UN document “Changing Climate and the Coast ” refutes the UN claim that global warming poses a significant and imminent threat.

Published on: June 25, 2023

UN, EPA, NOAA document “Changing Climate and the Coast” provides ample evidence that the threat of global warming is a hoax. The effects of global warming has been grossly exaggerated for financial gain. Investigations could find no evidence to support the UN’s claim that global warming poses a significant and imminent threat. The perceived threat is based on assumptions and speculation.

There is no evidence to back the UN’s claim that global warming is responsible for an allege acceleration in the rate of sea level rise. According to the UN document climate change “has accounted for sea level changes of less than one millimeter per century.”

Excerpts from document, “Changing Climate and the Coast”:

Clark et al. (1978) have pointed out that these changes have accounted for sea level changes of less than one millimeter per century. No published study has indicated that this determinant of sea level is likely to have a significant impact in the next century. …

There is no evidence that either the Greenland or East Antarctic ice sheet has completely disintegrated in the last two million years. However, it is generally recognized that sea level was about seven meters higher than today during the last interglacial, which was 1-2°C warmer (Mercer, 1970; Hollin, 1972) …

Although the estimated global warming of the last century appears to be at least partly responsible for the last century’s rise in sea level, studies have not yet demonstrated that global warming is responsible for acceleration in the rate of sea level rise. …  global temperatures and sea level have been fairly stable in recent centuries, …

Concern about a substantial rise in sea level as a result of the projected global warming stemmed originally from Mercer (1968), who suggested that The Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves might disintegrate, causing a deglaciation of the West Antarctic ice sheet and a resulting 6 to 7 meter rise in sea level, possibly over a period as short as 40 years.

Subsequent investigations have concluded that such a rapid rise is unlikely. Hughes (1983) and Bentley (1983) estimated that such a disintegration would take at least 200 or 500 years, respectively. Other researchers have estimated that this process would take considerably longer (Fastook, 1985; Lingle, 1985).

Because no evidence was found to support the 1922 and subsequent claims that global warming is so severe that it will cause entire nations to disappear off the face of the Earth the UN recommended the US government research and develop the means to fabricate climate change. The Bill Clinton and Al Gore administration did just that by developing HAARP Alaska ionosphere heaters. Since the 1990s  the increase in global temperatures has been caused by ionosphere heaters.

NASA confirmed in 2006 that ionosphere heaters have caused large temperature increases. NASA specifically named Germany’s EISCAT inonosphere heaters in Norway as the culprit.

NASA Tech Brief November 2006:

“In recent years, large electron temperature increases of 300% (3000 K above background) caused by powerful HF-radio wave injection have been observed during nighttime using the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar near Tromsø in northern Norway.”

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS):

“It has been estimated that through radio frequency heating at a power of 10 kW for one day, it should be possible to increase the temperature of a soil volume of about 1 cubic m by about 200 C”

Germany’s EISCAT inonosphere heaters in Norway has a transmitter peak power of 2-3 Megawatts.

One megawatt equals one million watts or 1,000 kilowatts, roughly enough electricity for the instantaneous demand of 750 homes at once.

If just 10 kw can raise the temperature of 1 cubic meter soil in a targeted area to 200°C imagine what 3 Megawatts can do to the World’s glaciers or its atmosphere.

Ionosphere heaters can easily cause global warming in a targeted area if the beams are focused on a specific ground target or widespread if the beams are heating up the ionosphere atmosphere for days.

Screenshot of Germany’s EISCAT ionosphere heater transmissions. EISCAT was transmitting at 2-3 Megawatts for 3 days to cause climate change – global warming.

Any agreement that is based on a false premise is invalid

The UN document essentially proves that the UN is committing fraud.

Fraud

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence

The UN document also provides ample evidence that the carbon tax is illegal because it’s money obtained by fraud. The UN document invalidates the Paris Agreement because it is based on a false premise. The UN is falsely claiming that global warming is a significant and imminent threat and that it is being caused by CO2 emissions in order to obtain $billions from carbon taxation.

Anyone who has entered a contract under false pretences can withdraw from the contract and, in fact, the contract, its provisions and terms and conditions become 100% irrelevant.

Patent provides evidence that ionosphere heaters can cause climate change

The Eastlund patent that was used by BAE Advanced Technologies to build the HAARP Alaska ionosphere heaters facility states in patent claims:

The patent also states that the temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees using ionosphere heaters:

In such experiments, certain regions of the ionosphere are heated to change the electron density and temperature within these regions. This is accomplished by transmitting from earth-based antennae high frequency electromagnetic radiation at a substantial angle to, not parallel to, the ionosphere’s magnetic field to heat the ionospheric particles primarily by ohmic heating. The electron temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees in these experiments.

 

Make no mistake, another banking crisis is being orchestrated to bailout the insolvent Germany EU

US Congressional report chart shows Americans that the Federal Reserve unlawfully funnelled $trillions to Germany and its Fourth Reich EU banks during the last orchestrated banking crisis

­March 23, 2023

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse were both orchestrated to initiate another global banking crisis. Another global banking crisis is being orchestrated to bailout Germany’s Fourth Reich EU.

Germany and the ECB don’t have the $trillions they need to bailout it’s insolvent EU states. They’re banking on Joe Biden coming to their aid once again by stealing $trillions from the US people and giving it to Germany’s Fourth Reich EU. Least we forget Joe Biden was Vice-President during the last global banking crisis. He was in office when the New York Federal Reserve funneled $trillions to Germany’s Fourth Reich EU in 2008-2009.

A 2011 Audit of the Federal Reserve found that the Fed illegally funneled $trillions to foreign banks during the orchestrated 2008 financial crisis.

The Sanders Report, a Government Accountability Office investigation record, revealed that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly and “unlawfully” doled out $trillions in zero interest loans and concealed electronic funds transfers to itself and some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world.

The audit found that $16 trillion was doled out by the Federal Reserve. That was 10 times more than what the U.S. Congress authorized and George W Bush ($700 billion) and President Barack Obama and VP Joe Biden ( $787 billion) signed off on.  The Federal Reserve was only authorized by Congress to disburse $1.487 trillion in federal tax dollars in bailouts and financial aid, not $16 trillion.  The Federal Reserve embezzled another $14.5 trillion.

The Congressional report determined that the Fed secretly hide most of the embezzled money into their own banks.  The rest the Fed unilaterally transfered trillions of dollars to foreign banks and corporations from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) through Canada’s top 5 banks to the UK and from the UK to Germany’s Fourth Reich EU banks and corporations.

The list of foreign banks that received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 (screenshot above) of the GAO government report

Foreign banks that illegally received $trillions from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 2008-2009 included:

Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)

UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)

Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)

European Commission paper reported COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna & Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford falsified data – committed fraud

“The candidate vaccines do not prevent SARS-COV-2 infections which makes them suspicious at best and dishonest at best since they were made to elicit immune response that targets the SARS-COV-2 Spike protein. If the immune response that is elicited by the candidate vaccines was truly targeting SARS-COV-2 Spike protein, prevention of SARS-COV-2 infections should have been their primary mechanism of action (SARS-COV-2 should not in principle be able to enter and infect cells). The fact that the candidate vaccines do not prevent SARS-COV-2 infections make the claims of more than 90% effectiveness dubious, misleading at best and dishonest at worse. As stated above, no verifiable scientific evidence is available to show that the candidate vaccines concocted and developed by Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna and Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford are more than 90% effective. The only way to know anything about the effectiveness of the candidate vaccines is to analyze the data towards the end of the clinical trials in 2022 or to completely unseal the data for all the participants now. There is also no study of the long-term effects of the candidate vaccines. Again, one cannot cut corners when it comes to proving the effectiveness of a candidate vaccine and whether it is dangerous or not.”

CERN EC Journal of Investigative Critiques of Published Scientific Articles.

Website “commissioned by the European Commission to support their nascent Open Data policy by providing a catch-all repository for European Commission funded research” CERN EC Journal of Investigative Critiques of Published Scientific Articles

Source: DISHONEST SCIENTIFIC REPORT AND DATA FALSIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CANDIDATE SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 VACCINES DEVELOPED BY BIONTECH/PFIZER, MODERNA AND ASTRAZENECA/UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

Criminal Code of Canada defines COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna & Astra Zeneca/University of Oxford falsifying data to obtain regulatory approval and sale or purchase of their vaccines as Fraud

  •  (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

    • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

    • (b) is guilty

      • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

      • (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

      where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

The United States’ SEC and FBI defines COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers’ falsifying data as securities fraud.

Generally, securities fraud occurs when someone makes a false statement about a company or the value of its stock, and others makes financial decisions based on the false information.

Securities fraud is a criminal offense that is punishable under 18 USC § 1348. The law has the intention of protecting investors against fraudulent securities, such as stocks and bonds, through the imposition of disclosing important facts related to all forms of trade securities. To become liable for the offense, one must have committed the following acts:

  • Causing to defraud another person related to a commodity transacted for a future delivery. It may include any form of a security that is included in the classification provided by the Securities and Exchange Act.
  • The commission of misrepresentation, false statements, or false promises to obtain anything of value, such as money and property, in relation to a sale or purchase of a commodity.
  • Failure to disclose material facts related to the exchange of securities and provide false statements instead.