MP Chrystia Freeland involved in ArriveCan

MP Chrystia Freeland is personally involved in the ArriveCan scandal. She was involved from day one. An email NCIO sent to RCMP HQ, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and Canada’s mass media, the CBC Ottawa and the National Post on March 7, 2024 explained how Chrystia Freeland was involved in the mass misappropriation/misuse of public funds.

Content of email:

Testimony given at the Standing Committee on Government Operations & Estimates provides evidence Chrystia Freeland & her chief of staff were involved in ArriveCan.

https://www.noscommunes.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/OGGO/meeting-81/evidence

House of Commons Committee Meeting transcripts:

“Was there ever any mention of a minister, or communication with a minister about a ministerial decision for this pilot project?” Mrs. Stephanie Kusie

“It was Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland.” Ms. Ritika Dutt

Committee testimony also stated that GC Strategies communicated directly with Chrystia Freeland and her chief of staff via email. The initial email sent by GC Strategies to Chrystia Freeland and her chief of staff was a marketing letter. That means Chrystia Freeland was involved in ArriveCan from the startup.

Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates

Wednesday, January 17, 2024

“I was asked to draft a marketing letter addressed to Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland. The letter was amended by Botler and GC Strategies, at which point we talked about sending it to Minister Freeland’s chief of staff as well.” Mr. Vaughn Brennan

There’s an ongoing coverup because Chrystia Freeland is involved. Investigate Chrystia Freeland. Start with her record in the United States. Record filed under an alias Chrystia Freela. Look into why Chrystia Freeland has a record in the US when she worked at Reuters. Look into why Chrystia Freeland used an alias while living and working in the US. It isn’t a pen name. Chrystia Freeland left Reuters abruptly. Reasonable suspicion she left abruptly because she was being investigated. Freeland was “Managing Director and Editor, Consumer News” at Reuters. The cost of the project she headed at Reuters cost more that what was initially estimated.

BuzzFeed article – How Chrystia Freeland Hastened Reuters Next’s Demise

“After Freeland committed to Reuters Next, she set about clearing out many existing Thomson Reuters employees to make room for her own people. Between Reuters.com employees and people brought on to Reuters Next, around 60 people were working under Freeland. And that’s not including the consultants she hired.”

“Costs steadily rose with new hires and payments to vendors and consultants as the project dragged on and the launch date was continually postponed. While earlier articles estimated the cost at around $5 million, sources close to the project said that actual figure was three to four times that amount, or between $15 and $20 million. Moreover, the first former Reuters employee said that Activate itself was paid $300,000 a month.”

“In July, Freeland herself left Reuters, announcing in stunning fashion in an article in the Canadian Globe and Mail that came out at midnight that she would be running for a Canadian parliamentary seat.”

“To people below her it was something of a shock, it was sudden,” says the Reuters employee.

Blackmail used to obtain $millions from the Trudeau government.

House of Commons Comittee hearing testimony provided evidence that GC Strategies may have blackmailed MP Chrystia Freeland and/or other “senior government officials with contracting authorities” to obtain $millions from the Trudeau government.

“In our interactions with GC Strategies, Mr. Firth routinely boasted that he and his friends, senior government officials with contracting authorities, have “dirt” on each other, essentially guaranteeing silence through mutually assured destruction. While external contractors are engaged in misconduct and do the actual dirty work, I want to emphasize that their conduct would not be possible without backing from factions within the government. At least in our case, their conduct was fully directed by the faction within the government that we have encountered” Mr. Amir Morv (Chief Technology and Security Officer, Botler)

If blackmail was indeed used to obtain $millions Canadians need to know and have a right to know what dirt GC Strategies has on Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland. After all, GC Strategies only initiated contact with Chrystia Freeland via an email to obtain $millions in public funds.

MP Chrystia Freeland continues to blatantly violate federal conflict of interest and breach of trust laws

Arrest of RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis linked to NSICOP investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland

2 RCMP AP Raven drones & several RCMP cruisers (Wifi Hotspots) were detected near Mountain Top Motel where National Counterintelligence Organization (NCIO) Director Paul W Kincaid was staying on September 18, 2019.

The RCMP surveillance operation was conducted just 5 days after Justin Trudeau had the General Director General of the RCMP’s National Intelligence co-ordination centre (NICC), Cameron Jay Ortis “charged with unauthorized communication of special operational information and preparatory acts … as well as communicating or confirming “special operational information” to an unspecified entity or individual. “.

The timing of the arrest and charges of the RCMP’s Director General of NICC coincided with a NSICOP investigation of foreign interference activities in Canada. The NSICOP investigation involved Chrystia Freeland and Foreign Affairs Canada.

NSICOP is mandated to investigate Member of Parliament and their departments. NSICOP investigates:

any activity carried out by a department that relates to national security or intelligence, unless the activity is an ongoing operation and the appropriate Minister determines that the review would be injurious to national security;

any matter relating to national security or intelligence that a minister of the Crown refers to NSICOP

NSICOP was investigating foreign interference activities in Canada involving Chrystia Freeland. The investigation was launched after Chrystia Freeland was awarded Germany’s prestigious Warburg award in December 2018. The award is only bestowed to German aristocrats and German collaborators.

NSICOP submitted its “classified” 2019 Annual Report to Justin Trudeau on August 30, 2019. At the time, the document was classifed as ‘Top Secret/Special Intelligence/Canadian Eyes Only/CODEWORD.’

Days later on September 11, 2019 called a federal election for 21 October 2019. Trudeau called the election to delay the tabling of a “declassified” NSICOP report in the House of Commons.

Section 21(6) of the NSICOP Act requires that the Prime Minister table declassified versions of the reports within 30 sitting days of the resumption of Parliament. Until then, their contents remain classified.

The REDACTED NSICOP report named China and Russia as foreign states that were engaging in “significant and sustained foreign interference activities” in Canada. Germany was named too but Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany from both the classified and declassified version of the NSICOP report.

We know Justin Trudeau REDACTED Germany because in 2019 MP Chrystia Freeland was recruited by Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum to further Germany’s interests and political agendas.

What the World Economic Forum and Germany did by recruiting Chrystia Freeland in January and April of 2019 respectively is defined by CSIS as foreign interference. The following excerpt was copied and pasted, word for word, from the Government of Canada website.

Foreign interference involves foreign states, or persons/entities operating on their behalf, attempting to covertly influence decisions, events or outcomes to better suit their strategic interests. In many cases, clandestine influence operations are meant to deceptively influence Government of Canada policies, officials or democratic processes in support of foreign political agendas.

This activity can include cultivating influential people to sway decision-making, spreading disinformation on social media, and seeking to covertly influence the outcome of elections. These threats can target all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal) across Canada.

RCMP Director General Cameron Jay Ortis contributed to the NSICOP’s special investigation of Germany’s foreign agent Chrystia Freeland. Remarks by the Hon. David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., Chair of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians on the
tabling in Parliament of the NSICOP 2019 Annual Report and Special
Report, March 12, 2020 stated:

This review examined:

1. the threat facing Canada from foreign interference; and,

2. the government’s response to that threat.

On both fronts, the Committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the Canadian
security and intelligence community, reviewed thousands of pages of documentation, both
classified and open source, and deliberated at great length.

The NSICOP investigation of Chrystia Freeland was initiated in 2019. Justin Trudeau delayed tabling NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” until November 2022.

Justin Trudeau called the 2019 federal election to conceal NSICOP finding that both Germany and Chrystia Freeland are a significant threat to the security of Canada. Portions of the NSICOP’s “Special Report on the National Security and Intelligence Activities of Global Affairs Canada” were REDACTED and deleted by Justin Trudeau for that purpose.

A reasonable person would conclude that Cameron Jay Ortis was arrested and charged “for communicating or confirming special operational information” pertaining to NSICOP’s investigation of Chrystia Freeland.

“to an unspecified entity or individual.”

Toronto Police investigation of Barry & Honey Sherman murders sealed by the Crown to cover up who committed the targeted murders

There is compeling evidence that shows that 5 years ago Justin Trudeau conspired to have his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers murdered. Justin Trudeau had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman. An ongoing RCMP investigation of his election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner and an Apotex lawsuit put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. The fundraiser was a prohibited gift. Justin Trudeau accepting the prohibited gift meant that he violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act.

Violating the Lobbying Act had no legal consequences for either Justin Trudeau or Barry Sherman.

“The RCMP have never, ever followed up. The RCMP then rubber-stamps or whitewashes whatever Lobbying Act activity has happened.” House of Commons

However, violating the Canada Elections Act meant that Justin Truduea could have lost his seat in the House of Commons and he couldn’t be a candidate in another election for 5 years. It would have meant the end of his political career.

“The Canada Elections Act also sets out a series of disqualifications that apply exclusively to electoral candidacy. … Current disqualifications include the following: A person found guilty of an illegal or corrupt electoral practice (as defined in section 502 of the Canada Elections Act) is disqualified from contesting a federal election for either five or seven years and, if he or she has been elected, may be required to vacate his or her seat in the House of Commons. Illegal practices include wilfully exceeding the spending limit or obstructing the electoral process. Corrupt practices include voting more than once or accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage ” Parliament of Canada

Conspiracy

465 (1) (a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;

A Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants” provided motive for Justin Trudeau to conspire to commit murder.

The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. That court order put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. Justin Trudeau could have been “required to vacate his seat in House of Commons” for violating the Canada Elections Act – accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

On December 13, 2017, the day of the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman, Justin Trudeau had both the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner removed as commissioners. Their removal was done during ongoing investigations by both commissioners into Justin Trudeau violating federal laws while campaigning in the 2015 federal election. Both commissioners were essentially fired for investigating Justin Trudeau for violating federal laws during the 2015 election campaign.

The 10 NOV 2017 Court Order and Justin Trudeau removing the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman are elements of a conspiracy to commit murder. The RCMP are involved. They became involved the day the Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers.

Lobbying Act
Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

The RCMP started investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers after the Lobbying Commissioner found evidence that federal laws were broken by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada (OCL)

A Nov 3, 2016 OCL taped recorded interview with Barry Sherman was the primary material evidence OCL used to have RCMP launch a “full investigation” of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser. OCL determined the tape recording provided evidence Justin Trudeau broke federal laws. Apotex filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner regarding the redacted name in transcripts of that Nov 3, 2016 taped recorded interview.

The Toronto Police know who murdered Barry and Honey Sherman. So does the Crown. The Crown sealed the Toronto Police murder investigation files and evidence to protect the people who committed the murders for Justin Trudeau’s benefit.

Crime scene evidence: restraint marks, Honey Sherman’s bloody lip & nose, the surreptitious entry, the person who entered the Shermans’ home Dec 14, 2017 for 29 minutes & the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers implicates RCMP officers in their murders.

Crime scene evidence shows murderers gained access to the Sherman home by the front door. No forced entry means Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers knocked on front door. It is plausible that Honey Sherman let her murderers in after her murderers identified themselves as police officers. Restraint marks and Honey Sherman’s bloody lip and nose supports assertion that she was forcibly restrained by police officers.

Keable Commission supports assertion that RCMP officers are viable suspects in Barry & Honey Sherman targeted murders. 15 RCMP officers were charged/tried for: conspiracy, B&E, kidnapping & forcible detention. Indicted RCMP officers claimed they “were just following (PM Pierre Trudeau) orders.

Former Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks.

Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders also stated that his officers interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman while they lay dead in the basement.

“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,”

Note, only one person entered the home yet Police Chief Saunders said Toronto Police knew why “they” were there – they means the person of interest was part of an organization. The RCMP is an organization. RCMP were at the time investigating Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser/fundraisers. Wiretapping is tool in RCMP investigations, especially when it involves the Prime Minister of Canada. It is highly plausible that a RCMP officer entered the Shermans’ home to remove wiretaps and/or incriminating evidence.

Parties to offence

Where two or more persons are playing an active role in the commission of a crime, each becomes a co-principal to that offence. When this is the case, it is not necessary to determine exactly which person committed which element of the offence. Rather, every act done to commit the offence is deemed to have been committed by all co-principals. A person can be a principal to an offence despite not actually committing the offence with their own hands. This occurs where they instead direct an innocent agent to commit the offence in their place.

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim alledge Nova Scotia shooter used assault rifles

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada. A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the mass murders. Fintrac documents for a transfer of $500,000 on March 30, 2020 from the RCMP to Gabriel Wortman identified Gabriel Wortman as a RCMP agent.

The RCMP gave $475,000 ($500,00 – $25,000 transfer fees) to alledge mass murderer Gabriel Wortman on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op involving convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon.

“The withdrawal of $475,000 in cash by the man who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April matches the method the RCMP uses to send money to confidential informants and agents, sources say.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

RCMP CI Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op. RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.
Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. As a drug trafficker Griffon had the means to obtain the weapons he needed to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

9 charges filed against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);

Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;

Unauthorized possession of a firearm;

Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Analysis of evidence in the “targeted” killings of Barry & Honey Sherman concludes murders were politically motivated

5 years ago Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed. Mass media and government officials claim no motive for the double homicides has been found despite there being substantial evidence to support an inference that the murders were politically motivated.

What was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? To answer that one must first examine why lead Toronto police investigator, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes publicly stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed? “I believe they were targeted,” The word “targeted” was specifically chosen to describe Toronto’s 2017 homicides #64 and #65. What was Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes revealing to the public by calling the double homicides “targeted” killing?

Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. That’s what Toronto Police were telling Canadians when they said Barry & Honey Sherman were “targeted” & killed. Toronto Police stated publicly from the very beginning that “there was no sign of forced entry into their home”. That is referred to as surreptitious entry. Toronto Police publicly stating that the murderers entered the home of Barry and Honey Sherman via surreptitious entry is of major significance. It supports the discovery finding that the Shermans were targeted and killed by a “government authority”.

Evidence of markings being found on the wrists of both Barry and Honey Sherman, indicated they had been tied up, yet no ties or ropes were found at the scene. This too has major significance in that it confirms both Barry and Honey were restrained, forcibly detained (were handcuffed) before being killed. Both being forcibly restrained, leaving marks, provides evidence it wasn’t a murder suicide. No ties or ropes were found at the scene proves the killers took the “restraints” (handcuffs) with them.

Restraint markings on their wrists, the Toronto Police Services stating that the Shermans were targeted and killed and that their murderers gained access via surreptitious entry all lead to the conclusion that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed by police officers. Which police officers? RCMP. Why?

1) Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. A RCMP officer is a government authority. They are authorized by the federal government to uphold and enforce government enacted and imposed laws across Canada.

2) RCMP officers contend that they are authorized by government appointed adjudicators to enter private premises to install listening or video devices or recover evidence in support of “an ongoing criminal investigation”. The power so granted authorizing surreptitious entry allows the RCMP to utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or via Realtor lock box, or simply through trickery or coercion. Further, if RCMP officers acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them “to effect such entry by overcoming force” a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.

Motive for targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016. During the tape recorded interview, Mr Sherman openly discussed a fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex (Barry Sherman) filed a law suit (Court number T-761-17) seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording.

Justin Trudeau responded by paying the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman suit & a court hearing that was to be held on Thursday, the 8th day of February 2018, at 9:30 to address the Lobbying Commissioner KAREN SHEPHERD refusing to comply with a court order that “redacted” documents that detail the taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex.

The court order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in an ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with the court order would prove Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED Justin Trudeau’s name from the transcript in order to conceal that Justin Trudeau broke the law:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign.”

In an email to Brian H. Greenspan photographic evidence was provided that showed that the Sherman’s home was under surveillance by the RCMP.

Only the RCMP has jurisdiction (government authority) to conduct a criminal investigation for the Federal government’s Office of Commissioner of Lobbying.

Direct quote from Administering the Lobbying Act (December 2011) :

“The peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the matter, generally the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in the case of the Lobbying Act, will consider the case in consultation with legal counsel at the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors at the Department of Public Prosecutions. Together, they will determine whether or not to lay charges.”

Since the ongoing RCMP investigation involved a high profile government of Canada official the RCMP claim that they are authorized to make surreptitious entry, or simply through trickery or coercion. RCMP officers also claim that they are permitted “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”.

In Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, it was contended that s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code authorized trespass by the police in order to effect an arrest. The basis is that the police (RCMP) are entitled, in limited circumstances, to enter private property without consent to effect an arrest – detain a person.

People detained or arrested by police officers and the RCMP are usually forcibly restrained using handcuffs, either metal or plastic. A traditional form of plastic handcuffs are cable ties. Cable ties leave unique marks on wrists of those being arrested by police (RCMP). Forensic pathologist confirmed that the markings on the wrists of both Shermans, indicates they had been restrained (forcibly detained) with ties before they were murdered. Toronto Police confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers took the restraints with them.

Why would the restraints be removed from the wrists of the victims and from the crime scene? Restraints are material evidence that could be traced back to the murderers. Canadian police forces have and use a specific type of cable tie. The markings on the wrists of Barry and Honey Sherman can be matched with impressions made by any specific type of tie mfg today.

Crime scene evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered by police officers. Both had restraint marks on their wrists (were handcuffed) & Honey Sherman had cuts on her lip & nose, suggesting that she had struggled with assailants & was forced face down on pool tiles. The evidence is telling us that at some point Honey Sherman sensed that the intruders were going to kill her and out a fear for her life she put up a fight. The cuts on her lip & nose is telling us she was forced to the ground by a police officer(s) who used his or her knee to forcibly hold Honey Sherman’s head and face to the ground as they handcuffed Honey Sherman’s hands behind her back.

It is important to note that police officers and the RCMP do not have the authority to make surreptitious entry or “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”. The Supreme Court of Canada, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697 Date: 1984-12-20 ruled that police surreptitious entry is unlawful:

“Until such time as Parliament speaks specifically on this matter, I am of the view that an unlawful entry to install a listening device is an unauthorized and unjustified use of police powers. If the authorization to intercept did purport to sanction such an entry, the authorization would be invalid in that respect. Judges simply do not have the power to permit anyone, even police officers, to commit unlawful acts.“