According to UK law Elizabeth II wasn’t queen when she died. According to UK law Elizabeth forfeited the Crown and was deemed legally dead the moment she attended/held communion with the Church of Rome. The UK’s Act of Settlement (law) states:

That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion …should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance

Above image is infallible proof that Elizabeth II held Communion with the Church of Rome and because it she was “made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto … the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance”.

The Act of Settlement 1701 law prohibits forever any Catholic from becoming the UK monarch. The UK legislation (law) made it clear that no sovereign shall “hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or profess the Popish Religion”.

To attend a service of Holy Communion at Westminster Abbey is to hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome and profess the Popish Religion. Her attendance is a blatant violation of the UK’s Act of Settlement law.

Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith”

Catholics are officially termed as being “naturally dead and deemed to be dead” in terms of succession. This distinction was first legislated in the Bill of Rights 1689. … “the Act of Settlement deems somebody who has been a Catholic for a minute to be ‘dead’ in terms of the succession, and it passes over them ‘as if they were dead’. It is an absolute. If at any moment in their whole life they were in communion with Rome, they are excluded from the throne, deemed to be dead.

According to UK law, Elizabeth II was deemed to be dead on the 4th November 1970. On that day she unlawfully attended the inauguration of the General Synod.

During the 4th November 1970 inauguration of the General Synod Elizabeth II and everyone in attendance professed the Popish Religion.

The first time Elizabeth publicly professed the Popish Religion was on June 2, 1953. During her coronation Elizabeth II professed:

”And I believe one Catholic and Apostolic Church”

Furthermore, her ring is prima facie evidence that she is a Catholic. The June 2, 1953 coronation transcript states:

Receive the Ring of kingly dignity,
and the seal of Catholic Faith

Because she professed the Popish Religion on June 2, 1953 she was “made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto”. That means Elizabeth II was never the Queen. Because Elizabeth II was deemed to be ‘dead’ in terms of the succession on June 2, 1953 her son Charles isn’t the King.

Convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant, Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

• Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op.

RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.

• Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. Peter Alan Griffon had the means to obtain more weapons to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. Drug trafficking is defined as organized crime – “a group of three or more people whose purpose is the commission of one or more serious offences that would likely result in the direct or indirect receipt of a material benefit, including a financial benefit, by the group.” When Peter Alan Griffon was arrested in 2014 three other drug trafficking associates were arrested too. Where were they at the time of the mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides material evidence to support the assertion that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant.

“You would later advise your parole officer that you had misled police and lied outright to your parole officer when first contacted and queried about knowledge of the shooting suspect.”

The Parole Board of Canada review statement provides material evidence that Peter Alan Griffon framed Gabriel Wortman by giving RCMP information that he knew was absolutely false. Peter Alan Griffon is the one and only person who provided the RCMP with information which described Gabriel Wortman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

The Parole Board of Canada review also explains Peter Alan Griffon’s motive for framing Gabriel Wortman for the Nova Scotia mass murders and arsons April 18-19, 2020.

“You shared that your (cocaine) addiction at one point reached using over $1000 worth per day. That level of use was not sustainable on a legitimate income. In the pursuit of drugs, you met the individual that police connected to a notorious STG. Given the opportunity to deliver drugs for cash and drug access, the offer was quickly accepted”

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 

2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

Peter Alan Griffon is the one person who had motive to target and kill 2 correctional officers April 18-19, 2020. Griffon served time in a NS prison (Correctional Service of Canada facility) for drug trafficking and firearm offences. Note: “Parole Officers work either within a correctional facility or in the community.” Correctional Services Canada

Griffon also had motive to target anyone who might provide RCMP or his parole officer with information that Griffon was trafficking in drugs while on parole. Griffon was out on parole at the time of the mass murders. Anyone who bought drugs from or sold drugs to Peter Alan Griffon would be a potential target. Government of Canada website informs you why:

Conditions of release

Standard Conditions

All offenders released on conditional release must abide by a set of standard conditions. These include reporting to a parole officer, obeying the law and keeping the peace, not owning or possessing a weapon, and reporting any change in their family, domestic or financial situation to their parole officer.

Special Conditions

The Parole Board may also impose any special conditions it considers reasonable and necessary to further manage an offender’s risk in the community, such as to abstain from the use of drugs or alcohol.

Peter Alan Griffon’s parole conditions:

The evidence implicates drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon as the prime suspect for the Nova Scotia mass murders. When Peter Alan Griffon was arrested by Alberta Law Enforcement Response Team (ALERT) in December 2014 a variety of firearms and weapons were seized, including:

• Two .22 caliber rifles, one equipped with a silencer;
• .44 caliber Desert Eagle handgun;
• Sawed-off shotgun;
• Thousands of rounds of ammunition;
• Body armour vests.

Edmonton Police Service and the RCMP laid 9 charges against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

• Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);
• Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;
• Unauthorized possession of a firearm;
• Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Statement by ALERT, an integrated team consisting of Edmonton Police Service and RCMP members when Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and later convicted of drug trafficking and weapons offences:

“The group is called La Familia & their reputation includes bloodshed & intimidation. La Familia, or the The Family, is described as an international support arm for the Mexican drug cartels and has strong ties to El Salvador gang Mara Salvatrucha, also known as MS-13.”

If Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer why hasn’t he been charged? Because if he was a RCMP informant he can claim immunity from prosecution.

Public Proseution Service of Canada, Immunity Agreement

Introduction

Those who have violated the law should be held accountable for their crimes. However, some crimes can be proved only by the testimony or cooperation of individuals who are implicated in the same crime or in some other criminal activity and who seek immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony and/or their cooperation with the police. …

While the cooperation of these individuals has been recognized as a very powerful tool in the battle against crime, it brings with it the very real risk that individuals will falsely accuse others and/or minimize their own culpability in the hope of securing immunity. Great care therefore must be taken in dealing with individuals seeking immunity.

.2. Immunity from future prosecutions

The DPP is also entitled to provide an assurance of immunity against future prosecution for crimes that the information-provider is known to have already committed, but for which no charges have yet been laid

However, charges can still be laid if Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP agent at the time of the Nova Scotia mass murders. There is evidence that Gabriel Wortman obtained 1\2 million dollars from the RCMP for a RCMP Op on March 30, 2020. The RCMP Op involved convicted drug trafficker Peter Alan Griffon. Griffon arranged a drug buy for the RCMP using the money Gabriel Wortman obtained from the RCMP on March 30, 2020. Fintrac paperwork for the $475,000 transfer to Gabriel Wortman will confirm it.

“According to a source close to the police investigation the money came from CIBC Intria, a subsidiary of the chartered bank that handles currency transactions.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

In that case, Peter Alan Griffon has no immunity from prosecution because he was an agent acting on the direction of the RCMP to go “into the field” to participate in the illegal transaction in some way.

Public Proseution Service of Canada states:

8. Situations Where the Privilege Might Not Apply

There are situations where informer privilege does not apply, where the information-provider is a police agent or agent provocateur, when the privilege has been waived, or where a person provides information to the police in the absence of a promise or guarantee of confidentiality, either express or implied. In these situations, the information-provider does not have (or, in the case of waiver, no longer has) informer status.

a) Distinguishing Agents from Informers

One of the most difficult problems in this area is determining when the privilege applies to the actions of persons cooperating with the police. Informer privilege does not apply when the information-provider is characterized as a “police agent” or “agent provocateur,” rather than an “informer.”

A helpful explanation of the distinction between informers and agents is found in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Babes:

In general terms, the distinction between an informer and an agent is that an informer merely furnishes information to the police and an agent acts on the direction of the police and goes “into the field” to participate in the illegal transaction in some way. The identity of an informer is protected by a strong privilege and, accordingly, is not disclosable, subject to the innocence at stake exception. The identity of an agent is disclosable.

Generally speaking, passive observers to criminal activities will be considered informers. In contrast, individuals who participate in the criminal activities under investigation as a result of being directed by the police will generally be considered police agents or agents provocateurs. A person may have dual status as a confidential informer and police agent in relation to separate investigations or targets.

Despite all the evidence that implicates RCMP asset Peter Alan Griffon for the Nova Scotia mass murders he will likely never be charged or prosecuted because extremely corrupt PM/MP Justin Trudeau used the mass murders to obtain legislation banning assault rifles, pursuant to and furtherance of a UN agenda.

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit the mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada.

A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the Nova Scotia mass murders and the killing of RCMP officer Cst. Heidi Stevenson.

 

Justin Trudeau is solely responsible for the rise in home prices. Foreigners didn’t cause the rise in home prices. Home prices rose sharply as a result of the price of lumber being inflated to benefit Justin Trudeau personally.

Justin Trudeau caused the price of lumber to skyrocket during the 2021 federal election. Justin Trudeau “committed to building 1.4 million homes within four years by easing regulations on construction and eliminating some red tape.” 

“A re-elected Liberal government will build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes in the next four years” A Home. For Everyone: The Liberal Housing Plan“

Justin Trudeau’s 2021 election campaign plans to build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes within four years caused the demand for lumber to exceed supply. It’s a fundamental economic principle that when demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise.

Justin Trudeau has benefitted financially from the high prices of lumber. Justin Trudeau is currently listed/registered as a shareholder of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC – PRODUCTION AND SALE OF FIREWOOD AND LUMBER.

Justin Trudeau continuing to be an officer in 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC. is defined by the federal law, the Conflict of Interest Act, as Prohibited activities.

15 (1) No reporting public office holder shall (c) continue as, or become, a director or officer in a corporation or an organization.

“a public office holder (Justin Trudeau, Vice-President of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC.) is in a conflict of interest when he or she exercises an official power, duty or function that provides an opportunity to further his or her private interests or those of his or her relatives” DoJ

“When performing parliamentary duties & functions, a member shall not act in any way to further his or her private interests or those of a member of the member’s family” Parliament, CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

Justin Trudeau’s broke the law by causing the price of lumber to be inflated for personal benefit/gain. His actions is defined as breach of trust by public officer.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Actus Reus

The indictable offence of “breach of trust” can include “any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office as a senior civil servant of the Crown.”

The prohibited act must cause a personal benefit to the accused and must be contrary to the duties imposed upon them.

When Rodney and Ekaterina Baker flew from Vancouver to the town of Beaver Creek, Canada, on January 21, 2021 to get vaccine doses meant for elderly members of the local White River First Nation tribe the WHO and it’s COVID-19 biological attack co-conspiring Trudeau government panicked. The WHO wasn’t worried about the couple breaking quarantine and spreading COVID-19. The WHO was worried about what would happen if a white person was infected with the race specific viral protein that was purposely inserted in the COVID-19 vaccine Germany manufactured for Canada’s aboriginal people.

Testing of Germany’s COVID-19 vaccines will prove that they are biological weapons. They contain 2 components of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The spike protein (a modified/mutated form) and SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10. The spike protein facilitates ORF10 entry into the cells where they can replicate and make us sick. SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10 cannot enter cells without the spike protein. The novel coronavirus uses spike protein like a key to gain entry to our cells. Essentially, spike protein facilitates entry of Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA segment – ORF10.

“The vaccines deliver mRNA into cells near the injection site. This mRNA instructs the body’s own cells to replicate the coronavirus’s spike (S) protein. This protein, in turn, is recognized by the body as foreign, generating protective antibodies. The mRNA itself is rapidly degraded and does not enter the cell’s nucleus. Specifically, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleosidemodified mRNA vaccine. The lipid coating of the nanoparticles binds to the cell membrane, facilitating entry of the mRNA segment into the cell.” ASRM Coronavirus/COVID-19 Task Force

Germany internationally made their vaccines to facilitate infection. That’s what biological weapons are designed to do.

“(1) the term “biological agent” means any microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing— (A) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (B) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or (C) deleterious alteration of the environment;” 18 USC § 178(1)

The vaccines that Germany manufactured are also ethnic specific. The ingredients for vaccines intended for Canada’s oboriginals, and the Asian and African populations are different than the vaccines manufactured for the white American and European populations. Testing batches distributed to various countries and their ethnic groups will prove that is what Germany did for the WHO.

Former US Secretary of Defense William Cohen warned the World April 28, 1997 that some countries were developing pathogens that would be ethnic specific.

“There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races;” William Cohen

AIDS, SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 were all developed for the WHO to target specific ethnic groups. AIDS was caused by the WHO’s smallpox vaccine that contained the live and infectious vaccinia virus. AIDS was created to target the African populations. SARS was lab created to target the Asian populations. MERS was lab created to target Middle Eastern populations. SARS-CoV-2 is a lab modified/mutated form of SARS. The viral protein ORF10 was inserted in the SARS genome to make SARS more infectious.

Since 1972 the WHO (agency of the UN) called for/recommended virologists develop the means to prolong virus/coronavirus infections by imparing immune response to a virus.

The below screenshot was taken from the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Volume 47, p.259, 1972, Recommendations (3)

The viral protein ORF10 was inserted by virologists into the SARS virus to prolong SARS coronavirus infections.

2021 published study “SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy” informs you why Germany manufactured its COVID-19 vaccines to include 2 major components of SARS-CoV-2 – it’s spike protein and it’s unique viral protein ORF10:

“In this study, we showed that overexpression of ORF10 markedly suppressed the expression of type I interferon (IFN-I) genes and IFN-stimulated genes. Then, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) was identified as the target via which ORF10 suppresses the IFN-I signaling pathway, and MAVS was found to be degraded through the ORF10-induced autophagy pathway. Furthermore, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the accumulation of LC3 in mitochondria and induced mitophagy. ”

… ORF10 transcripts can be detected in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 [56]. Moreover, Liu et al. found that the expression level of ORF10 in patients with severe disease was much higher than that in patients with moderate disease; in addition, the expression ratio of ORF10 to nucleocapsid (N) in patients with severe disease was significantly higher than that in patients with moderate disease [57]. Therefore, ORF10 plays a vital role at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our study, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the degradation of MAVS and the replication of SARS-CoV-2. Consistent with these results, when ORF10 was knocked down by shRNA, MAVS was not degraded and viral replication was weakened, suggesting that ORF10 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication via degradation of MAVS.

End note. Rodney and Ekaterina Baker were never jailed. They only had to pay a small fine. The WHO had the Trudeau government impose the fine to avoid a trial. A trial requires a full investigation and disclosure. An investigation would have proven Germany’s vaccine were manufactured to be ethnic specific. To target a specific ethnic group and cause their death or serious bodily harm is genocide.

Convention for the Prevention and the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states in Article 1 that genocide is a crime under international law.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;

Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

 

In 2018 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone conducting an investigation into an allegation that he groped a female reporter in British Columbia in 2000. Any investigation would have uncovered that Justin Trudeau was “charged with an offence”. In 2000 Justin Trudeau was a defendant in a trial by jury court case.

BC Court documents provides infallible proof that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and the offence was serious enough to warrant a trial.

The link to search for Justin Trudeau’s court case file in Vancover BC is https://justice.gov.bc.ca/cso/esearch/civil/fileSearch.do.

Enter file number: B992544 (Requires payment of $6 fee to view Supreme File VLC-S-M-B992544).

Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury court case document is filed under Motor Vehicle Accidents. However, in order for Justin Trudeau to elect “trial by jury” charges had to be filed by RCMP against Justin Trudeau.

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right:

except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment.

To elect trial by jury a person must at one time have been “charged with an offence” as required by the opening words of section 11.

“Most civil cases in Canada are tried by judges without a jury. However, anyone charged with a criminal offence for which there can be a prison sentence of five years or more has the right to a trial by jury.”

“In some cases, a person charged with a criminal offence for which there can be a prison sentence of less than five years may have the right to choose a trial by jury.” Department of Justice

Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone investigating the 2000 groping because they would find out that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence.

Investigate further. This court case involved more than just a traffic accident. Police records at the RCMP detachment that responded to the accident will show why Justin Trudeau was charged. Justin Trudeau couldn’t be charged with an offence by the RCMP if Justin Trudeau was innocent. The RCMP had to have sufficient evidence to charge Justin Trudeau with an offence. Secondly Justin Trudeau could only elect trial by jury if the “maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment”. A conviction and sentencing of imprisonment of 2 or more years would have meant Justin Trudeau would never have been able to become a MP or the Prime Minister of Canada.

Justin Trudeau claimed that six months before his younger brother’s death, Michel Trudeau was charged with possession of marijuana after he was involved in a collision on the highway while he was driving home to Montreal from the West Coast. RCMP had found a Sucrets box with a couple of joints inside when they were helping him collect his belongings that were scattered across the highway. However, there’s no record of Michel Trudeau being charged by RCMP in BC. There is no court case involving Michel Trudeau found using the same website that showed that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and was ordered to appear in a court of law in 1999.