Toronto Police know who murdered Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers

The Toronto Police know who had Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed. Toronto Police know it was a contracted murders.

“Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks” Toronto Star

Toronto Police investigation files were sealed because Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.

Toronto Police acted on a working theory for the December 13, 2017 “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau‘s Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Production orders were served on BMO Financial Group, CIBC and TD Bank on Feb 15, 2018. Why? To establish 1) who paid Barry & Honey Sherman’s murderers, 2) who were the murderers and 3) how much were the hitmen paid to target and kill Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers.

Production orders served on BMO made Justin Trudeau a viable and a prime suspect. BMO manages “Justin Trudeau’s Blind Trust”.

Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect the day Toronto Police confirmed that Barry and Honey Sherman were indeed targeted. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because Barry and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser the Lobbying Commissioner and the RCMP were investigating when Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over her and the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. RCMP were investigating to determine if Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser was a “prohibited gift or other advantage”. It was because Barry Sherman was a registered in-house lobbyist when he hosted Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser.

“In October 2016, then Commissioner Shepherd received information alleging that Dr. Bernard Sherman, founder of Apotex Inc. and a registered in-house (corporation) lobbyist, was in breach of the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct because of his participation in the organizing and hosting of fundraising events for the Liberal Party of Canada.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017-2018 Annual Report

That means Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. Justin Trudeau faced a slap on the wrist for violating the Lobbying Act. However, Justin Trudeau would have “automatically” lost his seat in the House of Commons after being convicted of accepting a prohibited gift from in-house lobbyist Barry Sherman.

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is … a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

  • (a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

A Government of Canada document (screenshot below) provides prima facie evidence that Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Barry Sherman registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before the fundraiser on August 24, 2015.

RCMP were involved in the targeted murders because of their ongoing investigation of Justin Trudeau’ and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. The Lobbying Commissioner confirmed that the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser when Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered.

“In 2017-18, the Office referred two files to the RCMP for investigation” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada’s Annual report 2017–18

The RCMP investigation no doubt involved the wiretapping of the Sherman residence. RCMP install wiretaps by surreptitious entry or “effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.”

“The power so granted would go much further than authorizing surreptitious entry and would allow the police to act openly and utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or through trickery or coercion. Further, if police acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission” SPREME COURT OF CANADA, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697, Date: 1984-12-20

A person was seen entering and exiting the Sherman residence on December 14, 2017. Toronto Police stated that “the person” was interviewed. However, the person’s identity wasn’t made public because “the person” was a RCMP.

“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,” then Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders

There is evidence that showed responding Toronto Police officers that the crime scene was staged. Staged to make the targeted murders look like it was a murder suicide. The bodies of Barry & Honey Sherman were found propped up. Restraints that were used by their murderers caused restraint markings on the wrist of both Barry and Honey Sherman. The restraints were removed from the bodies and from the crime scene. If the bodies were found with restraints on their wrists the Toronto Police would have conducted a double homicide investigation immediately, on December 15, 2017.

There is evidence that implicates RCMP officers in the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. No forced entry = surreptitious entry. There is physical evidence that both Barry and Honey Sherman were handcuffed. Both bodies had restraint marks on their wrists. Restraint marks provides evidence that the murderers handcuffed Barry and Honey Sherman but removed the restraints and took them with them.

Crime scene evidence indicates that Honey Sherman’s lip & nose were bloody. Both active and retired police officers know how Honey Sherman’s lip and nose could have been injured. Bloody lip & nose are injuries that are frequently sustained by resisting being arrested/handcuffed by a police officer.

“if police acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission” SPREME COURT OF CANADA, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697, Date: 1984-12-20

Toronto Police know who killed Barry & Honey Sherman because of RCMP wiretapping, the Sherman’s own HD video security cameras (image above) and their neighbors’ security cameras recorded the politically motivated assassinations of December 13, 2017. The targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman will likely and intentionally remain a cold case because the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.

According to UK law Charles isn’t King and can never be recognized as being King because according to UK law he was naturally dead and deemed to be dead May 6, 2023

Published on: Aug 26, 2023

Charles isn’t the UK’s King and he can never be the UK’s King because according to UK law he was naturally dead and deemed to be dead on May 6, 2023.

The Act of Settlement 1701 law prohibits forever any Catholic from becoming the UK monarch. The UK legislation (law) made it clear that no sovereign shall “hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or profess the Popish Religion”.

To attend any service of Holy Communion at Westminster Abbey is to hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome and profess the Popish Religion. Charles attendance and receiving communion on May 6, 2023 is a blatant violation of the UK’s Act of Settlement law.

Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Churchworshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith

Catholics are officially termed as being “naturally dead and deemed to be dead” in terms of succession. This distinction was first legislated in the Bill of Rights 1689. … “the Act of Settlement deems somebody who has been a Catholic for a minute to be ‘dead’ in terms of the succession, and it passes over them ‘as if they were dead’. It is an absolute. If at any moment in their whole life they were in communion with Rome, they are excluded from the throne, deemed to be dead.

Westminster Abbey website has confirmed that Charles held communion with the Church of Rome on May 6, 2023. Excerpt from Westminster Abbey website states:

coronations take place within a Communion service or Eucharist. The monarch is crowned in the name of God, surrounded by prayer, and the first thing that the newly-crowned monarch does is receive Holy Communion as a sign of his dependency on God.

The Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Churchworshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith

That means Charles did hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or profess the Popish Religion. As a result, Charles isn’t King because Charles was, according to law, naturally dead and deemed to be dead in terms of the succession.

