No statute of limitations for Justin Trudeau’s sexual exploitation of a 17 year old WPGA student

WPGA yearbook provides prima facie evidence that Justin Trudeau had close contact with convicted child sex offender (child pornography, child exploitation) Christopher Charles Ingvaldson at West Point Grey Academy. Justin Trudeau and Christopher Ingvaldson were both teachers and roommates when Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old WPGA student. Because they were roommates Christopher Charles Ingvaldson knows who the 17 year old WPGA student was. He’s a witnesses who can get Justin Trudeau indicted for statuatory rape (sexual exploitation).

In June of 2010 Justin Trudeau’s WPGA coworker and roommate Christopher Ingvaldson was caught and charged during an international police sting of a child porn ring that spanned three countries and used Facebook.

When Justin Trudeau’s West Point Grey Academy coworker and roommate Christopher Charles Ingvaldson was charged as a sex offender there were no plaintiffs. He was charged as a result of the police sting. Police don’t need plaintiffs only a witness and/or reasonable suspicion a person has committed a crime to lay charges.

Because there is no statute of limitations for sexual assault (statuatory rape) the police can charge Justin Trudeau if a witness, witnesses or a confidential informant provides the police with information that Justin Trudeau committed the offence of sexual exploitation while teaching at WPGA.

Material witness replying to @presscoreca June 22, 2020 on Twitter

“Sophie said she & Justin are not getting divorced. This is all just based on a tryst Justin had with a student after his father died. She was 17, but the legal age was 14 in Canada at the time. The age of consent was raised to 16 in 2008 by Stephen Harper. It’s nonsense.”

Justin Trudeau having a tryst with a 17 year old student is a criminal offence of statutory rape. Statutory rape makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

You now know why in 2018 PM Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone investigating the 2000 groping incident.

Justin Trudeau says there is no need to conduct an investigation into an allegation that he inappropriately touched a female reporter in British Columbia

A U.K. Conservative MP was arrested in May of 2022 on suspicion of rape and sexual assault offences.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “A man was arrested on suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, abuse of position of trust and misconduct in a public office.”

The alleged sexual offences were committed between 2002 and 2009 in London. The alleged sexual offences began 20 years ago.

That means Justin Trudeau could also be charged and arrested today on suspicion of sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust for the tryst that Justin Trudeau had with a 17 year old WPGA student. The RCMP have a witness and her witness testimony is available on Twitter. The witness has made it appear that her source of information is Justin Trudeau’s wife, Sophie.

A second tweet by the material witness on the same day she confirmed that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a 17 year old WPGA student implies she knows Sophie and that she talked to Sophie directly. In the second tweet to @presscoreca the material witness again emphasized that “Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced”.

“Sophie is staying at Harrington Lk. It was tough, quarantined with 3 kids 24/7. Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced. Dealing with Canada’s Covid-19 crisis caused them stress.”

The material witness informed at least 2 Twitter account holders that Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a female WPGA student. The material witness informed the two in a Twitter reply. The two Twitter accounts have since been suspended.

One of the two informed Twitter accounts was PRESS Core – @presscoreca. The material witness was replying to a tweet that Justin Trudeau and Sophie were separated. It was confirmed via Twitter on October 21, 2019 (2019 federal election day) that Justin Trudeau and Sophie were separated.

No immunity from arrest or prosecution for MP Justin Trudeau

The Parliament of Canada website informs Canadians and Ontario police officers that Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

Freedom from arrest has been confined to civil cases and does not entitle a Member to evade criminal law.

Any incident of a criminal nature in which a Member has been charged is not a matter where immunity from arrest will protect that Member. Matters of a criminal nature would include treason, felonies, all indictable offences, …

Members cannot claim freedom from arrest or imprisonment on a criminal charge. A Member of the House of Commons is in exactly the same position as any other citizen if he or she is suspected of, charged with, or found guilty of a crime, provided that it is unrelated to proceedings in Parliament.

The offences are unrelated to proceedings in Parliament. The deplorable offences were committed over 20 years ago when Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA.

Material witness in 2020 confirmed that Justin Trudeau committed statuatory rape at WPGA

The 2019 federal election campaign rumors were apparently true that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a student when he was a teacher at West Point Grey Academy (WPGA). A woman named Barbara replied to PRESS Core on Twitter that she had spoken with Sophie Trudeau about a rumor of Sophie and Justin Trudeau getting a divorce. In the reply Barbara confirmed that Justin Trudeau had sexually assaulted a WPGA student.

Barbara replying to @presscoreca June 22, 2020 on Twitter

“Sophie said she & Justin are not getting divorced. This is all just based on a tryst Justin had with a student after his father died. She was 17, but the legal age was 14 in Canada at the time. The age of consent was raised to 16 in 2008 by Stephen Harper. It’s nonsense.”

Justin Trudeau having a tryst (a private romantic rendezvous between lovers) with a 17 year old student is a criminal offence of statutory rape. Statutory rape makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

Statutory Rape in Canada is defined as any sexual contact with a person under the age of consent. Under statutory rape laws, a person who has sex with a person under a certain age known as “the age of consent” risks criminal charges and a jail or prison sentence, even if the younger person is a willing partner.

There are many different scenarios where the age of consent would be raised to the age of 18. Some of these situations may arise in relationships of trust or authority between, for example, a teacher and student, an employer and employee, a coach and player, etc.

When Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old student Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA. He was a teacher at WPGA when his father, Pierre Trudeau, died on September 28, 2000. The law states that the age of consent is raised to 18 years of age when:

The older party is in a position of authority or a position of trust over the other party.

In Canada there’s no statute of limitations for statuatory rape. Section 3(4)(l) of the BC Limitation Act holds that:

“a cause of action based on sexual assault” is not “governed by a limitation period and may be brought at any time“.

Section 271 of the Criminal Code sets out the offence of sexual assault. This offence replaced the more stringent offence of “rape” which no longer appears in Canada’s Code.

271. Sexual assault

Everyone who commits a sexual assault is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or, if the complainant is
under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.

The punishment for this crime is not only imprisonment but also carries a criminal record, which can affect an offender’s future prospects. In Justin Trudeau’s case a criminal record for statuatory rape would mean Justin Trudeau couldn’t be a MP or Prime Minister of Canada.

A second tweet by Barbara on the same day she confirmed that Justin Trudeau sexually assaulted a 17 year old WPGA student implies she knows Sophie and that she talked to Sophie directly. In the second tweet to @presscoreca Barbara again emphasized that “Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced”.

“Sophie is staying at Harrington Lk. It was tough, quarantined with 3 kids 24/7. Sophie said she & Justin ARE NOT getting divorced. Dealing with Canada’s Covid-19 crisis caused them stress.”

During the 2019 federal election campaign a female accuser claimed 2019 election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau had sexually assaulted a female student while Justin Trudeau was a teacher at West Point Grey Academy. The person Justin Trudeau bribed to keep quiet was accusing Justin Trudeau of committing the offence of “statutory rape”.

No evidence has ever been found or presented that would verify that the female accuser was a student at WPGA. There is evidence that Justin Trudeau’s female accuser wasn’t a WPGA student. That female person knew Justin Trudeau personally and she used the 2019 federal election campaign to blackmail Justin Trudeau into paying her $2.25 million.

Blackmail is the crime of threatening to reveal embarrassing, disgraceful or damaging information about a person to the public, family, spouse or associates unless money is paid to purchase silence.

To avoid a criminal investigation and criminal charges Justin Trudeau paid $millions to obtain a NDA and silence the person accusing Justin Trudeau of committing “statutory rape” at West Point Grey Academy.

Justin Trudeau offering/paying a bribe during the 2019 election campaign warrants an investigation by Elections Canada. Elections Canada need only to serve Justin Trudeau’s BMO trust fund and/or the Trudeau Foundation with a financial warrant to obtain evidence that a bribe was paid during the 2019 federal election campaign. Look for a multi-million dollar transfer on Oct 9, 2019 or soon thereafter.

A conviction of “offering bribe” could result in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons and Justin Trudeau being barred from campaigning in any election for the next 7 years.

“A person found guilty of any corrupt electoral practice under the Canada Elections Act within the previous 5 years is disqualified from seeking election.”

The 2019 federal election campaign was held within “the previous 5 years”.

Furthermore, in Canada there is no statute of limitations on bringing a criminal charge for sexual assault. A student/child who was the victim of statuatory rape could report it after reaching adulthood. The 17 year old WPGA student who had a tryst with Justin Trudeau could one day decide to bring a criminal charge for sexual assault against Justin Trudeau.

Teachers face serious consequences for having sex with a 17 year old student. Even 20 years after Justin Trudeau had a tryst with a 17 year old WPGA student.

If Justin Trudeau were convicted today and sentenced to two years or more in prison he would automatically lose his seat in the House of Commons. Parliament of Canada website states:

Section 750(1) of the Criminal Code,11 which applies to members of both the Senate and the House, stipulates the following:

Where a person is convicted of an indictable offence for which the person is sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more and holds, at the time that person is convicted, an office under the Crown or other public employment, the office or employment forthwith becomes vacant.

Parliamentarians automatically lose their seat if they fall within the terms of this section.

Arrest of RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis linked to NSICOP investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland

2 RCMP AP Raven drones & several RCMP cruisers (Wifi Hotspots) were detected near Mountain Top Motel where National Counterintelligence Organization (NCIO) Director Paul W Kincaid was staying on September 18, 2019.

