Toronto Police know who had Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers murdered

The Toronto Police know who had Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed. Toronto Police know it was a contracted murders. Toronto Police investigation files were sealed because Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.

Toronto Police acted on a working theory for the December 13, 2017 “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau‘s Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Production orders were served on BMO Financial Group, CIBC and TD Bank on Feb 15, 2018. Why? To establish 1) who paid Barry & Honey Sherman’s murderers, 2) who were the murderers and 3) how much were the hitmen paid to target and kill Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers.

Production orders served on BMO made Justin Trudeau a viable and a prime suspect. BMO manages “Justin Trudeau’s Blind Trust”.

Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect the day Toronto Police confirmed that Barry and Honey Sherman were indeed targeted. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because Barry and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser the Lobbying Commissioner and the RCMP were investigating when Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over her and the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. RCMP were investigating to determine that the fundraiser was a “prohibited gift or other advantage”. If the 2015 election campaign fundraiser was a prohibited gift or other advantage that would mean Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act.

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is … a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

  • (a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons

RCMP were involved in the targeted murders because of their ongoing investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. RCMP were involved by wiretapping the Sherman residence. The person seen entering and exiting the Sherman residence on December 14, 2017 was identified and interviewed by the Toronto Police. The person’s identity wasn’t made public because he was a RCMP. RCMP were involved because they are the ones who claimed it was a murder suicide.

There is evidence that implicates RCMP officers in the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. There is physical evidence that both Barry and Honey Sherman were handcuffed. Both bodies had restraint marks on their wrists. Restraint marks provides evidence that the murderers handcuffed Barry and Honey Sherman but removed the restraints and took them with them.

Crime scene evidence indicates that Honey Sherman’s lip & nose were bloody. Both active and retired police officers know how Honey Sherman’s lip and nose could have been injured. Bloody lip & nose are injuries that are frequently sustained by resisting being arrested/handcuffed by a police officer.

Toronto Police know who killed Barry & Honey Sherman because of RCMP wiretapping, the Sherman’s own HD video security cameras (image above) and their neighbors’ security cameras recorded the politically motivated assassinations of December 13, 2017. The targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman will likely and intentionally remain a cold case because the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.

According to UK law, there never was a Queen of/in Canada

According to UK law Elizabeth II wasn’t Queen of/in Canada. She never was. UK Act of Settlement (law) states:

That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance

On June 2, 1953, during her coronation Elizabeth II was “made for ever incapable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm” because she “professe the Popish Religion“.

Profess means to affirm one’s faith in or allegiance to (a religion or set of beliefs).

The transcript of the coronation provides material evidence that Elizabeth II professed the Popish Religion, and according to UK law, Elizabeth II wasn’t Queen of/in Canada. Because Elizabeth II violated the law during her coronation every Canadian including every MP, MLA, RCMP, CAF officer and every adjudicator, barrister and solicitor “are thereby absolved of their Allegiance”.

Transcript of Elizabeth II‘s coronation states:

And I believe in the Holy Ghost,
The Lord and giver of life,
Who proceedeth from the Father and the Son,
Who with the Father and the Son together
is worshipped and glorified,
Who spake by the Prophets.
And I believe one Catholic and Apostolic Church.

Publicly affirming “And I believe one Catholic and Apostolic Church” means Elizabeth II “professe the Popish Religion”.

Furthermore, her ring is prima facie evidence that she is a Catholic – the Popish Religion. The Ring represents “the seal of Catholic Faith“.

Catholics are for ever prohibited by law from “inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same”

June 2, 1953 coronation transcript states:

Then the Keeper of the Jewel House shall deliver to the Archbishop the Queen’s Ring, wherein is set a sapphire and upon it a ruby cross: the Archbishop shall put it on the fourth finger of her Majesty’s right hand, and say:

Receive the Ring of kingly dignity,
and the seal of Catholic Faith:
and as you are this day
consecrated to be our Head and Prince,
so may you continue stedfastly
as the Defender of Christ’s Religion;
that being rich in faith
and blessed in all good works,
you may reign with him who is the King of Kings,
to whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen.

The Act of Settlement, provides irrefutable proof that there was no Queen Elizabeth II of/in Canada. There never was.

The UK’s Act of Settlement (law) also made Elizabeth II’s grandsons, William and Harry, forever incapable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm. Both were married in a Catholic Church. The Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith

 

Kraut Charles III’s first act regarding Canada will be to reimpose arbitrary rule and martial law in Canada

Kraut Charles III’s first act regarding Canada will be to reimpose arbitrary rule and martial law in and over Canada. Why? Canada doesn’t have a democracy because arbitrary rule and martial law is imposed in Canada by a German (Kraut) monarchy that was forever abolished in 1919. Each successive illegitimate German monarchy has obtained arbitrary rule in and over Canada with the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General of Canada.

Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General of Canada is arbitrary rule obtained by color of law and color of authority. Color of law and color of authority are defined as abuse of power. Power is often said to be arbitrary when it can be exercised according to the ‘will or pleasure’ of the person or group holding that power. Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General states:

“And We do declare Our Will and pleasure”.

The Governor General is appointed, not elected, “Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada” . Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada is a military title.

Arbitrary rule and martial law is established in Canada with the Letters Patent stating:

And We do declare Our Will and pleasure as follows:

I. We do hereby constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada, and appointments to the Office of Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada shall be made by Commission under Our Great Seal of Canada.

How can Canada be a democracy when the leader of Canada, Canada’s Parliament and Canada’s Armed Forces and the RCMP “paramilitary” force is appointed, not elected.  Canadian elections are held to conceal the historical and political fact that all Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor General of Canada effectively imposes arbitrary rule and martial law in Canada.  A democracy cannot exist when an unelected Governor General (a general is a military rank) is appointed head of state & commander-in-chief in and over Canada.

A foreign power (1919 abolished German ruler of the UK) effectively overthrows the dully elected and Constitutionally established Government of Canada by appointing an “unelected” high ranking “military officer”, a General, as de facto head of the Government of Canada and Commander-in-chief of all military forces in Canada.

How can Canada become a truly sovereign and independent state? By Parliament of Canada legally cutting all ties to the UK’s House of Windsor (alias assumed in 1917 by the UK’s WWI abolished German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy) or we become a republic and dismantle the Crown.

” … when the Canadian constitution was patriated Canada became a fully sovereign and independent state. While the 1982 patriation ended Canada’s legal ties to Great Britain, the expanded Canadian constitution retained the Crown as the concept of the Canadian state and as ultimate source of sovereign authority in Canada. This fully independent Canadian state could not have the British Crown as the source of its sovereign authority. Nor could it be a shared Crown. The only way Canada could be completely sovereign and independent was to decouple the Canadian Crown from its British counterpart.”

“the Crown is an inherently British entity and Canada cannot claim to be an independent state until our ties to the House of Windsor are cut or we become a republic. … Canada would effectively cease to be a constitutional monarchy if the United Kingdom decided to become a republic. The concept that underlies Canada’s entire system of government, the Crown, could be dismantled by another country.” Maclean’s, 3 February 2013 article ” The Queen of Canada is dead; long live the British Queen”

Advocating abolition of the monarchy is explicitly permitted.

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: McAteer v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONCA 578

DATE: 20140813

DOCKET: C57775

“[N]ot only is advocating abolition of the monarchy explicitly permitted, Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada, supra, but the prospect of separation from the United Kingdom and secession of a province both form the subject of legitimate legal discourse. Reference re Resolution to Amend the Constitution (“Patriation Reference”), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 753; Reference re Secession of Québec, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 217. Moreover, a political party dedicated to constitutional fracture can form Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition in Canada’s Parliament. David E. Smith, Across the Aisle: Opposition in Canadian Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013) at 85-86.” Ontario Court DOCKET: C57775

The US and UK governments knew in 1944 that Germany would start World War III

The US government initiated a “Program To Prevent Germany From Starting a World War III”. The program was discussed during the 1944 Quebec Conference. The first measures that were discussed to prevent Germany from starting WWIII was the demilitarization of Germany.

Section II of the top secret US briefing book revealed that to prevent Germany from starting WWIII Germany couldn’t be allowed to gain financial control of Europe.

The US government recommended that a program of large-scale reparations must be rejected for the following reasons:

2. If liberated Europe becomes economically dependent on Germany for reparations, her economic dependence cannot be broken off when reparations cease. The rest of Europe would continue to be dependent on Germany as a source of supply and as a market. These economic ties would also mean political ties. Germany would be right back where she was in the Thirties when she was able to dominate the rest of Europe economically through her industrial power and to exert her economic power to achieve political domination.

3. An economically powerful Germany ipso facto constitutes a military threat to world security.

The US government knew that soon after Germany gained economic control of Europe Germany would resume a policy of aggression.

“A long range program should be put into effect for the purpose of controlling the strategic elements in the German economy for a prolonged period .. It is essential that the foregoing strategic elements in the German economy be controlled lest through their use, the Germans once again proceed to build up various aspects of their industrial and economic structure for future militaristic and aggressive purposes.”

(1)The Nazi regime is essentially the culmination of the unchanging German drive toward aggression.

(aGerman society has been dominated for at least three generations by powerful forces fashioning the German state and nation into a machine for military conquest and self-aggrandizement. Since 1864 Germany has launched five wars of aggression against other powers, each war involving more destruction over larger areas than the previous one.
(bAs in the case of Japan, the rapid evolution of a modern industrial system in Germany immeasurably strengthened the economic base of German militarism without weakening the Prussian feudal ideology or its hold on German society.
(cThe Nazi regime is not an excrescence on an otherwise healthy society but an organic growth out of the German body politic. Even before the Nazi regime seized power, the German nation had demonstrated an unequalled capacity to be seduced by a militarist clique offering the promise of economic security and political domination in exchange for disciplined acceptance of its leadership. What the Nazi regime has done has been to systematically debauch the passive German nation on an unprecedented scale and shape it into an organized and dehumanized military machine integrated by all the forces of modern technique and science.

(2) The dissolution of the Nazi Party will not, therefore, by itself ensure the destruction of the militaristic spirit instilled into the German people over generations and given an overwhelming impetus in the last decade. This will of necessity be an arduous process, and for a long time to come it would be gambling with the very destiny of civilization to rely on an unproven German capacity for self-regeneration in the face of its proven capacity for creating new weapons of destruction to be used in wars of aggression. Therefore, in addition to disarming and weakening Germany as a military power, the interests of world security will best be promoted by:

(aForcibly reducing Germany’s industrial capacity so that she will cease to be a major economic, military and political power.
(bStrengthening all Germany’s neighbors politically and economically relatively to Germany. The more powerful her neighbors, the more likely she is to realize the futility of the militarist philosophy from which aggression ensues.

Germany has done what Roosevelt and Churchill tried to prevent. Germany has gained financial control of Europe via the EU and Germany has started WWIII by instigating the Ukraine Russia war. Germany instigated the Ukraine Russia war to force NATO states to wage WWIII as Germany’s new Waffen SS military forces.

Other nations knew that the defeated Germany still posed a significant threat after WWII. Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, signed the Brussels Treaty to create a collective defense alliance. Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg anticipated that Germany would one day resume a policy of aggression. The Brussels Treaty lead to the formation of NATO. Signatories of the Brussels Treaty agreed:

“To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression”.

Other treaties were drafted to prevent Germany from starting another war of aggression.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their declarations that only peace will emanate from German soil. According to the constitution of the united Germany, acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional and a punishable offence.

William, He is his father’s son

Under the law of the United Kingdom, high treason is the crime of disloyalty to the Crown. Offences constituting high treason include plotting the murder of the sovereign; committing adultery with the sovereign’s consort, with the sovereign’s eldest unmarried daughter, or with the wife of the heir to the throne.

