to commit fraud – obtain $billions via global warming eco-terrorism.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, would fit the bill” Vatican think tank, Club of Rome

On April 27, 1997 at the University of Georgia former Secretary of Defense, William Cohen spoke on weapons of mass destruction. At that lecture Cohen asserted that:

“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.”

Link to William Cohen‘s DoD briefing at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy.

Cohen warned us in 1997 about ionosphere heaters called HAARP (US) and EISCAT/EISCAT 3D (Germany’s Fourth Reich EU) being used to cause climate change. He stated that they’re being used as an eco-type of terrorism.

Bernard J. Eastlund’s US patent US4686605A, Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere states:

“In such experiments, certain regions of the ionosphere are heated to change the electron density and temperature within these regions. This is accomplished by transmitting from earth-based antennae high frequency electromagnetic radiation at a substantial angle to, not parallel to, the ionosphere’s magnetic field to heat the ionospheric particles primarily by ohmic heating. The electron temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees in these experiments,”

There are 4 main ionosphere heaters currently being used by various governments to cause climate change. HAARP (USA), EISCAT (GERMANY), SURA (RUSSIA) AND WEM (CHINA) all have the capability to cause climate change.

The US Air Force provided irrefutable proof that its X-37B is an orbital ionosphere heater. The infrared view of the U.S.’s Air Force classified X-37B space plane was taken shortly after it landed at Vandenberg Air Force base on June 16, 2012. (Image credit: 30 Space Wing USAF). The infrared view of the X-37B shows an “Active directional X-band (microwave) beaming Phased Array” inside the cargo bay.

Another US owned and operated ionosphere heater was recently redeployed to cause climate change. It was redeployed by US President Joe Biden to assist the UN fabricate climate change.

The SBX-1 ionosphere heater is currently deployed in the Pacific Ocean. The SBX-1 ionosphere heater left Hawaii in March 2023. Its position can’t be tracked because its current deployment is classified. They are using the cover story that it is being used to monitored North Korean ICBM activity. However, the SBX-1, the X-37B, HAARP Alaska and Germany’s EISCAT are all capable of fabricating climate change (by pushing the jet stream off course), setting of earthquakes and of causing widespread communications blackouts in a targeted area.

The US Navy’s SBX-1 ionosphere heater was deployed because US President Joe Biden is an advocate of Germany’s WWII envisioned World government under German control.

“THE AFFIRMATIVE TASK WE HAVE NOW IS TO ACTUALLY CREATE A NEW WORLD ORDER BECAUSE THE GLOBAL ORDER IS CHANGING AGAIN. AND THE INSTITUTIONS THAT RULE … THAT WORKS SO WELL IN THE POST-WORLD WAR TWO ERA FOR DECADES THEY NEED TO BE STRENGTHENED. AND SOME HAVE TO BE CHANGED” Joe Biden