Trudeau Foundation used by Germany for foreign interference activities during 2015 federal election

Published on: May 11, 2023

Foreign interference activities by Germany influenced the 2015 federal election. Donations to the Trudeau Foundation during the 2015 federal election campaign were made to promote and influence one specific election campaign candidate – Justin Trudeau.

A $928,000 gift to the Trudeau Foundation from European Climate Foundation founder and EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain to 2015 federal election candidate Justin Trudeau was offered to obtain $2.65 billion from the Government of Canada.

The gift, $428,000 in 2015 (Justin Trudeau was a 2015 federal election candidate) & another $500,000 donation in 2016 by McCall MacBain (was the concurrent Chair of the Trudeau Foundation and the Chair of the European Climate Foundation) is defined by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act as Foreign Influenced Activities, which is another term for Foreign Interference.

“Foreign interference includes harmful activities undertaken by foreign states, or those acting on its behalf, that are clandestine, deceptive, or involve a threat to any person to advance the strategic objectives of those states to the detriment of Canada’s national interests.” Public Safety Canada

Both Justin Trudeau and McCall MacBain broke the law during the 2015 federal election campaign. The gifts constitutes a bribe.

  •  (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years who

    • (a) being the holder of a judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by them in their official capacity, or

    • (b) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to a person mentioned in paragraph (a), or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by that person in their official capacity.

McCall MacBain indirectly paid a member of Parliament almost a $million to influence (solicit) Justin Trudeau to pledge, in his official capacity as Prime Minister of Canada, $2.65 billion to climate change. Just one month after being elected Justin Trudeau pledged $2.65 billion to climate change.

The Conflict of Interest Act & Canada Elections Act prohibited the 2015 election candidate MP Justin Trudeau and the Trudeau Foundation from accepting the $928,000 gift from EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain.

Elections Canada

Prohibition on using foreign funds

“A third party must not use funds from a foreign entity to pay for regulated activities. It must not circumvent, or attempt to circumvent, the prohibition or collude with any other person or entity for that purpose.”

A foreign entity includes:

a corporation or entity organized outside Canada that does not carry on business in Canada, or whose only activity in Canada is to influence electors to vote or refrain from voting, either in general or for a particular candidate or registered party in the election.

During the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation was a third party and McCall MacBain’s European Climate Foundation was a foreign entity.

Evidence supporting the charge that a foreign entity did in fact donate a gift of $928,000 to the Trudeau Foundation to influence Justin Trudeau in his official capacity as Prime Mister of Canada was first made known in the National Post article “Money began to rain on Trudeau Foundation once Justin took over Liberals, analysis shows” In that article it was confirmed that,

“one in six donors have affiliations with organizations currently lobbying the government”.

The largest donors in 2015, when Justin Trudeau was a 2015 election candidate, and in 2016, soon after Justin Trudeau became Prime Minster and pledged $2.65 billion to the climate change fund (European Climate Foundation a benefactor), where made by the European Climate Foundation. The foreign entity was founded by McCall MacBain in 2008. The foundation’s aims are to promote/lobby for the EU and its climate and energy policies.

Foreign donations to the Trudeau Foundation jumped from $53,000 in the 2014 fiscal year to $535,000 in 2016 — a ten-fold increase, because of just one donor, the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain and his Switzerland-based European Climate Foundation.

The EU and its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain have been responsible for the majority of the increase in foreign donations and they were the largest foreign donors of 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The Switzerland-based foundation donated prohibited gift of $428,000 in 2015 and another prohibited gift of $500,000 in 2016. A red flag was raised by statement of fact foreign “gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada”.

“A National Post analysis of the Trudeau Foundation’s public disclosures has found that gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. The amount of money contributed to the foundation by foreign donors has grown each year since Trudeau claimed the party’s leadership. Moreover, a significant proportion of the charity’s donors, directors and members have ties to companies and organizations that are actively lobbying the federal government.”

Foreign interference activities by the EU using its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain continued after the 2015 federal election.

On September 9, 2016 the Trudeau Foundation reported it had received the largest gift in the Foundation’s history. A record $1 million was donated to the Trudeau Foundation by the Foundation’s Chair McCall MacBain. However, the $1 million donation was never reported in any annual reports.

The original article reporting the receipt of $1 million gift stated the following:

The largest gift in the Foundation’s history | Fondation Trudeau

An investigation would find that during the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation engaged in prohibited “Conduct that is illegal or contrary to public policy”. The Trudeau Foundation engaged in foreign interference activities for Germany’s EU.

The Trudeau Foundation’s Annual Reports provides proof the Trudeau Foundation never reported (concealed) the $1 million donation from McCall MacBain. How many other major donations from foreign donors were made to the Trudeau Foundation (beneficiary Justin Trudeau) during a federal election but were hidden from the CRA, the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying, from the Office of the Ethics Commissioner, from the Commissioner of Canada Elections, from the Government of Canada and from the Canadian public?

NOTE: Within 1 year the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain donated almost $2 million to the Trudeau Foundation. MP/PM Justin Trudeau is a beneficiary of the Trudeau Foundation. House committee or the RCMP need to ask why the donations were made in 3 installments. It is plausible all 3 donations were for Justin Trudeau taking and giving the EU climate change lobbyist $2.65 billion.

Working theory – McCall MacBain paid Justin Trudeau a down payment of $428,000 in 2015 to pledged $2.65 billion in federal funds once he was elected & another $500,000 in 2016, after Justin Trudeau completed the heist. The $1 million that the Trudeau Foundation received from McCall MacBain but never reported in its annual reports was the result of Justin Trudeau wanting more money for stealing $2.65 billion.

Justin Trudeau remains the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

September 13, 2022, NCIO

There remains one person who had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman on December 13, 2017. That person was being investigated by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner at the time of the targeted murders. That person took extraordinary steps on the day of the murders to attempt to quash 2 ongoing investigations involving himself.

Who had the most to gain by the “targeted” murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Justin Trudeau did. Justin Trudeau would have lost his seat in House of Commons as a result of a Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants”. The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review.

At the time of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s 26 Aug 2015 election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner, as required by the Lobbying Act

Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

Investigation continued

(9) The Commissioner may not continue an investigation under this section until any investigation or charge regarding the same subject-matter has been finally disposed of.

The Lobbying Commissioner and Justin Trudeau were unable to quash the Apotex lawsuit court order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal laws on December 20, 2017. An attempt was made by Justin Trudeau to quash/end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his 26 August 2015 fundraiser and the court order by replacing the Lobbying Commissioner.

On December 13, 2017, the day Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, Justin Trudeau had both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones. Link to December 13, 2017 video of the House of Commons appointments … “on division” – ParlVu

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” while campaigning in the 2015 federal election.

Providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

Justin Trudeau’s actions on the day of the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers made Justin Trudeau a prime suspect. Justin Trudeau being convicted of violating ethics laws days later on December 20, 2017 made Justin Trudeau the one person to have motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman to:

  1. end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
  2. dismiss the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
  3. prevent a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage

A conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act Section 502(2) (h.01) meant Justin Trudeau would lose his seat in the House of Commons for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, that the guest list was somewhere between 100 and 150 people and that he believed the proceeds were split between the Liberal Party of Canada and Levitt’s electoral district association. A ticket reportedly cost $1,500.” Macleans

Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. The Apotex lawsuit is Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review

Why would Justin Trudeau fear the Apotex lawsuit, not the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 campaign fundraiser? Parliament of Canada standing committee meeting involving Karen Shepherd informs you why:

The Apotex lawsuit posed a serious threat to Justin Trudeau’s political career. If Apotex was successful the lawsuit would have provided compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau had violated the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

  •  (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

    • (a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

  • (a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

  • (b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

  • (a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Highlights of the Federal Court Proceeding T-761-17 provides compelling evidence that the Apotex lawsuit was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Murdered because the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t defeat the court order of Prothonotary Kevin Aaltorequiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants“. Court order issued 1 month before the December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Court order dated 10-NOV-2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary. 16 days after Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the Lobbying Commissioner tried December 29, 2017 to keep the redacted evidence implicating Justin Trudeau from being made public. Filed a motion for “Setting aside portions of the order of Prothonotary Aalto dated November 10, 2017 … those portions of the Order Under Appeal which preserved redactions contained in the Rule 318 Record and requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants;”

Justin Trudeau paid the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 (used Federal funding) in December 2017 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman/Apotex lawsuit.

“In December 2017, the Office received access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges. … An unanticipated court action against the Office resulted in unplanned legal costs of almost $300,000 in 2017–18. These additional costs have been paid through access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for litigation.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017–18 Departmental results report

According to the T-761-17 Federal Court documents (PDF backup of T-761-17 made available on NCIO website) a court hearing was to be held 08-FEB-2018 to address the Lobbying Commissioner refusing to comply with the decision of Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary dated 10-NOV-2017 that “redacted” documents that detail the (audio) taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from OCL transcripts in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the RCMP for violating the Lobbying Act. The RCMP investigation began with this statement:

The Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would conclude that private interests of Justin Trudeau (redacted) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

Justin Trudeau is a prime suspect in the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman because of the Apotex lawsuit – Federal Court Number T-761-17 and because of what transpired the day Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered, December 13, 2017. Justin Trudeau had Karen Shepherd removed as Lobbying Commissione, effective December 30, 2017.

resolution of the House of Commons dated December 13, 2017, the Senate and House of Commons have approved the appointment of Nancy Bélanger as Commissioner of Lobbying … on the recommendation of the Prime Minister … effective December 30, 2017” Order in Council PC Number: 2017-1564

The Lobbying Commissioner was removed during an ongoing Apotex lawsuit pertaining to an active RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Toronto Police Services stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were in fact “targeted”. That means the murders were planned and deliberate and if the police found evidence that money was payed to have the Shermans murdered the murders was “contracted murder”.

“murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.” Criminal Code of Canada 231 (3)

The planned and deliberate murders of Barry and Honey Sherman resulted in:

  1. ending the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
  2. the dropping/dismissal of the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
  3. preventing Justin Trudeau from losing his seat in the House of Commons for a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from registered government lobbyist Barry Sherman/Apotex.

In a homicide criminal investigation that’s motive.

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Parliament of Canada – Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for a tryst he reportedly had with a 17 year old WPGA student

On June 22, 2020 a Twitter follower implied that she had spoken with Sophie Trudeau about a rumor that Sophie and Justin Trudeau were getting a divorce. In a tweet to @presscoreca the Twitter follower revealed that Justin Trudeau had a secret sexual relationship with a 17 year old student when he was a teacher at WPGA.

A tryst is a meeting between two people who are having a sexual relationship, especially a secret one. A teacher having a sexual relationship with a 17 year old student is statutory rape.

Diamond and Diamond Lawyers:

Statutory rape, makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

The Department of Justice Canada website defines Justin Trudeau’s tryst with a 17 year old West Point Grey Academy student as sexual exploitation.

Sexual exploitation

A 16 or 17 year old cannot consent to sexual activity if:

their sexual partner is in position of trust or authority towards them, for example their teacher

The age of consent is raised to 18 when the older party is in a position of trust or authority over the other, the younger party is in a relationship of dependency with the owner, or if the relationship is exploitative.

The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that

“in the absence of evidence raising a reasonable doubt on this point, teachers are necessarily in a position of trust and authority towards their students” (R. v. Audet, 2 Supreme Court of Canada, Citation1996, 2 SCR 171 at para 44 (SCC)).

The combined effect of sections 150.1 and 153 of the Criminal Code is that if a person is in a position of trust or authority (e.g., a coach, teacher, etc.) over any child between the ages of 12 and 17, if the child is dependent on that other person, or if the relationship is exploitative of the child, that child is not able to legally consent. In these situations, only a person age 18 or older is capable of consent.

A U.K. Conservative MP was arrested in May of 2022 on suspicion of rape and sexual assault offences.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “A man was arrested on suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, abuse of position of trust and misconduct in a public office.”

Some of the alleged sexual offences were committed 20 years ago.

That means Liberal MP Justin Trudeau could be arrested too for suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

The RCMP have a at least 3 material witnesses. One of the three material witnesses used Twitter to report that Justin Trudeau had a sexual relationship with a 17 year old student when he was a teacher at WPGA.

The second material witness is Justin Trudeau’s roommate and WPGA co-worker. Convicted child sex offender (child pornography, child exploitation) Christopher Charles Ingvaldson.

The third material witness is Sophie Trudeau. Section 4 of the Canada Evidence Act informs police officers that Sophie can be used as a competent and compellable witness:

Spouse of accused

(2) No person is incompetent, or uncompellable, to testify for the prosecution by reason only that they are married to the accused

British Columbia Evidence Act

Person charged and spouse competent

6 A person charged with an offence, and the spouse of the person charged, is a competent witness whether the person charged is charged solely or jointly with any other person.

Other witnesses who can be compelled to testify for the prosecution are the WPGA principal and teachers.

The Parliament of Canada website informs Canadians and Ontario police officers that Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

Any incident of a criminal nature in which a Member has been charged is not a matter where immunity from arrest will protect that Member. Matters of a criminal nature would include treason, felonies, all indictable offences, …

Members cannot claim freedom from arrest or imprisonment on a criminal charge. A Member of the House of Commons is in exactly the same position as any other citizen if he or she is suspected of, charged with, or found guilty of a crime, provided that it is unrelated to proceedings in Parliament.

The offences are unrelated to proceedings in Parliament. The deplorable offences were committed over 20 years ago when Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA.

Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and was issued a writ of summons before. When he was a teacher at WPGA.

The screenshot below was obtained June 18, 2023. It lists all court proceedings against Justin Trudeau in the province of British Columbia. The first one on the list pertains to Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury court case when he was a teacher at WPGA.

BC court documents provides proof that Justin Trudeau was charged with a criminal offence and was ordered to stand trial

Justin Trudeau facing an impending conviction for accepting a prohibited gift from a registered lobbyist during the 2015 election campaign got Barry and Honey Sherman killed

If Barry and Honey Sherman hadn’t been targeted and killed Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage during the 2015 election campaign from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. The penalty for such a conviction was Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

“Section 502 of the Canada Elections Act sets out other situations in which a conviction automatically results in the loss of the right to sit in the House of Commons. Under section 502(3), any person who is convicted of an illegal practice listed in section 502(1) (e.g., knowingly exceeding the election expenses limit) or a corrupt practice listed in section 502(2) (e.g., accepting prohibited gift or other advantage) becomes ineligible to sit in the House of Commons for five years (in the case of an illegal practice) or seven years (in the case of a corrupt practice).” Parliament of Canada

A Government of Canada document (screenshot below) provides prima facie evidence that Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Barry Sherman registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before the fundraiser on August 24, 2015.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

When Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser to determine for the Lobbying Commissioner if the fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act. The Government of Canada document is very compelling evidence that proves Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau. The document guaranteed that Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. Justin Trudeau was about to be convicted for accepting a prohibited gift (“providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada) from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman but the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman thwarted the impending conviction.

The only person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed was Justin Trudeau. Their murders meant Justin Trudeau averted a conviction and losing his seat in the House of Commons.

It’s important to note that Justin Trudeau was convicted just 7 days after the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman for accepting prohibited gift or other advantage from anithert registered lobbyist – Aga Khan.

Justin Trudeau didn’t lose his seat in the House of Commons because Justin Trudeau didn’t accept the prohibited gifts from registered lobbyist Aga Khan during an election campaign.

It’s imperative Canadians and Toronto Police homicide detectives know and understand that Barry Sherman was never in legal jeopardy for hosting the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Lobbying the Government of Canada is legitimate.

However, any elected or appointed government official who accepts a gift or other advantage from a registered lobbyist is breaking federal laws.

Despite it being illegal for registered lobbyist Barry Sherman to offer 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau a gift or other advantage Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.

No statute of limitations for Justin Trudeau’s sexual exploitation of a 17 year old WPGA student

WPGA yearbook provides prima facie evidence that Justin Trudeau had close contact with convicted child sex offender (child pornography, child exploitation) Christopher Charles Ingvaldson at West Point Grey Academy. Justin Trudeau and Christopher Ingvaldson were both teachers and roommates when Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old WPGA student. Because they were roommates Christopher Charles Ingvaldson knows who the 17 year old WPGA student was. He’s a  witnesses who can get Justin Trudeau indicted for statuatory rape (sexual exploitation).

In June of 2010 Justin Trudeau’s WPGA coworker and roommate Christopher Ingvaldson was caught and charged during an international police sting of a child porn ring that spanned three countries and used Facebook.

When Justin Trudeau’s West Point Grey Academy coworker and roommate Christopher Charles Ingvaldson was charged as a sex offender there were no plaintiffs. He was charged as a result of the police sting. Police don’t need plaintiffs only a witness and/or reasonable suspicion a person has committed a crime to lay charges.

Because there is no statute of limitations for sexual assault (statuatory rape) the police can charge Justin Trudeau if a witness, witnesses or a confidential informant provides the police with information that Justin Trudeau committed the offence of sexual exploitation while teaching at WPGA.

Material witness replying to @presscoreca June 22, 2020 on Twitter

“Sophie said she & Justin are not getting divorced. This is all just based on a tryst Justin had with a student after his father died. She was 17, but the legal age was 14 in Canada at the time. The age of consent was raised to 16 in 2008 by Stephen Harper. It’s nonsense.”

Justin Trudeau having a tryst with a 17 year old student is a criminal offence of statutory rape. Statutory rape makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

You now know why in 2018 PM Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone investigating the 2000 groping incident.

Justin Trudeau says there is no need to conduct an investigation into an allegation that he inappropriately touched a female reporter in British Columbia

A U.K. Conservative MP was arrested in May of 2022 on suspicion of rape and sexual assault offences.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “A man was arrested on suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, abuse of position of trust and misconduct in a public office.”

The alleged sexual offences were committed between 2002 and 2009 in London. The alleged sexual offences began 20 years ago.

That means Justin Trudeau could also be charged and arrested today on suspicion of sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust for the tryst that Justin Trudeau had with a 17 year old WPGA student. The RCMP have a witness and her witness testimony is available on Twitter. The witness has made it appear that her source of information is Justin Trudeau’s wife, Sophie.

A second tweet by the material witness on the same day she confirmed that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a 17 year old WPGA student implies she knows Sophie and that she talked to Sophie directly. In the second tweet to @presscoreca the material witness again emphasized that “Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced”.

“Sophie is staying at Harrington Lk. It was tough, quarantined with 3 kids 24/7. Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced. Dealing with Canada’s Covid-19 crisis caused them stress.”

The material witness informed at least 2 Twitter account holders that Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a female WPGA student. The material witness informed the two in a Twitter reply. The two Twitter accounts have since been suspended.

One of the two informed Twitter accounts was PRESS Core – @presscoreca. The material witness was replying to a tweet that Justin Trudeau and Sophie were separated. It was confirmed via Twitter on October 21, 2019 (2019 federal election day) that Justin Trudeau and Sophie were separated.

No immunity from arrest or prosecution for MP Justin Trudeau

The Parliament of Canada website informs Canadians and Ontario police officers that Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

Freedom from arrest has been confined to civil cases and does not entitle a Member to evade criminal law.

Any incident of a criminal nature in which a Member has been charged is not a matter where immunity from arrest will protect that Member. Matters of a criminal nature would include treason, felonies, all indictable offences, …

Members cannot claim freedom from arrest or imprisonment on a criminal charge. A Member of the House of Commons is in exactly the same position as any other citizen if he or she is suspected of, charged with, or found guilty of a crime, provided that it is unrelated to proceedings in Parliament.

The offences are unrelated to proceedings in Parliament. The deplorable offences were committed over 20 years ago when Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA.

Material witness in 2020 confirmed that Justin Trudeau committed statuatory rape at WPGA

The 2019 federal election campaign rumors were apparently true that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a student when he was a teacher at West Point Grey Academy (WPGA). A woman named Barbara replied to PRESS Core on Twitter that she had spoken with Sophie Trudeau about a rumor of Sophie and Justin Trudeau getting a divorce. In the reply Barbara confirmed that Justin Trudeau had sexually assaulted a WPGA student.

Barbara replying to @presscoreca June 22, 2020 on Twitter

“Sophie said she & Justin are not getting divorced. This is all just based on a tryst Justin had with a student after his father died. She was 17, but the legal age was 14 in Canada at the time. The age of consent was raised to 16 in 2008 by Stephen Harper. It’s nonsense.”

Justin Trudeau having a tryst (a private romantic rendezvous between lovers) with a 17 year old student is a criminal offence of statutory rape. Statutory rape makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

Statutory Rape in Canada is defined as any sexual contact with a person under the age of consent. Under statutory rape laws, a person who has sex with a person under a certain age known as “the age of consent” risks criminal charges and a jail or prison sentence, even if the younger person is a willing partner.

There are many different scenarios where the age of consent would be raised to the age of 18. Some of these situations may arise in relationships of trust or authority between, for example, a teacher and student, an employer and employee, a coach and player, etc.

When Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old student Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA. He was a teacher at WPGA when his father, Pierre Trudeau, died on September 28, 2000. The law states that the age of consent is raised to 18 years of age when:

The older party is in a position of authority or a position of trust over the other party.

In Canada there’s no statute of limitations for statuatory rape. Section 3(4)(l) of the BC Limitation Act holds that:

“a cause of action based on sexual assault” is not “governed by a limitation period and may be brought at any time“.

Section 271 of the Criminal Code sets out the offence of sexual assault. This offence replaced the more stringent offence of “rape” which no longer appears in Canada’s Code.

271. Sexual assault

Everyone who commits a sexual assault is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or, if the complainant is
under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.

The punishment for this crime is not only imprisonment but also carries a criminal record, which can affect an offender’s future prospects. In Justin Trudeau’s case a criminal record for statuatory rape would mean Justin Trudeau couldn’t be a MP or Prime Minister of Canada.

A second tweet by Barbara on the same day she confirmed that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a 17 year old WPGA student implies she knows Sophie and that she talked to Sophie directly. In the second tweet to @presscoreca Barbara  again emphasized that “Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced”.

“Sophie is staying at Harrington Lk. It was tough, quarantined with 3 kids 24/7. Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced. Dealing with Canada’s Covid-19 crisis caused them stress.”

During the 2019 federal election campaign a female accuser claimed 2019 election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau had sexually assaulted a female student while Justin Trudeau was a teacher at West Point Grey Academy. The person Justin Trudeau bribed to keep quiet was accusing Justin Trudeau of committing the offence of “statutory rape”.

No evidence has ever been found or presented that would verify that the female accuser was a student at WPGA. There is evidence that Justin Trudeau’s female accuser wasn’t a WPGA student. That female person knew Justin Trudeau personally and she used the 2019 federal election campaign to blackmail Justin Trudeau into paying her $2.25 million.

Blackmail is the crime of threatening to reveal embarrassing, disgraceful or damaging information about a person to the public, family, spouse or associates unless money is paid to purchase silence.

To avoid a criminal investigation and criminal charges Justin Trudeau paid $millions to obtain a NDA and silence the person accusing Justin Trudeau of committing “statutory rape” at West Point Grey Academy.

Justin Trudeau offering/paying a bribe during the 2019 election campaign warrants an investigation by Elections Canada. Elections Canada need only to serve Justin Trudeau’s BMO trust fund and/or the Trudeau Foundation with a financial warrant to obtain evidence that a bribe was paid during the 2019 federal election campaign. Look for a multi-million dollar transfer on Oct 9, 2019 or soon thereafter.

A conviction of “offering bribe” could result in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons and Justin Trudeau being barred from campaigning in any election for the next 7 years.

“A person found guilty of any corrupt electoral practice under the Canada Elections Act within the previous 5 years is disqualified from seeking election.”

The 2019 federal election campaign was held within “the previous 5 years”.

Furthermore, in Canada there is no statute of limitations on bringing a criminal charge for sexual assault. A student/child who was the victim of statuatory rape could report it after reaching adulthood. The 17 year old WPGA student who had a tryst with Justin Trudeau could one day decide to bring a criminal charge for sexual assault against Justin Trudeau.

Teachers face serious consequences for having sex with a 17 year old student. Even 20 years after Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old WPGA student.

If Justin Trudeau were convicted today and sentenced to two years or more in prison he would automatically lose his seat in the House of Commons. Parliament of Canada website states:

Section 750(1) of the Criminal Code,11 which applies to members of both the Senate and the House, stipulates the following:

Where a person is convicted of an indictable offence for which the person is sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more and holds, at the time that person is convicted, an office under the Crown or other public employment, the office or employment forthwith becomes vacant.

Parliamentarians automatically lose their seat if they fall within the terms of this section.

Arrest of RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis linked to NSICOP investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland

2 RCMP AP Raven drones & several RCMP cruisers (Wifi Hotspots) were detected near Mountain Top Motel where National Counterintelligence Organization (NCIO) Director Paul W Kincaid was staying on September 18, 2019.

The RCMP surveillance operation was conducted just 5 days after Justin Trudeau had the General Director General of the RCMP’s National Intelligence co-ordination centre (NICC), Cameron Jay Ortis “charged with unauthorized communication of special operational information and preparatory acts … as well as communicating or confirming “special operational information” to an unspecified entity or individual. “.

The timing of the arrest and charges of the RCMP’s Director General of NICC coincided with a NSICOP investigation of foreign interference activities in Canada. The NSICOP investigation involved Chrystia Freeland and Foreign Affairs Canada.

NSICOP is mandated to investigate Member of Parliament and their departments. NSICOP investigates:

any activity carried out by a department that relates to national security or intelligence, unless the activity is an ongoing operation and the appropriate Minister determines that the review would be injurious to national security;

any matter relating to national security or intelligence that a minister of the Crown refers to NSICOP

NSICOP was investigating foreign interference activities in Canada involving Chrystia Freeland. The investigation was launched after Chrystia Freeland was awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award in December 2018. The award is only bestowed to German aristocrats and German collaborators.

NSICOP submitted its “classified” 2019 Annual Report to Justin Trudeau on August 30, 2019. At the time, the document was classifed as ‘Top Secret/Special Intelligence/Canadian Eyes Only/CODEWORD.’

Days later on September 11, 2019 called a federal election for 21 October 2019. Trudeau called the election to delay the tabling of a “declassified” NSICOP report in the House of Commons.

Section 21(6) of the NSICOP Act requires that the Prime Minister table declassified versions of the reports within 30 sitting days of the resumption of Parliament. Until then, their contents remain classified.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis contributed to the NSICOP’s special investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland. Remarks by the Hon. David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., Chair of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians on the
tabling in Parliament of the NSICOP 2019 Annual Report and Special
Report, March 12, 2020 stated:

This review examined:

1. the threat facing Canada from foreign interference; and,

2. the government’s response to that threat.

On both fronts, the Committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the Canadian
security and intelligence community, reviewed thousands of pages of documentation, both
classified and open source, and deliberated at great length.

The NSICOP investigation of Chrystia Freeland was initiated in 2019. Justin Trudeau delayed tabling NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” until November 2022.

Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election to conceal NSICOP finding that both Germany and Chrystia Freeland are a significant threat to the security of Canada. Portions of the NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” were REDACTED and deleted by Justin Trudeau for that purpose.

A reasonable person would conclude that Cameron Jay Ortis was arrested and charged “for communicating or confirming special operational information” pertaining to NSICOP’s investigation of Chrystia Freeland.

to an unspecified entity or individual.”

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Two days before Justin Trudeau attended Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada. The date of Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada was during the ongoing 2015 federal election campaign. Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada during an election campaign and 2 days before Apotex’s head hosted an election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau informs Canadians that Apotex was seeking to influence Justin Trudeau in the performance of his duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if he were to be elected.

The Government of Canada’s “Registry of Lobbyists” report confirms that on August 24, 2015 Apotex registered to lobby the Trudeau government.

Stated purpose of registering to lobby the Government of Canada:

The lobbyist has arranged or expects to arrange one or more meetings on behalf of the client between a public office holder and any other person in the course of this undertaking.

Subject Matter Details

Policies or Program

  • Arranging meetings with regards to building better bridges of communication between Apotex and government officials. Discuss Apotex contributions to innovation and research and development. Discuss Apotex contributions to the Health Care sector.

Regulation

  • Legislation relating to patented medicines — Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations — provisional nature of judicial determinations of proceedings brought by first persons; inadequacy of section 8 damages.

The “Registry of Lobbyists” information provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau attending Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada 3 days after Barry Sherman reported that he had meet privately with 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The private meeting between Justin Trudeau and Barry Sherman (Apotex) was made public a few days before Barry Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser.

“Serman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues” The Canadian Jewish News (CJN), August 21, 2015

Barry Sherman meeting and “discussing various issues” with 2015 election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser and Apotex registering to lobby the incoming Government of Canada 2 days before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser meant Justin Trudeau violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – accepting prohibited gift or other advantage. Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act because the meeting before the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser provided an opportunity to further the private interests of 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau & registered lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex).

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,” wrote McIntosh, in a recommendation to open a full investigation into the case.

“There is basis to conclude that Mr. Sherman is in breach of  the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct as a consequence of his involvement in the organization of a fundraising event for the (Liberal Party),” McIntosh wrote on Jan. 18, 2017.

Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd checked the box, “I agree,” the same day.

The Government of Canada document also provides the primary motive for the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

“Despite the available penalties under the current act, no one has ever been charged, or convicted of an offence under the Lobbying Act” Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd @ ETHI Committee Meeting

Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have forfeited/lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.

Germany redacted by Justin Trudeau in national security and intelligence investigation report on foreign interference

The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates redaction or deletion of information by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction amd deletion by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada

The NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada was delivered to Justin Trudeau on September 3, 2019. 8 days later Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election on September 11, 2019.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

The World Economic Forum is and has always been operating on Germany’s behalf. That is the World Economic Forum’s primary mission.

On being elected, Members of the House of Commons become trustees of public confidence. Members must be seen to be impartial and to derive no personal benefit or gain from their decisions. Various attempts have been made over the past 25 years to define what constitutes a conflict of interest and to devise rules regarding Members improperly using their influence, using insider information, and furthering their private interests.” …

Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders … applies to Cabinet Ministers, Secretaries of State, Parliamentary Secretaries and other senior public office holders (full-time Governor in Council appointees). It requires that, on appointment to one of these offices, the office holders are to arrange their private affairs so as to prevent real, potential or apparent conflicts from arising. They are not to solicit or accept money or gifts; not to assist individuals in their dealings with government in such a way as to compromise their own professional status; not to take advantage of information obtained because of their positions as insiders;”

House of Commons

Given that service in Parliament is a public trust, the House of Commons recognizes and declares that members are expected

(a) to serve the public interest and represent constituents to the best of their abilities;

(b) to fulfill their public duties with honesty and uphold the highest standards so as to avoid real or apparent conflicts of interests, and maintain and enhance public confidence and trust in the integrity of each member and in the House of Commons;

(c) to perform their official duties and functions and arrange their private affairs in a manner that bears the closest public scrutiny, an obligation that may not be fully discharged by simply acting within the law;

(d) to arrange their private affairs so that foreseeable real or apparent conflicts of interest may be prevented from arising, but if such a conflict does arise, to resolve it in a way that protects the public interest; and

(e) not to accept any gift or benefit connected with their position that might reasonably be seen to compromise their personal judgment or integrity except in accordance with the provisions of this code.

 

Ukraine government committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. The Ukraine government recruiting and financing of mercenaries with the $billions the Ukraine government obtained from Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland is a gross violation of the “International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries“.

Affirming that the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these offences should be either prosecuted or extradited.

I, Paul W Kincaid, know for a fact that the Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and funded by Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. A Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary stayed at the motel where I live outside Moncton, New Brunswick. He moved out on November 14, 2022 to deploy to Ukraine as a mercenary. The mercenary told me he was being paid by the Ukraine government to conduct military operations against Russians in Ukraine.

The Ukraine government mercenary attempted to board an international flight from the Fredericton NB airport to the EU with an assault rifle fitted with a scope and suppressor on November 14, 2022. The Ukraine government’s mercenary is a civilian. He was reportedly wearing combat gear when he attempted to redeploy for his second 3 month deployment to Ukraine with the assault rifle. He wasn’t arrested even though he, a civilian, was in the possession of prohibited weapons and he tried to board an international commercial airline flight with an assault rifle and 2 prohibited long knives.

The incident at the Fredericton international airport should have made headlines news, but it was kept quiet because Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are involved in supporting/funding the Ukraine government’s illegal recruitment, use and financing of mercenaries.

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and other countries to conducted military operations against and in Ukraine villages and towns that are predominately inhibited by Russian civilians. The Ukraine government is essentially using mercenaries for ethnic cleansing and genocide. The $billions that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia are funnelling to Ukraine through the IMF is being used to fund the Ukraine government’s crimes against humanity and war crimes.

War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law and occur in the state of armed conflict. The Rome Statute lists numerous acts that may constitute war crimes, including attacks on civilians, forcibly recruiting and using child soldiers, and destruction of educational and religious institutions.”

“(vii) Launching an indiscriminate attack resulting in loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects. The prohibition of indiscriminate attacks is part of customary international law (see Rule 11). Launching an indiscriminate attack constitutes an offence under the legislation of numerous States. Although not listed as such in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, an indiscriminate attack amounts in practice to an attack on civilians” Rule 156, International Committee for the Red Cross

Ethnic cleansing constitute crimes against humanity and can be assimilated to specific war crimes. Furthermore, such acts could also fall within the meaning of the Genocide Convention.” the UN

Genocide Convention

Article I

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

The Ukraine government’s mercenary provided ample material evidence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the Ukraine government is committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland. The Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary showed me a ballistic vest and helmet that he purchased online. He intended on using them in battle in Ukraine. The vest and helmet are material evidence that the Ukraine government and its mercenaries are committing the war crime called perfidy. The vest and helmet had a Canadian flag patch affixed to them. The mercenary isn’t a Canadian soldier. He was a civilian who became a Ukraine government mercenary to make money by killing people in Ukraine. Canadian soldiers are banned from joining Ukraine government’s mercenary forces.

“So for current CAF members, they are not permitted to be in the area, even if they were to be on leave,” Vice-chief of the defence staff Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen Global News report

The Ukraine government paid mercenary’s ballistic helmet had a Ukraine military insignia on one side and a Canadian flag patch on the opposite side. The vest had a Canadian flag patch affixed on the front. The mercenary said he was instructed to wear the Canadian flag patch during Ukraine’s military operations in the Ukraine Russia war. Wearing the Canadian flag patch in the armed conflict in Ukraine is perfidy – a war crime.

Rule 10 of Canada’s Code of Conduct (2005) states:

Perfidy is a war crime.

Perfidy is defined as:

“Acts inviting the confidence of adversaries and leading them to believe that they are entitled to protection or are obliged to grant protection under the Law of Armed Conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, constitute perfidy. In other words, perfidy consists of committing a hostile act under the cover of a legal protection (e.g., firing on a member of an opposing force who comes forward under the protection of a white flag).”

Geneva Conventions Act

Article 37 – Prohibition of perfidy

1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy.

Article 39 — Emblems of nationality

“1 It is prohibited to make use in an armed conflict of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict