The WHO staged concurrent and consecutive pandemic simulation exercises during COVID-19 and data from those exercises were used to exaggerate the severity and extent of COVID-19

“As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. … The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.” UK government

If COVID-19 was downgraded in March 2020 why did COVID-19 continue? The insolvent WHO (UN) conducted concurrent and consecutive COVID-19 pandemic simulation exercises (SE) and the WHO used data from those SE to exaggerate the severity and extent of COVID-19. As many as 21 “realistic” simulations exercise were conducted throughout 2020. The WHO stated on its website in 2020 that its simulation exercises used various means including “through fake press articles, face to face through actors, audio/visual material including video clips” to present the simulation exercises “as close to reality as possible”. The WHO simulation exercises used the official names and locations of countries’ regulation and health care institutions in order to deceive public officials, the mass media and the general public.

The WHO stated in its NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) SIMULATION EXERCISE FACILITATORS’ GUIDE “In order to provide a realistic context for the simulation, the scenario and relevant questions must be adapted to the country specific context, and incorporate some of the following elements:

• Actual names of existing regulation procedures, institutions in your country,

• Actual location of services within the country (health care facilities etc)

• Numbers in line with the size of your populations,

• Etc

This adaptation is essential for the success of the exercise; this is what makes the simulation ‘real’ to participants.

Note that the WHO is conducting COVID-19 simulations Exercises throughout 2021. WHO’s “COVID-19 Simulation Exercises Packages” states:

“COVID-19 vaccine drill package sets out four common exercise drills that can be used in conjunction with your country COVID-19 vaccination programme.”

The cash strapped/insolvent WHO is using COVID-19 simulation exercises to commit fraud – obtain $billions by false pretense. The purpose of those exercises is to make it look like countries are being vaccinated willingly. News agencies are given those simulation exercises videos to help the WHO promote the UN’s “Immunization Agenda 2030“

Coincidentally, the WHO conducted a pandemic simulation (synonyms: sham, fake, pretext) exercise December 5, 2019 just days before the novel/patented SARS-CovV-2 coronavirus epidemic began in Wuhan China. The WHO website stated in 2020 (link to a screenshot of the WHO’s 2020 pandemic simulation exercises website) that the simulation exercises used various means including “through fake press articles, face to face through actors, audio/visual material including video clips” to present the simulation exercises “as close to reality as possible”.

Charges of High Treason and Treason warranted for Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and provincial premiers

Charges of high treason and treason are warranted and need to be laid against Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and other co-conspirators for assisting an enemy, Germany wage COVID-19 biological warfare (act of war) against Canada.

There is ample evidence showing Germany sponsored the biological warfare attack. German Chancellor Angela Merkel Pledged 600 Million Euros in January 31, 2020 (day the UK formally left Germany’s EU) to fund the COVID-19 biological warfare attack. Stated purpose of Germany sponsoring the biological attack – “It’s an amazing start to what’s going to be a huge year for worldwide support of vaccinations.“

Germany and the WHO began conspiring in 2017 to stage a worldwide biological warfare attack to save the insolvent Germany and the UN.

“We conducted a (pandemic) simulation exercise during our meeting in Berlin in May 2017 in close cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO), … The international community needs to fully support the WHO in order for the organization to be able to fulfill its role, including in capacity building and in preparing for and responding to health emergencies. In this respect, we acknowledge that WHO’s financial and human resource capacities have to be strengthened, including through adequate and sustainable funding for the Health Emergencies Programme and the WHO Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE).

Berlin Declaration of the G20 Health Ministers

The UN being insolvent was made perfectly clear in October 2019 in a statement by the Secretary-General about “the worst cash crisis facing the United Nations in nearly a decade. The Organization runs the risk of depleting its liquidity reserves by the end of the month and defaulting on payments to staff and vendors.” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, The UN declaring it was insolvent was made just months before start of Germany sponsored COVID-19 biological warfare attack.

News articles reported 21 February 2020 that Germany’s EU was insolvent too. “A summit of EU leaders seeking to fill a €75bn hole in the bloc’s budget left by Brexit dramatically collapsed after Angela Merkel led major contributors in rejecting a proposal that would have left them paying billions more.“

“The UK’s departure has left EU states struggling to fund plans over the next seven years to tackle the climate emergency, aid poorer regions and continue to subsidise farmers through the common agricultural policy.” The Guardian

When Chrystia Freeland joined Germany formed and lead alliance to save the International World Order/UN (WHO) from destruction in April 2019, Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland, Germany and their co-conspirators knew that there was only one way to save an organization like the United Nations Organization (UNO). By giving the UNO $billions.

However, Canada, the USA, the UK and other non-EU countries couldn’t just hand over $billions to the UNO so Germany, the WHO, the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, and Event 201 players stage/lead the COVID-19 plandemic to cover up the theft of $billions for the insolvent Germany Fourth Reich EU and its International World Order/UN.

High treason

46 (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or

(c) assists an enemy at war (biological warfare is the use of biological toxins or infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses, insects, and fungi with the intent to kill, harm or incapacitate humans, animals or plants as an act of war) with Canada, whether or not a state of war exists

Treason

(2) Every one (Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs and Alberta Premier Jason Kenney) commits treason who, in Canada,

(c) conspires with any person (German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the WHO?UN) to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act (COVID-19 biological warfare attack)

New cases of COVID-19 result of people getting tested after Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna vaccines makes them feel ill. Testing positive indicates that they’ve developed antibodies in response to their vaccination

Your body makes antibodies after it’s infected by a virus or other infectious agents, or after you receive a vaccination. That is what the Government of Canada has been stating on its website. The screenshot is from the Government of Canada website. I’ll repeat what it states: “If you have a positive serology test result, it’s likely that you previously had a COVID-19 infection and that you developed an antibody response to the virus. It may also indicate that you developed antibodies in response to vaccination.”

“Serological testing detects the presence of antibodies, not the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This testing is also not to be used to diagnose infection.”

Government of Canada

The overwhelming majority of COVID-19 test kits used to diagnose new COVID-19 cases in Canada, the US and UK are serological test kits which “do not detect the virus itself“. That being said, Canada’s federal and provincial governments claiming that there are x number of new cases of COVID-19 is completely and utterly false.

If serological test kits do not detect the virus that causes COVID-19 then logically and factually Canadians are not being tested for COVID-19 and they haven’t tested positive for COVID-19.

Stated by Johns Hopkins Medicine, the FDA, Health Canada, and product inserts for Assure, TBG, ACON, MEGNA & BIOTIME COVID-19 IgM/IgG Antibody Rapid Test Kits:

“Results from antibody testing should not be used to diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection or to inform (COVID-19) infection status.”

COVID-19 IgM/IgG Antibody Rapid Test Kit insert:

“False positive results for IgM and IgG antibodies may occur due to cross reactivity from pre-existing antibodies or other possible causes.”

“Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E”

Vaccine passport unconstitutional – violating Canadians’ right to refuse medical treatment & the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution

Forcing Canadians to be vaccinated – a medical treatment under threat of prosecution (fines) violates Canada’s supreme law. Quebec and other provinces who are requiring vaccine passports are violating Canadians’ right to refuse medical treatment & the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution.

Threatening to fine a person in Canada for not having a vaccine passport at a public venue or workplace amounts to the governments depriving Canadians of their constitutional rights under “threat of criminal prosecution”.

Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 states that any federal or provincial law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is of no force or effect. Statutes which conflict with the Constitution are invalid in the most radical sense; they do not become law.

Section 7 of the Charter is part of Canada’s supreme law – Constitution Act, 1982. Section 7. of the Charter states “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.” Section 7 of the Charter requires that laws or state actions that interfere with life, liberty and security of the person conform to the principles of fundamental justice.

The wording of section 7 says that it applies to “everyone”. This includes all people within Canada, including non-citizens.

Section 7 rights and Canada’s supreme law are being violated by the conduct of a party other than a Canadian government body – e.g. the UN / WHO. The government need only be a participant or complicit in the conduct threatening the right, where the violation must be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the government actions.

Canada’s Department of Justice states:

“The liberty interest protected under section 7 has at least two aspects. The first aspect is directed to the protection of persons in a physical sense and is engaged when there is physical restraint such as imprisonment or the threat of imprisonment (R. v. Vaillancourt, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 636 at 652), or state compulsions or prohibitions affecting one’s ability to move freely (R. v. Heywood, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 761 at 789). The physical restraint can be quite minor to engage the liberty component.”

s. 7 of the Constitution of Canada includes the right to refuse medical treatment & the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution.

1. Everyone

“All individuals physically present in Canada will benefit from the protection of section 7 (Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177 at page 202; Charkaoui (2007), supra, at paragraphs 17-18).”

2. Life, liberty and security of the person
(ii) Right to liberty

“Section 7 protects a sphere of personal autonomy involving “inherently private choices” that go to the “core of what it means to enjoy individual dignity and independence” (Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844 at paragraph 66; Association of Justice Counsel v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 55 at paragraph 49). Where state compulsions or prohibitions affect such choices, s. 7 may be engaged (A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, at paragraphs 100-102; Blencoe, supra at paragraphs 49-54; Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 6 at paragraph 45) This aspect of liberty includes the right to refuse medical treatment (A.C., supra, at paragraphs 100-102, 136) and the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution (e.g. fines): R. v. Smith, 2015 SCC 34 at paragraph 18. It may also include the ability to choose where one intends to live (Godbout, supra), as well as a protected sphere of parental decision-making for parents to ensure their children’s well-being, e.g., a right to make decisions concerning a child’s education and health (B.(R.), supra, at paragraph 80).” Department of Justice https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html

Justin Trudeau called a snap election days after receiving damning NSICOP national security and intelligence report

Justin Trudeau called a snap election for Sept. 20 days after NSICOP delivered to him and “relevant ministers” another damning national security and intelligence report August 11, 2021 – a special report regarding the Government of Canada’s cyber defence framework.

The NSICOP report specifically named the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) which oversees the expenditures of the federal government – of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.

“TBS is responsible for overseeing how the federal government spends taxpayers’ dollars. It does this by reviewing government programs, spending proposals and spending authorities, and by reporting to Parliament and Canadians on government spending.”

“As part of fulfilling this responsibility in 2020–21, TBS will support the Department of Finance Canada, as appropriate, to meet the government’s commitment to undertake a comprehensive review of government spending to ensure that resources are efficiently allocated to continue to invest in people and keep the economy strong and growing.” TBS

“Section 21(6) of the NSICOP Act requires that the Prime Minister table a declassified version of the report within 30 sitting days of the resumption of Parliament. Until then, its contents remain classified.” NSICOP report

Same thing happened in 2019 just days after Liberal MP David McGuinty presented Justin Trudeau with NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada on September 3, 2019. Justin Trudeau called 2019 federal election 8 days later on September 11, 2019.

Excerpt from NSICOP’s 2019 annual report on foreign states’ interference activities in Canada that was presented to PM Justin Trudeau on September 3, 2019 – 8 days before Justin Trudeau called 2019 federal election on September 11, 2019:

“The Committee believes there is ample evidence that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** (*** indicates a state name – Germany / EU, was redacted by Justin Trudeau) The PRC, the Russian Federation, other states. *** (*** indicates more redaction by Justin Trudeau)”

“The Committee believes that these states target Canada for a variety of reasons, but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. They target ethnocultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media, and attempt to curate debate on postsecondary campuses. Each of these activities poses a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty: they are a clear threat to the security of Canada”

Germany and the WHO infected the World with herpes using COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

During the first herpes outbreak (called primary herpes), an infected person may experience flu-like symptoms. These include body aches, fever and headache. People who have been vaccinated with Germany’s Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are experiencing the same flu-like symptoms as herpes because the human herpes virus protein ORF10 is encoded in SARS-CoV-2 and in mRNA vaccines.

There is more evidence that supports the assertion that mRNA vaccines are infecting the World population with herpes. On August 12, 2021 Europe’s drug regulator EMA published new updates on the safety of mRNA vaccines after it investigated a possible link between mRNA vaccines and a skin reaction called erythema multiforme. Erythema multiforme is a hypersensitivity reaction usually triggered by infections, most commonly herpes simplex virus (HSV).

The human herpes virus ORF10 protein (HHV-8) is the only protein that is present exclusively in SARS-CoV-2 and not in SARS-CoV or any other human coronaviruses.

The WHO’s COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease suggested the severity of COVID-19 is enhanced by the human herpes virus protein ORF10.

“Could the severity of COVID-19 be enhanced by ORF10 accessory proteins?”

uniqueness of ORF10 and predicted intrinsic characteristics support possible involvement of ORF10 protein in giving COVID-19 its specific characteristics like spread and virulence

World Heath Organization

Since 1972 the WHO/UN has called for/recommended virologists develop the means to prolong virus/coronavirus infections:

An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. e.g. by depressing (to diminish the activity, strength, or yield of) 7S (IgG) versus 19S (IgM) antibody, or by affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens. If this proves to be the case, virus-induced immunodepression might conceivably be highly instrumental in prolonging certain virus infections, such as murine leukemia, hepatitis, …

Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Volume 47, p.259, 1972, Recommendations (3)

Virologists did that by genetically engineering/modifying the SARS coronavirus. The human herpes virus protein ORF10 was encoded into the SARS coronavirus to make SARS-CoV-2.

There is currently no cure or preventive treatment for the herpes infection. If a person gets either form of herpes virus infection, they will have it for life , whether or not they experience symptoms.

A 2003 patent informs us when the herpes virus protein ORF10 was added to the SARS virus by virologists to create SARS-CoV-2. The 2003 Patent US-2006257852-A1 assigned to CHIRON CORP (US), which was acquired by Novartis (Switzerland) on April 20, 2006 specifically names the ORF10 protein – a protein that is exclusively found in SARS-CoV-2 genome and not in SARS-CoV, being used/encoded in the fusion protein of the patented novel SARS coronavirus.

BC court document reveals Justin Trudeau has a record for trial by jury

British Columbia trail by jury documents Justin Trudeau concealed and had deleted. Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury court case SAMIE, Ali v TRUDEAU, Justin occurred when Justin Trudeau was a teacher in BC.

Jury trials are used in a significant share of serious criminal cases in many but not all common law judicial systems. In Canada, you have the right to request a jury trial when you are facing a serious criminal charge. When you face charges for a crime that can have a prison sentence of five years or more, you have the right to request a jury trial in your criminal proceeding. “Jury trials are not common in civil matters, and they are far more complicated than trials without a jury” Supreme Court of BC

Screenshot of BC court documents confirmed Justin Trudeau has a record and he was a defendant in a trial by jury. Justin Trudeau issued Writ of Summons 15 June 1999. Appeared before court 03 Nov 1999 and received “Notice Requiring Trial by Jury” 21 Nov 2002.

Section 11(f) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right: (f) … to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;

To engage section 11(f), a person must at one time have been “charged with an offence” as required by the opening words of section 11.

Trial by jury involves matters such as theft, mischief, assault, sexual assault, murder, manslaughter (vehicular), aggravated assault, bank robbery and drug cases.

In BC the process of trial by jury begins with the defendant/accused making a court appearance. The court clerk reads the charges and the accused is asked to plead guilty or not guilty – when the accused pleads not guilty, the jury selection begins.

Pierre Trudeau’s law firm Heenan Blaikie used to cover up Justin Trudeau’s offences when Justin taught in Port Coguitlam & at WPGA.

Justin Trudeau admitted in 2017 that his father – the former Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau – “reached out to his friends in the legal community, got the best possible lawyer and was very confident that he was going to be able to make those charges go away”. Justin Trudeau was referring to his younger brother Michel who was charged with possession of marijuana (controlled substance) after he was involved in a collision in 1998. Or was he? Coincidentally Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury process began in 1999. Justin was charged with an offence after he too was involved in a collision. And, he’s admitted to smoking pot/controlled substance. Didn’t find any trial by jury record for Michel. Did find trial by jury record for Justin.

You now know why Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone to conduct an investigation into an allegation that he groped a female reporter in British Columbia in 2000. Investigation would find this court document and Canadians who know that Justin Trudeau has a record and he went to trial.

Justin Trudeau’s Canada Elections Act violation primary motive for homicides of Barry and Honey Sherman

The Canada Elections Act provided the primary motive for the targeted double homicides of Toronto billionaires Barry and Honey Sherman. Events prior and post the targeted murders leads to the conclusion that the homicides were politically motivated. That the homicides are linked to the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser the murdered couple hosted for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. A fundraiser that triggered an investigation by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner after an administrative review by Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) investigators

“found evidence indicating that Mr. Sherman engaged in political activities that risk creating a sense of obligation on the part of one or more public office holders.”. iPolitics

A fundraiser that provided MP Justin Trudeau with a “prohibited gift or other advantage” while Justin Trudeau was a candidate contesting in the October 19, 2015 federal election. A fundraiser that the Commissioner of Canada Elections defines as an illegal or corrupt practice under the Canada Elections Act for which, if convicted, Justin Trudeau would have been disqualified from contesting in the 2019 federal election. Very strong motive for murder.

How do events prior and post the Barry and Hong Sherman murders link their murders to the August 26, 2015 fundraiser they hosted for election candidate Justin Trudeau? Prior to their murders, Honey and Barry Sherman hosted a fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that not only violated ethics and lobbying laws it violated sections of the Canada Elections Act.

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected

Canada Elections Act

At the time Justin Trudeau was an election candidate in the October 2015 federal election and Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist who Justin Trudeau was offered and did accept from Barry Sherman a prohibited gift or other advantage (the fundraiser), that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence Trudeau in the performance of his duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate, Justin Trudeau were to be elected.

Prohibition — accepting contributions, borrowing

Corrupt practice defined as:

502 (2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Canada Elections Act

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

Section 502 of the Canada Elections Act sets out other situations in which a conviction automatically results in the loss of the right to sit in the House of Commons

House of Commons 3.1 Consequences Affecting a Parliamentarian’s Right to Hold His or Her Seat

502 (3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons;

That means the penalty for Justin Trudeau violating the Canada Elections Act isn‘t a slap on wrist, it means the end to Justin Trudeau’s political career as Prime Minister of Canada and as a member of Parliament.

Just days after Honey and Barry Sherman were murdered on December 13, 2017 , Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating numerous ethics laws. On Dec 20, 2017, just 5 days after Honey and Barry Sherman’s bodies were “officially” discovered (plainclothes RCMP officer filmed by neighbor‘s security camera entering Sherman’s home morning of December 14, 2017 to remove wiretap devices for Lobbying Commissioner initiated investigation of August 26, 2015 Trudeau fundraiser) Conflict of Interest Commissioner Mary Dawson found Justin Trudeau guilty of violating “multiple” Conflict of Interest Act laws. Days before their murders Barry Sherman was attempting to quash an RCMP lead Lobbying Commissioner investigation into the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser registered lobbyists Honey and Barry Sherman hosted for 2015 federal election candidate Justin Trudeau. The lobbyists’ code of conduct prohibits registered lobbyists, such as Barry Sherman, from lobbying office holders they helped get elected. Any RCMP investigation of Barry Sherman‘s fundraiser would also include Justin Trudeau as the Sherman fundraiser was hosted for Justin Trudeau.

Events, prior & post Honey & Barry Sherman murders, leads to no other conclusion than the murders were politically motivated. They were murdered because of the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser Honey and Barry Sherman hosted for election candidate Justin Trudeau. That fundraiser not only violated the Lobbying Act it also violated the Canada Elections Act. Because the

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices is

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or
(b) hold any office in the nomination of the Crown or of the Governor in Council.

Are there witnesses that the Commissioner of Canada Elections can use to convict Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of corrupt practices and bar him from contesting any election for the next 7 years? Yes. Toronto Police Services were at the August 26, 2015 Honey and Barry Sherman fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Dispatched to police the Jewish Defense League protesting outside the fundraiser. The Toronto Police and the protesters are all material witnesses as are the invited guests.

Other witnesses include:

Gabriel Erem (recipient of an Sherman email invitation soliciting support, i.e. other advantage for election candidate Justin Trudeau).
York Center candidate Michael Levitt (also broke Canada Elections Act by attending fundraiser as an election candidate),
Meir Weinstein (JDL leader),
Joel Goldman (JDL protester),
Toronto Immigration barrister solicitor Guidy Mamman (invited guest), and
Canadian Jewish News (reported Aug 21, 2015 that Barry Sherman spent an hour with election candidate Justin Trudeau a week before, before the fundraiser).

The above named witnesses can all attest that Justin Trudeau arrived at the August 26, 2015 fundraiser at about 7:15 PM in a black van to “knowingly” accept registered lobbyists Honey and Barry Sherman’s “prohibited gift or other advantage”.

Human herpes virus protein in genome of SARS-CoV-2 provides evidence the virus that causes COVID-19 was developed for WHO to be used as a bioweapon

SARS-CoV-2 genome annotation revealed the presence of 10 open reading frames (ORFs). SARS-CoV-2 possesses two accessory proteins, ORF8 and ORF10, that share no homology to other coronavirus strains.

The SARS-CoV-2 accessory protein ORF10 (organism Human herpesvirus 8/HHV-8), a putative 38-amino acid viral protein encoded in the 3’ accessory region of the genome, is a highly ordered, hydrophobic (insoluble in water; repelling water) , and thermally stable protein, which contains at least one transmembrane region.

“the ORF10 protein contains high numbers of promiscuous cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes, primarily on the α-helix. A recent study by Liu et al. 2020 found that in severe cases of COVID-19, the ORF10 was overexpressed when compared against ORF10 expression levels in moderate cases. If the ORF10 protein is synthesized (manufactured, man made), this may help to partially explain the nature behind severe cases of COVID-19. The large number of CTL epitopes in conjunction with the overproduction of the ORF10 protein could result in elevated immune responses towards SARS-CoV-2, leading to some potentially fatal immunopathological outcomes. … Alternatively, ORF10 may act itself or serve as a precursor for other RNAs in regulating gene expression/replication, translation efficiency, or interfering with cellular antiviral pathways. ” October 2020 study

ORF8, “although non-essential and the precise functions are unknown, it has been suggested that this protein assists in SARS-CoV-2 replication in the early secretory pathway and in immune evasion. … Since ORF8 is not an essential protein for the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle, ORF8 is likely to functionally associate with other SARS-CoV-2 components to assist with SARS-CoV-2 replication and assembly in host cells, but, the coordinated process of this mechanism is still unknown”

“It is also noteworthy that ORF10, exclusively found in SARS-CoV-2 (and not in SARS-CoV), has been shown to the Cullin 2 (CUL2) RING E3 ligase complex, possibly hijacking its function. It is not known what the implications of this interaction is for virus replication, but a similar complex is recruited by other viral proteins, including HIV Vif, Adenovirus E4Orf6, EBV Bzlf and others (Mahon et al., 2014). In all cases, the virus exploits this to target an antiviral protein for proteasome degradation, and it is therefore likely the case also for Orf10.” Structural Characterization of SARS-CoV-2: Where We Are, and Where We Need to Be

Accessory proteins (ORF8, ORF10) were suggested to play an important role in virulence and host interaction in other coronaviruses (Liu et al., 2014).

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome contains

Protein ORF10

Gene

ORF10

Organism

Human herpesvirus 8 type P (isolate GK18) (HHV-8) (Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus)

Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is the infectious cause of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and HIV-infection. HHV-8 infection is not very common in North America. It occurs more often in some Mediterranean countries and is widespread in Africa.

“In the United States, men who have sex with men (MSM) and persons with HIV infection are at increased risk for HHV-8 infection. Among MSM without HIV infection, the seroprevalence ranges from 13% to 20% and HHV-8 seroprevalence increases to 30% to 35% among MSM with HIV infection. Injection drug use may also be a risk factor for HHV-8 seropositivity, although this association has not been consistently observed.”

“HHV-8 is etiologically associated with all forms of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) including classic, endemic (belonging or native to a particular people or country), transplant-related, and AIDS-related, as well as rare neoplastic disorders (primary effusion lymphoma [PEL] and solid organ variants) and the lymphoproliferative disorder known as multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD). Although the precise pathogenesis for these tumors remains unclear, infection with HHV-8 precedes their development.” Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV

The presence of two accessory proteins, ORF8 and ORF10, that share no homology to other coronaviruses strains but appear to assist with SARS-CoV-2 replication and and in immune evasion, suggests SARS-CoV-2 was developed for the strapped for cash WHO as a bioweapon.

ORF10 protein “HHV-8 mostly causes disease mainly in immunocompromised individuals” Johns Hopkins Medicine

Germany’s Pfizer-BioNTech and DARPA funded Moderna COVID-19 vaccines part of UN/WHO’s vaccine induced sterility/genocide program

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is genetic material, so in that sense, the vaccines are genetically based therapy. But the FDA classifies them as vaccines, not gene therapy. Here’s why?

Since 1972 “the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology.” WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation

The UN/WHO/World Bank’s strategy is for devising a nonsurgical method to induce permanent sterility. That has already been developed and tested.

“a nonsurgical method to induce permanent sterility calls for the combined use of a “gene silencing” technology with a “gene therapy” delivery system that can target silencing molecules to specific regions of the brain critical for fertility, and cause long-term suppression of gene expression. Because the vector to be employed remains active for years, permanent sterility is expected to occur following a single systemic administration.”

“Recently published studies of a gene know as Enhanced at Puberty 1 (EAP1), evidence was provided that RNAi can be used to disrupt reproductive cyclicity in two species of animals, rats and non-human primates. These studies in rats and non-human primates clearly demonstrate that RNAi is capable of disrupting female reproductive cyclicity.” Targeted Gene Silencing to Induce Permanent Sterility

“As of June 2020, two of the ten top vaccine candidates used RNAi technology for COVID-19 vaccination. These two vaccines were developed by Moderna and NIAD, and BioNTech and Pfizer.” Yahoo!Finance

The UN/WHO have been conducting vaccine medical experiments since WWII. The UN/WHO continued Nazi Germany’s Auschwitz medical experiment using vaccines. Photo below provides refutable proof – “United Nations personnel vaccinate an 11-year-old concentration camp survivor who was a victim of medical experiments at the Auschwitz camp.”

What the UN/WHO wants and is supporting under the “WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” is a very serious crime. The UN/WHO supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines is defined as genocide.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

The intended and stated purpose of the UN/WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation “has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines“

The UN/WHO is essentially saying it wants vaccines to be developed to commit genocide. Birth control vaccines are UN/WHO measures intended to prevent births = genocide.

“Genocide is the most heinous of crimes, encompassing all it touches in a tsunami of hate and destruction. It is an assault on our most fundamental shared values.” UN Secretary-general, December 9, 2020 New York

“The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide” The United Nations Organization