Supreme Court of Canada Justice implicated UN and WHO in targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman

Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) Justice presiding over a SCC case involving the unsealing of Toronto Police Services files on the double homicide investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman implicated both the UN and the WHO in the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman.

The murders were “a very, very sophisticated crime, in my view, committed by a very sophisticated organization – at least it has those hallmarks.” Supreme Court of Canada Justice Michael Moldaver, October 6, 2020 – multiple news sources: The Chronicle Herald and the Globe and Mail

The official / legal name for the UN is the United Nations Organization. The official name for the WHO is the World Health Organization.

Why are the UN and WHO suspects in the “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman? The Shermans owned Apotex which manufactured and sold Hydroxychloroquine – a cheap, effective and a less toxic metabolite of chloroquine.

“In conclusion, our results show that HCQ can efficiently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. In combination with its anti-inflammatory function, we predict that the drug has a good potential to combat the disease. ” research paper Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, published March 18, 2020 – day Justin Trudeau announced the closure of Canada’s borders to most travelers during news conference outside Rideau Cottage about the measures Canada is taking to combatCOVID-19

“chloroquine is an effective pre & post-infection antiviral agent for SARS-CoV. A dose-dependant decrease in virus antigen-positive cells was observed starting at 0.1 μM chloroquine & 10 μM (Micrometre, also called micron, metric unit of measure for length equal to 0.001 mm, or about 0.000039 inch) completely abolished SARS-CoV infection. … Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases including malaria, amoebiosis and human immunodeficiency virus” Virology Journal 2005 study “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread“. Acknowledgements “This work was supported by a Canadian PENCE grant (T3), CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, is Canada’s federal funding agency for health research) group grant #MGC 64518, and CIHR grant #MGP-44363 (to NGS)” Virology Journal, Published 2005 Aug 22

“There is sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence regarding the effectiveness of chloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 as well as evidence of safety from long-time use in clinical practice for other indications.” Europe PMC paper ” A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19“.

Europe PMC is a service of the Europe PMC Funders’ Group, in partnership with the European Bioinformatics Institute ; and in cooperation with the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NCBI/NLM) .

Chloroquine was shown to inhibit in vitro replication of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero E6 cells in an effective concentration EC90 of 6.90 μM that can be easily achieved with standard dosing, due to its favourable penetration into tissues, including in the lung. This is substantially lower than the concentration detected in human plasma when the drug is prescribed to treat malaria at a dose of 25 mg/kg over 3 days. However, for COVID-19 patients, a lower dose such as 3.6 mg/kg that are often prescribed to treat rheumatoid arthritis has been suggested for long-term patients as the dose is similar to IC50 for SARS-CoV. It is to be noted that hydroxychloroquine (made by Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman who were targeted and murdered December 13, 2017 – 7 days before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal ethics laws) showed greater efficacy than chloroquine, at least based on in vitro studies. Besides, hydroxychloroquine was shown to have minimal risk of toxicity such as retinopathy. Other recent studies also showed that hydroxychloroquine is a less toxic metabolite of chloroquine, as it is more soluble, and causes less side effects and therefore is safer. … both hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can interfere with ACE2 receptor glycosylation and prevents SARS-CoV-2 binding to pneumocytes. Chloroquine could also possibly inhibit sialic acid biosynthesis thus limiting cell surface binding of SARS-CoV-2.

Biological Trace Element Research (2021) 199:550–558

Barry Sherman’s Apotex drug Hydroxychloroquine clearly threatened to prematurely end Germany and WHO’s COVID-19 biological warfare attack and defund the bankrupt / insolvent UN / WHO & Bill Gates’ lucrative multi $billion global vaccine agenda.

The Barry & Honey Sherman murders in 2017, coincided with Germany and the WHO initiating their planning and preparing for the COVID-19 biological attack.

The WHO and Germany initiated the COVID-19 plandemic during the G20 Germany 2017 summit. “By putting global health on the agenda of the G20, we affirm our role in strengthening the political support for existing initiatives and working to address the economic aspects of global health issues. We support the leading role of the World Health Organization (WHO), as the United Nations specialized agency for health, in global health cooperation. Furthermore, we seek to intensify global action and cooperation in order to address ever-evolving challenges and identify where the health sector can provide leadership and added value…. We conducted a simulation exercise during our meeting in Berlin in May 2017 in close cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO), … The international community needs to fully support the WHO in order for the organization to be able to fulfill its role, including in capacity building and in preparing for and responding to health emergencies. In this respect, we acknowledge that WHO’s financial and human resource capacities have to be strengthened, including through adequate and sustainable funding for the Health Emergencies Programme and the WHO Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE).” Berlin Declaration of the G20 Health Ministers

Greater terrorist threat comes from deranged people who are willing to risk an out-of-control epidemic for the good of “the cause.”

Bill Gates, is for all intents and purposes, a drug dealer for the largest drug trafficking Organization in the World – the United Nations Organization

“We’re tempted to say that nobody in their right mind would ever use these things (bioweapons – infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses / coronaviruses and genetically engineered organisms), but not everybody is in their right mind! … In my opinion, the terrorist threat is very real, and it’s about to get worse.” Steven Block, a professor of biological sciences and applied physics at Stanford.

He argues that bioweapons offer terrorist groups and “rogue states” (Germany) an affordable way to counter the overwhelming military superiority of the United States and other nuclear powers

Although Block was concerned about the bioweapons buildup in Iraq and other nations, he believes a greater threat comes from terrorist groups (Bill Gates, World Economic Forum and event 201 players) willing to risk an out-of-control epidemic (COVID-19) and eager to suffer casualties for the good of “the cause” = save Germany’s bankrupt / insolvent EU and International World Order / UN from destruction. UN Secretary-General publicly stated/confirmed that the UN was insolvent in October 2019 in a letter written to Member States, “about the worst cash crisis facing the United Nations in nearly a decade. The Organization runs the risk of depleting its liquidity reserves by the end of the month and defaulting on payments to staff and vendors.”, source https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/10/1048782

Germany’s Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, in every practical sense, were developed to make SARS-CoV-2 more transmissible and infectious

Coronaviruses are surrounded by a fatty membrane known as an envelope. In order to gain entry to the inside of the cell, enveloped viruses use spike proteins to fuse their own membrane to that of cells’ and take over the cell. “The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.” the CDC

Germany’s Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make “spike protein” – lots of them. 2nd vaccine causes the making of more spike protein. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine uses modified messenger RNA (mRNA). “Specifically, the vaccine contains the mRNA of spike protein, which is located on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is what SARS-CoV-2 uses to invade host cells.” Carlos Malvestutto, MD, MPH, who specializes in infectious disease at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

The WHO, CDC and other health authorities know and have repeatedly stated that the “novel coronavirus uses spike protein like a key to gain entry to our cells; once inside, the virus is free to replicate, making us sick. The spike protein binds to a protein on the surface of our cells called ACE2, triggering uptake of the virus particle and eventually membrane fusion.”

That means Germany’s COVID-19 vaccines were developed to make spike protein and give the SARS-CoV-2 virus the means to invade cells and cause millions of healthy people to become sick. SARS-CoV-2 can’t invade cells and make us sick without spike (S) protein. Germany’s Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, in every practical sense, is making SARS-CoV-2 more transmissible and infectious.

The WHO, CDC, Health Canada and Germany would have you believe that Germany’s vaccines that instruct cells to make SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein is harmless yet they all know SARS-CoV-2 needs the spike protein to invade cells to replicate and make you sick. Furthermore, “mRNAs are created as an exact copy (a clone) of the segment of DNA found along the genome corresponding to a protein-coding gene.” UMass Medical School “Specifically, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine. The lipid coating of the nanoparticles binds to the cell membrane, facilitating entry of the (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA (genetic material) segment into the cell.” AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE (ASRM).

European Commission paper reported COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna & Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford falsified data – committed fraud

“The candidate vaccines do not prevent SARS-COV-2 infections which makes them suspicious at best and dishonest at best since they were made to elicit immune response that targets the SARS-COV-2 Spike protein. If the immune response that is elicited by the candidate vaccines was truly targeting SARS-COV-2 Spike protein, prevention of SARS-COV-2 infections should have been their primary mechanism of action (SARS-COV-2 should not in principle be able to enter and infect cells). The fact that the candidate vaccines do not prevent SARS-COV-2 infections make the claims of more than 90% effectiveness dubious, misleading at best and dishonest at worse. As stated above, no verifiable scientific evidence is available to show that the candidate vaccines concocted and developed by Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna and Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford are more than 90% effective. The only way to know anything about the effectiveness of the candidate vaccines is to analyze the data towards the end of the clinical trials in 2022 or to completely unseal the data for all the participants now. There is also no study of the long-term effects of the candidate vaccines. Again, one cannot cut corners when it comes to proving the effectiveness of a candidate vaccine and whether it is dangerous or not.”

CERN EC Journal of Investigative Critiques of Published Scientific Articles.

Website “commissioned by the European Commission to support their nascent Open Data policy by providing a catch-all repository for European Commission funded research” CERN EC Journal of Investigative Critiques of Published Scientific Articles

Source: DISHONEST SCIENTIFIC REPORT AND DATA FALSIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CANDIDATE SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 VACCINES DEVELOPED BY BIONTECH/PFIZER, MODERNA AND ASTRAZENECA/UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

Criminal Code of Canada defines COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna & Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford falsifying data to obtain regulatory approval and sale or purchase of their vaccines as Fraud

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,
- (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
- (b) is guilty
  - (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
  - (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,
  where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

The United States’ SEC and FBI defines COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers’ falsifying data as securities fraud.

Generally, securities fraud occurs when someone makes a false statement about a company or the value of its stock, and others makes financial decisions based on the false information.

Securities fraud is a criminal offense that is punishable under 18 USC § 1348. The law has the intention of protecting investors against fraudulent securities, such as stocks and bonds, through the imposition of disclosing important facts related to all forms of trade securities. To become liable for the offense, one must have committed the following acts:

Causing to defraud another person related to a commodity transacted for a future delivery. It may include any form of a security that is included in the classification provided by the Securities and Exchange Act.
The commission of misrepresentation, false statements, or false promises to obtain anything of value, such as money and property, in relation to a sale or purchase of a commodity.
Failure to disclose material facts related to the exchange of securities and provide false statements instead.