Ukraine government committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. The Ukraine government recruiting and financing of mercenaries with the $billions the Ukraine government obtained from Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland is a gross violation of the “International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries“.

Affirming that the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these offences should be either prosecuted or extradited.

I, Paul W Kincaid, know for a fact that the Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and funded by Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. A Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary stayed at the motel where I live outside Moncton, New Brunswick. He moved out on November 14, 2022 to deploy to Ukraine as a mercenary. The mercenary told me he was being paid by the Ukraine government to conduct military operations against Russians in Ukraine.

The Ukraine government mercenary attempted to board an international flight from the Fredericton NB airport to the EU with an assault rifle fitted with a scope and suppressor on November 14, 2022. The Ukraine government’s mercenary is a civilian. He was reportedly wearing combat gear when he attempted to redeploy for his second 3 month deployment to Ukraine with the assault rifle. He wasn’t arrested even though he, a civilian, was in the possession of prohibited weapons and he tried to board an international commercial airline flight with an assault rifle and 2 prohibited long knives.

The incident at the Fredericton international airport should have made headlines news, but it was kept quiet because Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are involved in supporting/funding the Ukraine government’s illegal recruitment, use and financing of mercenaries.

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and other countries to conducted military operations against and in Ukraine villages and towns that are predominately inhibited by Russian civilians. The Ukraine government is essentially using mercenaries for ethnic cleansing and genocide. The $billions that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia are funnelling to Ukraine through the IMF is being used to fund the Ukraine government’s crimes against humanity and war crimes.

War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law and occur in the state of armed conflict. The Rome Statute lists numerous acts that may constitute war crimes, including attacks on civilians, forcibly recruiting and using child soldiers, and destruction of educational and religious institutions.”

“(vii) Launching an indiscriminate attack resulting in loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects. The prohibition of indiscriminate attacks is part of customary international law (see Rule 11). Launching an indiscriminate attack constitutes an offence under the legislation of numerous States. Although not listed as such in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, an indiscriminate attack amounts in practice to an attack on civilians” Rule 156, International Committee for the Red Cross

Ethnic cleansing constitute crimes against humanity and can be assimilated to specific war crimes. Furthermore, such acts could also fall within the meaning of the Genocide Convention.” the UN

Genocide Convention

Article I

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

The Ukraine government’s mercenary provided ample material evidence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the Ukraine government is committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland. The Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary showed me a ballistic vest and helmet that he purchased online. He intended on using them in battle in Ukraine. The vest and helmet are material evidence that the Ukraine government and its mercenaries are committing the war crime called perfidy. The vest and helmet had a Canadian flag patch affixed to them. The mercenary isn’t a Canadian soldier. He was a civilian who became a Ukraine government mercenary to make money by killing people in Ukraine. Canadian soldiers are banned from joining Ukraine government’s mercenary forces.

“So for current CAF members, they are not permitted to be in the area, even if they were to be on leave,” Vice-chief of the defence staff Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen Global News report

The Ukraine government paid mercenary’s ballistic helmet had a Ukraine military insignia on one side and a Canadian flag patch on the opposite side. The vest had a Canadian flag patch affixed on the front. The mercenary said he was instructed to wear the Canadian flag patch during Ukraine’s military operations in the Ukraine Russia war. Wearing the Canadian flag patch in the armed conflict in Ukraine is perfidy – a war crime.

Rule 10 of Canada’s Code of Conduct (2005) states:

Perfidy is a war crime.

Perfidy is defined as:

“Acts inviting the confidence of adversaries and leading them to believe that they are entitled to protection or are obliged to grant protection under the Law of Armed Conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, constitute perfidy. In other words, perfidy consists of committing a hostile act under the cover of a legal protection (e.g., firing on a member of an opposing force who comes forward under the protection of a white flag).”

Geneva Conventions Act

Article 37 – Prohibition of perfidy

1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy.

Article 39 — Emblems of nationality

“1 It is prohibited to make use in an armed conflict of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict

Justin Trudeau remains the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

September 13, 2022, NCIO

There remains one person who had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman on December 13, 2017. That person was being investigated by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner at the time of the targeted murders. That person took extraordinary steps on the day of the murders to attempt to quash 2 ongoing investigations involving himself.

Who had the most to gain by the “targeted” murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Justin Trudeau did. Justin Trudeau would have lost his seat in House of Commons as a result of a Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants”. The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review.

At the time of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s 26 Aug 2015 election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner, as required by the Lobbying Act

Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

Investigation continued

(9) The Commissioner may not continue an investigation under this section until any investigation or charge regarding the same subject-matter has been finally disposed of.

The Lobbying Commissioner and Justin Trudeau were unable to quash the Apotex lawsuit court order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal laws on December 20, 2017. An attempt was made by Justin Trudeau to quash/end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his 26 August 2015 fundraiser and the court order by replacing the Lobbying Commissioner.

On December 13, 2017, the day Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, Justin Trudeau had both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones. Link to December 13, 2017 video of the House of Commons appointments … “on division” – ParlVu

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” while campaigning in the 2015 federal election.

Providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

Justin Trudeau’s actions on the day of the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers made Justin Trudeau a prime suspect. Justin Trudeau being convicted of violating ethics laws days later on December 20, 2017 made Justin Trudeau the one person to have motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman to:

  1. end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
  2. dismiss the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
  3. prevent a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage

A conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act Section 502(2) (h.01) meant Justin Trudeau would lose his seat in the House of Commons for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, that the guest list was somewhere between 100 and 150 people and that he believed the proceeds were split between the Liberal Party of Canada and Levitt’s electoral district association. A ticket reportedly cost $1,500.” Macleans

Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. The Apotex lawsuit is Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review

Why would Justin Trudeau fear the Apotex lawsuit, not the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 campaign fundraiser? Parliament of Canada standing committee meeting involving Karen Shepherd informs you why:

The Apotex lawsuit posed a serious threat to Justin Trudeau’s political career. If Apotex was successful the lawsuit would have provided compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau had violated the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

  •  (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

    • (a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

  • (a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

  • (b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

  • (a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Highlights of the Federal Court Proceeding T-761-17 provides compelling evidence that the Apotex lawsuit was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Murdered because the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t defeat the court order of Prothonotary Kevin Aaltorequiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants“. Court order issued 1 month before the December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Court order dated 10-NOV-2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary. 16 days after Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the Lobbying Commissioner tried December 29, 2017 to keep the redacted evidence implicating Justin Trudeau from being made public. Filed a motion for “Setting aside portions of the order of Prothonotary Aalto dated November 10, 2017 … those portions of the Order Under Appeal which preserved redactions contained in the Rule 318 Record and requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants;”

Justin Trudeau paid the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 (used Federal funding) in December 2017 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman/Apotex lawsuit.

“In December 2017, the Office received access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges. … An unanticipated court action against the Office resulted in unplanned legal costs of almost $300,000 in 2017–18. These additional costs have been paid through access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for litigation.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017–18 Departmental results report

According to the T-761-17 Federal Court documents (PDF backup of T-761-17 made available on NCIO website) a court hearing was to be held 08-FEB-2018 to address the Lobbying Commissioner refusing to comply with the decision of Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary dated 10-NOV-2017 that “redacted” documents that detail the (audio) taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from OCL transcripts in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the RCMP for violating the Lobbying Act. The RCMP investigation began with this statement:

The Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would conclude that private interests of Justin Trudeau (redacted) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

Justin Trudeau is a prime suspect in the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman because of the Apotex lawsuit – Federal Court Number T-761-17 and because of what transpired the day Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered, December 13, 2017. Justin Trudeau had Karen Shepherd removed as Lobbying Commissione, effective December 30, 2017.

resolution of the House of Commons dated December 13, 2017, the Senate and House of Commons have approved the appointment of Nancy Bélanger as Commissioner of Lobbying … on the recommendation of the Prime Minister … effective December 30, 2017” Order in Council PC Number: 2017-1564

The Lobbying Commissioner was removed during an ongoing Apotex lawsuit pertaining to an active RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Toronto Police Services stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were in fact “targeted”. That means the murders were planned and deliberate and if the police found evidence that money was payed to have the Shermans murdered the murders was “contracted murder”.

“murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.” Criminal Code of Canada 231 (3)

The planned and deliberate murders of Barry and Honey Sherman resulted in:

  1. ending the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
  2. the dropping/dismissal of the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
  3. preventing Justin Trudeau from losing his seat in the House of Commons for a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from registered government lobbyist Barry Sherman/Apotex.

In a homicide criminal investigation that’s motive.

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Germany provoked the Ukraine Russia war by attempting to obtain nuclear weapons grade uranium from Ukraine

If North Korea, Iran or Iraq were the ones conspiring to obtain Ukraine’s nuclear weapons grade plutonium 239 the whole World would have supported Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to prevent the acquisition and transfer of the nuclear bomb making Pu-239.

The Ukraine Russia war was provoked by Germany conspiring with Ukraine to produce nuclear weapons (bombs) with the plutonium-239 (PU-239) stored at Chernobyl. PU-239 is the reason why the Russian military targeted and seized control of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on the first day of the Germany provoked invasion and war. Russia invaded Ukraine to prevent our WWI and WWII enemy from obtaining Chernobyl’s nuclear weapons grade plutonium-239.

Ukraine’s nuclear weapons grade plutonium-239 were stored at Chernobyl in DWCs. Each of the loaded DWCs contained 93 used fuel assemblies from Chernobyl’s aging storage facility. The double-walled canister (DWC) were loaded with the PU-239 into the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (ChNPP) site’s Interim Storage Facility (ISF-2) in 2020. The first fully loaded DWC was placed in storage on 18 November 2020.

Ukraine’s nuclear weapons grade PU-239 double-walled canister (DWC)

The primary target of the Russia invasion was Chernobyl. All major news medias reported that on the first day of the Germany provoked invasion.

Germany is prohibited from manufacturing nuclear weapons by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT and the Two Plus Four Treaty (Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany). Germany instigating/provoking the Ukraine Russia war is defined by the constitution of the united Germany as “unconstitutional and a punishable offence”.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their declarations that only peace will emanate from German soil. According to the constitution of the united Germany, acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional and a punishable offence.

ARTICLE 3

(1) The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their renunciation of the manufacture and possession of and control over nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. They declare that the united Germany, too, will abide by these commitments. In particular, rights and obligations arising from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 1 July 1968 will continue to apply to the united Germany.