High treason is why Elizabeth II had Princess Diana killed in a staged car accident. Diana was about to reveal that Prince Philip is William’s biological father. Charles couldn’t father a child because of generations of inbreeding/incest.

Elizabeth II married her third cousin Prince Philip. George VI married is 13th cousin. George V married his second cousin, German Princess Mary of Teck. King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra were 3rd cousins. Queen Victoria married her first cousin, German Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, in 1840. Inbreeding can cause detrimental recessive alleles to become paired, causing lethality or infertility.

DNA, paternity test will prove Philip is William’s biological father. These pictures don’t lie. He is his father’s son. When you say, “He is his father’s son,” similarly you mean he’s a chip off the old block, he’s just like his dad in the ways that count.

Younger Prince Philip on the left. Prince William on the right.

If adultery with the sovereign’s consort or with the wife of the heir to the throne is high treason what does the UK law say about their offspring, Prince William? How can William be the heir apparent when he was born as the result of an act of high treason.

Furthermore, …

The Act of Settlement prohibits Prince William from becoming King

On Friday 29 April 2011 Prince William of Wales and Miss Catherine Middleton were married in Westminster Abbey. The UK’s Act of Settlement (law) made William, forever incapable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm because William was married in a Catholic Church.

The Westminster Abbey Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith

Catholic Church Nicene Creed:

“We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.”

UK Act of Settlement (law) states:

That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance

Communion at the Inauguration of the Tenth General Synod of the Church of England at Westminster Abbey on Tuesday 24th November 2015. Elizabeth II in attendance:

Patent provides compelling evidence that ionosphere heaters are the root cause of global warming

Climate change has always been about making money for the Germany EU

European Parliament report, “Green Money: Reclaiming Quantitative Easing” informed the World what’s the Paris Agreement, Climate Action, Climate Change and carbon tax are all about. The report’s subtitle makes their intent perfectly clear -“Money Creation for the Common Good”

The initiatives were all formed as a direct result of the European Parliament report, “Green Money: Reclaiming Quantitative Easing”. Initiatives were made to save the insolvent Germany EU. The report states that the EU is the sole beneficiary of these money making schemes. All are being used to obtain $billions for the Germany EU under false pretenses. EU Parliament report states:

Europe’s economies have still not recovered from the 2008 financial crash. Austerity policies have failed to secure prosperity and employment opportunities, despite some success in calming the finance sector.

However both the EU and member state governments
have generally proved very reluctant to use significant
government spending on public services, infrastructure,
or welfare benefits as a way out of the crisis. Amongst
the consequences, we still see disastrously high rates of
unemployment in many EU countries, with figures for
Spain and Greece around 25%.

Looked at a different way, this continuing economic crisis could also be seen as an opportunity. The immediate need for economic revival should be put together with the more long-term need to restructure economies to fit them for what has been called “the great transition” – the historic shift from carbon-intensive and resource-intensive industrial production to smarter and greener ways of working and living. …

Proposal 3: The green QE programme operated by the EIB should be funded through the creation of new money by the ECB, together with the central banks of EU states outside the Eurozone.

Perhaps the most politically sensitive question about green QE is where the money would come from. This is in some ways a strange topic, because currently most money is created by banks, which do so without any direct political control over that activity, with their own profit-making objectives in mind rather than any obligation to serve society as a whole. A change in this situation, establishing public control over money creation, would of course not abolish the need to be wary about adding to inflation through creating additional money on an excessive scale: the power to create money has to be used responsibly. This raises some general and larger questions about debt, credit, and the creation of money, which will not be pursued here, although they have become increasingly controversial and relevant following the 2008 financial crash. …

The obvious principal body for the purpose of creating the money necessary for green QE is the European Central Bank, working alongside the central banks of the EU member states outside the Eurozone (which include those of the UK, Sweden, and Poland).

… Green QE is a practical plan to tackle both finance and the global environment together. Doing so would create a more stable, secure and prosperous Europe.

 

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland committed treason by assisting Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy levy COVID-19 biological warfare against Canada

Germany declared war against Canada, the US, the UK and the World on January 31, 2020 during the World Economic Forum (WEF). Germany used the WEF venue to sponsor and direct the COVID-19 biological attack against the World’s civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State (Germany) and an organizational (World Health Organization/United Nations Organization) policy.

Stated policy/objectives of Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare/war attack:

  • obtain “worldwide support of vaccinations
  • force World leaders to invest $billions in vaccines – buy Germany made mRNA vaccines,
  • obtain an additional $350 billion annually to fund UN’s Sustainable Development Goals

Germany’s COVID-19 biological warfare (an act of war) objectives were clearly stated January 31, 2020 at the World Economic Forum in Davos when German Chancellor Angela Merkel pledged 600 million euros to fund the COVID-19 biological warfare/war attack.

Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and provincial premiers were elected to serve Canadian constituents, not to betray Canada and Canadians by assisting an enemy of Canada wage COVID-19 biological warfare, an act of war. Assisting an enemy of Canada wage any form of warfare (armed, biological, nuclear, financial, etc., ) against Canada is and always has been a crime of high treason and treason.

High treason

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or

(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, … whether or not a state of war exist

Treason

(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

  • (c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

  • d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or

There is ample evidence to prove Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy Germany sponsored the Germany and the WHO planned and lead COVID-19 biological warfare attack.

Evidence Exhibit A: Germany’s payment of 600 million euros on January 31, 2020 at Germany’s World Economic Forum. The stated purpose of the funds was for, and I quote,

“It’s an amazing start to what’s going to be a huge year for worldwide support of vaccinations.”

“With 2020 being such an important year for Gavi and the worldwide financing of vaccinations, we’re certainly not going to be stepping back from our efforts any time soon. … in support of Global Goal 3 for health, and to urge world leaders to invest in vaccines.” Global Citizen

It’s important to note and know that January 31, 2020 was Brexit Day – UK officially left the Germany controlled EU. Because of Brexit Germany had no funds to prevent the imminent collapse of the insolvent EU. Many EU states were insolvent and would have defaulted in 2020. Italy alone desperately needed a $572 billion to $801 billion emergency bailout:

So, where did strapped for cash Germany get the funds to sponsor the COVID-19 biological warfare attack?

The Government of Canada’s “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020” report essentially informed you where Germany obtained the money to finance its COVID-19 biological warfare attack. From Justin Trudeau and German sympathizer/collaborator Chrystia Freeland.

“The Department of Finance Canada announced today that Canada’s official international reserves increased by an amount equivalent to US$1,175 million during January to US$86,472 million. This was driven by reserves management funding operations (US$566 million). … Notes. During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond”

The report stated in Notes that the US$566 million was cross-currency swaps. Cross currency swap refers to an agreement between two parties to trade currencies. The parties are essentially loaning each other money.

The “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020” report also stated in Notes that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland government “issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond“. A bond is a fixed income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental). A bond could be thought of as an I.O.U. between the lender and borrower that includes the details of the loan and its payments.

Put 2 and 2 together and you and many seasoned investigators would conclude that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland gave Germany the funds to finance Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare attack.

Throughout Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare/war attack Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and provincial premiers also violated the Constitution of Canada – the supreme law of Canada. The supreme law of Canada includes Canadians’ guaranteed right to refuse any and all forms of medical treatment & the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution: R. v. Smith, 2015 SCC 34 at paragraph 18.

The NB government website states medical treatment includes: identifying and responding to an illness (COVID-19 testing), and prevention (such as immunizations). The NB government’s website states, “your rights in New Brunswick” includes the right to:

  • refuse treatment,

Screenshot from NB Government’s “Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick (PLEIS-NB)” website:

Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and provincial premiers committed medical fraud throughout the Germany and WHO planned and lead COVID-19 biological attack. They misdiagnosed millions of Canadians. They used bogus COVID-19 tests to claim Canadians were infected with SARS-CoV-2, knowing that COVID-19 antibodies tests “don’t detect the virus itself”. The vast majority of COVID-19 tests used by the Canadian, US and UK governments check for antibodies, not for the bioengineered SARS-CoV-2.

“Your body makes antibodies after it’s infected by a virus or other infectious agents, or after you receive a vaccination.” Government of Canada

Let me repeat what Justin Trudeau’s “minority government” formally states on an official Government of Canada website – “Your body makes antibodies after you receive a vaccination“. That means COVID-19 vaccines can and are producing false positives for COVID-19.

Furthermore, if serological/antibody test kits do not detect the virus that causes COVID-19 then logically and factually Canadians, Americans, British, Asian, African, and European populations weren’t being tested for COVID-19 and they didn’t test positive for COVID-19.

Moreover, COVID-19 mRNA were designed to elicit antibodies, not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections. Designed to produce more false positives for COVID-19 so that Germany can continue to make $billions from a vaccine that doesn’t prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections.

“Vaccination not only elicited a more robust immune reaction than natural infection, but the level of neutralizing and anti-RBD antibody binding after vaccination is also significantly higher in pre-immune participants compared to immunologically naïve participants” Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States

December 3, 2020 report on website funded by the European Union reported that the manufacturers of Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna and Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford vaccines falsified data, committed fraud, to obtain FDA approval. The report stated their vaccines don’t prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections:

“the biggest drawback of the (COVID-19) candidate vaccines concocted and manufactured by Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna and Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford is that they do not prevent individuals from being infected with SARS-COV-2. A vaccine against SARS-COV-2 is supposed to prevent SARS-COV-2 infections and not just the symptoms of the diseases that it causes. The candidate vaccines do not prevent SARS-COV-2 infections” Europen Commission investigative report

NSICOP warned Canadians in 2019 that foreign states are actively engaging in activities that pose a significant threat to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the sovereignty of Canada. Justin Trudeau redacted the state of Germany from the NSICOP 2019 annual report on its investigation of foreign state interference. Justin Trudeau did that to assist Germany (Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy) continue its espionage and sabotage activities in Canada so that Germany and its collaborators (the WHO, the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, Event 201 players, Chrystia Freeland …) can meet their objectives.

Screenshot from NSICOP 2019 Annual Report. *** indicates Justin Trudeau redaction:

Justin Trudeau is guilty of criminal negligence for quarantining suspected COVID-19 infected persons in motels and hotels

Throughout Germany and the WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare attack Justin Trudeau intentionally put the lives and safety of Canadians at risks by mandating suspected COVID-19 infected travelers self-isolate/quarantine themselves in motels and hotels across Canada. Motels and hotels are public places, not health care facilities. Justin Trudeau showed wanton and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of Canadians. According to Canada’s criminal code Justin Trudeau is guilty of criminal negligence

Criminal negligence

  •  (1) Every one is criminally negligent who

    • (a) in doing anything, or

    • (b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,

    shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.

Canadians couldn’t travel abroad during COVID-19 yet Justin Trudeau brought in hundreds of students from China (origin of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak) and housed them in motels and hotels across Canada. All of the students were suspected of being infected with COVID-19 when they arrived at various ports of entry. Some were sick when they arrived. Because the Trudeau government suspected they were infected with COVID-19 they were isolated/quarantined in motels and hotels, not in hospitals or quarantine facilities.

Isolation and quarantine are public health measures used to control the spread of contagious disease:

    • Isolation is used to separate and restrict the movement of those who are ill with a communicable disease.
    • Quarantine is used to separate and restrict the movement of those who are still well but who may have been exposed to a communicable disease.

The purpose of quarantine is clearly to prevent additional spread of contagious disease or environmental toxins within a specific population. Quarantining in motels and hotels defeats the purpose of quarantine. Quarantining in motels and hotels facilitates the spread of contagious disease within a specific population. Doing so “shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons”