Justin Trudeau facing an impending conviction for accepting a prohibited gift from a registered lobbyist during the 2015 election campaign got Barry and Honey Sherman killed

If Barry and Honey Sherman hadn’t been targeted and killed Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage during the 2015 election campaign from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. The penalty for such a conviction was Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

“Section 502 of the Canada Elections Act sets out other situations in which a conviction automatically results in the loss of the right to sit in the House of Commons. Under section 502(3), any person who is convicted of an illegal practice listed in section 502(1) (e.g., knowingly exceeding the election expenses limit) or a corrupt practice listed in section 502(2) (e.g., accepting prohibited gift or other advantage) becomes ineligible to sit in the House of Commons for five years (in the case of an illegal practice) or seven years (in the case of a corrupt practice).” Parliament of Canada

A Government of Canada document (screenshot above) provides prima facie evidence that Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Barry Sherman registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before the fundraiser on August 24, 2015.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

When Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser to determine for the Lobbying Commissioner if the fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act. The Government of Canada document is very compelling evidence that proves Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau. The document guaranteed that Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. Justin Trudeau was about to be convicted for accepting a prohibited gift (“providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada) from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman but the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman thwarted the impending conviction.

The only person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed was Justin Trudeau. Their murders meant Justin Trudeau averted a conviction and losing his seat in the House of Commons.

It’s important to note that Justin Trudeau was convicted just 7 days after the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman for accepting prohibited gift or other advantage from anithert registered lobbyist – Aga Khan.

Justin Trudeau didn’t lose his seat in the House of Commons because Justin Trudeau didn’t accept the prohibited gifts from registered lobbyist Aga Khan during an election campaign.

It’s imperative Canadians and Toronto Police homicide detectives know and understand that Barry Sherman was never in legal jeopardy for hosting the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Lobbying the Government of Canada is legitimate.

However, any elected or appointed government official who accepts a gift or other advantage from a registered lobbyist is breaking federal laws.

Despite it being illegal for registered lobbyist Barry Sherman to offer 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau a gift or other advantage Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.

Justin Trudeau is the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

September 13, 2022, NCIO

There is only one person who had motive to conspire to murder the Shermans December 13, 2017. That person was being investigated by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner at the time of the targeted murders. That person took extraordinary steps on the day of the murders to attempt to quash 2 ongoing investigations involving himself.

Who had the most to gain by the “targeted” murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Justin Trudeau did. Justin Trudeau would have lost his seat in House of Commons as a result of a Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants”. The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review.

At the time of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s 26 Aug 2015 election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner, as required by the Lobbying Act“

Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

Investigation continued

(9) The Commissioner may not continue an investigation under this section until any investigation or charge regarding the same subject-matter has been finally disposed of.

The Lobbying Commissioner and Justin Trudeau were unable to quash the Apotex lawsuit court order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal laws on December 20, 2017. An attempt was made by Justin Trudeau to quash/end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his 26 August 2015 fundraiser and the court order by replacing the Lobbying Commissioner.

On December 13, 2017, the day Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, Justin Trudeau had both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones. Link to December 13, 2017 video of the House of Commons appointments … “on division” – ParlVu

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” while campaigning in the 2015 federal election.

“Providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

Justin Trudeau’s actions on the day of the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers made Justin Trudeau a prime suspect. Justin Trudeau being convicted of violating ethics laws days later on December 20, 2017 made Justin Trudeau the one person to have motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman to:

end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
dismiss the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
prevent a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”

A conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act Section 502(2) (h.01) meant Justin Trudeau would lose his seat in the House of Commons for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, that the guest list was somewhere between 100 and 150 people and that he believed the proceeds were split between the Liberal Party of Canada and Levitt’s electoral district association. A ticket reportedly cost $1,500.” Macleans

Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. The Apotex lawsuit is Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review

Why would Justin Trudeau fear the Apotex lawsuit, not the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 campaign fundraiser? Parliament of Canada standing committee meeting involving Karen Shepherd informs you why:

The Apotex lawsuit posed a serious threat to Justin Trudeau’s political career. If Apotex was successful the lawsuit would have provided compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau had violated the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Highlights of the Federal Court Proceeding T-761-17 provides compelling evidence that the Apotex lawsuit was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Murdered because the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t defeat the court order of Prothonotary Kevin Aalto “requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants“. Court order issued 1 month before the December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Court order dated 10-NOV-2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary. 16 days after Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the Lobbying Commissioner tried December 29, 2017 to keep the redacted evidence implicating Justin Trudeau from being made public. Filed a motion for “Setting aside portions of the order of Prothonotary Aalto dated November 10, 2017 … those portions of the Order Under Appeal which preserved redactions contained in the Rule 318 Record and requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants;”

Justin Trudeau paid the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 (used Federal funding) in December 2017 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman/Apotex lawsuit.

“In December 2017, the Office received access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges. … An unanticipated court action against the Office resulted in unplanned legal costs of almost $300,000 in 2017–18. These additional costs have been paid through access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for litigation.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017–18 Departmental results report

According to the T-761-17 Federal Court documents (PDF backup of T-761-17 made available on NCIO website) a court hearing was to be held 08-FEB-2018 to address the Lobbying Commissioner refusing to comply with the decision of Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary dated 10-NOV-2017 that “redacted” documents that detail the (audio) taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from OCL transcripts in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the RCMP for violating the Lobbying Act. The RCMP investigation began with this statement:

The Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would conclude that private interests of Justin Trudeau (redacted) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

Justin Trudeau is a prime suspect in the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman because of the Apotex lawsuit – Federal Court Number T-761-17 and because of what transpired the day Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered, December 13, 2017. Justin Trudeau had Karen Shepherd removed as Lobbying Commissione, effective December 30, 2017.

“resolution of the House of Commons dated December 13, 2017, the Senate and House of Commons have approved the appointment of Nancy Bélanger as Commissioner of Lobbying … on the recommendation of the Prime Minister … effective December 30, 2017” Order in Council PC Number: 2017-1564

The Lobbying Commissioner was removed during an ongoing Apotex lawsuit pertaining to an active RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Toronto Police Services stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were in fact “targeted”. That means the murders were planned and deliberate and if the police found evidence that money was payed to have the Shermans murdered the murders was “contracted murder”.

“murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.” Criminal Code of Canada 231 (3)

The planned and deliberate murders of Barry and Honey Sherman resulted in:

ending the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
the dropping/dismissal of the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
preventing Justin Trudeau from losing his seat in the House of Commons for a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from registered government lobbyist Barry Sherman/Apotex.

In a homicide criminal investigation that’s motive.

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Trudeau Foundation used by Germany’s EU for foreign interference activities during 2015 federal election

Foreign interference activities by Germany’s EU influenced the 2015 federal election. Donations to the Trudeau Foundation during the 2015 federal election campaign were made to promote and influence one specific election campaign candidate – Justin Trudeau.

A $928,000 gift to the Trudeau Foundation from European Climate Foundation founder and EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain to 2015 federal election candidate Justin Trudeau was offered to obtain $2.65 billion from the Government of Canada.

The gift, $428,000 in 2015 (Justin Trudeau was a 2015 federal election candidate) & another $500,000 donation in 2016 by McCall MacBain (was the concurrent Chair of the Trudeau Foundation and the Chair of the European Climate Foundation) is defined by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act as Foreign Influenced Activities, which is another term for Foreign Interference.

“Foreign interference includes harmful activities undertaken by foreign states, or those acting on its behalf, that are clandestine, deceptive, or involve a threat to any person to advance the strategic objectives of those states to the detriment of Canada’s national interests.” Public Safety Canada

Both Justin Trudeau and McCall MacBain broke the law during the 2015 federal election campaign. The gifts constitutes a bribe.

119 (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years who

(a) being the holder of a judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by them in their official capacity, or

(b) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to a person mentioned in paragraph (a), or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by that person in their official capacity.

McCall MacBain indirectly paid a member of Parliament almost a $million to influence (solicit) Justin Trudeau to pledge, in his official capacity as Prime Minister of Canada, $2.65 billion to climate change. Just one month after being elected Justin Trudeau pledged $2.65 billion to climate change.

The Conflict of Interest Act & Canada Elections Act prohibited the 2015 election candidate MP Justin Trudeau and the Trudeau Foundation from accepting the $928,000 gift from EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain.

Elections Canada

Prohibition on using foreign funds

“A third party must not use funds from a foreign entity to pay for regulated activities. It must not circumvent, or attempt to circumvent, the prohibition or collude with any other person or entity for that purpose.”

A foreign entity includes:

a corporation or entity organized outside Canada that does not carry on business in Canada, or whose only activity in Canada is to influence electors to vote or refrain from voting, either in general or for a particular candidate or registered party in the election.

During the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation was a third party and McCall MacBain’s European Climate Foundation was a foreign entity.

Evidence supporting the charge that a foreign entity did in fact donate a gift of $928,000 to the Trudeau Foundation to influence Justin Trudeau in his official capacity as Prime Mister of Canada was first made known in the National Post article “Money began to rain on Trudeau Foundation once Justin took over Liberals, analysis shows” In that article it was confirmed that,

“one in six donors have affiliations with organizations currently lobbying the government”.

The largest donors in 2015, when Justin Trudeau was a 2015 election candidate, and in 2016, soon after Justin Trudeau became Prime Minster and pledged $2.65 billion to the climate change fund (European Climate Foundation a benefactor), where made by the European Climate Foundation. The foreign entity was founded by McCall MacBain in 2008. The foundation’s aims are to promote/lobby for the EU and its climate and energy policies.

Foreign donations to the Trudeau Foundation jumped from $53,000 in the 2014 fiscal year to $535,000 in 2016 — a ten-fold increase, because of just one donor, the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain and his Switzerland-based European Climate Foundation.

The EU and its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain have been responsible for the majority of the increase in foreign donations and they were the largest foreign donors of 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The Switzerland-based foundation donated prohibited gift of $428,000 in 2015 and another prohibited gift of $500,000 in 2016. A red flag was raised by statement of fact foreign “gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada”.

“A National Post analysis of the Trudeau Foundation’s public disclosures has found that gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. The amount of money contributed to the foundation by foreign donors has grown each year since Trudeau claimed the party’s leadership. Moreover, a significant proportion of the charity’s donors, directors and members have ties to companies and organizations that are actively lobbying the federal government.”

Foreign interference activities by the EU using its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain continued after the 2015 federal election.

On September 9, 2016 the Trudeau Foundation reported it had received the largest gift in the Foundation’s history. A record $1 million was donated to the Trudeau Foundation by the Foundation’s Chair McCall MacBain. However, the $1 million donation was never reported in any annual reports.

The original article reporting the receipt of $1 million gift stated the following:

The largest gift in the Foundation’s history | Fondation Trudeau

An investigation would find that during the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation engaged in prohibited “Conduct that is illegal or contrary to public policy”. The Trudeau Foundation engaged in foreign interference activities for Germany’s EU.

The Trudeau Foundation’s Annual Reports provides proof the Trudeau Foundation never reported (concealed) the $1 million donation from McCall MacBain. How many other major donations from foreign donors were made to the Trudeau Foundation (beneficiary Justin Trudeau) during a federal election but were hidden from the CRA, the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying, from the Office of the Ethics Commissioner, from the Commissioner of Canada Elections, from the Government of Canada and from the Canadian public?

NOTE: Within 1 year the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain donated almost $2 million to the Trudeau Foundation. MP/PM Justin Trudeau is a beneficiary of the Trudeau Foundation. House committee or the RCMP need to ask why the donations were made in 3 installments. It is plausible all 3 donations were for Justin Trudeau taking and giving the EU climate change lobbyist $2.65 billion.

Working theory – McCall MacBain paid Justin Trudeau a down payment of $428,000 in 2015 to pledged $2.65 billion in federal funds once he was elected & another $500,000 in 2016, after Justin Trudeau completed the heist. The $1 million that the Trudeau Foundation received from McCall MacBain but never reported in its annual reports was the result of Justin Trudeau wanting more money for stealing $2.65 billion.

Arrest of RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis linked to NSICOP investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland

2 RCMP AP Raven drones & several RCMP cruisers (Wifi Hotspots) were detected near Mountain Top Motel where National Counterintelligence Organization (NCIO) Director Paul W Kincaid was staying on September 18, 2019.

The RCMP surveillance operation was conducted just 5 days after Justin Trudeau had the General Director General of the RCMP’s National Intelligence co-ordination centre (NICC), Cameron Jay Ortis “charged with unauthorized communication of special operational information and preparatory acts … as well as communicating or confirming “special operational information” to an unspecified entity or individual. “.

The timing of the arrest and charges of the RCMP’s Director General of NICC coincided with a NSICOP investigation of foreign interference activities in Canada. The NSICOP investigation involved Chrystia Freeland and Foreign Affairs Canada.

NSICOP is mandated to investigate Member of Parliament and their departments. NSICOP investigates:

any activity carried out by a department that relates to national security or intelligence, unless the activity is an ongoing operation and the appropriate Minister determines that the review would be injurious to national security;

any matter relating to national security or intelligence that a minister of the Crown refers to NSICOP

NSICOP was investigating foreign interference activities in Canada involving Chrystia Freeland. The investigation was launched after Chrystia Freeland was awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award in December 2018. The award is only bestowed to German aristocrats and German collaborators.

NSICOP submitted its “classified” 2019 Annual Report to Justin Trudeau on August 30, 2019. At the time, the document was classifed as ‘Top Secret/Special Intelligence/Canadian Eyes Only/CODEWORD.’

Days later on September 11, 2019 called a federal election for 21 October 2019. Trudeau called the election to delay the tabling of a “declassified” NSICOP report in the House of Commons.

Section 21(6) of the NSICOP Act requires that the Prime Minister table declassified versions of the reports within 30 sitting days of the resumption of Parliament. Until then, their contents remain classified.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis contributed to the NSICOP’s special investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland. Remarks by the Hon. David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., Chair of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians on the
tabling in Parliament of the NSICOP 2019 Annual Report and Special
Report, March 12, 2020 stated:

This review examined:

1. the threat facing Canada from foreign interference; and,

2. the government’s response to that threat.

On both fronts, the Committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the Canadian
security and intelligence community, reviewed thousands of pages of documentation, both
classified and open source, and deliberated at great length.

The NSICOP investigation of Chrystia Freeland was initiated in 2019. Justin Trudeau delayed tabling NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” until November 2022.

Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election to conceal NSICOP finding that both Germany and Chrystia Freeland are a significant threat to the security of Canada. Portions of the NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” were REDACTED and deleted by Justin Trudeau for that purpose.

A reasonable person would conclude that Cameron Jay Ortis was arrested and charged “for communicating or confirming special operational information” pertaining to NSICOP’s investigation of Chrystia Freeland.

“to an unspecified entity or individual.”

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Two days before Justin Trudeau attended Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada. The date of Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada was during the ongoing 2015 federal election campaign. Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada during an election campaign and 2 days before Apotex’s head hosted an election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau informs Canadians that Apotex was seeking to influence Justin Trudeau in the performance of his duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if he were to be elected.

The Government of Canada’s “Registry of Lobbyists” report confirms that on August 24, 2015 Apotex registered to lobby the Trudeau government.

Stated purpose of registering to lobby the Government of Canada:

The lobbyist has arranged or expects to arrange one or more meetings on behalf of the client between a public office holder and any other person in the course of this undertaking.

Subject Matter Details

Policies or Program

Arranging meetings with regards to building better bridges of communication between Apotex and government officials. Discuss Apotex contributions to innovation and research and development. Discuss Apotex contributions to the Health Care sector.

Regulation

Legislation relating to patented medicines — Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations — provisional nature of judicial determinations of proceedings brought by first persons; inadequacy of section 8 damages.

The “Registry of Lobbyists” information provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau attending Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada 3 days after Barry Sherman reported that he had meet privately with 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The private meeting between Justin Trudeau and Barry Sherman (Apotex) was made public a few days before Barry Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser.

“Serman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues” The Canadian Jewish News (CJN), August 21, 2015

Barry Sherman meeting and “discussing various issues” with 2015 election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser and Apotex registering to lobby the incoming Government of Canada 2 days before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser meant Justin Trudeau violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – accepting prohibited gift or other advantage. Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act because the meeting before the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser provided an opportunity to further the private interests of 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau & registered lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex).

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,” wrote McIntosh, in a recommendation to open a full investigation into the case.

“There is basis to conclude that Mr. Sherman is in breach of … the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct as a consequence of his involvement in the organization of a fundraising event for the (Liberal Party),” McIntosh wrote on Jan. 18, 2017.

Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd checked the box, “I agree,” the same day.

The Government of Canada document also provides the primary motive for the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

“Despite the available penalties under the current act, no one has ever been charged, or convicted of an offence under the Lobbying Act” Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd @ ETHI Committee Meeting

Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have forfeited/lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.

Germany redacted by Justin Trudeau in national security and intelligence investigation report on foreign interference

The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates redaction or deletion of information by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction amd deletion by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada”

The NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada was delivered to Justin Trudeau on September 3, 2019. 8 days later Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election on September 11, 2019.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

The World Economic Forum is and has always been operating on Germany’s behalf. That is the World Economic Forum’s primary mission.

“On being elected, Members of the House of Commons become trustees of public confidence. Members must be seen to be impartial and to derive no personal benefit or gain from their decisions. Various attempts have been made over the past 25 years to define what constitutes a conflict of interest and to devise rules regarding Members improperly using their influence, using insider information, and furthering their private interests.” …

Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders … applies to Cabinet Ministers, Secretaries of State, Parliamentary Secretaries and other senior public office holders (full-time Governor in Council appointees). It requires that, on appointment to one of these offices, the office holders are to arrange their private affairs so as to prevent real, potential or apparent conflicts from arising. They are not to solicit or accept money or gifts; not to assist individuals in their dealings with government in such a way as to compromise their own professional status; not to take advantage of information obtained because of their positions as insiders;”

House of Commons

Given that service in Parliament is a public trust, the House of Commons recognizes and declares that members are expected

(a) to serve the public interest and represent constituents to the best of their abilities;

(b) to fulfill their public duties with honesty and uphold the highest standards so as to avoid real or apparent conflicts of interests, and maintain and enhance public confidence and trust in the integrity of each member and in the House of Commons;

(c) to perform their official duties and functions and arrange their private affairs in a manner that bears the closest public scrutiny, an obligation that may not be fully discharged by simply acting within the law;

(d) to arrange their private affairs so that foreseeable real or apparent conflicts of interest may be prevented from arising, but if such a conflict does arise, to resolve it in a way that protects the public interest; and

(e) not to accept any gift or benefit connected with their position that might reasonably be seen to compromise their personal judgment or integrity except in accordance with the provisions of this code.

Ukraine government committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. The Ukraine government recruiting and financing of mercenaries with the $billions the Ukraine government obtained from Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland is a gross violation of the “International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries“.

Affirming that the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these offences should be either prosecuted or extradited.

I, Paul W Kincaid, know for a fact that the Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and funded by Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. A Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary stayed at the motel where I live outside Moncton, New Brunswick. He moved out on November 14, 2022 to deploy to Ukraine as a mercenary. The mercenary told me he was being paid by the Ukraine government to conduct military operations against Russians in Ukraine.

The Ukraine government mercenary attempted to board an international flight from the Fredericton NB airport to the EU with an assault rifle fitted with a scope and suppressor on November 14, 2022. The Ukraine government’s mercenary is a civilian. He was reportedly wearing combat gear when he attempted to redeploy for his second 3 month deployment to Ukraine with the assault rifle. He wasn’t arrested even though he, a civilian, was in the possession of prohibited weapons and he tried to board an international commercial airline flight with an assault rifle and 2 prohibited long knives.

The incident at the Fredericton international airport should have made headlines news, but it was kept quiet because Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are involved in supporting/funding the Ukraine government’s illegal recruitment, use and financing of mercenaries.

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and other countries to conducted military operations against and in Ukraine villages and towns that are predominately inhibited by Russian civilians. The Ukraine government is essentially using mercenaries for ethnic cleansing and genocide. The $billions that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia are funnelling to Ukraine through the IMF is being used to fund the Ukraine government’s crimes against humanity and war crimes.

“War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law and occur in the state of armed conflict. The Rome Statute lists numerous acts that may constitute war crimes, including attacks on civilians, forcibly recruiting and using child soldiers, and destruction of educational and religious institutions.”

“(vii) Launching an indiscriminate attack resulting in loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects. The prohibition of indiscriminate attacks is part of customary international law (see Rule 11). Launching an indiscriminate attack constitutes an offence under the legislation of numerous States. Although not listed as such in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, an indiscriminate attack amounts in practice to an attack on civilians” Rule 156, International Committee for the Red Cross

“Ethnic cleansing constitute crimes against humanity and can be assimilated to specific war crimes. Furthermore, such acts could also fall within the meaning of the Genocide Convention.” the UN

Genocide Convention

Article I

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

The Ukraine government’s mercenary provided ample material evidence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the Ukraine government is committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland. The Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary showed me a ballistic vest and helmet that he purchased online. He intended on using them in battle in Ukraine. The vest and helmet are material evidence that the Ukraine government and its mercenaries are committing the war crime called perfidy. The vest and helmet had a Canadian flag patch affixed to them. The mercenary isn’t a Canadian soldier. He was a civilian who became a Ukraine government mercenary to make money by killing people in Ukraine. Canadian soldiers are banned from joining Ukraine government’s mercenary forces.

“So for current CAF members, they are not permitted to be in the area, even if they were to be on leave,” Vice-chief of the defence staff Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen Global News report

The Ukraine government paid mercenary’s ballistic helmet had a Ukraine military insignia on one side and a Canadian flag patch on the opposite side. The vest had a Canadian flag patch affixed on the front. The mercenary said he was instructed to wear the Canadian flag patch during Ukraine’s military operations in the Ukraine Russia war. Wearing the Canadian flag patch in the armed conflict in Ukraine is perfidy – a war crime.

Rule 10 of Canada’s Code of Conduct (2005) states:

“Perfidy is a war crime.”

Perfidy is defined as:

“Acts inviting the confidence of adversaries and leading them to believe that they are entitled to protection or are obliged to grant protection under the Law of Armed Conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, constitute perfidy. In other words, perfidy consists of committing a hostile act under the cover of a legal protection (e.g., firing on a member of an opposing force who comes forward under the protection of a white flag).”

Geneva Conventions Act

Article 37 – Prohibition of perfidy

1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy.

Article 39 — Emblems of nationality

“1 It is prohibited to make use in an armed conflict of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict

Toronto Police investigation of Barry & Honey Sherman murders sealed by the Crown to cover up who committed the targeted murders

There is compeling evidence that shows that 5 years ago Justin Trudeau conspired to have his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers murdered. Justin Trudeau had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman. An ongoing RCMP investigation of his election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner and an Apotex lawsuit put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. The fundraiser was a prohibited gift. Justin Trudeau accepting the prohibited gift meant that he violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act.

Violating the Lobbying Act had no legal consequences for either Justin Trudeau or Barry Sherman.

“The RCMP have never, ever followed up. The RCMP then rubber-stamps or whitewashes whatever Lobbying Act activity has happened.” House of Commons

However, violating the Canada Elections Act meant that Justin Truduea could have lost his seat in the House of Commons and he couldn’t be a candidate in another election for 5 years. It would have meant the end of his political career.

“The Canada Elections Act also sets out a series of disqualifications that apply exclusively to electoral candidacy. … Current disqualifications include the following: A person found guilty of an illegal or corrupt electoral practice (as defined in section 502 of the Canada Elections Act) is disqualified from contesting a federal election for either five or seven years and, if he or she has been elected, may be required to vacate his or her seat in the House of Commons. Illegal practices include wilfully exceeding the spending limit or obstructing the electoral process. Corrupt practices include voting more than once or accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage ” Parliament of Canada

Conspiracy

465 (1) (a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;

A Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants” provided motive for Justin Trudeau to conspire to commit murder.

The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. That court order put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. Justin Trudeau could have been “required to vacate his seat in House of Commons” for violating the Canada Elections Act – accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

On December 13, 2017, the day of the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman, Justin Trudeau had both the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner removed as commissioners. Their removal was done during ongoing investigations by both commissioners into Justin Trudeau violating federal laws while campaigning in the 2015 federal election. Both commissioners were essentially fired for investigating Justin Trudeau for violating federal laws during the 2015 election campaign.

The 10 NOV 2017 Court Order and Justin Trudeau removing the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman are elements of a conspiracy to commit murder. The RCMP are involved. They became involved the day the Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers.

Lobbying Act
Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

The RCMP started investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers after the Lobbying Commissioner found evidence that federal laws were broken by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada (OCL)

A Nov 3, 2016 OCL taped recorded interview with Barry Sherman was the primary material evidence OCL used to have RCMP launch a “full investigation” of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser. OCL determined the tape recording provided evidence Justin Trudeau broke federal laws. Apotex filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner regarding the redacted name in transcripts of that Nov 3, 2016 taped recorded interview.

The Toronto Police know who murdered Barry and Honey Sherman. So does the Crown. The Crown sealed the Toronto Police murder investigation files and evidence to protect the people who committed the murders for Justin Trudeau’s benefit.

Crime scene evidence: restraint marks, Honey Sherman’s bloody lip & nose, the surreptitious entry, the person who entered the Shermans’ home Dec 14, 2017 for 29 minutes & the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers implicates RCMP officers in their murders.

Crime scene evidence shows murderers gained access to the Sherman home by the front door. No forced entry means Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers knocked on front door. It is plausible that Honey Sherman let her murderers in after her murderers identified themselves as police officers. Restraint marks and Honey Sherman’s bloody lip and nose supports assertion that she was forcibly restrained by police officers.

Keable Commission supports assertion that RCMP officers are viable suspects in Barry & Honey Sherman targeted murders. 15 RCMP officers were charged/tried for: conspiracy, B&E, kidnapping & forcible detention. Indicted RCMP officers claimed they “were just following (PM Pierre Trudeau) orders.

Former Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks.

Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders also stated that his officers interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman while they lay dead in the basement.

“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,”

Note, only one person entered the home yet Police Chief Saunders said Toronto Police knew why “they” were there – they means the person of interest was part of an organization. The RCMP is an organization. RCMP were at the time investigating Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser/fundraisers. Wiretapping is tool in RCMP investigations, especially when it involves the Prime Minister of Canada. It is highly plausible that a RCMP officer entered the Shermans’ home to remove wiretaps and/or incriminating evidence.

Parties to offence

Where two or more persons are playing an active role in the commission of a crime, each becomes a co-principal to that offence. When this is the case, it is not necessary to determine exactly which person committed which element of the offence. Rather, every act done to commit the offence is deemed to have been committed by all co-principals. A person can be a principal to an offence despite not actually committing the offence with their own hands. This occurs where they instead direct an innocent agent to commit the offence in their place.

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim alledge Nova Scotia shooter used assault rifles

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada. A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the mass murders. Fintrac documents for a transfer of $500,000 on March 30, 2020 from the RCMP to Gabriel Wortman identified Gabriel Wortman as a RCMP agent.

The RCMP gave $475,000 ($500,00 – $25,000 transfer fees) to alledge mass murderer Gabriel Wortman on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op involving convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon.

“The withdrawal of $475,000 in cash by the man who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April matches the method the RCMP uses to send money to confidential informants and agents, sources say.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

RCMP CI Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op. RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.
Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. As a drug trafficker Griffon had the means to obtain the weapons he needed to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

9 charges filed against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);

Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;

Unauthorized possession of a firearm;

Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Analysis of evidence in the “targeted” killings of Barry & Honey Sherman concludes murders were politically motivated

5 years ago Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed. Mass media and government officials claim no motive for the double homicides has been found despite there being substantial evidence to support an inference that the murders were politically motivated.

What was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? To answer that one must first examine why lead Toronto police investigator, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes publicly stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed? “I believe they were targeted,” The word “targeted” was specifically chosen to describe Toronto’s 2017 homicides #64 and #65. What was Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes revealing to the public by calling the double homicides “targeted” killing?

Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. That’s what Toronto Police were telling Canadians when they said Barry & Honey Sherman were “targeted” & killed. Toronto Police stated publicly from the very beginning that “there was no sign of forced entry into their home”. That is referred to as surreptitious entry. Toronto Police publicly stating that the murderers entered the home of Barry and Honey Sherman via surreptitious entry is of major significance. It supports the discovery finding that the Shermans were targeted and killed by a “government authority”.

Evidence of markings being found on the wrists of both Barry and Honey Sherman, indicated they had been tied up, yet no ties or ropes were found at the scene. This too has major significance in that it confirms both Barry and Honey were restrained, forcibly detained (were handcuffed) before being killed. Both being forcibly restrained, leaving marks, provides evidence it wasn’t a murder suicide. No ties or ropes were found at the scene proves the killers took the “restraints” (handcuffs) with them.

Restraint markings on their wrists, the Toronto Police Services stating that the Shermans were targeted and killed and that their murderers gained access via surreptitious entry all lead to the conclusion that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed by police officers. Which police officers? RCMP. Why?

1) Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. A RCMP officer is a government authority. They are authorized by the federal government to uphold and enforce government enacted and imposed laws across Canada.

2) RCMP officers contend that they are authorized by government appointed adjudicators to enter private premises to install listening or video devices or recover evidence in support of “an ongoing criminal investigation”. The power so granted authorizing surreptitious entry allows the RCMP to utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or via Realtor lock box, or simply through trickery or coercion. Further, if RCMP officers acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them “to effect such entry by overcoming force” a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.

Motive for targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016. During the tape recorded interview, Mr Sherman openly discussed a fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex (Barry Sherman) filed a law suit (Court number T-761-17) seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording.

Justin Trudeau responded by paying the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman suit & a court hearing that was to be held on Thursday, the 8th day of February 2018, at 9:30 to address the Lobbying Commissioner KAREN SHEPHERD refusing to comply with a court order that “redacted” documents that detail the taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex.

The court order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in an ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with the court order would prove Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED Justin Trudeau’s name from the transcript in order to conceal that Justin Trudeau broke the law:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign.”

In an email to Brian H. Greenspan photographic evidence was provided that showed that the Sherman’s home was under surveillance by the RCMP.

Only the RCMP has jurisdiction (government authority) to conduct a criminal investigation for the Federal government’s Office of Commissioner of Lobbying.

Direct quote from Administering the Lobbying Act (December 2011) :

“The peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the matter, generally the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in the case of the Lobbying Act, will consider the case in consultation with legal counsel at the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors at the Department of Public Prosecutions. Together, they will determine whether or not to lay charges.”

Since the ongoing RCMP investigation involved a high profile government of Canada official the RCMP claim that they are authorized to make surreptitious entry, or simply through trickery or coercion. RCMP officers also claim that they are permitted “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”.

In Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, it was contended that s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code authorized trespass by the police in order to effect an arrest. The basis is that the police (RCMP) are entitled, in limited circumstances, to enter private property without consent to effect an arrest – detain a person.

People detained or arrested by police officers and the RCMP are usually forcibly restrained using handcuffs, either metal or plastic. A traditional form of plastic handcuffs are cable ties. Cable ties leave unique marks on wrists of those being arrested by police (RCMP). Forensic pathologist confirmed that the markings on the wrists of both Shermans, indicates they had been restrained (forcibly detained) with ties before they were murdered. Toronto Police confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers took the restraints with them.

Why would the restraints be removed from the wrists of the victims and from the crime scene? Restraints are material evidence that could be traced back to the murderers. Canadian police forces have and use a specific type of cable tie. The markings on the wrists of Barry and Honey Sherman can be matched with impressions made by any specific type of tie mfg today.

Crime scene evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered by police officers. Both had restraint marks on their wrists (were handcuffed) & Honey Sherman had cuts on her lip & nose, suggesting that she had struggled with assailants & was forced face down on pool tiles. The evidence is telling us that at some point Honey Sherman sensed that the intruders were going to kill her and out a fear for her life she put up a fight. The cuts on her lip & nose is telling us she was forced to the ground by a police officer(s) who used his or her knee to forcibly hold Honey Sherman’s head and face to the ground as they handcuffed Honey Sherman’s hands behind her back.

It is important to note that police officers and the RCMP do not have the authority to make surreptitious entry or “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”. The Supreme Court of Canada, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697 Date: 1984-12-20 ruled that police surreptitious entry is unlawful:

“Until such time as Parliament speaks specifically on this matter, I am of the view that an unlawful entry to install a listening device is an unauthorized and unjustified use of police powers. If the authorization to intercept did purport to sanction such an entry, the authorization would be invalid in that respect. Judges simply do not have the power to permit anyone, even police officers, to commit unlawful acts.“