The RCMP surveillance operation was conducted just 5 days after Justin Trudeau had the General Director General of the RCMP’s National Intelligence co-ordination centre (NICC), Cameron Jay Ortis “charged with unauthorized communication of special operational information and preparatory acts … as well as communicating or confirming “special operational information” to an unspecified entity or individual. “.

The timing of the arrest and charges of the RCMP’s Director General of NICC coincided with a NSICOP investigation of foreign interference activities in Canada. The NSICOP investigation involved Chrystia Freeland and Foreign Affairs Canada.

NSICOP is mandated to investigate Member of Parliament and their departments. NSICOP investigates:

any activity carried out by a department that relates to national security or intelligence, unless the activity is an ongoing operation and the appropriate Minister determines that the review would be injurious to national security;

any matter relating to national security or intelligence that a minister of the Crown refers to NSICOP

NSICOP was investigating foreign interference activities in Canada involving Chrystia Freeland. The investigation was launched after Chrystia Freeland was awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award in December 2018. The award is only bestowed to German aristocrats and German collaborators.

NSICOP submitted its “classified” 2019 Annual Report to Justin Trudeau on August 30, 2019. At the time, the document was classifed as ‘Top Secret/Special Intelligence/Canadian Eyes Only/CODEWORD.’

Days later on September 11, 2019 called a federal election for 21 October 2019. Trudeau called the election to delay the tabling of a “declassified” NSICOP report in the House of Commons.

Section 21(6) of the NSICOP Act requires that the Prime Minister table declassified versions of the reports within 30 sitting days of the resumption of Parliament. Until then, their contents remain classified.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis contributed to the NSICOP’s special investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland. Remarks by the Hon. David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., Chair of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians on the
tabling in Parliament of the NSICOP 2019 Annual Report and Special
Report, March 12, 2020 stated:

This review examined:

1. the threat facing Canada from foreign interference; and,

2. the government’s response to that threat.

On both fronts, the Committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the Canadian
security and intelligence community, reviewed thousands of pages of documentation, both
classified and open source, and deliberated at great length.

The NSICOP investigation of Chrystia Freeland was initiated in 2019. Justin Trudeau delayed tabling NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” until November 2022.

Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election to conceal NSICOP finding that both Germany and Chrystia Freeland are a significant threat to the security of Canada. Portions of the NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” were REDACTED and deleted by Justin Trudeau for that purpose.

A reasonable person would conclude that Cameron Jay Ortis was arrested and charged “for communicating or confirming special operational information” pertaining to NSICOP’s investigation of Chrystia Freeland.

“to an unspecified entity or individual.”

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

Two days before Justin Trudeau attended Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada. The date of Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada was during the ongoing 2015 federal election campaign. Apotex registering to lobby the Government of Canada during an election campaign and 2 days before Apotex’s head hosted an election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau informs Canadians that Apotex was seeking to influence Justin Trudeau in the performance of his duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if he were to be elected.

The Government of Canada’s “Registry of Lobbyists” report confirms that on August 24, 2015 Apotex registered to lobby the Trudeau government.

Stated purpose of registering to lobby the Government of Canada:

The lobbyist has arranged or expects to arrange one or more meetings on behalf of the client between a public office holder and any other person in the course of this undertaking.

Subject Matter Details

Policies or Program

Arranging meetings with regards to building better bridges of communication between Apotex and government officials. Discuss Apotex contributions to innovation and research and development. Discuss Apotex contributions to the Health Care sector.

Regulation

Legislation relating to patented medicines — Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations — provisional nature of judicial determinations of proceedings brought by first persons; inadequacy of section 8 damages.

The “Registry of Lobbyists” information provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau attending Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Apotex registered to lobby the Government of Canada 3 days after Barry Sherman reported that he had meet privately with 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The private meeting between Justin Trudeau and Barry Sherman (Apotex) was made public a few days before Barry Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser.

“Serman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues” The Canadian Jewish News (CJN), August 21, 2015

Barry Sherman meeting and “discussing various issues” with 2015 election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser and Apotex registering to lobby the incoming Government of Canada 2 days before the Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser meant Justin Trudeau violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act – accepting prohibited gift or other advantage. Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act because the meeting before the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser provided an opportunity to further the private interests of 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau & registered lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex).

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,” wrote McIntosh, in a recommendation to open a full investigation into the case.

“There is basis to conclude that Mr. Sherman is in breach of … the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct as a consequence of his involvement in the organization of a fundraising event for the (Liberal Party),” McIntosh wrote on Jan. 18, 2017.

Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd checked the box, “I agree,” the same day.

The Government of Canada document also provides the primary motive for the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

“Despite the available penalties under the current act, no one has ever been charged, or convicted of an offence under the Lobbying Act” Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd @ ETHI Committee Meeting

Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have forfeited/lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.

Toronto Police investigation of Barry & Honey Sherman murders sealed by the Crown to cover up who committed the targeted murders

There is compeling evidence that shows that 5 years ago Justin Trudeau conspired to have his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers murdered. Justin Trudeau had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman. An ongoing RCMP investigation of his election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner and an Apotex lawsuit put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. The fundraiser was a prohibited gift. Justin Trudeau accepting the prohibited gift meant that he violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act.

Violating the Lobbying Act had no legal consequences for either Justin Trudeau or Barry Sherman.

“The RCMP have never, ever followed up. The RCMP then rubber-stamps or whitewashes whatever Lobbying Act activity has happened.” House of Commons

However, violating the Canada Elections Act meant that Justin Truduea could have lost his seat in the House of Commons and he couldn’t be a candidate in another election for 5 years. It would have meant the end of his political career.

“The Canada Elections Act also sets out a series of disqualifications that apply exclusively to electoral candidacy. … Current disqualifications include the following: A person found guilty of an illegal or corrupt electoral practice (as defined in section 502 of the Canada Elections Act) is disqualified from contesting a federal election for either five or seven years and, if he or she has been elected, may be required to vacate his or her seat in the House of Commons. Illegal practices include wilfully exceeding the spending limit or obstructing the electoral process. Corrupt practices include voting more than once or accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage ” Parliament of Canada

Conspiracy

465 (1) (a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;

A Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants” provided motive for Justin Trudeau to conspire to commit murder.

The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. That court order put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. Justin Trudeau could have been “required to vacate his seat in House of Commons” for violating the Canada Elections Act – accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

On December 13, 2017, the day of the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman, Justin Trudeau had both the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner removed as commissioners. Their removal was done during ongoing investigations by both commissioners into Justin Trudeau violating federal laws while campaigning in the 2015 federal election. Both commissioners were essentially fired for investigating Justin Trudeau for violating federal laws during the 2015 election campaign.

The 10 NOV 2017 Court Order and Justin Trudeau removing the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman are elements of a conspiracy to commit murder. The RCMP are involved. They became involved the day the Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers.

Lobbying Act
Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

The RCMP started investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers after the Lobbying Commissioner found evidence that federal laws were broken by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada (OCL)

A Nov 3, 2016 OCL taped recorded interview with Barry Sherman was the primary material evidence OCL used to have RCMP launch a “full investigation” of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser. OCL determined the tape recording provided evidence Justin Trudeau broke federal laws. Apotex filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner regarding the redacted name in transcripts of that Nov 3, 2016 taped recorded interview.

The Toronto Police know who murdered Barry and Honey Sherman. So does the Crown. The Crown sealed the Toronto Police murder investigation files and evidence to protect the people who committed the murders for Justin Trudeau’s benefit.

Crime scene evidence: restraint marks, Honey Sherman’s bloody lip & nose, the surreptitious entry, the person who entered the Shermans’ home Dec 14, 2017 for 29 minutes & the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers implicates RCMP officers in their murders.

Crime scene evidence shows murderers gained access to the Sherman home by the front door. No forced entry means Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers knocked on front door. It is plausible that Honey Sherman let her murderers in after her murderers identified themselves as police officers. Restraint marks and Honey Sherman’s bloody lip and nose supports assertion that she was forcibly restrained by police officers.

Keable Commission supports assertion that RCMP officers are viable suspects in Barry & Honey Sherman targeted murders. 15 RCMP officers were charged/tried for: conspiracy, B&E, kidnapping & forcible detention. Indicted RCMP officers claimed they “were just following (PM Pierre Trudeau) orders.

Former Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks.

Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders also stated that his officers interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman while they lay dead in the basement.

“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,”

Note, only one person entered the home yet Police Chief Saunders said Toronto Police knew why “they” were there – they means the person of interest was part of an organization. The RCMP is an organization. RCMP were at the time investigating Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser/fundraisers. Wiretapping is tool in RCMP investigations, especially when it involves the Prime Minister of Canada. It is highly plausible that a RCMP officer entered the Shermans’ home to remove wiretaps and/or incriminating evidence.

Parties to offence

Where two or more persons are playing an active role in the commission of a crime, each becomes a co-principal to that offence. When this is the case, it is not necessary to determine exactly which person committed which element of the offence. Rather, every act done to commit the offence is deemed to have been committed by all co-principals. A person can be a principal to an offence despite not actually committing the offence with their own hands. This occurs where they instead direct an innocent agent to commit the offence in their place.

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim alledge Nova Scotia shooter used assault rifles

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada. A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the mass murders. Fintrac documents for a transfer of $500,000 on March 30, 2020 from the RCMP to Gabriel Wortman identified Gabriel Wortman as a RCMP agent.

The RCMP gave $475,000 ($500,00 – $25,000 transfer fees) to alledge mass murderer Gabriel Wortman on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op involving convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon.

“The withdrawal of $475,000 in cash by the man who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April matches the method the RCMP uses to send money to confidential informants and agents, sources say.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

RCMP CI Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op. RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.
Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. As a drug trafficker Griffon had the means to obtain the weapons he needed to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

9 charges filed against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);

Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;

Unauthorized possession of a firearm;

Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Analysis of evidence in the “targeted” killings of Barry & Honey Sherman concludes murders were politically motivated

5 years ago Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed. Mass media and government officials claim no motive for the double homicides has been found despite there being substantial evidence to support an inference that the murders were politically motivated.

What was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? To answer that one must first examine why lead Toronto police investigator, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes publicly stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed? “I believe they were targeted,” The word “targeted” was specifically chosen to describe Toronto’s 2017 homicides #64 and #65. What was Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes revealing to the public by calling the double homicides “targeted” killing?

Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. That’s what Toronto Police were telling Canadians when they said Barry & Honey Sherman were “targeted” & killed. Toronto Police stated publicly from the very beginning that “there was no sign of forced entry into their home”. That is referred to as surreptitious entry. Toronto Police publicly stating that the murderers entered the home of Barry and Honey Sherman via surreptitious entry is of major significance. It supports the discovery finding that the Shermans were targeted and killed by a “government authority”.

Evidence of markings being found on the wrists of both Barry and Honey Sherman, indicated they had been tied up, yet no ties or ropes were found at the scene. This too has major significance in that it confirms both Barry and Honey were restrained, forcibly detained (were handcuffed) before being killed. Both being forcibly restrained, leaving marks, provides evidence it wasn’t a murder suicide. No ties or ropes were found at the scene proves the killers took the “restraints” (handcuffs) with them.

Restraint markings on their wrists, the Toronto Police Services stating that the Shermans were targeted and killed and that their murderers gained access via surreptitious entry all lead to the conclusion that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed by police officers. Which police officers? RCMP. Why?

1) Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. A RCMP officer is a government authority. They are authorized by the federal government to uphold and enforce government enacted and imposed laws across Canada.

2) RCMP officers contend that they are authorized by government appointed adjudicators to enter private premises to install listening or video devices or recover evidence in support of “an ongoing criminal investigation”. The power so granted authorizing surreptitious entry allows the RCMP to utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or via Realtor lock box, or simply through trickery or coercion. Further, if RCMP officers acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them “to effect such entry by overcoming force” a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.

Motive for targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016. During the tape recorded interview, Mr Sherman openly discussed a fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex (Barry Sherman) filed a law suit (Court number T-761-17) seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording.

Justin Trudeau responded by paying the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman suit & a court hearing that was to be held on Thursday, the 8th day of February 2018, at 9:30 to address the Lobbying Commissioner KAREN SHEPHERD refusing to comply with a court order that “redacted” documents that detail the taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex.

The court order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in an ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with the court order would prove Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED Justin Trudeau’s name from the transcript in order to conceal that Justin Trudeau broke the law:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign.”

In an email to Brian H. Greenspan photographic evidence was provided that showed that the Sherman’s home was under surveillance by the RCMP.

Only the RCMP has jurisdiction (government authority) to conduct a criminal investigation for the Federal government’s Office of Commissioner of Lobbying.

Direct quote from Administering the Lobbying Act (December 2011) :

“The peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the matter, generally the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in the case of the Lobbying Act, will consider the case in consultation with legal counsel at the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors at the Department of Public Prosecutions. Together, they will determine whether or not to lay charges.”

Since the ongoing RCMP investigation involved a high profile government of Canada official the RCMP claim that they are authorized to make surreptitious entry, or simply through trickery or coercion. RCMP officers also claim that they are permitted “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”.

In Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, it was contended that s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code authorized trespass by the police in order to effect an arrest. The basis is that the police (RCMP) are entitled, in limited circumstances, to enter private property without consent to effect an arrest – detain a person.

People detained or arrested by police officers and the RCMP are usually forcibly restrained using handcuffs, either metal or plastic. A traditional form of plastic handcuffs are cable ties. Cable ties leave unique marks on wrists of those being arrested by police (RCMP). Forensic pathologist confirmed that the markings on the wrists of both Shermans, indicates they had been restrained (forcibly detained) with ties before they were murdered. Toronto Police confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers took the restraints with them.

Why would the restraints be removed from the wrists of the victims and from the crime scene? Restraints are material evidence that could be traced back to the murderers. Canadian police forces have and use a specific type of cable tie. The markings on the wrists of Barry and Honey Sherman can be matched with impressions made by any specific type of tie mfg today.

Crime scene evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered by police officers. Both had restraint marks on their wrists (were handcuffed) & Honey Sherman had cuts on her lip & nose, suggesting that she had struggled with assailants & was forced face down on pool tiles. The evidence is telling us that at some point Honey Sherman sensed that the intruders were going to kill her and out a fear for her life she put up a fight. The cuts on her lip & nose is telling us she was forced to the ground by a police officer(s) who used his or her knee to forcibly hold Honey Sherman’s head and face to the ground as they handcuffed Honey Sherman’s hands behind her back.

It is important to note that police officers and the RCMP do not have the authority to make surreptitious entry or “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”. The Supreme Court of Canada, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697 Date: 1984-12-20 ruled that police surreptitious entry is unlawful:

“Until such time as Parliament speaks specifically on this matter, I am of the view that an unlawful entry to install a listening device is an unauthorized and unjustified use of police powers. If the authorization to intercept did purport to sanction such an entry, the authorization would be invalid in that respect. Judges simply do not have the power to permit anyone, even police officers, to commit unlawful acts.“

There’s ample evidence to charge Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland with high treason and treason

Two intelligence reports provides ample evidence that Germany is Canada, the UK, the USA and Europe‘s enemy. These two intelligence reports provides ample evidence that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland have committed and are committing high treason and treason. Both assisted Germany, an enemy of Canada, wage COVID-19 biological warfare against Canada. Vaccines manufactured by Germany are biological weapons – contains SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10 and a modified spike protein that acts as a key to facilitate new coronavirus infections.

The WHO, CDC, Health Canada and Germany would have you believe that Germany’s vaccines instructing cells to make SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein is harmless yet they all know SARS-CoV-2 and all common human coronaviruses need the spike protein to invade cells to replicate and make you sick.

The WHO, CDC and other health authorities know and have repeatedly stated:

“the novel coronavirus uses spike protein like a key to gain entry to our cells; once inside, the virus is free to replicate, making us sick. The spike protein binds to a protein on the surface of our cells called ACE2, triggering uptake of the virus particle and eventually membrane fusion.”

Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack was waged to obtain $billions for Canada’s enemy, Germany and the insolvent UN. The financial objectives of Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological attack was made known at the World Economic Forum in January 2020:

Government and police forensic labs can prove Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are biological weapons by looking for SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10.

“Consistent with our observations, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, ORF10 inhibited MAVS expression and facilitated viral replication. In brief, our results reveal a novel mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 inhibits the innate immune response; that is, ORF10 induces mitophagy-mediated MAVS degradation by binding to NIX.” …

“ORF10 plays a vital role at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our study, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the degradation of MAVS and the replication of SARS-CoV-2.”

Source : immunology study SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy

SARS-COV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10 was intentionally added to Germany’s COVID-19 vaccines to facilitate/cause new coronavirus infections. Causing new SARS like infections ensures Canada’s enemy, Germany obtains $billions in vaccine sales.

Germany’s COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer BioNtech informed you in a press release just how dangerous their vaccines are. Their labs use biological weapons agent handling safety protocols.

You only need decontamination chambers and hazmat suits if you’re handling/using infectious biological agents – “bioengineered or synthesized component” of a biological weapon:

“the term “biological agent” means any microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing— (A) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human” US Code 18 USC § 178(1)

Germany’s mRNA vaccines contain 2 bioengineered or synthesized components of SARS-CoV-2. Germany’s vaccines contain SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein (a modified/mutated form) and the viral protein that made SARS-COV-2 a novel coronavirus, ORF10

Both Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are guilty of high treason and treason because they are now assisting Canada’s enemy, Germany, wage Germany’s WWIII military campaign in Ukraine. The Germany and Ukraine provoked war in Ukraine is being waged for Germany and its Fourth Reich EU.

The US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 informs us that German industrialists were given the task of building Germany’s Fourth Reich. The Fourth Reich was to be an economic empire. The EU is Germany’s Fourth Reich.

“The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire – but not just German.”

Numerous EU states know that the EU is Germany’s Fourth Reich. Italy was the first to publicly inform its citizens that the EU is the Fourth Reich (Quarto Reich). The UK exited the EU when the majority realized that the EU represented the “odious apparatus of Nazi rule”. France wanted to exit Germany’s Fourth Reich EU too but Germany and the WHO initiated and lead the COVID-19 biological attack to prevent France from exiting the German Fourth Reich EU. Mass nation wide protests throughout France calling for Frexit ended when Germany’s COVID-19 co-conspirator, the World Health Organization, imposed social distancing (banned protests and opposition) and travel restrictions.

Few people realize that the EU was originally called the European Economic Community (EEC). It was subsequently renamed the European Community (EC) upon becoming integrated into the first pillar of the newly formed European Union. The one thing that has remained the same is that Germany controls/rules the Fourth Reich EU.

The “Elimination of German Resources for War: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Military Affairs” provides evidence that during WWII Germany (Europe, the UK, the USA, the USSR (Russia) and Canada’s enemy) made plans to build Germany’s economic empire, the German Fourth Reich EU:

During the occupation of the remainder of Europe they took the opportunity to lay the ground work for an economic empire which involved in direct affiliations of business relationships, literally, hundreds of thousands of individuals in the liberated areas, including such countries as France, Belgium, Holland, Norway, Yugoslavia, and Austria.

This economic network grew with government supervision and was carefully planned as an important component in the German scheme for the maintenance of an overwhelming political and economic power. Old established investments, contractual rights, personnel, and other assets were used to serve the objectives of the state.

With the defeat of Germany these assets previously used in out-right war take on a new meaning. They are the means whereby the ground work for rebuilding a new German war potential can be developed beyond the reach of the Allied occupation forces.

Link to the above excerpt from the US government subcommittee hearing …

The Parliament of Canada informs Canadians and Ontario police officers that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland can be charged and imprisoned for committing the criminal offences of high treason and treason.

Freedom from arrest has been confined to civil cases and does not entitle a Member to evade criminal law.

Any incident of a criminal nature in which a Member has been charged is not a matter where immunity from arrest will protect that Member. Matters of a criminal nature would include treason, felonies, all indictable offences, …

Members cannot claim freedom from arrest or imprisonment on a criminal charge. A Member of the House of Commons is in exactly the same position as any other citizen if he or she is suspected of, charged with, or found guilty of a crime, provided that it is unrelated to proceedings in Parliament.

… should the police arrest a Member outside the House on some criminal matter, the House of Commons is not entitled to intervene. In Canada, the administration of justice is a provincial responsibility. The Crown Attorney for the particular judicial district where the offence occurred would therefore prosecute any breach of the Criminal Code.

In Canada, the administration of justice is a provincial responsibility means Ontario police officers (OPP, Toronto Police Services, Ottawa Police and/RCMP) have jurisdiction and law enforcement authority to charge Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland with high treason and treason for assisting an enemy, Germany.

It is the Ontario police officers’ sworn duty to “be loyal to Canada, and uphold the Constitution of Canada”.

Ontario Police Services Act, oath or affirmation of office taken by a police officer, special constable or First Nations Constable:

“I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as (insert name of office) faithfully, impartially and according to law. So help me God“

COVID-19 didn’t destroy Canada’s economy, Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland did that by assisting Germany wage the COVID-19 biological warfare/war attack. COVID-19 didn’t violate Canada’s supreme law, the Constitution of Canada, Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland did by imposing measures that blatantly infringed on Canadians’ rights and freedoms.

Chrystia Freeland and other Canadian MPs are guilty of treason for being foreign agents for Germany

The World Economic Forum serves as a proxy for the German government. It serves Germany’s strategic interests. That was made abundantly clear throughout Germany and the WHO orchestrated COVID-19 biological warfare attack. Germany sponsored the heinous biological attack against the civilian population of the World in January 2020 at the World Economic Forum in Davos pursuant to and furtherance of Germany and the WHO’s objectives: 1) to obtain worldwide support of vaccinations and 2) to force world leaders to invest $billions in Germany made vaccines.

Germany sponsored the COVID-19 biological attack with funds Germany obtained from Chrystia Freeland and Justin Trudeau in January 2020. Documentation of the transfer of funds to Germany disclosed in Government of Canada financial report – “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020”

Every World Economic Forum meeting in Davos since COVID-19 has been about facilitating the Great Reset.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Professor Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.

What most Canadians don’t understand is that the WEF initiated Great Reset is Germany’s attempt to form its WWII envisioned Neuordnung (New Order) – a World government (the United Nations Organization) under German control.

WEF’s Davos Agenda, the Great Reset, relies on corrupt government officials like Chrystia Freeland betraying their own country by assisting WEF and our WWI and WWII enemy, Germany, form Neuordnung – rule the World.

Assisting the WEF, an agent of Germany, form a World government under German control amounts to treason.

46 (2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;

(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or

46 (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,;

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto;

Assisting Germany wage WWIII against Russia amounts to high treason because Freeland knows or ought to know that Germany instigated the Ukraine Russia proxy war to force NATO states to wage Germany’s WWIII military campaigns.

A proxy war occurs when a major power instigates or plays a major role in supporting and directing a party to a conflict but does only a small portion of the actual fighting itself

Chrystia Freeland and Justin Trudeau are now assisting Germany prepare to levy a war against Canada by deploying Canadian Armed Forces troops to Ukraine to fight a war that Germany instigated against our WWII ally Russia. Trudeau and Freeland are assisting Germany, an enemy of Canada in 2 World Wars, wage its WWIII military campaign in Ukraine. The use of CAF personnel to wage war for an enemy of Canada is defined by Canada’s criminal code as high treason:

(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland assisting Germany prepare to levy a war in Ukraine against Russia is high treason because the ultimate goal of Germany waging WWIII against Russia using CAF personnel and other NATO Waffen SS forces is World domination. Germany’s World domination agenda includes putting Canada under German control/rule – Neuordnung. It is a well known historical fact that NATO was formed using Nazi war criminals. NATO was originally formed to prevent Germany from initiating another World War.

The post WWII Brussels Treaty lead to the formation of NATO. Signatories of the Brussels Treaty agreed:

“To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression”.

Other treaties were drafted to prevent Germany from starting another war of aggression.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their declarations that only peace will emanate from German soil. According to the constitution of the united Germany, acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional and a punishable offence.

However, Germany turned NATO into its new Nazi Waffen SS forces. NATO is embedded with Nazi symbols. Its flag is embedded with the Nazi swastika. NATO headquarters was intentionally designed and built to form Nazi SS symbols because all who serve under the NATO banner serve Germany’s Fourth Reich EU as its new Nazi Waffen SS forces.

Germany attacked Russia first because US President Joe Biden supports Germany’s quest to form its WWII envisioned Neuordnung.

Joe Biden stated his intention to betray the USA by assisting Germany create a World government under German control in this CSPAN video:

“THE AFFIRMATIVE TASK WE HAVE NOW IS TO ACTUALLY CREATE A NEW WORLD ORDER BECAUSE THE GLOBAL ORDER IS CHANGING AGAIN. AND THE INSTITUTIONS THAT RULE … THAT WORKS SO WELL IN THE POST-WORLD WAR TWO ERA FOR DECADES THEY NEED TO BE STRENGTHENED. AND SOME HAVE TO BE CHANGED” Joe Biden

Least we forget that Germany started WWII by initiating war in Eastern Europe. Germany used Ukraine and Ukrainians to wage WWII, first against Poland and Russia and then against Allied Forces from France, Britain, the USA and Canada. Never forget that Ukraine assisted Germany kill Canadian, British, and American troops and millions of Russian and European civilians as 14th Waffen SS Division “Galicia”.

Government of Canada has documented proof that thousands of Ukrainians did in fact “volunteer” to serve in Germany’s 14th Waffen SS Division. Government of Canada documents informs Canadians that the Ukrainian 14th Waffen SS commited atrocities/war crimes for Germany in Poland and against their own people.

The Germany instigated war in Ukraine is the renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression. The stark reality is Germany is waging WWIII with the traitorous assistance of Joe Biden, Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland. Germany is waging WWIII using NATO and countries that defeated it in 2 World Wars.

Justin Trudeau is guilty of criminal negligence for quarantining suspected COVID-19 infected persons in motels and hotels

Throughout Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare attack Justin Trudeau intentionally put the lives and safety of Canadians at risks by mandating suspected COVID-19 infected travelers self-isolate/quarantine themselves in motels and hotels across Canada. Motels and hotels are public places, not health care facilities. Justin Trudeau showed wanton and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of Canadians. According to Canada’s criminal code Justin Trudeau is guilty of criminal negligence

Criminal negligence

219 (1) Every one is criminally negligent who

(a) in doing anything, or

(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,

shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.

Canadians couldn’t travel abroad during COVID-19 yet Justin Trudeau brought in hundreds of students from China (origin of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak) and housed them in motels and hotels across Canada. All of the students were suspected of being infected with COVID-19 when they arrived at various ports of entry. Some were sick when they arrived. Because the Trudeau government suspected they were infected with COVID-19 they were isolated/quarantined in motels and hotels, not in hospitals or quarantine facilities.

Isolation and quarantine are public health measures used to control the spread of contagious disease:

- Isolation is used to separate and restrict the movement of those who are ill with a communicable disease.

- Quarantine is used to separate and restrict the movement of those who are still well but who may have been exposed to a communicable disease.

The purpose of quarantine is clearly to prevent additional spread of contagious disease or environmental toxins within a specific population. Quarantining in motels and hotels defeats the purpose of quarantine. Quarantining in motels and hotels facilitates the spread of contagious disease within a specific population. Doing so “shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons”