Justin Trudeau remains the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

September 13, 2022, NCIO

There remains one person who had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman on December 13, 2017. That person was being investigated by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner at the time of the targeted murders. That person took extraordinary steps on the day of the murders to attempt to quash 2 ongoing investigations involving himself.

Who had the most to gain by the “targeted” murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Justin Trudeau did. Justin Trudeau would have lost his seat in House of Commons as a result of a Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants”. The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review.

At the time of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s 26 Aug 2015 election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner, as required by the Lobbying Act“

Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

Investigation continued

(9) The Commissioner may not continue an investigation under this section until any investigation or charge regarding the same subject-matter has been finally disposed of.

The Lobbying Commissioner and Justin Trudeau were unable to quash the Apotex lawsuit court order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal laws on December 20, 2017. An attempt was made by Justin Trudeau to quash/end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his 26 August 2015 fundraiser and the court order by replacing the Lobbying Commissioner.

On December 13, 2017, the day Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, Justin Trudeau had both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones. Link to December 13, 2017 video of the House of Commons appointments … “on division” – ParlVu

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” while campaigning in the 2015 federal election.

“Providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

Justin Trudeau’s actions on the day of the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers made Justin Trudeau a prime suspect. Justin Trudeau being convicted of violating ethics laws days later on December 20, 2017 made Justin Trudeau the one person to have motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman to:

end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
dismiss the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
prevent a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”

A conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act Section 502(2) (h.01) meant Justin Trudeau would lose his seat in the House of Commons for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, that the guest list was somewhere between 100 and 150 people and that he believed the proceeds were split between the Liberal Party of Canada and Levitt’s electoral district association. A ticket reportedly cost $1,500.” Macleans

Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. The Apotex lawsuit is Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review

Why would Justin Trudeau fear the Apotex lawsuit, not the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 campaign fundraiser? Parliament of Canada standing committee meeting involving Karen Shepherd informs you why:

The Apotex lawsuit posed a serious threat to Justin Trudeau’s political career. If Apotex was successful the lawsuit would have provided compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau had violated the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Highlights of the Federal Court Proceeding T-761-17 provides compelling evidence that the Apotex lawsuit was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Murdered because the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t defeat the court order of Prothonotary Kevin Aalto “requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants“. Court order issued 1 month before the December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Court order dated 10-NOV-2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary. 16 days after Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the Lobbying Commissioner tried December 29, 2017 to keep the redacted evidence implicating Justin Trudeau from being made public. Filed a motion for “Setting aside portions of the order of Prothonotary Aalto dated November 10, 2017 … those portions of the Order Under Appeal which preserved redactions contained in the Rule 318 Record and requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants;”

Justin Trudeau paid the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 (used Federal funding) in December 2017 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman/Apotex lawsuit.

“In December 2017, the Office received access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges. … An unanticipated court action against the Office resulted in unplanned legal costs of almost $300,000 in 2017–18. These additional costs have been paid through access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for litigation.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017–18 Departmental results report

According to the T-761-17 Federal Court documents (PDF backup of T-761-17 made available on NCIO website) a court hearing was to be held 08-FEB-2018 to address the Lobbying Commissioner refusing to comply with the decision of Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary dated 10-NOV-2017 that “redacted” documents that detail the (audio) taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from OCL transcripts in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the RCMP for violating the Lobbying Act. The RCMP investigation began with this statement:

The Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would conclude that private interests of Justin Trudeau (redacted) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

Justin Trudeau is a prime suspect in the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman because of the Apotex lawsuit – Federal Court Number T-761-17 and because of what transpired the day Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered, December 13, 2017. Justin Trudeau had Karen Shepherd removed as Lobbying Commissione, effective December 30, 2017.

“resolution of the House of Commons dated December 13, 2017, the Senate and House of Commons have approved the appointment of Nancy Bélanger as Commissioner of Lobbying … on the recommendation of the Prime Minister … effective December 30, 2017” Order in Council PC Number: 2017-1564

The Lobbying Commissioner was removed during an ongoing Apotex lawsuit pertaining to an active RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Toronto Police Services stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were in fact “targeted”. That means the murders were planned and deliberate and if the police found evidence that money was payed to have the Shermans murdered the murders was “contracted murder”.

“murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.” Criminal Code of Canada 231 (3)

The planned and deliberate murders of Barry and Honey Sherman resulted in:

ending the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
the dropping/dismissal of the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
preventing Justin Trudeau from losing his seat in the House of Commons for a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from registered government lobbyist Barry Sherman/Apotex.

In a homicide criminal investigation that’s motive.

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

They died in vain because Justin Trudeau’s minority government is assisting Germany wage WWIII

Sorry my friend, you fought and died in vain. The US, Canada, France and UK governments dishonor your sacrifice by aiding & abetting Germany (Canada’s WWII and WWII enemy) and NATO (Germany’s new Nazi Waffen SS) initiate and wage its WWIII military campaign against Russia in Ukraine.

*Nazi swastika embedded in the NATO flag*.

*NATO HQ purposely designed to form the Nazi Germany SS insignia*

*The Flags of Germany’s Fourth Reich include the European Union flag and the NATO (Germany’s new Waffen SS) flag.*

Rest in peace knowing there are still some who honor your sacrifice by continuing your fight against all of the odious apparatuses of Nazi rule.

“Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous states have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. … we shall never surrender” Winston Churchill, 4 June 1940 Britain’s House of Commons

Germany attempting to establish a World government under German control is an odious apparatus of Nazi rule. The United Nations Organization (UNO) rule base system of government isn’t about governing according to the rule of law it has always been about putting the World under German rule (control of or dominion over an area or people) .

The EU is another odious apparatus of Nazi rule. The EU is Germany reoccupied Europe. Germany controls/rules it.

The WHO has always been an odious apparatus of Nazi rule. The WHO continued Nazi Germany’s concentration camp medical experiments immediately after WWII. The WHO subjected WWII survivors and refugees to vaccine medical experiments (See above screenshot). The WHO lead the Germany sponsored and orchestrated COVID-19 biological warfare attack and Germany and the WHO (UN’s eugenics agency) conducted mRNA vaccine medical experiments on the World’s civilian population.

The WHO has been researching and developing sterilization vaccines for the developing World since 1972. The WHO targeting the developing World provides ample evidence that the WHO is the UN’s eugenics agency. The stated purpose of developing infertility vaccines is birth control. Birth control prevents births. The UN’s own rules defines the crime of genocide as:

“Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”

World Bank’s “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction”

Note that the first victims of Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare attack were the World’s senior citizens. They were specifically targeted for they were the ones who witnessed Germany’s WWII atrocities. They were the last remaining survivors of Germany’s WWII. They were WWII veterans who defeated Germany and prevented Britain, Canada and the USA from being placed under Nazi Germany rule.

Germany’s proxy, the World Economic Forum boasting that Justin Trudeau and more than half of his cabinet are double agents

“What we are very proud of now are the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, president of Argentina … so we penetrate the cabinets. … I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum” Germany’s proxy Klaus Schwab

Note that the head of the World Economic Forum outright stated that “we penetrate the cabinets”. In the video clip Klaus Schwab outed Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and more than half of Trudeau’s cabinet as foreign agents.

NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada

“The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates redaction or deletion of information by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction amd deletion by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada”

The NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada was delivered to Justin Trudeau on September 3, 2019. 8 days later Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election on September 11, 2019.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

NSICOP repeated in its annual report 2020 titled – Espionage and Foreign Interference, that foreign states or individuals acting on their behalf, “penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives”.

Public Safety Canada is aware of the World Economic Forum’s foreign interference activities.

Foreign governments and entities regularly seek to influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in lawful and transparent ways in Canada, including through routine diplomatic engagement. However, some foreign states engage in acts of foreign interference to advance foreign political interests and influence federal officials and decision-makers. As part of these efforts, they may employ individuals, some of whom may be high profile, to act on their behalf without disclosing ties to the foreign state.

One such person who is employed by Germany’s proxy, “to act on their behalf” is Chrystia Freeland – active World Economic Forum Board of Trustees member. Chrystia Freeland joined the World Economic Forum and officially became a double agent on January 25, 2019.

“The Forum is chaired by Founder and Executive Chairman Professor Klaus Schwab. It’s guided by a Board of Trustees, exceptional individuals who act as guardians of its mission and values” World Economic Forum

Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers

Published: Dec 15, 2023
Justin Trudeau is involved in the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Justin Trudeau had motive. At the very least Justin Trudeau counseled an offence that resulted in the murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Accordingly, Justin Trudeau could be charged with murder.

Person counselling offence

22 (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.

Idem

(2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence that the other commits in consequence of the counselling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.

Definition of “counsel”

(3) For the purposes of this Act, “counsel” includes procure, solicit or incite.

The December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman has everything to do with Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

The August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser was deemed a “prohibited gift” by 2 federal laws – the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. MP Justin Trudeau violated the 2 federal laws by attending the fundraiser because Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company Apotex had registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before he and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

Accordingly, the Office of Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau for violating the Lobbying Act. Because the Lobbying Commissioner implicated Barry Sherman by having the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser Barry Sherman filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner and REDACTED third party defendant Justin Trudeau.

The lawsuit was filed because the Lobbying Commissioner concealed that Justin Trudeau was the one who broke federal laws, not Barry Sherman. The Lobbying Commissioner concealed Justin Trudeau’s Lobbying Act offence by redacting Justin Trudeau’s name.

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, and that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaigns,”

The above statement informs Canadians that the REDACTED name wasn’t Barry Sherman because his name is included “unredacted” in the statement above. The REDACTED name could only be either 2015 election campaign candidates Michael Levitt or Justin Trudeau because the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser that was being investigated by the RCMP was for Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Phil McIntosh, director of investigations at the Office of the Lobby Commissioner stated:

“while conducting the administrative review, the directorate found evidence indicating that Mr. Sherman engaged in political activities that risk creating a sense of obligation on the part of one or more public office holders” through the fundraising event held at his home on Aug. 26, 2015.

We know Justin Trudeau was the subject of the RCMP investigation because:

1) the Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

“Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would therefore conclude that the private interests of Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

2) the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying initiated the investigation based on a tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, … ” Macleans

Justin Trudeau tried to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit just days before the targeted murders by giving the Lobbying Commissioner $400,000 to fight the lawsuit.

The Lobbying Commissioner receiving access to a “special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges” eliminated Michael Levitt as the name of the person the Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED.

Despite having received $400,000 in misappropriated public funds the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t quash the Apotex lawsuit and a court order requiring her to unredact Justin Trudeau‘s name – the third party and “a defendant” in the Apotex lawsuit.

Because the Lobbying Commissioner failed to quash the Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit Justin Trudeau had her removed as the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders – December 13, 2017.

On December 13, 2017 Justin Trudeau committed the offence of obstruction of justice by having both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones.

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from lobbyists.

It is imperative Canadians know and realized that the Apotex lawsuit threatened Justin Trudeau’s political career. The lawsuit could have resulted in Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

Canada Elections Act

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; …

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

Justin Trudeau went to great lengths to quash the Apotex lawsuit (Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review) days before Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered.

Obstruction of justice is committed when the accused (Justin Trudeau) wilfully attempts to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in an existing or proposed judicial proceeding. The most extreme form of obstruction is the killing of a witness or a plaintiff in a judicial proceeding.

On December 13, 2017 “Apotex lawsuit plaintiff Barry Sherman” and his wife Honey Sherman were targeted and killed.

Motives for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman:

1) Terminate the RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau for accepting a prohibited gift (26 Aug 2015 campaign fundraiser) from registered government lobbyist (registered 24 Aug 2015) Barry Sherman.

2) Terminate an Apotex/Bernard Sherman lawsuit in which Justin Trudeau (REDACTED) was a third party defendant.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are misusing tax dollars to buy votes

Published: July 6, 2023

Since September 2022 Justin Trudeau has been misusing tax dollars to buy votes. The latest campaign of buying votes is Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s Grocery Rebate.

The Grocery rebate was purposely attached to Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s budget. Its is a blatant attempt at vote buying. A federal election wasn’t called, yet, however the House of Commons (your elected representatives) had to vote to either pass or defeat the March 28, 2023 tabled budget. A budget is automatically a confidence measure that would force an election if defeated.

The Grocery Rebate is one of many vote buying measures Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are using to stay in office. A cheque is in the mail if your elected representatives passes the “Vote for Us” budget. If the House of Commons didn’t pass their budget voters wouldn’t get the money.

In the meantime, since September 2022 Justin Trudeau has been misusing tax dollars to buy votes. Over $4.5 billion was taken to fund Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s vote buying campaign.

Justin Trudeau initiated his vote buying campaign September 13, 2022 by announcing that he was going to put “more money back in the pockets of the middle class”. The Canadian government defines “middle class” as a four-person family earning $45,000–130,000.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s $4.5 billion vote buying measures include:

Increase the Goods and Services Tax Credit

Dental Benefit to children under 12 who do not have access to dental insurance

The one-time top-up to the Canada Housing Benefit

An increase to the Old Age Security (OAS) pension for seniors 75 years and older.

doubling the Canada Student Grant amount and waiving interest on Canada Student Loans.

All have one purpose. Help Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland stay in office and/or get re-elected.

What Canadians don’t realize is that the vote buying money is being taken from your tax dollars to help Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland stay in office. They’re essentially pickpocketing. They’re taking your money and giving it to someone else.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are campaigning for an election that hasn’t been called yet. They’re misusing tax dollars for buying votes before an election is called because their actions is defined by the Canada Elections Act as offering bribe. Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are skirting federal election laws.

Canada Elections Act

Offering bribe

282.7 (1) No person shall, during an election period, directly or indirectly, offer a bribe to influence an elector to vote or refrain from voting, or to vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate or registered party, at the election.

Germany redacted by Justin Trudeau in national security and intelligence investigation report on foreign interference

Published: Mar 7, 2023

“The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates redaction or deletion of information by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction amd deletion by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada”

“What we are very proud of now are the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, president of Argentina … so we penetrate the cabinets. … I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum” Germany’s proxy Klaus Schwab

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

The World Economic Forum is and has always been operating on Germany’s behalf. That is the World Economic Forum’s primary mission.

“On being elected, Members of the House of Commons become trustees of public confidence. Members must be seen to be impartial and to derive no personal benefit or gain from their decisions. Various attempts have been made over the past 25 years to define what constitutes a conflict of interest and to devise rules regarding Members improperly using their influence, using insider information, and furthering their private interests.” …

Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders … applies to Cabinet Ministers, Secretaries of State, Parliamentary Secretaries and other senior public office holders (full-time Governor in Council appointees). It requires that, on appointment to one of these offices, the office holders are to arrange their private affairs so as to prevent real, potential or apparent conflicts from arising. They are not to solicit or accept money or gifts; not to assist individuals in their dealings with government in such a way as to compromise their own professional status; not to take advantage of information obtained because of their positions as insiders;”

House of Commons

Given that service in Parliament is a public trust, the House of Commons recognizes and declares that members are expected

(a) to serve the public interest and represent constituents to the best of their abilities;

(b) to fulfill their public duties with honesty and uphold the highest standards so as to avoid real or apparent conflicts of interests, and maintain and enhance public confidence and trust in the integrity of each member and in the House of Commons;

(c) to perform their official duties and functions and arrange their private affairs in a manner that bears the closest public scrutiny, an obligation that may not be fully discharged by simply acting within the law;

(d) to arrange their private affairs so that foreseeable real or apparent conflicts of interest may be prevented from arising, but if such a conflict does arise, to resolve it in a way that protects the public interest; and

(e) not to accept any gift or benefit connected with their position that might reasonably be seen to compromise their personal judgment or integrity except in accordance with the provisions of this code.

Trudeau Foundation used by Germany for foreign interference activities during 2015 federal election

Published on: May 11, 2023

Foreign interference activities by Germany influenced the 2015 federal election. Donations to the Trudeau Foundation during the 2015 federal election campaign were made to promote and influence one specific 2015 election campaign candidate – Justin Trudeau.

A $928,000 gift to the Trudeau Foundation from European Climate Foundation founder and EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain to 2015 federal election candidate Justin Trudeau was offered to obtain $2.65 billion from the Government of Canada.

The gift, $428,000 in 2015 (Justin Trudeau was a 2015 federal election candidate) & another $500,000 donation in 2016 by McCall MacBain (was the concurrent Chair of the Trudeau Foundation and the Chair of the European Climate Foundation) is defined by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act as Foreign Influenced Activities, which is another term for Foreign Interference.

“Foreign interference includes harmful activities undertaken by foreign states, or those acting on its behalf, that are clandestine, deceptive, or involve a threat to any person to advance the strategic objectives of those states to the detriment of Canada’s national interests.” Public Safety Canada

Both Justin Trudeau and McCall MacBain broke the law during the 2015 federal election campaign. The gifts constitutes a bribe.

119 (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years who

(a) being the holder of a judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by them in their official capacity, or

(b) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to a person mentioned in paragraph (a), or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by that person in their official capacity.

McCall MacBain indirectly paid a member of Parliament almost a $1 million to influence (solicit) Justin Trudeau to pledge, in his official capacity as Prime Minister of Canada, $2.65 billion to climate change. Just one month after being elected Justin Trudeau pledged $2.65 billion to climate change.

The Conflict of Interest Act & Canada Elections Act prohibited the 2015 election candidate MP Justin Trudeau and the Trudeau Foundation from accepting the $928,000 gift from EU climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain.

Elections Canada

Prohibition on using foreign funds

“A third party must not use funds from a foreign entity to pay for regulated activities. It must not circumvent, or attempt to circumvent, the prohibition or collude with any other person or entity for that purpose.”

A foreign entity includes:

a corporation or entity organized outside Canada that does not carry on business in Canada, or whose only activity in Canada is to influence electors to vote or refrain from voting, either in general or for a particular candidate or registered party in the election.

During the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation was a third party and McCall MacBain’s European Climate Foundation was a foreign entity.

Evidence supporting the charge that a foreign entity did in fact donate a gift of $928,000 to the Trudeau Foundation to influence Justin Trudeau in his official capacity as Prime Mister of Canada was first made known in the National Post article “Money began to rain on Trudeau Foundation once Justin took over Liberals, analysis shows” In that article it was confirmed that,

“one in six donors have affiliations with organizations currently lobbying the government”.

The largest donors in 2015, when Justin Trudeau was a 2015 election candidate, and in 2016, soon after Justin Trudeau became Prime Minster and pledged $2.65 billion to the climate change fund (European Climate Foundation a benefactor), where made by the European Climate Foundation. The foreign entity was founded by McCall MacBain in 2008. The foundation’s aims are to promote/lobby for the EU and its climate and energy policies.

Foreign donations to the Trudeau Foundation jumped from $53,000 in the 2014 fiscal year to $535,000 in 2016 — a ten-fold increase, because of just one donor, the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain and his Switzerland-based European Climate Foundation.

The EU and its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain have been responsible for the majority of the increase in foreign donations and they were the largest foreign donors of 2015 federal election campaign candidate Justin Trudeau. The Switzerland-based foundation donated prohibited gift of $428,000 in 2015 and another prohibited gift of $500,000 in 2016. A red flag was raised by statement of fact foreign “gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada”.

“A National Post analysis of the Trudeau Foundation’s public disclosures has found that gifts to the foundation have increased significantly since Justin Trudeau’s April 2013 election as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. The amount of money contributed to the foundation by foreign donors has grown each year since Trudeau claimed the party’s leadership. Moreover, a significant proportion of the charity’s donors, directors and members have ties to companies and organizations that are actively lobbying the federal government.”

Foreign interference activities by the EU using its climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain continued after the 2015 federal election.

On September 9, 2016 the Trudeau Foundation reported it had received the largest gift in the Foundation’s history. A record $1 million was donated to the Trudeau Foundation by the Foundation’s Chair McCall MacBain. However, the $1 million donation was never reported in any annual reports.

The original article reporting the receipt of $1 million gift stated the following:

The largest gift in the Foundation’s history | Fondation Trudeau

An investigation would find that during the 2015 federal election the Trudeau Foundation engaged in prohibited “Conduct that is illegal or contrary to public policy”. The Trudeau Foundation engaged in foreign interference activities for Germany’s EU.

The Trudeau Foundation’s Annual Reports provides proof the Trudeau Foundation never reported (concealed) the $1 million donation from McCall MacBain. How many other major donations from foreign donors were made to the Trudeau Foundation (beneficiary Justin Trudeau) during a federal election but were hidden from the CRA, the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying, from the Office of the Ethics Commissioner, from the Commissioner of Canada Elections, from the Government of Canada and from the Canadian public?

The evidence informs Canadians that MP Justin Trudeau ‘wittingly’ took part in German government foreign interference activities during the 2015 federal election. Justin Trudeau continued to facilitate Germany’s foreign interference activities after being elected.

NOTE: Within 1 year the EU’s climate change lobbyist McCall MacBain donated almost $2 million to the Trudeau Foundation. MP/PM Justin Trudeau is a beneficiary of the Trudeau Foundation. House committee or the RCMP need to ask why the donations were made in 3 installments. Reasonable suspicion all 3 donations were for Justin Trudeau – payments for taking and giving the EU climate change lobbyist $2.65 billion.

McCall MacBain paid Justin Trudeau a down payment of $428,000 in 2015 to pledged $2.65 billion in federal funds once he was elected & another $500,000 in 2016, after Justin Trudeau completed the heist. The $1 million that the Trudeau Foundation received from McCall MacBain but never reported in its annual reports was the result of Justin Trudeau wanting more money for stealing $2.65 billion.

Justin Trudeau’s Candidate Campaign Returns Part 2a – Statement of Contributions Received for the 42nd general election ( October 19, 2015 ) shows Justin Trudeau declared the he received only $700 in donations from 1 donor. Where did Justin get the money to cover his election campaign expenses? Election expenses surely exceeded piddly $700 donation.

It is abundantly clear that foreign entries and governments, including China and Germany, used the Trudeau Foundation to indirectly and illegally contribute $millions to Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign.

This is the reality that Justin Trudeau, and a lot of Canadians refuse to acknowledge or accept. Only 26,391 Canadians voted for Justin Trudeau in the 2015 election. Only 1 person contributed to his election campaign.

Ukraine government committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. The Ukraine government recruiting and financing of mercenaries with the $billions the Ukraine government obtained from Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland is a gross violation of the “International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries“.

Affirming that the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these offences should be either prosecuted or extradited.

I, Paul W Kincaid, know for a fact that the Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and funded by Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland to wage the Germany provoked war in Ukraine. A Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary stayed at the motel where I live outside Moncton, New Brunswick. He moved out on November 14, 2022 to deploy to Ukraine as a mercenary. The mercenary told me he was being paid by the Ukraine government to conduct military operations against Russians in Ukraine.

The Ukraine government mercenary attempted to board an international flight from the Fredericton NB airport to the EU with an assault rifle fitted with a scope and suppressor on November 14, 2022. The Ukraine government’s mercenary is a civilian. He was reportedly wearing combat gear when he attempted to redeploy for his second 3 month deployment to Ukraine with the assault rifle. He wasn’t arrested even though he, a civilian, was in the possession of prohibited weapons and he tried to board an international commercial airline flight with an assault rifle and 2 prohibited long knives.

The incident at the Fredericton international airport should have made headlines news, but it was kept quiet because Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are involved in supporting/funding the Ukraine government’s illegal recruitment, use and financing of mercenaries.

The Ukraine government is using mercenaries recruited in Canada and other countries to conducted military operations against and in Ukraine villages and towns that are predominately inhibited by Russian civilians. The Ukraine government is essentially using mercenaries for ethnic cleansing and genocide. The $billions that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia are funnelling to Ukraine through the IMF is being used to fund the Ukraine government’s crimes against humanity and war crimes.

“War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law and occur in the state of armed conflict. The Rome Statute lists numerous acts that may constitute war crimes, including attacks on civilians, forcibly recruiting and using child soldiers, and destruction of educational and religious institutions.”

“(vii) Launching an indiscriminate attack resulting in loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects. The prohibition of indiscriminate attacks is part of customary international law (see Rule 11). Launching an indiscriminate attack constitutes an offence under the legislation of numerous States. Although not listed as such in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, an indiscriminate attack amounts in practice to an attack on civilians” Rule 156, International Committee for the Red Cross

“Ethnic cleansing constitute crimes against humanity and can be assimilated to specific war crimes. Furthermore, such acts could also fall within the meaning of the Genocide Convention.” the UN

Genocide Convention

Article I

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

The Ukraine government’s mercenary provided ample material evidence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the Ukraine government is committing war crimes with the support of Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland. The Ukraine government recruited and paid mercenary showed me a ballistic vest and helmet that he purchased online. He intended on using them in battle in Ukraine. The vest and helmet are material evidence that the Ukraine government and its mercenaries are committing the war crime called perfidy. The vest and helmet had a Canadian flag patch affixed to them. The mercenary isn’t a Canadian soldier. He was a civilian who became a Ukraine government mercenary to make money by killing people in Ukraine. Canadian soldiers are banned from joining Ukraine government’s mercenary forces.

“So for current CAF members, they are not permitted to be in the area, even if they were to be on leave,” Vice-chief of the defence staff Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen Global News report

The Ukraine government paid mercenary’s ballistic helmet had a Ukraine military insignia on one side and a Canadian flag patch on the opposite side. The vest had a Canadian flag patch affixed on the front. The mercenary said he was instructed to wear the Canadian flag patch during Ukraine’s military operations in the Ukraine Russia war. Wearing the Canadian flag patch in the armed conflict in Ukraine is perfidy – a war crime.

Rule 10 of Canada’s Code of Conduct (2005) states:

“Perfidy is a war crime.”

Perfidy is defined as:

“Acts inviting the confidence of adversaries and leading them to believe that they are entitled to protection or are obliged to grant protection under the Law of Armed Conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, constitute perfidy. In other words, perfidy consists of committing a hostile act under the cover of a legal protection (e.g., firing on a member of an opposing force who comes forward under the protection of a white flag).”

Geneva Conventions Act

Article 37 – Prohibition of perfidy

1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy.

Article 39 — Emblems of nationality

“1 It is prohibited to make use in an armed conflict of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict

Parliament of Canada – Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for a tryst he reportedly had with a 17 year old WPGA student

On June 22, 2020 a Twitter follower implied that she had spoken with Sophie Trudeau about a rumor that Sophie and Justin Trudeau were getting a divorce. In a tweet to @presscoreca the Twitter follower revealed that Justin Trudeau had a secret sexual relationship with a 17 year old student when he was a teacher at WPGA.

A tryst is a meeting between two people who are having a sexual relationship, especially a secret one. A teacher having a sexual relationship with a 17 year old student is statutory rape.

Diamond and Diamond Lawyers:

Statutory rape, makes it unlawful to have sex with a minor under the “age of consent.”

The Department of Justice Canada website defines Justin Trudeau’s tryst with a 17 year old West Point Grey Academy student as sexual exploitation.

Sexual exploitation

A 16 or 17 year old cannot consent to sexual activity if:

their sexual partner is in position of trust or authority towards them, for example their teacher

The age of consent is raised to 18 when the older party is in a position of trust or authority over the other, the younger party is in a relationship of dependency with the owner, or if the relationship is exploitative.

The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that

“in the absence of evidence raising a reasonable doubt on this point, teachers are necessarily in a position of trust and authority towards their students” (R. v. Audet, 2 Supreme Court of Canada, Citation1996, 2 SCR 171 at para 44 (SCC)).

The combined effect of sections 150.1 and 153 of the Criminal Code is that if a person is in a position of trust or authority (e.g., a coach, teacher, etc.) over any child between the ages of 12 and 17, if the child is dependent on that other person, or if the relationship is exploitative of the child, that child is not able to legally consent. In these situations, only a person age 18 or older is capable of consent.

A U.K. Conservative MP was arrested in May of 2022 on suspicion of rape and sexual assault offences.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “A man was arrested on suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, abuse of position of trust and misconduct in a public office.”

Some of the alleged sexual offences were committed 20 years ago.

That means Liberal MP Justin Trudeau could be arrested too for suspicion of indecent assault, sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

The RCMP have a at least 3 material witnesses. One of the three material witnesses used Twitter to report that Justin Trudeau had a sexual relationship with a 17 year old student when he was a teacher at WPGA.

The second material witness is Justin Trudeau’s roommate and WPGA co-worker. Convicted child sex offender (child pornography, child exploitation) Christopher Charles Ingvaldson.

The third material witness is Sophie Trudeau. Section 4 of the Canada Evidence Act informs police officers that Sophie can be used as a competent and compellable witness:

Spouse of accused

(2) No person is incompetent, or uncompellable, to testify for the prosecution by reason only that they are married to the accused

British Columbia Evidence Act

Person charged and spouse competent

6 A person charged with an offence, and the spouse of the person charged, is a competent witness whether the person charged is charged solely or jointly with any other person.

Other witnesses who can be compelled to testify for the prosecution are the WPGA principal and teachers.

The Parliament of Canada website informs Canadians and Ontario police officers that Justin Trudeau can be charged and imprisoned for sexual assault, rape, and abuse of position of trust.

Any incident of a criminal nature in which a Member has been charged is not a matter where immunity from arrest will protect that Member. Matters of a criminal nature would include treason, felonies, all indictable offences, …

Members cannot claim freedom from arrest or imprisonment on a criminal charge. A Member of the House of Commons is in exactly the same position as any other citizen if he or she is suspected of, charged with, or found guilty of a crime, provided that it is unrelated to proceedings in Parliament.

The offences are unrelated to proceedings in Parliament. The deplorable offences were committed over 20 years ago when Justin Trudeau was a teacher at WPGA.

Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and was issued a writ of summons before. When he was a teacher at WPGA.

The screenshot below was obtained June 18, 2023. It lists all court proceedings against Justin Trudeau in the province of British Columbia. The first one on the list pertains to Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury court case when he was a teacher at WPGA.

BC court documents provides proof that Justin Trudeau was charged with a criminal offence and was ordered to stand trial

Justin Trudeau facing an impending conviction for accepting a prohibited gift from a registered lobbyist during the 2015 election campaign got Barry and Honey Sherman killed

If Barry and Honey Sherman hadn’t been targeted and killed Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage during the 2015 election campaign from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. The penalty for such a conviction was Justin Trudeau losing his seat in the House of Commons.

“Section 502 of the Canada Elections Act sets out other situations in which a conviction automatically results in the loss of the right to sit in the House of Commons. Under section 502(3), any person who is convicted of an illegal practice listed in section 502(1) (e.g., knowingly exceeding the election expenses limit) or a corrupt practice listed in section 502(2) (e.g., accepting prohibited gift or other advantage) becomes ineligible to sit in the House of Commons for five years (in the case of an illegal practice) or seven years (in the case of a corrupt practice).” Parliament of Canada

A Government of Canada document (screenshot below) provides prima facie evidence that Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Barry Sherman registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before the fundraiser on August 24, 2015.

Canada Elections Act

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, … not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

When Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser to determine for the Lobbying Commissioner if the fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act. The Government of Canada document is very compelling evidence that proves Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau. The document guaranteed that Justin Trudeau would have been convicted of accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman. Justin Trudeau was about to be convicted for accepting a prohibited gift (“providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada) from registered lobbyist Barry Sherman but the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman thwarted the impending conviction.

The only person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed was Justin Trudeau. Their murders meant Justin Trudeau averted a conviction and losing his seat in the House of Commons.

It’s important to note that Justin Trudeau was convicted just 7 days after the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman for accepting prohibited gift or other advantage from anithert registered lobbyist – Aga Khan.

Justin Trudeau didn’t lose his seat in the House of Commons because Justin Trudeau didn’t accept the prohibited gifts from registered lobbyist Aga Khan during an election campaign.

It’s imperative Canadians and Toronto Police homicide detectives know and understand that Barry Sherman was never in legal jeopardy for hosting the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Lobbying the Government of Canada is legitimate.

However, any elected or appointed government official who accepts a gift or other advantage from a registered lobbyist is breaking federal laws.

Despite it being illegal for registered lobbyist Barry Sherman to offer 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau a gift or other advantage Barry Sherman faced no severe punitive measures for hosting Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Lobbyist Barry Sherman (Apotex) had a right to communicate with elected government officials. However, Justin Trudeau faced severe punitive measures because of the RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser.

A conviction for accepting the prohibited gift or other advantage meant Justin Trudeau would have lost his job. Justin Trudeau wouldn’t be Prime Minister of Canada today or throughout COVID-19. German collaborator Chrystia Freeland wouldn’t be Deputy Prime Minister or the Finance Minister either.