Every one who attended the coronation are material witnesses. They and the mass media witnessed Kraut Charles holding Communion with the Church of Rome and they all heard him profess the Popish Religion.

There’s documented proof. The transcript of the coronation.

Because the ring was blessed before it was placed on the finger of Kraut Charles the ring became an Ecclesiastical ring. There’s no mistake, the moment the ring was placed on the finger of Kraut Charles and it was proclaimed that the ring was the “seal of Catholic faith” Charles was/is a Catholic.

Act of Settlement

“… And it was thereby further enacted That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion F1… should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [Incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance.

Kraut William can never be King either. He was married in the Catholic Church of England – Westminster Abbey.

Again, the Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states that it, the Church of England, is part of the Catholic Church and that it professes the Catholic faith. Catholic Church parishioners are forever unable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown.

It’s imperative Canadians know that the UK’s monarchy are German (Krauts) and that they are German today despite Kraut George V concealing the historical fact the they are German by assuming the English surname Windsor during WWI, July of 1917.

It is also imperative Canadians know that in 1919 all German monarchies, all German kings, grand dukes, dukes, and princes, were abolished, including Kraut George V’s Saxe-Coburg & Gotha/alias Windsor monarchy.

On August 19, 1919, when the Weimar Constitution went into effect, all the German nobility’s legal privileges and titles were forever abolished. Excerpt from the Weimar constitution:

All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished included Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from. Because the House of Hanover monarchy was abolished in 1919 no UK monarchy since has had the legal right or authority to be king or queen of/in the UK or Canada.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) to completely do away with (something) ANNUL

Synonym: void.

In law, void means of no legal effect. An action, document, or transaction which is void is of no legal effect whatsoever: an absolute nullity—the law treats it as if it had never existed or happened.

UK Parliament debate on April 7, 2014 confirms that Charles, who was a Catholic for a minute (during his coronation), is deemed to be dead in terms of the succession:

“The Act of Settlement deems somebody who has been a Catholic for a minute to be dead in terms of the succession, and it passes over them as if they were dead.” Debate between Lord Beith and Jacob Rees-Mogg, Commons Chamber

It is treason to pledge allegiance to and serve Kraut Charles

Report on Germany funded and developed COVID-19 tests provides ample evidence that millions were intentionally misdiagnosed for financial gain

Published on: December 9, 2022

The tests the WHO used and still uses today to claim millions were infected with and/or died of COVID-19 were designed, developed and distributed worldwide without having SARS-CoV-2 virus isolates or original patient specimens.

The COVID-19 tests that were/are used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 infection don’t detect the SARS-CoV-2 itself.

Government of Canada website:

COVID-19 “tests do not detect the virus itself. Instead, they detect the antibodies produced in response to an infection. Serology tests are also known as antibody tests.”

“Serological tests are not appropriate for diagnosing COVID-19.”

Yet, the WHO, Justin Trudeau‘s minority government and governments worldwide used and are still using those bogus tests to test for/diagnose COVID-19 infection. Because those tests don’t detect SARS-CoV-2 millions were intentionally misdiagnosed so that Germany and the insolvent UN could obtain $billions.

Germany funded COVID-19 test developers stated in a January 2020 published report why the tests don’t detect SARS-CoV-2 and why millions were intentionally misdiagnosed as testing positive for COVID-19.

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

published on 23 Jan 2020

Background: The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as VIRUS ISOLATES ARE UNAVAILABLE while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur.

Aim: We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings WITHOUT HAVING VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE.

Methods: Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.

“In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

Development of the bogus COVID-19 tests was funded by European Union DG Research through projects Prepare (GA602525), Compare (GA643476), and EVAg (GA653316); by European Union DG SANCO through EVD-LabNet, as well as by the German Ministry of Research through projects RAPID (01KI1723A) and DZIF (301-4-7-01.703).

Germany funded, developed and deployed these bogus COVID-19 test to make $billions. To intentionally misdiagnose a patient for financial gain is a criminal offence – health care fraud.

Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain the human herpes virus protein ORF10

Herpes test kit that can prove Germany added SARS-CoV-2’S unique human herpes virus protein ORF10 to its COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

There is material evidence that supports the assertion that Germany’s mRNA vaccines are biological weapons – used by Germany to infect the World’s population with SARS-CoV-2’s unique human herpes virus protein ORF10.

On August 12, 2021 Europe’s drug regulator EMA published new updates on the safety of mRNA vaccines after it investigated a possible link between mRNA vaccines and a skin reaction called erythema multiforme. Erythema multiforme is a hypersensitivity reaction usually triggered by infections, most commonly herpes simplex virus (HSV).

The human herpes virus protein ORF10 is the only protein that is present exclusively in SARS-CoV-2 and not in SARS or any other human coronaviruses.

The WHO’s COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease suggested the severity of COVID-19 is enhanced by the human herpes virus protein ORF10.

“Could the severity of COVID-19 be enhanced by ORF10 accessory proteins?” …

“uniqueness of ORF10 and predicted intrinsic characteristics support possible involvement of ORF10 protein in giving COVID-19 its specific characteristics like spread and virulence” the World Heath Organization

Since 1972 the WHO/UN has called for/recommended virologists develop the means to prolong virus/coronavirus infections. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Volume 47, p.259, 1972, Recommendations (3):

An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. e.g. by depressing (to diminish the activity, strength, or yield of) 7S (IgG) versus 19S (IgM) antibody, or by affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens. If this proves to be the case, virus-induced immunodepression might conceivably be highly instrumental in prolonging certain virus infections, such as murine leukemia, hepatitis, …

Virologists did that by genetically engineering/modifying the SARS coronavirus. The human herpes virus protein ORF10 was encoded into the SARS coronavirus to make the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

A 2003 patent informs us when the herpes virus protein ORF10 was added to the SARS virus by virologists to create the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The 2003 Patent US-2006257852-A1 assigned to CHIRON CORP (US), which was acquired by Novartis (Switzerland) on April 20, 2006 specifically names the ORF10 protein – a protein that is exclusively found in SARS-CoV-2 genome and not in SARS-CoV, being used/encoded in the fusion protein of the patented novel SARS coronavirus.

2021 published study “SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy” informs you why Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine ingredients includes a bioengineered or synthesized component of SARS-CoV-2, the viral protein that causes COVID-19 – ORF10.

“ORF10 plays a vital role at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our study, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the degradation of MAVS and the replication of SARS-CoV-2. Consistent with these results, when ORF10 was knocked down by shRNA, MAVS was not degraded and viral replication was weakened, suggesting that ORF10 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication via degradation of MAVS.” 

ORF10 was included because it facilities/causes new SARS-CoV-2 infections. Causing new SARS-CoV-2 infections generates more vaccine sales for Germany.

Related NCIO briefing:

Germany informed World that its COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are biological weapons

Justin Trudeau is involved in targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers

Published on: Dec 15, 2023

There is reasonable suspicion Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Justin Trudeau had motive. At the very least Justin Trudeau counseled a/the offence. Accordingly, Justin Trudeau could be charged with murder.

The December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman has everything to do with Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

The fundraiser is deemed a “prohibited gift” by 2 federal laws – the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. MP Justin Trudeau violated the 2 federal laws by attending the fundraiser because Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company Apotex had registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before he and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

Accordingly, the Office of Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau for violating the Lobbying Act. Because the Lobbying Commissioner implicated Barry Sherman by having the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Barry Sherman filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner and (REDACTED) third party defendant Justin Trudeau.

The lawsuit was filed because the Lobbying Commissioner concealed that Justin Trudeau was the one who broke federal laws, not Barry Sherman. The Lobbying Commissioner concealed Justin Trudeau’s Lobbying Act offence by redacting Justin Trudeau’s name.

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,”

The above statement informs Canadians that the REDACTED name wasn’t Barry Sherman because his name is included “unredacted” in the statement above. The REDACTED name could only be either 2015 election campaign candidates Michael Levitt or Justin Trudeau because the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser that was being investigated by the RCMP was for Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Phil McIntosh, director of investigations at the Office of the Lobby Commissioner stated:

“while conducting the administrative review, the directorate found evidence indicating that Mr. Sherman engaged in political activities that risk creating a sense of obligation on the part of one or more public office holders” through the fundraising event held at his home on Aug. 26, 2015.

We know Justin Trudeau was the subject of the RCMP investigation because:

1) the Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

“Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the private interests of Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

2) the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying initiated the investigation based on a tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, … ” Macleans

Justin Trudeau tried to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit just days before the targeted murders by giving the Lobbying Commissioner $400,000 to fight the lawsuit.

The Lobbying Commissioner receiving access to a “special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges” eliminated Michael Levitt as the name of the person the Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED.

Despite having received $400,000 in misappropriated public funds the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t quash the Apotex lawsuit and a court order requiring her to unredact Justin Trudeau‘s name – the third party and “a defendant” in the Apotex lawsuit.

Because the Lobbying Commissioner failed to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit Justin Trudeau had her removed as the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders – December 13, 2017.

 

On December 13, 2017 Justin Trudeau committed the offence of obstruction of justice by having both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones.

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from lobbyists.

It is imperative Canadians know and realized that the Apotex lawsuit threatened Justin Trudeau’s political career. The lawsuit could have resulted in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

Canada Elections Act

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; …

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

Justin Trudeau went to great lengths to quash the Apotex lawsuit (Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review) days before Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered.

Obstruction of justice is committed when the accused (Justin Trudeau) wilfully attempts to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in an existing or proposed judicial proceeding. The most extreme form of obstruction is the killing of a witness or a plaintiff in a judicial proceeding.

On December 13, 2017 “Apotex lawsuit plaintiff Barry Sherman” and his wife Honey Sherman were targeted and killed.

Motives for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman:

1) Terminate the RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau for accepting a prohibited gift (26 Aug 2015 campaign fundraiser) from registered government lobbyist (registered 24 Aug 2015) Barry Sherman.

2) Terminate an Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit in which Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) was a third party defendant.

The Crown remains the number one threat to Canada’s Independence

Foreign agent hiding in plain sight. The dishonourable Governor General.

Foreign interference occurs in Canada during every federal and provincial election. This foreign interference rigs the outcome of every election. The foreign entity, the Crown, establishing the office of Governor General is irrefutable evidence of foreign interference in Canada. The office of the Governor General is always formed arbitrarily. The foreign entity of a foreign government establishes the office of Governor General to deprive Canadians of their right to elect a democratic representative government.

“Foreign interference is a complex national security threat. It poses a significant threat to the integrity of our political systems, democratic processes, social cohesion, academic freedom, economic prosperity and challenges Canadians’ rights and freedoms.” CSIS, Foreign Interference and You

In 1982 Canada became a wholly independent nation. Independence is a condition of a nation, country, or state, in which residents and population, or some portion thereof, exercise self-government, and usually sovereignty, over its territory. Immediately after Canada became an independent nation, the foreign entity, the Crown arbitrarily reestablished the office of the Governor General and forced every politician in Canada to swear allegiance to a German monarchy that was forever abolished in 1919.

The “Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor General” establishes arbitrary rule in Canada. The office has never been formed according to law.

And We do declare Our Will and pleasure as follows:

… We do hereby constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada, and appointments to the Office of Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada shall be made by Commission under Our Great Seal of Canada.

… And We do hereby authorize and empower Our Governor General, with the advice of Our Privy Council for Canada or of any members thereof or individually, as the case requires, to exercise all powers and authorities lawfully belonging to Us in respect of Canada

No matter who Canadians elect as Prime Minister or Premier, the foreign entity, the Crown, subverts the laws and the principals of democracy by arbitrarily appointing a Governor General to be Canada’s “head of state” and “Commander-in-chief” of Canada’s Armed Forces and RCMP. Canadians are deprived of their right to choose their head of state and commander-in-chief because the arbitrarily “appointed” Governor General remains in office before, during and after each and every election.

As of Oct 1, 1947, with the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor General, every elected Government of Canada has been overthrown and an arbitrary rule government installed.

The Governor General is, for all intent and purposes, a dictatorship, a Marxist regime, and single-party government installed by the foreign entity, the Crown.

In Canada elections are staged to give the Crown the aura of legitimacy. In Canada there is only one candidate, the Crown, who is represented by the Crown appointed Governor General.

Canadian elections offer several candidates, but through the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor General only the Crown appointed candidate, the Governor General, always remains Canada’s “head of state” and “Commander-in-chief”.

Canada’s elections are staged to appear to offer genuine choices but the fact remains, after every election the Crown appointed Governor General remains in power. Because Canada’s “head of state” and “Commander-in-chief” is appointed, not elected, and he or she remains in power before and after the election Canada does not have democratic elections.

This foreign interference by the foreign entity, the Crown, has the effect of a coup d’état. Every Governor General who serves the Crown as Governor General is a traitor. They betray Canada and every Canadians by being the Crown’s foreign agent in Canada.

The Office of the Governor General is deemed unlawful by Canada’s supreme law, the Constitution Act, 1982. The Government of Canada states:

The principles of fundamental justice include the principles against arbitrariness, overbreadth and gross disproportionality. A deprivation of a right will be arbitrary and thus unjustifiably limit section 7 if it “bears no connection to” the law’s purpose (Bedfordsupra, at paragraph 111; Rodriguezsupra at 594-95; Malmo-Levine, supra at paragraph 135; Chaoulli, supra at paragraphs 129-30 and 232; A.C., supra, at paragraph 103).

Constitution Act, 1982

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect

Unlike most of the rights conferred by the Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian’s democratic rights cannot be overridden by the use of section 33, the “notwithstanding clause.”.

However, the majority of Canadians don’t know or realize their right to vote is invalidated during every election by a foreign entity that represents a foreign power. No “elected” MP can take their seat in the House of Commons until they swear allegiance to a foreign power (the UK’s 1919 German monarchy) and take a secret oath to serve a foreign entity, the Crown.

The preamble to The Constitution Act, 1982 states:

“Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law”

The Crown and the UK’ German monarchy aren’t mentioned in the preamble because they both represent a foreign government. Both use color of law and color of right to arbitrarily rule Canada and Canadians.

“Color of law refers to the appearance of legal authority or an apparently legal right that may not exist. The term is often used to describe the abuse of power under the guise of state authority, and is therefore illegal.” Cornell Law School

The rule of law principle provides a shield for Canadians from arbitrary state action.

“The rule of law vouchsafes to the citizens and residents of the country a stable, predictable and ordered society in which to conduct their affairs. It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action.” Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217 at para. 70

 

Drive-charge EV power system designed by Paul W Kincaid

Drive-charge EV power system designed by NCIO Director Paul W Kincaid (Moncton NB Canada). Designed to power an electric vehicle great distances without having to stop to recharge. Designed so that you’ll never have to pay to drive or recharge an EV. Concept proven 90 years ago by Nikola Tesla.

In 1931 Nikola Tesla powered a 1931 Pierce Arrow with a 80 horsepower AC motor with just 1 car battery, an alternator and an ignition coil. The newspaper left out these vital details when they reported what Nikola Tesla had achieved.

The media mislead everyone by claiming that a single car battery was only in the vehicle to power the lights. The battery was needed to power the vacuum tubes in Nikola Tesla’s power receiver. The vacuum tubes can’t function without a battery.

The media also left out the fact that the 80 horsepower AC motor was attached by a serpentine belt to a 50 amp alternator and that the dash had an ignition coil installed which Tesla hooked up a small power receiver to.

The 3 gas combustion engine parts powered the 80 horsepower AC motor at speeds up to 90 mph for hundreds of miles.

The 50 amp alternator played the most important role in powering the Pierce Arrow with a 80 horsepower AC electric motor for great distances.

A typical mass produced alternator is designed so that the field (in the rotor) can be driven with just one 12 volt car battery and produce at least 14 volts DC on the stator (via diodes) to continously charge the car battery at idle speed. The vehicle’s pulleys and belts usually provide a RPM boost at idle. At maximum engine speed (6000-9000 RPM), the alternator will spin at up to ten times faster than when idling, and the voltage on the stator (with 12V on the field) will then be as much as 10x higher, or as high as 140 volts AC (three phase) and nearly 200 volts DC through the diodes.

A typical 50 amp alternator like the one that was in Nikola Tesla’s electric car could therefore “continously” produce 200 x 50 = 10 kW or 15 HP.

The pulleys and belts will in practice limit the power output of the alternator. So to produce more kW or HP from an alternator one could:

1) bypass the regulator so it applies full voltages to the field coil, from another alternator or battery, at light loading, the alternator could put out 120 volts DC. at light loading or

2) gear up the alternator, since an alternator must turn about 5000 RPM to produce 120 volts.

Putting a larger pulley on the electric motor will achieve a gear up whose ratio is proportional to the ratio of the pulley diameters. For instance, an electric motor running at 2600 RPM must be Geared to turn the alternator at 5200 RPM, We need to gear the alternator up by 5200 / 2600 = factor of 2. Therefore, the pulley on the electric motor should be twice the diameter as the pulley on the alternator.

There’s an even simpler way to get more kW or HP from an alternator. Install an alternator with higher amps or add one or more alternators to the EV power system.

A Leece Neville 230 Amp Alternator for a 6.0L & 7.3L Ford can do 230 amps continuous output. A 230 amp high amp full duty alternator will typically have a 100% duty cycle. This alternator can generate continuously at 230 amps into a restive load.

This commercial grade alternator is a replacement for the stock 6.0L and 7.3L ford alternators. The units are USA Made and have a proven history of performance and reliability. Tens of thousands of big rigs run Leece Neville/Prestolite alternators.

100+ year old auto part instantly and continously converts 12 volts to 30-60,000 volts (30-60 kVs)

The 1931 Pierce Arrow tune-up manual confirms that Nikola Tesla’s Pierce Arrow electric car was equipped with an Delco-Remy ignition coil and that it was mounted on the dash.

An ignition coil (also called a spark coil) is an induction coil in an automobile’s ignition system which transforms the car battery’s low voltage to the thousands of volts needed to create an electric spark in the spark plugs to ignite the fuel. It is entirely plausible that Nikola Tesla used the Pierce Arrow’s ignition coil to transform the 12 volt car battery’s low voltage into thousands of volts (kVs) needed to power the electric motor.

An AC electric motors requires more than 12 volts of AC current. So all Nikola Tesla needed to do is use the Pierce Arrow’s ignition coil to transform the Willard battery’s low voltage into the required voltage needed to power the 80 horsepower AC electric motor.

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the 50 amp alternator was used to continuously recharge the Willard battery (128 Amp. hour) so that the Delco-Remy ignition coil could simultaneously keep on producing the required voltage needed to power the 80 horsepower AC electric engine.

Nikola Tesla proved beyond any reasonable doubt that electric cars don’t need expensive battery packs or be plugged in to be recharged

Published on: September 12, 2023

Electric cars don’t need very expensive battery packs and they don’t need to be plugged in to be recharged. Nikola Tesla successfully demonstrated in the 1930s that an electric car can be powered and driven using 3 mass produced automobile parts.

  1. A single 12 volt battery
  2. an alternator and
  3. an ignition coil

Nikola Tesla removed the gas engine from a Pierce Arrow and replaced it with a 80 horsepower AC electric motor. Tesla then built a power receiver using 12 vacuum tubes, some wires and resistors. Tesla installed the compact power receiver in the dash of the Pierce Arrow and then connected the receiver to an antenna mounted on the rear of the car and to a 80 horsepower AC electric motor. This was reported by the Dallas Morning News.

Dallas Morning News

The Electric Auto that almost triumphed: Power Source of ‘31 car still a mystery

by A.C. Greene,

January 24th, 1931

It is a mystery car once demonstrated by Nikola Tesla, developer of alternating current, that might have made electrics triumphant.

Supported by the Pierce-Arrow Co. and Westinghouse in 1931, he took the gasoline engine from a new Pierce-Arrow and replaced it with an 80 horsepower alternating current electric motor with no external power source. From the electric motor trailed two very thick cables, which connected with the dashboard. In addition, there was an ordinary 12-volt storage battery. (”There was a 12-volt Willard battery installed in the car, but it was for the lights only and much too small to run the car. In any case.”) The motor was rated at 80 horsepower. Maximum rotor speed was stated to be 30 turns per second (1800 rpm). A 6-foot vertical antenna rod was fitted into the rear section of the car.

At the appointed time, Nikola Tesla arrived from New York City and inspected the Pierce-Arrow automobile. He then went to a local radio store and purchased a handful of tubes (12 radio vacuum tubes), wires and assorted resistors. A box measuring 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high was assembled housing the circuit. The “power receiver” was then placed into the dashboard of the car and its wires connected to the antenna and to the air-cooled, brushless motor. Two rods 1/4” in diameter stuck out of the box about 3” in length. Tesla began making adjustments on the “power receiver”

Mr. Tesla got into the driver’s seat, pushed the two rods in and stated, “We now have power”. He put the car into gear and it moved forward! This vehicle, powered by an A.C. motor, was driven to speeds of 90 m.p.h. and performed better than any internal combustion engine of its day! One week was spent testing the vehicle. Several newspapers in Buffalo reported this test. When asked where the power came from, Tesla replied, “From the ethers all around us”. Several people suggested that Tesla was mad and somehow in league with sinister forces of the universe. He became incensed, removed his mysterious box from the vehicle and returned to his laboratory in New York City. His secret died with him!

A nephew of Nikola Tesla later reported:

under the hood, there was a brushless electric motor, connected to the engine. The engine was said to measure 40” long by 28” diameter.

Take note that he reported that there were 2 electric motors in the engine compartment. “A brushless electric motor” was “connected to the engine” – a 80 horsepower brushless electric motor. That’s significant because it starts to unravel the mystery as to how Nikola Tesla powered the Pierce Arrow with only one 12 volt battery installed in the car.

We know that there was only one 12 volt battery in the car because the Dallas Morning News reported that there was just one 12 volt battery. The tune-up manual for the Pierce Arrow states that the Pierce Arrow’s battery was a Willard Type WJ 4-15. Capacity – 128 Amp hour (20 hr. rate).

There is no mention in the Dallas Morning News article or by any witnesses that Nikola Tesla removed the alternator of the Pierce Arrow. It just stated that the gas combustion engine was removed and replaced with an 80 horsepower AC electric motor.

Alternators are used in all gas combustion engine automobiles to charge the battery and to power the electrical system when the engine is running. Even the Ford Model T automobiles from 1919 to 1927 had a 12 volt negative ground Delco style alternator.

An alternator was the brushless electric motor that Tesla’s nephew reported was connected to the engine. Nikola Tesla made use of the alternator to continuously recharge the Pierce Arrow’s “single” 12 volt Willard battery.

There’s no mentioning that Tesla removed the Pierce Arrow’s ignition coil either. An ignition coil converts 12 volts to 30-40 kVs using a transistor or in Tesla’s case, vacuum tubes.

Ignition coils existed back in the 1930s too. We know there was an ignition coil installed in the Pierce Arrow before it was converted into an electric motor car. The tune-up manual stated that the 1931 Pierce Arrow ignition coil was a Delco-Remy 526-B ignition coil. The Pierce Arrow tune-up manual also stated that it was mounted on the dash. A 12 volt battery wire also enters the dash and is connected to the ignition switch.

The Pierce Arrow tune-up manual stating and confirming that the Pierce Arrow was equipped with an ignition coil and that it was mounted on the dash is a significant finding because Nikola Tesla’s

“power receiver” was then placed into the dashboard of the car and its wires connected to the antenna and to the air-cooled, brushless motor.

An ignition coil (also called a spark coil) is an induction coil in an automobile’s ignition system which transforms the battery’s low voltage to the thousands of volts needed to create an electric spark in the spark plugs to ignite the fuel. It is entirely plausible that Nikola Tesla used the Pierce Arrow’s ignition coil to transform the 12 volt car battery’s low voltage into thousands of volts (kVs) needed to power the electric motor.

An AC electric motors requires more than 12 volts of AC current. So all Nikola Tesla needed to do is use the Pierce Arrow’s ignition coil to transform the Willard battery’s 12 volts into the required voltage needed to power the 80 horsepower AC electric motor.

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the 50 amps 12 volt alternator was used to continuously recharge the Willard 12 volt battery (128 Amp. hour) so that the Delco-Remy ignition coil could simultaneously keep on producing the required voltage needed to power the 80 horsepower AC electric engine. As a result, an electric car owner would never have to stop to charge or recharge an electric vehicle. The electric car would charge or recharge itself while it was driven.

The Dallas Morning News reported that there was a battery in the vehicle but it wasn’t used as the source of power. That’s isn’t entirely true. The battery was involved in powering the vehicle. Vacuum tubes were used to make a small AC signal voltage into a larger AC voltage, thus amplifying it. A vacuum tube is a “valve” for electricity. Vacuum tube amplification uses a small amount of electric charge to control a much bigger amount of electricity that travels through the vacuum in a tube. Vacuum tubes require a filament voltage of at least 6.3 volts to produce high AC voltages. In the early days of electronics, vacuum tube (called valves in British contexts) devices were powered by batteries.

Batteries provided the voltages required by vacuum tubes in early radio sets. Three different voltages were generally required, using three different batteries designated as the A, B, and C battery. The “A” battery or LT (low-tension) battery provided the filament voltage.

Therefore, 3 automobile parts,

1) a single 12 volt battery,

2) an alternator and

3) an ignition coil

could be repurposed to produce enough energy to power any electric car today. Nikola Tesla proved it could be done 92 years ago.

Step-up Power Pack designed by Paul W Kincaid. Designed to be to be easily serviced or reconfigured to increase or decrease the energy storage capacity of each Step-up Power Pack ™

Another mass produced electrical component can be used instead of a 12 volt car battery or be added to ensure that the electric car motor is continuously provided with the sufficient power to operate optimally. A super capacitor.

“One of the best features of supercapacitors is fast charging and discharging time that makes them suitable for many applications requiring rapid charge/discharge cycles and high-power bursts such as automobiles, buses, trains, cranes, and elevators.” ScienceDirect

Supercapacitors also have a much longer lifespan than batteries. A regular battery can handle around 2000-3000 charge and discharge cycles, while supercapacitors can usually sustain more than 1,000,000.

The power source of Nikola Tesla’s 1931 Pierce Arrow car has been solved – a single 12 volt battery.

Donate an electric car without the battery packs installed and it will be proven, once again, that a single 12 volt battery can power an electric car.

Canada and the UK’s German enemy hiding in plain sight

False identity is when someone pretends to be something they are not. Generally speaking it is NOT against the law to use a false name, an alias. Using an alias in order to commit fraud or other criminal acts, however, is definitely illegal.

Since 1917 the UK’s illegitimate German monarchy have used a false identity, an alias, to defraud and wage wars against the UK and Canadian people. The German oligarchy, Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor to deceive the British and Canadian people.

What Kraut George V did by assuming a forged name, an alias, is defined by Canada’s criminal code as false pretence. Kraut George V claimed he adopted the Windsor name because his birth surname Saxe-Coburg & Gotha sounded German. The truth is, his surname was German and he and his family were German. His father was German. His grandmother, Queen Victoria was German. German was the first language she spoke. His grandfather, Queen Victoria’s consort Prince Albert “Saxe-Coburg & Gotha” was German.

361 (1) A false pretence is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.

Kraut George V didn’t forge and adopt a new surname called Windsor. Families in the UK, Canada and the USA bore the surname Windsor long before Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor during WWI to conceal the fact that he and his family were German. To conceal the fact that he too was Canada and Britain’s WWI enemy. Kraut George V conspired with his German cousin to wage WWI for the Crown.

The Windsor family surname was found in the USA, the UK, Canada, and Scotland between 1840 and 1920. The most Windsor families were found in United Kingdom in 1891. In 1840 there were 26 Windsor families living in New York. New York had the highest population of Windsor families in 1840.

Kraut George V purposefully assumed an English alias with German origins. The town of Windsor was founded by Saxons. The Saxons were a group of Germanic peoples whose name was given in the early Middle Ages to a large country near the North Sea coast of northern Germania, in what is now Germany.

By assuming an alias with German origins Kraut George V continued to rule England during WWI as a German monarchy.

It’s imperative Canadians know that the UK’s monarchy are German and that they are German today despite what Kraut George V did in 1917. Because, in 1919 all German monarchies, all German kings, grand dukes, dukes, and princes, were abolished, including Kraut George V’s Saxe-Coburg & Gotha/alias Windsor monarchy.

On August 19, 1919, when the Weimar Constitution went into effect, all the German nobility’s legal privileges and titles were forever abolished.

All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy and Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : annul (to declare or make legally invalid or void)

If someone in authority abolishes a system or practice, they formally put an end to it.

MP Chrystia Freeland is a German double agent and a traitor

Chrystia Freeland being awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award for serving Germany’s interests. No other Canadian has ever received the German (Canada’s WWI, WWII enemy) award.

MPs who serve a foreign state or its proxies are double agents. A double agent is a spy pretending to serve one government while actually serving another. Germany’s proxy, the World Economic Forum (WEF) provides compelling evidence that Chrystia Freeland is a double agent. World Economic Forum boldly states that Chrystia Freeland serves Germany through it’s proxy the WEF:

The Board of Trustees serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum’s mission and values

Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 25 January 2019 – The World Economic Forum announces that Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, and Fabiola Gianotti, Director-General of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), join its Board of Trustees.

The Board of Trustees is the highest-level governance body of the World Economic Forum.

Chrystia Freeland is a double agent was made perfectly clear in April 2019 when she joined a Germany initiated and lead alliance to save the international world order, the UN, from destruction. The alliance serves Germany’s strategic interests.

“This, in a nutshell, is the mission of the Alliance for Multilateralism, which German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas first started promoting in summer 2018. The Alliance is not intended to be a new institution; it aims to support and strengthen existing organizations, in particular the United Nations” the United Nations Organization, April 30, 2020

Chrystia Freeland was officially and publicly outed as a double agent for Gemany in 2018 when Heiko Maas opened Germany’s Ambassadors Conference at the Federal Foreign Office together with Chrystia Freeland. Maas introduced Chrystia Freeland by stating:

We Germans in particular could have no interest in a jungle growing back in the world order

Heiko Maas introducing Chrystia Freeland as “We Germans” informed the conference attendees (and the World) that Chrystia Freeland was/is a German collaborator, a double agent.

Since WWII Germany has been trying to establish a World government under German control. Germany’s WWII envisioned Neuordnung (New Order) relies on traitors like Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland assisting Germany acquire control of the United Nations Organization via a financial takeover.

In October 2019 the United Nations Organization declared that it was insolvent – “risks defaulting on payments to staff and vendors”. Germany is using the UN’s cash crisis to obtain control of the UN. Germany is attempting to acquire complete control of the UN by using debt financing. After all, Germany successfully reoccupied Europe using debt financing. EU states have surrendered their sovereignty to Germany in exchange for debt financing.

Chrystia Freeland poses a serious threat to the security of Canada. She is using her office to further Germany’s strategic interests. She is stealing $billions to fund Germany’s WWIII military campaign in Ukraine. Canada’s intelligence community knows she is a threat to the security of Canada. NSICOP launched an investigation of Global Affairs Canada when Chrystia Freeland headed that department. The investigation examined “the national security and intelligence activities of Global Affairs Canada”.

OTTAWA, September 17, 2020 — The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) today announces two reviews of national security and intelligence activities. These reviews will be conducted over the next few months and concluded in 2021.

The Committee’s first review will examine the national security and intelligence activities of Global Affairs Canada (GAC). GAC collects information on security issues, liaises with allied intelligence organizations and supports the work of the security and intelligence community through its missions abroad. As with the Committee’s previous reports of DND/CAF in 2018 and the CBSA in 2019, this review is intended to establish a baseline of knowledge about GAC’s national security and intelligence activities. While GAC is a core member of the national security and intelligence community, its national security and intelligence activities have never been subject to external independent review and are not well known by the public or Parliament.

Justin Trudeau called a snap election just days after NSICOP delivered to him and “relevant ministers” its intelligence report regarding the investigation of Global Affairs Canada when Chrystia Freeland headed that department (January 2017- November 2019). NSICOP stated in a September 17, 2020 press release that the NSICOP investigation “is intended to establish a baseline of knowledge about Global Affairs Canada’s national security and intelligence activities. … its national security and intelligence activities have never been subject to external independent investigation.”

It’s important to note that the NSICOP investigates matters of national security and intelligence. NSICOP investigates Parliamentarians – Members of Parliament and the activities of their departments.

Coincidentally, on August 11, 2021, the same day NSICOP delivered its “national security and intelligence report” to Justin Trudeau the House of Commons was debating NSICOP reporting its findings to the PM instead of to the House of Commons.

Debate continues in the House of Commons over who should be able to see documents containing possible national security concernsThe Hill Times

House of Commons debated this major national security issue June 1, 2021. “In short, NSICOP is accountable to the government. Under our constitution, the government is accountable to this House. It is to this House that the government should deliver the documents.House of Commons transcript

MPs were concerned that Justin Trudeau is covering up foreign governments’ espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. Activities that are defined by CSIS as threats to the security of Canada.

Justin Trudeau redacted the NSICOP national security and intelligence investigation report regarding Chrystia Freeland when she headed Global Affairs Canada. Redacted the names of foreign states that are actively conducting espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. He didn’t redact China or Russia so which foreign states is Justin Trudeau protecting – assisting them to continue to conduct espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. Top of the list is Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy, Germany.

While Chrystia Freeland was head of Global Affairs Canada she also served as a Trustee of the Aspen Institute Kyiv (serves Ukraine’s political interests). Chrystia Freeland continued to serve Ukraine’s interests after she became Finance Minister. Resigned from her position as a Trustee of the Aspen Institute Kyiv Board of Trustees effective May 16, 2021. However, in her letter of resignation she stated “Rest assured you can count on my continued support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, reforms, and democracy.

Freeland’s letter of resignation is prima facie evidence that Chrystia Freeland intends on continuing to commit offences of: frauds on the government, conflict of interest and criminal breach of trust to further/bankroll Ukraine’s interests while she serves as finance minister – a MP in Canada’s Parliament.

Evidence of Chrystia Freeland committing the offence of criminal breach of trust – the funneling of $billions to Ukraine, can be found in the Government of Canada’s financial reports – “Monthly Official International Reserves”. Freeland transfers $billions to Ukraine using a well known money laundering method called placement. Freeland transfers $billions to the IMF and the IMF transfers the $billions to Ukraine.

Freeland’s money laundering is disguised as currency swaps or Global bonds. Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland disguised the transfer of $billions to Germany in January 2020 to finance Germany and the Who’s planned and lead COVID-19 biological attack as a $3 billion global bond.

“During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond” Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020

More information available regarding Chrystia Freeland funneling $3.6 billion to Germany in January 2020 is provided in NCIO briefing:

MP Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum to assist Germany bribe foreign public officials

Swiss numbered accounts for COVID-19 biological attack co-conspirators likely triggered collapse of Credit Suisse

Investigators already know that the Credit Suisse demise was caused by bank account holders withdrawing $billions from Credit Suisse beginning in 2022. That was reported by the mass media in late 2022.

“The bank also saw a sharp acceleration in withdrawals in the fourth quarter, with outflows of more than 110 billion Swiss francs”

Coincidentally, 2022 was the year Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack ended. It stands to reason that Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack collaborators would start to withdraw their bribe money from Credit Suisse in the fourth quarter of 2022 and/or first quarter of 2023. Another plausible scenario is that Germany and its proxy, the World Economic Forum double crossed its COVID-19 collaborators. They withdrew from Credit Suisse the bribe money they paid to their COVID-19 collaborators. After all, who’s going to report to the police that their bribe money was stolen.

In October of 2022 the German parliament approved a €200-billion energy relief plan in an attempt to avoid a recession in 2023. Germany didn’t have €200-billion so it is reasonable to suspect Germany took the money from Credit Suisse.

Credit Suisse collapse linked to Germany and the World Economic Forum

NATO is part of Germany’s Fourth Reich EU. It’s Germany’s new Waffen SS.

A picture is worth a thousand words. This pictures speaks volumes. It is informing you that NATO is part of Germany’s Fourth Reich EU.

NATO is a security organization of conscripts from the world’s most powerful democracies collaborating with Germany to reoccupy Europe. It is Germany’s new Nazi Waffen SS.

Time and again Germany has publicly declared that NATO serves Germany. That NATO is the “signature pillar of Germany’s peace and prosperity”.

The Nazi Germany’s Waffen SS symbol is embedded in the NATO logo. The Swastika is made by the superimposed SS.

NATO’s headquarter building was designed to include the Nazi Germany‘s Waffen SS symbol.

The Waffen-SS (“Armed SS”) was created as the armed wing of the Nazi Party’s Schutzstaffel (“Protective Squadron”; SS). It grew from three regiments to over 38 divisions during World War II, and served alongside the Heer (regular army) but was never formally part of it. By 1945, the Waffen-SS had developed into a multi-ethnic and multi-national military force of Nazi Germany, its divisions manned by volunteers and conscripts from across Europe.

During WWII Germany enlisted 500,000 volunteers and conscripts into its Waffen SS army. Ukraine was one of the first European states to “volunteer” to serve Nazi Germany:

  • 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Ukrainian)
  • 24th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS
  • 30th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS
    • Schutzmannschaft-Brigade Siegling
  • 36th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS
  • SS-Kampfgruppe “Beyersdorff”

To serve in NATO is high treason. You are assisting Canada’s notorious WWI and WWII enemy, Germany, wage war. Germany’s ultimate goal is World domination via a World government being established under German control. That World government has always been the United Nations Organization (UNO is Italian meaning One) Germany is now using NATO as its new Nazi Waffen SS to wage its wars to achieve World domination by force.

NATO originally formed to protect Europe from Germany aggression

The Brussels Treaty lead to the formation of NATO. Signatories of the Brussels Treaty agreed:

“To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression”.

Germany remained a significant threat post WWII. Other treaties were drafted to ensure Germany didn’t start another war of aggression.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their declarations that only peace will emanate from German soil. According to the constitution of the united Germany, acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional and a punishable offence. The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic declare that the united Germany will never employ any of its weapons except in accordance with its constitution and the Charter of the United Nations.