Germany had been trying to obtain nukes from France and the UK but France, the UK, the US and other nuclear states are barred from giving Germany control of their nukes. As a result, Germany has been trying since President Trump took office to initiate Germany’s “Nuclear Plan B” – build their own nuclear bombs.

Polish Institute of international Affairs reported that Germany & Ukraine partnered in 26 Aug 2020 to decommission Ukraine’s nuclear power plants.

Germany is involved in the energy transition process in Ukraine by providing it with financial and advisory support. It also promotes the German model (Energiewende), which is based on state-supported development of RES, increasing energy efficiency, and decommissioning nuclear and coal-fired power plants. A declaration on energy partnership signed on 26 August 2020 at the ministerial level sets the framework for German-Ukrainian energy cooperation.

Germany wanted the World to think that the Germany Ukraine energy partnership was a good thing. However, the partnership meant Germany (our WWI and WWII enemy) would recover and divert Plutonium-239 in Ukraine to Germany to make its own nuclear weapons/bombs. Germany agreed to give the bankrupt and failed state Ukraine $billions in exchange for the nuclear weapons grade Pu-239.

Late last year Germany’s defense minister threatened to use NATO’s nuclear arsenal against Russia. Germany’s overt threat caused Russia to mass troops along the Ukraine Russia border.

This is Germany’s torpedo tube launched IDAS missile developed by Diehl BGT Defense and ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems.

It’s currently being developed for the Type 209 and Type 212A submarine class of the German Navy.

The IDAS system comprises 4 missiles which are housed in a special launch canister in the torpedo tube.

The IDAS missile was developed by Germany to be tipped with tactical nuclear warheads. Nuclear warheads that Germany planned on making using Chernobyl Ukraine’s nuclear weapons grade plutonium 239.

The US and UK governments knew in 1944 that Germany would start World War III

COVID-19 made it abundantly clear that the UN and its WHO are a criminal organization

There is significant evidence available showing that the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Wuhan China was a WHO simulation exercise.

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Wuhan China coincided with a WHO pandemic simulation exercise. The WHO conducted a pandemic simulation exercise 5 Dec 2019 – just days before the WHO reported that the novel SARS-CovV-2 outbreak had begun.

The WHO simulation exercises used various means to make the fictional outbreak appear real. WHO SimEx utilized “fake press articles” to make their fictional coronavirus outbreak appear real. Quote from the WHO website:

“A simulation exercise is more effective and efficient when a simulated scenario is used that is close to reality. The scenario is a pre-planned storyline that drives an exercise, as well as the stimuli used to achieve exercise objectives. The scenario is designed to stimulate exercise participants to respond to certain events and can be presented through various means, including through fake press articles, face to face through actors, audio/visual material including video clip, etc.”

The WHO conducted “21 epidemic and pandemic simulation exercises (SE) in 2020”. Screenshot of the WHO website also informs you that the WHO conducted pandemic simulation exercises throughout Europe in 2019.

Data from the WHO’s “epidemic and pandemic” simulation exercises where used to exaggerate the extent of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 plandemic was devised and staged by Germany and the WHO. They used pandemic simulation exercise videos depicting “a novel fictitious coronavirus outbreak” to recruit co-conspirators at the 2017 G2O Summit in Hamburg, Germany.

To assist the WHO orchestrate the largest medical fraud scheme in history the WHO used tests that were developed using synthetic DNA or RNA material that were provided by Germany. COVID-19 tests were designed and developed to detect the presence of antibodies, not SARS-CoV-2 itself. The tests the WHO used to test for COVID-19 and to declare a global health emergency didn’t and couldn’t detect SARS-CoV-2 because they were developed by Germany without having SARS-CoV-2 material.

“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”

“diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

The synthetic DNA or RNA material for COVID-19 tests was provided by Germany.

“All oligonucleotides were synthesised and provided by Tib-Molbiol (Berlin, Germany).” Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

The WHO thereafter instructed world leaders to “assume” that all new cases of respiratory illnesses were COVID-19. The WHO also instructed health officials to falsify medical records and death certificates. Instructed health officials to report all new cases of influenza, bronchitis, TB, and the common cold as COVID-19.

Public Health Ontario’s “Monthly Infectious Diseases Surveillance Reports” provides material evidence that Ontario Premier Doug Ford falsified medical records to assist Germany and the WHO/UN prolong their COVID-19 bioterrorism attack against Canada and Canadians.

Influenza infections occur annually, worldwide. Influenza infections don’t just vanish or skip a year or two. The Ontario government’s Monthly Infectious Diseases Surveillance Reports provides ample material evidence that medical records were falsified – pursuant to Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 bioterrorism demands

MP Chrystia Freeland is a German double agent and a traitor

Chrystia Freeland being awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award for serving Germany’s interests. No other Canadian has ever received the German (Canada’s WWI, WWII enemy) award.

MPs who serve a foreign state or its proxies are double agents. A double agent is a spy pretending to serve one government while actually serving another. Germany’s proxy, the World Economic Forum (WEF) provides compelling evidence that Chrystia Freeland is a double agent. World Economic Forum boldly states that Chrystia Freeland serves Germany through it’s proxy the WEF:

The Board of Trustees serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum’s mission and values

Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 25 January 2019 – The World Economic Forum announces that Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, and Fabiola Gianotti, Director-General of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), join its Board of Trustees.

The Board of Trustees is the highest-level governance body of the World Economic Forum.

Chrystia Freeland is a double agent was made perfectly clear in April 2019 when she joined a Germany initiated and lead alliance to save the international world order, the UN, from destruction. The alliance serves Germany’s strategic interests.

“This, in a nutshell, is the mission of the Alliance for Multilateralism, which German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas first started promoting in summer 2018. The Alliance is not intended to be a new institution; it aims to support and strengthen existing organizations, in particular the United Nations” the United Nations Organization, April 30, 2020

Chrystia Freeland was officially and publicly outed as a double agent for Gemany in 2018 when Heiko Maas opened Germany’s Ambassadors Conference at the Federal Foreign Office together with Chrystia Freeland. Maas introduced Chrystia Freeland by stating:

We Germans in particular could have no interest in a jungle growing back in the world order

Heiko Maas introducing Chrystia Freeland as “We Germans” informed the conference attendees (and the World) that Chrystia Freeland was/is a German collaborator, a double agent.

Since WWII Germany has been trying to establish a World government under German control. Germany’s WWII envisioned Neuordnung (New Order) relies on traitors like Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland assisting Germany acquire control of the United Nations Organization via a financial takeover.

In October 2019 the United Nations Organization declared that it was insolvent – “risks defaulting on payments to staff and vendors”. Germany is using the UN’s cash crisis to obtain control of the UN. Germany is attempting to acquire complete control of the UN by using debt financing. After all, Germany successfully reoccupied Europe using debt financing. EU states have surrendered their sovereignty to Germany in exchange for debt financing.

Chrystia Freeland poses a serious threat to the security of Canada. She is using her office to further Germany’s strategic interests. She is stealing $billions to fund Germany’s WWIII military campaign in Ukraine. Canada’s intelligence community knows she is a threat to the security of Canada. NSICOP launched an investigation of Global Affairs Canada when Chrystia Freeland headed that department. The investigation examined “the national security and intelligence activities of Global Affairs Canada”.

OTTAWA, September 17, 2020 — The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) today announces two reviews of national security and intelligence activities. These reviews will be conducted over the next few months and concluded in 2021.

The Committee’s first review will examine the national security and intelligence activities of Global Affairs Canada (GAC). GAC collects information on security issues, liaises with allied intelligence organizations and supports the work of the security and intelligence community through its missions abroad. As with the Committee’s previous reports of DND/CAF in 2018 and the CBSA in 2019, this review is intended to establish a baseline of knowledge about GAC’s national security and intelligence activities. While GAC is a core member of the national security and intelligence community, its national security and intelligence activities have never been subject to external independent review and are not well known by the public or Parliament.

Justin Trudeau called a snap election just days after NSICOP delivered to him and “relevant ministers” its intelligence report regarding the investigation of Global Affairs Canada when Chrystia Freeland headed that department (January 2017- November 2019). NSICOP stated in a September 17, 2020 press release that the NSICOP investigation “is intended to establish a baseline of knowledge about Global Affairs Canada’s national security and intelligence activities. … its national security and intelligence activities have never been subject to external independent investigation.”

It’s important to note that the NSICOP investigates matters of national security and intelligence. NSICOP investigates Parliamentarians – Members of Parliament and the activities of their departments.

Coincidentally, on August 11, 2021, the same day NSICOP delivered its “national security and intelligence report” to Justin Trudeau the House of Commons was debating NSICOP reporting its findings to the PM instead of to the House of Commons.

Debate continues in the House of Commons over who should be able to see documents containing possible national security concernsThe Hill Times

House of Commons debated this major national security issue June 1, 2021. “In short, NSICOP is accountable to the government. Under our constitution, the government is accountable to this House. It is to this House that the government should deliver the documents.House of Commons transcript

MPs were concerned that Justin Trudeau is covering up foreign governments’ espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. Activities that are defined by CSIS as threats to the security of Canada.

Justin Trudeau redacted the NSICOP national security and intelligence investigation report regarding Chrystia Freeland when she headed Global Affairs Canada. Redacted the names of foreign states that are actively conducting espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. He didn’t redact China or Russia so which foreign states is Justin Trudeau protecting – assisting them to continue to conduct espionage and sabotage activities in Canada. Top of the list is Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy, Germany.

While Chrystia Freeland was head of Global Affairs Canada she also served as a Trustee of the Aspen Institute Kyiv (serves Ukraine’s political interests). Chrystia Freeland continued to serve Ukraine’s interests after she became Finance Minister. Resigned from her position as a Trustee of the Aspen Institute Kyiv Board of Trustees effective May 16, 2021. However, in her letter of resignation she stated “Rest assured you can count on my continued support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, reforms, and democracy.

Freeland’s letter of resignation is prima facie evidence that Chrystia Freeland intends on continuing to commit offences of: frauds on the government, conflict of interest and criminal breach of trust to further/bankroll Ukraine’s interests while she serves as finance minister – a MP in Canada’s Parliament.

Evidence of Chrystia Freeland committing the offence of criminal breach of trust – the funneling of $billions to Ukraine, can be found in the Government of Canada’s financial reports – “Monthly Official International Reserves”. Freeland transfers $billions to Ukraine using a well known money laundering method called placement. Freeland transfers $billions to the IMF and the IMF transfers the $billions to Ukraine.

Freeland’s money laundering is disguised as currency swaps or Global bonds. Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland disguised the transfer of $billions to Germany in January 2020 to finance Germany and the Who’s planned and lead COVID-19 biological attack as a $3 billion global bond.

“During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond” Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020

More information available regarding Chrystia Freeland funneling $3.6 billion to Germany in January 2020 is provided in NCIO briefing:

MP Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum to assist Germany bribe foreign public officials

Swiss numbered accounts for COVID-19 biological attack co-conspirators likely triggered collapse of Credit Suisse

Investigators already know that the Credit Suisse demise was caused by bank account holders withdrawing $billions from Credit Suisse beginning in 2022. That was reported by the mass media in late 2022.

“The bank also saw a sharp acceleration in withdrawals in the fourth quarter, with outflows of more than 110 billion Swiss francs”

Coincidentally, 2022 was the year Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack ended. It stands to reason that Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack collaborators would start to withdraw their bribe money from Credit Suisse in the fourth quarter of 2022 and/or first quarter of 2023. Another plausible scenario is that Germany and its proxy, the World Economic Forum double crossed its COVID-19 collaborators. They withdrew from Credit Suisse the bribe money they paid to their COVID-19 collaborators. After all, who’s going to report to the police that their bribe money was stolen.

In October of 2022 the German parliament approved a €200-billion energy relief plan in an attempt to avoid a recession in 2023. Germany didn’t have €200-billion so it is reasonable to suspect Germany took the money from Credit Suisse.

Credit Suisse collapse linked to Germany and the World Economic Forum

Canada and the UK’s German enemy hiding in plain sight

False identity is when someone pretends to be something they are not. Generally speaking it is NOT against the law to use a false name, an alias. Using an alias in order to commit fraud or other criminal acts, however, is definitely illegal.

Since 1917 the UK’s illegitimate German monarchy have used a false identity, an alias, to defraud and wage wars against the UK and Canadian people. The German oligarchy, Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor to deceive the British and Canadian people.

What Kraut George V did by assuming a forged name, an alias, is defined by Canada’s criminal code as false pretence. Kraut George V claimed he adopted the Windsor name because his birth surname Saxe-Coburg & Gotha sounded German. The truth is, his surname was German and he and his family were German. His father was German. His grandmother, Queen Victoria was German. German was the first language she spoke. His grandfather, Queen Victoria’s consort Prince Albert “Saxe-Coburg & Gotha” was German.

361 (1) A false pretence is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.

Kraut George V didn’t forge and adopt a new surname called Windsor. Families in the UK, Canada and the USA bore the surname Windsor long before Kraut George V assumed the alias Windsor during WWI to conceal the fact that he and his family were German. To conceal the fact that he too was Canada and Britain’s WWI enemy. Kraut George V conspired with his German cousin to wage WWI for the Crown.

The Windsor family surname was found in the USA, the UK, Canada, and Scotland between 1840 and 1920. The most Windsor families were found in United Kingdom in 1891. In 1840 there were 26 Windsor families living in New York. New York had the highest population of Windsor families in 1840.

Kraut George V purposefully assumed an English alias with German origins. The town of Windsor was founded by Saxons. The Saxons were a group of Germanic peoples whose name was given in the early Middle Ages to a large country near the North Sea coast of northern Germania, in what is now Germany.

By assuming an alias with German origins Kraut George V continued to rule England during WWI as a German monarchy.

It’s imperative Canadians know that the UK’s monarchy are German and that they are German today despite what Kraut George V did in 1917. Because, in 1919 all German monarchies, all German kings, grand dukes, dukes, and princes, were abolished, including Kraut George V’s Saxe-Coburg & Gotha/alias Windsor monarchy.

On August 19, 1919, when the Weimar Constitution went into effect, all the German nobility’s legal privileges and titles were forever abolished.

All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy and Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : annul (to declare or make legally invalid or void)

If someone in authority abolishes a system or practice, they formally put an end to it.

MP Chrystia Freeland continues to blatantly violate federal conflict of interest and breach of trust laws

Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland is in a conflict of interest. While serving as a member of Parliament Chrystia Freeland became and continues to be an active member of the Board of Trustees for Germany’s proxy the World Economic Forum (WEF).

An apparent conflict of interest exists when there is a reasonable apprehension, which reasonably well-informed persons could properly have, that a conflict of interest exists.

As of July 26, 2023 the World Economic Forum’s website still lists Chrystia Freeland as an active member of WEF’s Board of Trustees.

“She is a member of the Forum’s Board of Trustees.” World Economic Forum

MP Chrystia Freeland has been blatantly violating Canada’s federal law, the Conflict of Interest Act, since January 2019.

“Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 25 January 2019 – The World Economic Forum announces that Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, … join its Board of Trustees.” …

“The Board of Trustees serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum’s mission and values”

Similar to a board of directors, board of trustees play a strong role in governance, tasked with strategic planning and providing oversight and accountability for the organization. … The board of trustees’ primary responsibility is to uphold their fiduciary duties.

MP Chrystia Freeland becoming and continuing to serve as an active member of the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees isn’t just a conflict of interest offence her actions is a criminal offence – Breach of trust by public officer.

Regardless of whether specific rules of government ethics have been adopted, public officials have a broad fiduciary duty to carry out their responsibilities in a manner that is faithful to the public trust that has been reposed in them.

All MPs have a fiduciary duty to represent the interests of their constituents, not a foreign government or its proxy, the World Economic Forum.

The House of Commons states:

“The obligation members have to represent the interests of their constituents is truly at the heart of the mandate of a member of parliament. Without constituents to represent there would be no role for MPs to play in our current system of government, there would be no need for an oath of office, there would be no system of representative democracy to uphold, there would be no need for parties to effect change or safeguard the status quo. The obligations members have flow from the power they gain from the citizenry.”

Even if no ethics code has been adopted, or if no code provision is on point, public officials must act in a manner that comports with their common law fiduciary duty obligations.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Actus Reus

A “breach of trust” can include “any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office as a senior civil servant of the Crown.”

Chrystia Freeland becoming and continuing to serve as an active member of the Board of Trustees for the World Economic Forum, is contrary to the fiduciary duties imposed upon her as a member of Parliament (MP).

MP Chrystia Freeland being Canada’s Minister of Finance and an active Board of Trustees member for Germany’s proxy is defined by Canada’s criminal code as a Criminal breach of trust:

336 Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Reasonable suspicion MP Chrystia Freeland is using her office pursuant to or in furtherance of the World Economic Forum’s missions.

One of the board of trustees’ primary responsibilities is to uphold the fiduciary duty to protect all of the organization’s assets and funds in trust. The overarching fiduciary duty includes the duties of care, obedience, and loyalty, which means that a trustee must place the organization’s interests above their own when making decisions on behalf of the organization.

The board of trustees has a fiduciary responsibility to manage the organization’s funds in the best interest of all stakeholders. Managing WEF’s funds includes obtaining funding for the World Economic Forum.

Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum in January of 2020 as a Board of Trustee member. Coincidentally in January of 2020 the Trudeau government made a very large transfer of funds – transfered $3.6 billion as a US$556.7 million cross-currency swap and a US$3 billion Global bond.

Government of Canada’s financial reports – “Monthly Official International Reserves” provides  compelling evidence that Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland committed the offence of Criminal breach of trust by misappropriating $3.6 billion for the benefit of Germany’s proxy the World Economic Forum.

“During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond” Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020

The Government of Canada website and the World Economic Forum provides the most compelling evidence to support the assertion that Chrystia Freeland didn’t attend the 2020 World Economic Forum to represent Canada.

She wasn’t on the list of political leaders taking part in the 2020 World Economic Forum. She attended as a World Economic Forum Board of Trustees member. Chrystia Freeland no doubt billed the Canadian people for her flights to and from Switzerland and for her luxurious accommodations.

Chrystia Freeland attended the World Economic Forum Annual meeting in January of this year. The Chrystia Freeland and WEF meetings were “Closed to media”. Means Chrystia Freeland’s meetings with the World Economic Forum are clandestine.

Purpose of the World Economic Forum’s annual meetings:

Influencing global agendas & decision making, lobbying for public-private cooperation.

Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act defines the World Economic Forum’s influencing activities as threats to the security of Canada.

threats to the security of Canada means:

(b) foreign influenced activities within or relating to Canada that are detrimental to the interests of Canada and are clandestine or deceptive or involve a threat to any person,

Broadly speaking, foreign interference includes attempts to covertly influence, intimidate, manipulate, interfere, corrupt or discredit individuals, organizations and governments to further the interests of a foreign country.

The World Economic Forum is a proxy for the German government. WEF and it’s founder and Board of Trustees furthers the interests of Germany.

No lawful line of succession for the UK monarchy since 1919 means there’s no King or Queen in/of Canada or the UK

The Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 restricts succession to the UK throne to the legitimate Protestant descendants of Sophia of Hanover (Germany’s House of Hanover monarchy) who are in “communion with the Church of England”

However, during World War I the Titles Deprivation Act of 1917 stripped the “House of Hanover” of their titles of nobility in the UK. In 1918 Ernst August was forced to abdicate in the course of the November Revolution, and the new Weimar Republic then abolished all German titles of nobility, including those of the House of Hanover.

In August 1919, at the beginning of the Weimar Republic (1919–1933), Germany’s first democratic constitution officially abolished royalty and nobility, and the respective legal privileges and immunities appertaining to an individual, a family or any heirs. All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished including the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy and Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from.

Article 109: All Germans are equal before the law. Men and women have the same fundamental civil rights and duties. Public legal privileges or disadvantages of birth or of rank are abolished. Titles of nobility shall be regarded merely as part of the name and may no longer be bestowed. Titles may only be bestowed when they indicate an office or profession; academic degrees are not affected hereby. Orders and decorations shall not be conferred by the state. No German shall accept titles or orders from a foreign government.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : annul (to declare or make legally invalid or void)

If someone in authority abolishes a system or practice, they formally put an end to it.

Academic Law Dictionary:

abolish: verb abate, abolere, abrogate, annihilate, annul, cancel, declare null and void, delere, delete, deprive of force, destroy, disannul, discontinue, disestablish, dispense with, dispose, dissolve, eliminate, eradicate, exstinguere, exterminate, extinguish, extirpate, invalidate, negate, nullify, obliterate, override, overrule, overturn, prohibit, quash, raze, render null and void, …

Collins dictionary of law. W. J. Stewart. 2001

abolish

to terminate the legal effect of some provision or doctrine.
In law, void means of no legal effect. An action, document or transaction which is void is of no legal effect whatsoever: an absolute nullity — the law treats it as if it had never existed or happened.
That means there is no lawful line of succession. Lawful line of succession ended when the UK’s German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha and Germany’s House of Hanover monarchies were both forever abolished (made legally invalid or void) in 1919.

Carbon tax revenue going to bankroll the Fourth Reich EU and the Vatican

Published on: July 9, 2023

Both the Catholic Church and the EU are broke. The Catholic Church is broke because since 1970, weekly church attendance has steadily dropped, and the number of people who have left the Catholic Church has increased more than 10 fold – from under 2 million in 1975 to over 30 million today.

Compounding the Catholic Church’s financial crisis is the $billions that have been paid out to settle priests’ child sexual abuse claims. The Catholic Church has been forced to sell off assets to pay its bills and lawsuits.

“According to an unreleased Cardus and Angus Reid Institute survey looking at Canada’s shifting religious landscape, in 2018, around 23 per cent of Catholics attended mass, said Ray Pennings, executive vice president of Cardus. In 2019, these numbers dropped to about 19 per cent and in 2020, after the pandemic hit, attendance at Catholic masses fell to 12 per cent.” National Post, The state of the Catholic Church in Canada, amid scandals and declining attendance, Published Jul 18, 2022

An increasing number of churches have been sold to compensate for empty pews. The diocesan centre in Dieppe, New Brunswick Canada which used to be the home of the archbishop, was sold. The archbishop went on record and stated that there’s virtually no money is left in the church’s coffers.

“We sold things, and now we’re at a point … we’ve taken all the money that we have,” Moncton NB Archbishop Valery Vienneau.

“We had money — the diocese had money, but doesn’t anymore.”

The CBC reported that the archdiocese of Moncton might be forced to declare bankruptcy. Archbishop Vienneau noted the archdiocese’s only remaining assets are church buildings and the occasional monastery or convent. The prelate is quoted,

“And to say that the bankruptcy would fix things is, I think, quite improbable. Because there are no assets left except the churches themselves. And I don’t know who would want to buy a church.”

The sole purpose of the Pope Francis devised climate change hoax – Laudato Si was to obtain $1 trillion a year to save/revive the bankrupt Catholic Church and the EU. That failed because national leaders wouldn’t sign Pope Francis pledge to give the Catholic Church and the EU $trillion a year so Pope Francis and the UN came up with imposing a carbon tax to force non-EU states to bailout / save the insolvent / bankrupt Catholic Church and it Fourth Reich EU.

The EU was formed for the Vatican.

The following publication that was financed by the European Union, and L’Osservatore Romano provides ample evidence that the EU was formed to be the Fourth Holy Roman Empire. Note the publication date on the cover of the publication – “Vatican City, 2017”.

Throughout this long and difficult journey, the Popes of the Catholic Church have accompanied the men and women who worked to construct Europe with their encouragement, their warnings and their spiritual guidance. This has been true since the very foundation of the European Union was laid with the blessing given by Pope Pius XII to the leaders of our six founding Member States gathering in Rome for the signature of the Treaties in 1957.

From Zachary to Leo III, successive Popes turned to the powerful Frankish and Germanic monarchs, particularly Charlemagne, who was known as the “father of Europe ”, seeking protection against the invading Lombards, Normans and Saracens; in doing so, they invented the Christian West. Thus, from its earliest beginnings, the papacy had close ties to the European events that would influence the world order for centuries to come.

Note that publication states that the Popes have turned to the powerful Frankish and Germanic monarchs, to wage it’s wars. WWI and WWII were waged by Germany for the reigning Popes. The UK’s German monarchy conspired with it’s German cousins in Germany to wage WWI for the Pope.

The Vatican provides you with irrefutable proof that Germany waged WWI and WWII for the Pope (the Crown). The following excerpt makes it abundantly clear that the Pope enlisted Germany to wage WWII. “Again resume” means resume WWI which technically never ended. Germany didn’t surrender. Both sides signed an armistice – an agreement in which both sides agree to stop fighting, rather than a surrender. It is not necessarily the end of a war, as it may constitute only a cessation of hostilities.

“as the German people return to religion, bend the knee before Christ, and arming themselves against the enemies of God, again resume the task God has laid upon them.” ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI, March 14, 1937

The Reich Concordat was drafted and signed in Rome – on July 20, 1933, to form and regulate a war alliance between the Nazi German Third Reich and the Holy See.

The signing was done by Vice Chancellor Franz von Papen for Germany and by Cardinal State Secretary Eugenio Pacelli for the Holy See. Cardinal State Secretary Eugenio Pacelli later became Pope Pius XII.


Cardinal State Secretary Eugenio Pacelli (Pope Pius XII) & his Nazi German guards.

Adolf Hitler waited until Eugenio Pacelli became Pope to launch WWII by invading Poland. The day Nazi German troops invaded Poland newly elected Pope Pius XII gave Adolf Hitler his blessing.

On December 11, 1941 Italy and Germany simultaneously declared war against the United States of America.

Italy switched sides after surrendering to Allied troops in 1943.

To help save the bankrupt Catholic Church and the EU the Vatican enlisted the UK’s illegitimate German monarchy to impose and collect a carbon tax in the UK and Canada for the Vatican and the EU. Carbon tax revenue is being collected to bankroll the Vatican and the EU.

No queen or king of/in Canada

Kraut Elizabeth II was never queen because she forfeited the Crown during her coronation by breaking the UK law that forbids all UK monarchs from becoming a Catholic, professing the Catholic faith or holding communion with the Catholic Church. During her coronation she professed the popish religion. Elizabeth II and everyone in attendance sung the professing of the Catholic faith.

Coronation transcript in “the Abbey Church of St. Peter, Westminster, on Tuesday, the second day of June, 1953″:

And the Gospel ended, shall be sung the Creed following, the Queen with the people standing, as before. …

And I believe one Catholic and Apostolic Church. …

Elizabeth II became a Catholic during the coronation by accepting the ring that represents the “seal of Catholic faith”.

Note that the ring is known as the the “wedding ring”. It signifies the monarch’s unfaithful and unlawful marriage to the Catholic Church.

Kraut Charles isn’t king because he too violated the UK’s Act of Settlement law during his coronation. The Westminster Abbey is a Catholic Church and it professes the Catholic faith.

Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the (Catholic) faith”

Kraut Charles held communion with the Church of Rome during his coronation. The Westminster Abbey website provided irrefutable evidence that Charles held communion with the Church of Rome on May 6, 2023. Excerpt from Westminster Abbey website states:

“coronations take place within a Communion service or Eucharist. The monarch is crowned in the name of God, surrounded by prayer, and the first thing that the newly-crowned monarch does is receive Holy Communion as a sign of his dependency on God.”

During the coronation Kraut Charles professed the popish religion and accepted and wore the Catholic Church ring – the seal of Catholic faith. There’s documented proof. The transcript of the coronation.

According to the Act of Settlement law there is no trial, house debate or committee hearing to challenge the law. The forfeiture of the Crown is immediate, absolute and it is forever.

Related NCIO briefing:

Carbon tax illegal because it’s being collected based on a false premise

Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers

Published on: Dec 15, 2023

There is reasonable suspicion Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Justin Trudeau had motive. At the very least Justin Trudeau counseled an offence that resulted in the murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Accordingly, Justin Trudeau could be charged with murder.

The December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman has everything to do with Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

The fundraiser is deemed a “prohibited gift” by 2 federal laws – the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. MP Justin Trudeau violated the 2 federal laws by attending the fundraiser because Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company Apotex had registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before he and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

Accordingly, the Office of Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau for violating the Lobbying Act. Because the Lobbying Commissioner implicated Barry Sherman by having the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Barry Sherman filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner and (REDACTED) third party defendant Justin Trudeau.

The lawsuit was filed because the Lobbying Commissioner concealed that Justin Trudeau was the one who broke federal laws, not Barry Sherman. The Lobbying Commissioner concealed Justin Trudeau’s Lobbying Act offence by redacting Justin Trudeau’s name.

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,”

The above statement informs Canadians that the REDACTED name wasn’t Barry Sherman because his name is included “unredacted” in the statement above. The REDACTED name could only be either 2015 election campaign candidates Michael Levitt or Justin Trudeau because the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser that was being investigated by the RCMP was for Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Phil McIntosh, director of investigations at the Office of the Lobby Commissioner stated:

“while conducting the administrative review, the directorate found evidence indicating that Mr. Sherman engaged in political activities that risk creating a sense of obligation on the part of one or more public office holders” through the fundraising event held at his home on Aug. 26, 2015.

We know Justin Trudeau was the subject of the RCMP investigation because:

1) the Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

“Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the private interests of Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

2) the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying initiated the investigation based on a tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, … ” Macleans

Justin Trudeau tried to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit just days before the targeted murders by giving the Lobbying Commissioner $400,000 to fight the lawsuit.

The Lobbying Commissioner receiving access to a “special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges” eliminated Michael Levitt as the name of the person the Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED.

Despite having received $400,000 in misappropriated public funds the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t quash the Apotex lawsuit and a court order requiring her to unredact Justin Trudeau‘s name – the third party and “a defendant” in the Apotex lawsuit.

Because the Lobbying Commissioner failed to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit Justin Trudeau had her removed as the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders – December 13, 2017.

 

On December 13, 2017 Justin Trudeau committed the offence of obstruction of justice by having both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones.

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from lobbyists.

It is imperative Canadians know and realized that the Apotex lawsuit threatened Justin Trudeau’s political career. The lawsuit could have resulted in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

Canada Elections Act

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; …

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

Justin Trudeau went to great lengths to quash the Apotex lawsuit (Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review) days before Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered.

Obstruction of justice is committed when the accused (Justin Trudeau) wilfully attempts to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in an existing or proposed judicial proceeding. The most extreme form of obstruction is the killing of a witness or a plaintiff in a judicial proceeding.

On December 13, 2017 “Apotex lawsuit plaintiff Barry Sherman” and his wife Honey Sherman were targeted and killed.

Motives for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman:

1) Terminate the RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau for accepting a prohibited gift (26 Aug 2015 campaign fundraiser) from registered government lobbyist (registered 24 Aug 2015) Barry Sherman.

2) Terminate an Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit in which Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) was a third party defendant.