Drug trafficker turned RCMP informant, Peter Alan Griffon had motive to commit Nova Scotia mass murders

Convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant, Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

  • Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op.

RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.

  • Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. Peter Alan Griffon had the means to obtain more weapons to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. Drug trafficking is defined as organized crime – “a group of three or more people whose purpose is the commission of one or more serious offences that would likely result in the direct or indirect receipt of a material benefit, including a financial benefit, by the group.” When Peter Alan Griffon was arrested in 2014 three other drug trafficking associates were arrested too. Where were they at the time of the mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides material evidence to support the assertion that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant.

“You would later advise your parole officer that you had misled police and lied outright to your parole officer when first contacted and queried about knowledge of the shooting suspect.”

The Parole Board of Canada review statement provides material evidence that Peter Alan Griffon framed Gabriel Wortman by giving RCMP information that he knew was absolutely false. Peter Alan Griffon is the one and only person who provided the RCMP with information which described Gabriel Wortman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

The Parole Board of Canada review also explains Peter Alan Griffon’s motive for framing Gabriel Wortman for the Nova Scotia mass murders and arsons April 18-19, 2020.

“You shared that your (cocaine) addiction at one point reached using over $1000 worth per day. That level of use was not sustainable on a legitimate income. In the pursuit of drugs, you met the individual that police connected to a notorious STG. Given the opportunity to deliver drugs for cash and drug access, the offer was quickly accepted”

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 

2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

Peter Alan Griffon is the one person who had motive to target and kill 2 correctional officers April 18-19, 2020. Griffon served time in a NS prison (Correctional Service of Canada facility) for drug trafficking and firearm offences. Note: “Parole Officers work either within a correctional facility or in the community.” Correctional Services Canada

Griffon also had motive to target anyone who might provide RCMP or his parole officer with information that Griffon was trafficking in drugs while on parole. Griffon was out on parole at the time of the mass murders. Anyone who bought drugs from or sold drugs to Peter Alan Griffon would be a potential target. Government of Canada website informs you why:

Conditions of release

Standard Conditions

All offenders released on conditional release must abide by a set of standard conditions. These include reporting to a parole officer, obeying the law and keeping the peace, not owning or possessing a weapon, and reporting any change in their family, domestic or financial situation to their parole officer.

Special Conditions

The Parole Board may also impose any special conditions it considers reasonable and necessary to further manage an offender’s risk in the community, such as to abstain from the use of drugs or alcohol.

Peter Alan Griffon’s parole conditions:

The evidence implicates drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon as the prime suspect for the Nova Scotia mass murders. When Peter Alan Griffon was arrested by Alberta Law Enforcement Response Team (ALERT) in December 2014 a variety of firearms and weapons were seized, including:

  • Two .22 caliber rifles, one equipped with a silencer;
  • .44 caliber Desert Eagle handgun;
  • Sawed-off shotgun;
  • Thousands of rounds of ammunition;
  • Body armour vests.

Edmonton Police Service and the RCMP laid 9 charges against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);
  • Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;
  • Unauthorized possession of a firearm;
  • Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Statement by ALERT, an integrated team consisting of Edmonton Police Service and RCMP members when Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and later convicted of drug trafficking and weapons offences:

“The group is called La Familia & their reputation includes bloodshed & intimidation. La Familia, or the The Family, is described as an international support arm for the Mexican drug cartels and has strong ties to El Salvador gang Mara Salvatrucha, also known as MS-13.”

If Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer why hasn’t he been charged? Because if he was a RCMP informant he can claim immunity from prosecution.

Public Proseution Service of Canada, Immunity Agreement

Introduction

Those who have violated the law should be held accountable for their crimes. However, some crimes can be proved only by the testimony or cooperation of individuals who are implicated in the same crime or in some other criminal activity and who seek immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony and/or their cooperation with the police.

While the cooperation of these individuals has been recognized as a very powerful tool in the battle against crime, it brings with it the very real risk that individuals will falsely accuse others and/or minimize their own culpability in the hope of securing immunity. Great care therefore must be taken in dealing with individuals seeking immunity.

.2. Immunity from future prosecutions

The DPP is also entitled to provide an assurance of immunity against future prosecution for crimes that the information-provider is known to have already committed, but for which no charges have yet been laid

However, charges can still be laid if Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP agent at the time of the Nova Scotia mass murders. There is evidence that Gabriel Wortman obtained 1\2 million dollars from the RCMP for a RCMP Op on March 30, 2020. The RCMP Op involved convicted drug trafficker Peter Alan Griffon. Griffon arranged a drug buy for the RCMP using the money Gabriel Wortman obtained from the RCMP on March 30, 2020. Fintrac paperwork for the $475,000 transfer to Gabriel Wortman will confirm it.

“According to a source close to the police investigation the money came from CIBC Intria, a subsidiary of the chartered bank that handles currency transactions.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

In that case, Peter Alan Griffon has no immunity from prosecution because he was an agent acting on the direction of the RCMP to go “into the field” to participate in the illegal transaction in some way.

Public Proseution Service of Canada states:

8. Situations Where the Privilege Might Not Apply

There are situations where informer privilege does not apply, where the information-provider is a police agent or agent provocateur, when the privilege has been waived, or where a person provides information to the police in the absence of a promise or guarantee of confidentiality, either express or implied. In these situations, the information-provider does not have (or, in the case of waiver, no longer has) informer status.

a) Distinguishing Agents from Informers

One of the most difficult problems in this area is determining when the privilege applies to the actions of persons cooperating with the police. Informer privilege does not apply when the information-provider is characterized as a “police agent” or “agent provocateur,” rather than an “informer.”

A helpful explanation of the distinction between informers and agents is found in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Babes:

In general terms, the distinction between an informer and an agent is that an informer merely furnishes information to the police and an agent acts on the direction of the police and goes “into the field” to participate in the illegal transaction in some way. The identity of an informer is protected by a strong privilege and, accordingly, is not disclosable, subject to the innocence at stake exception. The identity of an agent is disclosable.

Generally speaking, passive observers to criminal activities will be considered informers. In contrast, individuals who participate in the criminal activities under investigation as a result of being directed by the police will generally be considered police agents or agents provocateurs. A person may have dual status as a confidential informer and police agent in relation to separate investigations or targets.

Despite all the evidence that implicates RCMP asset Peter Alan Griffon for the Nova Scotia mass murders he will likely never be charged or prosecuted because extremely corrupt PM/MP Justin Trudeau used the mass murders to obtain legislation banning assault rifles, pursuant to and furtherance of a UN agenda.

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit the mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada.

A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the Nova Scotia mass murders and the killing of RCMP officer Cst. Heidi Stevenson.

 

Two year ban on foreigners buying homes in Canada imposed to conceal that Justin Trudeau caused home prices to rise

Justin Trudeau is solely responsible for the rise in home prices. Foreigners didn’t cause the rise in home prices. Home prices rose sharply as a result of the price of lumber being inflated to benefit Justin Trudeau personally.

Justin Trudeau caused the price of lumber to skyrocket during the 2021 federal election. Justin Trudeau “committed to building 1.4 million homes within four years by easing regulations on construction and eliminating some red tape.” 

“A re-elected Liberal government will build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes in the next four years” A Home. For Everyone: The Liberal Housing Plan

Justin Trudeau’s 2021 election campaign plans to build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes within four years caused the demand for lumber to exceed supply. It’s a fundamental economic principle that when demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise.

Justin Trudeau has benefitted financially from the high prices of lumber. Justin Trudeau is currently listed/registered as a shareholder of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INCPRODUCTION AND SALE OF FIREWOOD AND LUMBER.

Justin Trudeau continuing to be an officer in 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC. is defined by the federal law, the Conflict of Interest Act, as Prohibited activities.

15 (1) No reporting public office holder shall (c) continue as, or become, a director or officer in a corporation or an organization.

“a public office holder (Justin Trudeau, Vice-President of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC.) is in a conflict of interest when he or she exercises an official power, duty or function that provides an opportunity to further his or her private interests or those of his or her relatives” DoJ

“When performing parliamentary duties & functions, a member shall not act in any way to further his or her private interests or those of a member of the member’s family” Parliament, CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

Justin Trudeau’s broke the law by causing the price of lumber to be inflated for personal benefit/gain. His actions is defined as breach of trust by public officer.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Actus Reus

The indictable offence of “breach of trust” can include “any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office as a senior civil servant of the Crown.”

The prohibited act must cause a personal benefit to the accused and must be contrary to the duties imposed upon them.

Testing Germany’s COVID-19 vaccines will prove they manufactured different batches of vaccines that were ethnic specific

When Rodney and Ekaterina Baker flew from Vancouver to the town of Beaver Creek, Canada, on January 21, 2021 to get vaccine doses meant for elderly members of the local White River First Nation tribe the WHO and it’s COVID-19 biological attack co-conspiring Trudeau government panicked. The WHO wasn’t worried about the couple breaking quarantine and spreading COVID-19. The WHO was worried about what would happen if a white person was infected with the race specific viral protein that was purposely inserted in the COVID-19 vaccine Germany manufactured for Canada’s aboriginal people.

Testing of Germany’s COVID-19 vaccines will prove that they are biological weapons. They contain 2 components of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The spike protein (a modified/mutated form) and SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10. The spike protein facilitates ORF10 entry into the cells where they can replicate and make us sick. SARS-CoV-2’s unique viral protein ORF10 cannot enter cells without the spike protein. The novel coronavirus uses spike protein like a key to gain entry to our cells. Essentially, spike protein facilitates entry of Germany’s COVID-19 mRNA segment – ORF10.

“The vaccines deliver mRNA into cells near the injection site. This mRNA instructs the body’s own cells to replicate the coronavirus’s spike (S) protein. This protein, in turn, is recognized by the body as foreign, generating protective antibodies. The mRNA itself is rapidly degraded and does not enter the cell’s nucleus. Specifically, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleosidemodified mRNA vaccine. The lipid coating of the nanoparticles binds to the cell membrane, facilitating entry of the mRNA segment into the cell.” ASRM Coronavirus/COVID-19 Task Force

Germany internationally made their vaccines to facilitate infection. That’s what biological weapons are designed to do.

“(1) the term biological agent” means any microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing— (A) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (B) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or (C) deleterious alteration of the environment;” 18 USC § 178(1)

The vaccines that Germany manufactured are also ethnic specific. The ingredients for vaccines intended for Canada’s oboriginals, and the Asian and African populations are different than the vaccines manufactured for the white American and European populations. Testing batches distributed to various countries and their ethnic groups will prove that is what Germany did for the WHO.

Former US Secretary of Defense William Cohen warned the World April 28, 1997 that some countries were developing pathogens that would be ethnic specific.

“There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races;” William Cohen

AIDS, SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 were all developed for the WHO to target specific ethnic groups. AIDS was caused by the WHO’s smallpox vaccine that contained the live and infectious vaccinia virus. AIDS was created to target the African populations. SARS was lab created to target the Asian populations. MERS was lab created to target Middle Eastern populations. SARS-CoV-2 is a lab modified/mutated form of SARS. The viral protein ORF10 was inserted in the SARS genome to make SARS more infectious.

Since 1972 the WHO (agency of the UN) called for/recommended virologists develop the means to prolong virus/coronavirus infections by imparing immune response to a virus.

The below screenshot was taken from the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Volume 47, p.259, 1972, Recommendations (3)

The viral protein ORF10 was inserted by virologists into the SARS virus to prolong SARS coronavirus infections.

2021 published studySARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy” informs you why Germany manufactured its COVID-19 vaccines to include 2 major components of SARS-CoV-2 – it’s spike protein and it’s unique viral protein ORF10:

“In this study, we showed that overexpression of ORF10 markedly suppressed the expression of type I interferon (IFN-I) genes and IFN-stimulated genes. Then, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) was identified as the target via which ORF10 suppresses the IFN-I signaling pathway, and MAVS was found to be degraded through the ORF10-induced autophagy pathway. Furthermore, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the accumulation of LC3 in mitochondria and induced mitophagy. ”

… ORF10 transcripts can be detected in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 [56]. Moreover, Liu et al. found that the expression level of ORF10 in patients with severe disease was much higher than that in patients with moderate disease; in addition, the expression ratio of ORF10 to nucleocapsid (N) in patients with severe disease was significantly higher than that in patients with moderate disease [57]. Therefore, ORF10 plays a vital role at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In our study, overexpression of ORF10 promoted the degradation of MAVS and the replication of SARS-CoV-2. Consistent with these results, when ORF10 was knocked down by shRNA, MAVS was not degraded and viral replication was weakened, suggesting that ORF10 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication via degradation of MAVS.

End note. Rodney and Ekaterina Baker were never jailed. They only had to pay a small fine. The WHO had the Trudeau government impose the fine to avoid a trial. A trial requires a full investigation and disclosure. An investigation would have proven Germany’s vaccine were manufactured to be ethnic specific. To target a specific ethnic group and cause their death or serious bodily harm is genocide.

Convention for the Prevention and the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states in Article 1 that genocide is a crime under international law.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;

Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

 

BC court documents provides proof that Justin Trudeau was charged with a criminal offence and was ordered to stand trial

In 2018 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone conducting an investigation into an allegation that he groped a female reporter in British Columbia in 2000. Any investigation would have uncovered that Justin Trudeau was “charged with an offence”. In 2000 Justin Trudeau was a defendant in a trial by jury court case.

BC Court documents provides infallible proof that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and the offence was serious enough to warrant a trial.

The link to search for Justin Trudeau’s court case file in Vancover BC is https://justice.gov.bc.ca/cso/esearch/civil/fileSearch.do.

Enter file number: B992544 (Requires payment of $6 fee to view Supreme File VLC-S-M-B992544).

Justin Trudeau’s trial by jury court case document is filed under Motor Vehicle Accidents. However, in order for Justin Trudeau to elect “trial by jury” charges had to be filed by RCMP against Justin Trudeau.

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right:

except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment.

To elect trial by jury a person must at one time have been “charged with an offence” as required by the opening words of section 11.

“Most civil cases in Canada are tried by judges without a jury. However, anyone charged with a criminal offence for which there can be a prison sentence of five years or more has the right to a trial by jury.”

“In some cases, a person charged with a criminal offence for which there can be a prison sentence of less than five years may have the right to choose a trial by jury.” Department of Justice

Justin Trudeau didn’t want anyone investigating the 2000 groping because they would find out that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence.

Investigate further. This court case involved more than just a traffic accident. Police records at the RCMP detachment that responded to the accident will show why Justin Trudeau was charged. Justin Trudeau couldn’t be charged with an offence by the RCMP if Justin Trudeau was innocent. The RCMP had to have sufficient evidence to charge Justin Trudeau with an offence. Secondly Justin Trudeau could only elect trial by jury if the “maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment”. A conviction and sentencing of imprisonment of 2 or more years would have meant Justin Trudeau would never have been able to become a MP or the Prime Minister of Canada.

Justin Trudeau claimed that six months before his younger brother’s death, Michel Trudeau was charged with possession of marijuana after he was involved in a collision on the highway while he was driving home to Montreal from the West Coast. RCMP had found a Sucrets box with a couple of joints inside when they were helping him collect his belongings that were scattered across the highway. However, there’s no record of Michel Trudeau being charged by RCMP in BC. There is no court case involving Michel Trudeau found using the same website that showed that Justin Trudeau was charged with an offence and was ordered to appear in a court of law in 1999.

 

Toronto Police investigation of Barry & Honey Sherman murders sealed by the Crown to cover up who committed the targeted murders

There is compeling evidence that shows that 5 years ago Justin Trudeau conspired to have his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers murdered. Justin Trudeau had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman. An ongoing RCMP investigation of his election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner and an Apotex lawsuit put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. The fundraiser was a prohibited gift. Justin Trudeau accepting the prohibited gift meant that he violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act.

Violating the Lobbying Act had no legal consequences for either Justin Trudeau or Barry Sherman.

“The RCMP have never, ever followed up. The RCMP then rubber-stamps or whitewashes whatever Lobbying Act activity has happened.” House of Commons

However, violating the Canada Elections Act meant that Justin Truduea could have lost his seat in the House of Commons and he couldn’t be a candidate in another election for 5 years. It would have meant the end of his political career.

“The Canada Elections Act also sets out a series of disqualifications that apply exclusively to electoral candidacy. … Current disqualifications include the following: A person found guilty of an illegal or corrupt electoral practice (as defined in section 502 of the Canada Elections Act) is disqualified from contesting a federal election for either five or seven years and, if he or she has been elected, may be required to vacate his or her seat in the House of Commons. Illegal practices include wilfully exceeding the spending limit or obstructing the electoral process. Corrupt practices include voting more than once or accepting a prohibited gift or other advantageParliament of Canada

Conspiracy

465 (1) (a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;

A Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants” provided motive for Justin Trudeau to conspire to commit murder.

The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding  S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. That court order put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. Justin Trudeau could have been “required to vacate his seat in House of Commons” for violating the Canada Elections Act – accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

On December 13, 2017, the day of the targeted murders of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman, Justin Trudeau had both the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner removed as commissioners. Their removal was done during ongoing investigations by both commissioners into Justin Trudeau violating federal laws while campaigning in the 2015 federal election. Both commissioners were essentially fired for investigating Justin Trudeau for violating federal laws during the 2015 election campaign.

The 10 NOV 2017 Court Order and Justin Trudeau removing the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner on the day of the targeted murders of his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman are elements of a conspiracy to commit murder. The RCMP are involved. They became involved the day the Lobbying Commissioner had the RCMP investigate Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers.

Lobbying Act
Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

The RCMP started investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers after the Lobbying Commissioner found evidence that federal laws were broken by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada (OCL)

A Nov 3, 2016 OCL taped recorded interview with Barry Sherman was the primary material evidence OCL used to have RCMP launch a “full investigation” of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser. OCL determined the tape recording provided evidence Justin Trudeau broke federal laws. Apotex filed a lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner regarding the redacted name in transcripts of that Nov 3, 2016 taped recorded interview.

The Toronto Police know who murdered Barry and Honey Sherman. So does the Crown. The Crown sealed the Toronto Police murder investigation files and evidence to protect the people who committed the murders for Justin Trudeau’s benefit.

Crime scene evidence: restraint marks, Honey Sherman’s bloody lip & nose, the surreptitious entry, the person who entered the Shermans’ home Dec 14, 2017 for 29 minutes & the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s election campaign fundraiser/fundraisers implicates RCMP officers in their murders.

Crime scene evidence shows murderers gained access to the Sherman home by the front door. No forced entry means Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers knocked on front door. It is plausible that Honey Sherman let her murderers in after her murderers identified themselves as police officers. Restraint marks and Honey Sherman’s bloody lip and nose supports assertion that she was forcibly restrained by police officers.

Keable Commission supports assertion that RCMP officers are viable suspects in Barry & Honey Sherman targeted murders. 15 RCMP officers were charged/tried for: conspiracy, B&E, kidnapping & forcible detention. Indicted RCMP officers claimed they “were just following (PM Pierre Trudeau) orders.

Former Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks.

Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders also stated that his officers interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman while they lay dead in the basement.

“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,”

Note, only one person entered the home yet Police Chief Saunders said Toronto Police knew why “they” were there – they means the person of interest was part of an organization. The RCMP is an organization. RCMP were at the time investigating Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser/fundraisers. Wiretapping is tool in RCMP investigations, especially when it involves the Prime Minister of Canada. It is highly plausible that a RCMP officer entered the Shermans’ home to remove wiretaps and/or incriminating evidence.

Parties to offence

Where two or more persons are playing an active role in the commission of a crime, each becomes a co-principal to that offence. When this is the case, it is not necessary to determine exactly which person committed which element of the offence. Rather, every act done to commit the offence is deemed to have been committed by all co-principals. A person can be a principal to an offence despite not actually committing the offence with their own hands. This occurs where they instead direct an innocent agent to commit the offence in their place.

Related briefing: Justin Trudeau is the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim alledge Nova Scotia shooter used assault rifles

Dashcam video of the scene where RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed provides material evidence that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was pressured by Justin Trudeau to falsely claim Gabriel Wortman used assault rifles to commit mass murders on April 18-19 2020. Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to fabricate evidence to further the UN’s agenda of banning assault rifles in Canada. A screenshot from a dashcam video shows RCMP ERT officers firing assault rifles. A person RCMP identified as Gabriel Wortman was videotaped by a passing motorist fleeing the scene on foot but he wasn’t videotaped carrying an assault rifle.

The above screenshot from a dashcam provides material evidence that RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson was killed by friendly fire and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki covered it up by claiming Gabriel Wortman had used assault rifles to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders. The position of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s body on the ground and RCMP ERT officer firing assault rifles in the direction of her RCMP cruiser supports the friendly fire assertion.

This screenshot and other video images provides evidence that the weapons RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki claimed Gabriel Wortman used in the Nova Scotia shootings were actually used and fired by RCMP ERT officers at the scene where RCMP Cst Heidi Stevenson was killed. RCMP ERT members firing their Colt Carbines was captured by RCMP dashcam and by a motorist’s cell phone video. RCMP ERT officers were video taped carrying a Colt Carbine while he climbed over a guardrail in front of RCMP Cst. Heidi Stevenson’s cruiser.

The 2 RCMP cruisers were set on fire to destroy material evidence that could and would implicate the RCMP and their involvement in the mass murders. Fintrac documents for a transfer of $500,000 on March 30, 2020 from the RCMP to Gabriel Wortman identified Gabriel Wortman as a RCMP agent.

The RCMP gave $475,000 ($500,00 – $25,000 transfer fees) to alledge mass murderer Gabriel Wortman on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op involving convicted drug trafficker turned RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon.

“The withdrawal of $475,000 in cash by the man who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April matches the method the RCMP uses to send money to confidential informants and agents, sources say.”

“Sources in both banking and the RCMP say the transaction is consistent with how the RCMP funnels money to its confidential informants and agents, and is not an option available to private banking customers.” Macleans

RCMP CI Peter Alan Griffon had motive, means and opportunity to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

  • Motive – theft of the 1/2 a million dollars that Grabriel Wortman picked up on March 30, 2020 for a RCMP drug Op. RCMP claim the money was destroyed in a fire at Gabriel Wortman’s home.
  • Means – Peter Alan Griffon was arrested and charged by Alberta’s Alert for possession and careless use of numerous prohibited weapons. As a drug trafficker Griffon had the means to obtain the weapons he needed to commit the Nova Scotia mass murders.

Peter Alan Griffon’s Parole Board of Canada review provides the most compelling evidence that RCMP informant Peter Alan Griffon is the Nova Scotia mass murderer.

In the assessment of risk, the Board first looks to your index offences of Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Your sentence was in excess of six years, but with remand time considered, it translated into two years, nine months and eight days.

To be more specific on how you incurred the index offences, you became a person of interest to police who, in December 2014, were investigating a known Security Threat Group (STG), namely La Familia with ties to MS-13. Your vehicle was stopped, and a search uncovered a significant amount of cocaine, a considerable amount of cash and an extendable baton. This seizure resulted in a search of your residence, a converted warehouse of sorts. Again, considerable drugs and trafficking/production paraphernalia and money was seized. Further aggravating in the assessment of risk is the fact numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted, were seized. File information would certainly suggest that these weapons were directly related to the
drug trade, be it for protection and/or enforcement purposes. You readily admitted to working for a cocaine distribution operation and that your job was to store, process, distribute, and transport cocaine to traffickers.

Statement from Nova Scotia RCMP provides compelling evidence that Peter Alan Griffon was a RCMP informant:

Some of the information that was unsealed and released from the ITOs on July 27, 2020, is from one individual who was interviewed and provided information which described the gunman as someone who was involved in the importation and trafficking of illicit drugs and firearms.

As Part of H-Strong, investigators have conducted close to 700 witness interviews and only this one witness has come forward with information that the gunman was actively and recently involved in the importation and trafficking of illegal drugs. No other persons interviewed of the close to 700, including those closest to the gunman, have provided similar information that proves the gunman was an illegal drug smuggler and or drug trafficker.

The investigation has not uncovered any evidence that the gunman was involved in organized crime. Outside of one uncorroborated statement, the remainder of witness interviews have not revealed any corroborated or actionable information that the gunman was involved in organized importation or sale of illegal drugs with any other single person or that the gunman was part of any type of criminal organization or organized crime group.

Peter Alan Griffon’s index of offences: Possession of Schedule I/II Substance for Purpose of Trafficking, Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon, Fail to Comply with Condition of Undertaking/Recognizance, and Unauthorized Possession of Firearm. Supporting the allegation that Peter Alan Griffon is a prime suspect in the Nova Scotia mass murders is the fact Griffon was charged and convicted of Unauthorized Possession Prohibited/Restricted Weapon. After his arrest in 2014 “numerous weapons, mostly high powered and/or converted were seized”. 2014 CBC report informed readers what type of weapons were seized by ALERT:

9 charges filed against Peter Alan Griffon in 2014:

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking (x 2);
  • Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm;
  • Unauthorized possession of a firearm;
  • Careless use of a firearm (x 5).

Why Pope Francis condones the Germany provoked war in Ukraine

Every World War is waged by Germany for the Pope (a.k.a. the Crown). Pope Pius XII recruited Germany to wage WWII to defend the “Roman” Catholic faith. Germany slaughtered Jews in Europe and attacked Russia for the Pope (Pius XII). The Pope recruited Germany to wage WWII. Vatican website provides ample evidence to support this.

“as the German people return to religion, bend the knee before Christ, and arming themselves against the enemies of God, again resume the task God has laid upon them.”

… “We grant to you, as a pledge of Divine help, as a support in your difficult resolutions, as a comfort in the struggle, as a consolation in all trials, to You, Bishops and Pastors of the Faithful, priests, Religious, lay apostles of Catholic Action, to all your diocesans, and specially to the sick and the prisoners, in paternal love, Our Apostolic Benediction.”

Given at the Vatican on Passion Sunday, March 14, 1937.

PIUS XI

The Popes have for centuries turned to the German monarchies to wage its wars in Europe. The German monarchies included the UK’s 1919 abolished German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha monarchy. Stated in 2017 in Vatican City’s …

From Zachary to Leo III, successive Popes turned to the powerful Frankish and Germanic monarchs, particularly Charlemagne, who was known as the “father of Europe ”, seeking protection against the invading Lombards, Normans and Saracens; in doing so, they invented the Christian West. Thus, from its earliest beginnings, the papacy had close ties to the European events that would influence the world order for centuries to come.

Pope Francis condoned/supports the Germany provoked war in Ukraine because of one reason. Russia does not recognize the authority of the Pope.

The Eastern Orthodox Church is opposed to the Roman Catholic doctrine of papal supremacy. 

It is the position of the Eastern Orthodox Church that it has never accepted the pope as de jure leader of the entire church. All bishops are equal “as Peter“, therefore every church under every bishop (consecrated in apostolic succession) is fully complete (the original meaning of catholic).

Contrary to popular opinion, the word catholic does not mean “universal”; it means “whole, complete, lacking nothing.” … Thus, to confess the Church to be catholic is to say that She possesses the fullness of the Christian faith. To say, however, that Orthodox and Rome constitute “two lungs” of the same Church is to deny that either Church separately is catholic in any meaningful sense of the term. This is not only contrary to the teaching of Orthodoxy, it is flatly contrary to the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, which considered itself truly catholic.

Germany waged World Wars are essentially modern day papal crusades. All waged to revive the Popes’ Holy Roman Empires (Reich’s).

Severe snow storms in Canada and the US caused by Germany’s EISCAT ionosphere heater

There are 4 main ionosphere heaters currently being used by various governments to cause climate change. HAARP (USA), EISCAT (GERMANY), SURA (RUSSIA) AND WEM (CHINA) all have the capability to cause climate change in a targeted area. All 4 ionosphere heaters can alter the path of the jet stream by heating the ionosphere.

Bernard J. Eastlund’s US patent US4686605AMethod and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

Weather modification (climate change) is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns (jet streams) or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device

Altering the path of the jet stream can alter/modify the weather in Canada, the US or anywhere in the World. Pushing the polar jet stream south can cause heavy snow fall in Canada, the US and Europe. Ionosphere heater pushing the jet stream from southern United States can push the warm air into the northern states of the United States and into Canada to cause rainfall in the winter months.

Data from the SOS ENATTOS – E.G.O. ELF Monitoring station in Italy shows us that Germany’s EISCAT ionosphere heater is currently transmitting.  EISCAT 3D uses a different frequency than other ionosphere heaters. EISCAT 3D’s July 2022 study report informs us EISCAT 3D uses the “high-rate (50 Hz) amplitude”.

2.3 Scintillation data

GPS scintillation data are obtained from the CHAIN (Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network) receiver at Resolute Bay (Jayachandran et al., 2009). For this study, we are using the high-rate (50 Hz) amplitude and phase data from the L1 (1575.420 MHz) signal

SOS ENATTOS – E.G.O. ELF Monitoring station data clearly shows that EISCAT 3D is transmitting 50 Hz. It isn’t the Sun emitting bursts of 50 Hz.

The Sun emits radiation right across the electromagnetic spectrum, from extremely high-energy X-rays to ultra-long-wavelength radio waves, and everything in-between.

It isn’t a coincidence that Germany’s EISCAT ionosphere heater is actively transmitting just prior to a heavy snowfall warning (up to 40 cm) in Canada. EISCAT is heating the ionosphere to alter the jet stream path.

“Precipitation is expected to begin as rain or snow late this afternoon or early this evening before transitioning to rain for many areas tonight. Temperatures are expected to plummet on Friday morning leading to a potential flash freeze. Rapidly falling temperatures will be accompanied by damaging winds along with snow, heavy at times. Extensive blowing snow will develop Friday morning. Very cold wind chills are expected to develop on Friday and persist into the weekend.” Environment Canada

“A major winter storm is expected across parts of southern Ontario just ahead of Christmas Day … the storm will arrive from the U.S. Midwest and will rapidly deepen over the Great Lakes on Friday and early Saturday — Christmas Eve.”

“Although Friday will see mild temperatures as the system moves in as rain, Farnell said it will be replaced with much Arctic air and snow as Friday progresses.” Global News

Since the 1990s ionosphere heaters have been developed to cause climate change in a targeted area. The rise in temperatures since the 1990s is the direct result of ionosphere heater experiments. Now that they’re fully operational they are being funded by he UN, the Vatican and Germany for financial gain. Ionosphere heaters are being used to commit fraud – obtain $billions via global warming eco-terrorism.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, would fit the bill” Vatican think tank Club of Rome

On April 27, 1997 at the University of Georgia former Secretary of Defense, William Cohen spoke on weapons of mass destruction. At that lecture Cohen asserted that:

“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.”

William Cohen‘s DoD briefing at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy link

Cohen warned us in 1997 about ionosphere heaters called HAARP (US) and EISCAT/EISCAT 3D (Germany’s Fourth Reich EU) being used to cause climate change. He stated that they’re being used as an eco-type of terrorism.

Related briefings:

Magnetometers can be used to detect when ionosphere heaters are being used to cause climate change

 

Analysis of evidence in the “targeted” killings of Barry & Honey Sherman concludes murders were politically motivated

5 years ago Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed. Mass media and government officials claim no motive for the double homicides has been found despite there being substantial evidence to support an inference that the murders were politically motivated.

What was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? To answer that one must first examine why lead Toronto police investigator, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes publicly stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed? “I believe they were targeted,” The word “targeted” was specifically chosen to describe Toronto’s 2017 homicides #64 and #65. What was Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes revealing to the public by calling the double homicides “targeted” killing?

Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. That’s what Toronto Police were telling Canadians when they said Barry & Honey Sherman were “targeted” & killed. Toronto Police stated publicly from the very beginning that “there was no sign of forced entry into their home”. That is referred to as surreptitious entry. Toronto Police publicly stating that the murderers entered the home of Barry and Honey Sherman via surreptitious entry is of major significance. It supports the discovery finding that the Shermans were targeted and killed by a “government authority”.

Evidence of markings being found on the wrists of both Barry and Honey Sherman, indicated they had been tied up, yet no ties or ropes were found at the scene. This too has major significance in that it confirms both Barry and Honey were restrained, forcibly detained (were handcuffed) before being killed. Both being forcibly restrained, leaving marks, provides evidence it wasn’t a murder suicide. No ties or ropes were found at the scene proves the killers took the “restraints” (handcuffs) with them.

Restraint markings on their wrists, the Toronto Police Services stating that the Shermans were targeted and killed and that their murderers gained access via surreptitious entry all lead to the conclusion that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed by police officers. Which police officers? RCMP. Why?

1) Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. A RCMP officer is a government authority. They are authorized by the federal government to uphold and enforce government enacted and imposed laws across Canada.

2) RCMP officers contend that they are authorized by government appointed adjudicators to enter private premises to install listening or video devices or recover evidence in support of “an ongoing criminal investigation”. The power so granted authorizing surreptitious entry allows the RCMP to utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or via Realtor lock box, or simply through trickery or coercion. Further, if RCMP officers acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them “to effect such entry by overcoming force” a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.

Motive for targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016. During the tape recorded interview, Mr Sherman openly discussed a fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured Liberal candidates Michael Levitt and Justin Trudeau. Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex (Barry Sherman) filed a law suit (Court number T-761-17) seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording.

Justin Trudeau responded by paying the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman suit & a court hearing that was to be held on Thursday, the 8th day of February 2018, at 9:30 to address the Lobbying Commissioner KAREN SHEPHERD refusing to comply with a court order that “redacted” documents that detail the taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex.

The court order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in an ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with the court order would prove Lobbying Commissioner REDACTED Justin Trudeau’s name from the transcript in order to conceal that Justin Trudeau broke the law:

“There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s contribution to the 2015 election campaign.”

In an email to Brian H. Greenspan photographic evidence was provided that showed that the Sherman’s home was under surveillance by the RCMP.

Only the RCMP has jurisdiction (government authority) to conduct a criminal investigation for the Federal government’s Office of Commissioner of Lobbying.

Direct quote from Administering the Lobbying Act (December 2011) :

The peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the matter, generally the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in the case of the Lobbying Act, will consider the case in consultation with legal counsel at the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors at the Department of Public Prosecutions. Together, they will determine whether or not to lay charges.”

Since the ongoing RCMP investigation involved a high profile government of Canada official the RCMP claim that they are authorized to make surreptitious entry, or simply through trickery or coercion. RCMP officers also claim that they are permitted “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”.

In Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, it was contended that s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code authorized trespass by the police in order to effect an arrest. The basis is that the police (RCMP) are entitled, in limited circumstances, to enter private property without consent to effect an arrest – detain a person.

People detained or arrested by police officers and the RCMP are usually forcibly restrained using handcuffs, either metal or plastic. A traditional form of plastic handcuffs are cable ties. Cable ties leave unique marks on wrists of those being arrested by police (RCMP). Forensic pathologist confirmed that the markings on the wrists of both Shermans, indicates they had been restrained (forcibly detained) with ties before they were murdered. Toronto Police confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers took the restraints with them.

Why would the restraints be removed from the wrists of the victims and from the crime scene? Restraints are material evidence that could be traced back to the murderers. Canadian police forces have and use a specific type of cable tie. The markings on the wrists of Barry and Honey Sherman can be matched with impressions made by any specific type of tie mfg today.

Crime scene evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered by police officers. Both had restraint marks on their wrists (were handcuffed) & Honey Sherman had cuts on her lip & nose, suggesting that she had struggled with assailants & was forced face down on pool tiles. The evidence is telling us that at some point Honey Sherman sensed that the intruders were going to kill her and out a fear for her life she put up a fight. The cuts on her lip & nose is telling us she was forced to the ground by a police officer(s) who used his or her knee to forcibly hold Honey Sherman’s head and face to the ground as they handcuffed Honey Sherman’s hands behind her back.

It is important to note that police officers and the RCMP do not have the authority to make surreptitious entry or “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”. The Supreme Court of Canada, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697 Date: 1984-12-20 ruled that police surreptitious entry is unlawful:

“Until such time as Parliament speaks specifically on this matter, I am of the view that an unlawful entry to install a listening device is an unauthorized and unjustified use of police powers. If the authorization to intercept did purport to sanction such an entry, the authorization would be invalid in that respect. Judges simply do not have the power to permit anyone, even police officers, to commit unlawful acts.

 

The Crown in Canada is the Vatican Mafia, formed for the sole purpose of defrauding Canadians

The Catholic Church has long been associated with the Mafia. The majority of mafia families in Italy, the United States, Canada and Europe are devout Roman Catholics. The godfather of all mafia families throughout the World is the reigning Pope. He’s the godfather of the largest mafia criminal organization in the World. In Canada, the UK, and Australia it’s called “the Crown“.

The Mafia was originally formed by Rome in 241 BC as a Roman economic and social system called Latifundia – a feudal formation creating a hierarchy of personnel and a system of taxation.  The latifundia also set up a new system of justice to protect the newly imposed economic and social system. The Latifundia system of justice exists today across Canada. They serve the Crown, a.k.a. the Vatican Mafia. The RCMP serve the Crown as a soldato or soldier.

“36. For the purposes of determining liability in any proceedings by or against the Crown, a person who was at any time a member of the Canadian Forces or of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police shall be deemed to have been at that time a servant of the Crown.” Crown Liability and Proceedings Act

Pope Francis regularly berates Italy and Sicily’s mafia families. He isn’t condemning them. He’s reminding them that they serve him. The ‘Ndrangheta mafia, centered in Calabria, serves the Pope. They use the Vatican bank, officially called the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR), to launder money to and for the Pope.

‘Ndrangheta men who invest and recycle money, those with real power, are getting upset because they have prospered for years on the connivance with the Church,” Reggio Calabria District Attorney Nicola Gratteri

The Vatican Bank is and has always been used for money laundering. The Vatican Bank was founded in 1942 by Pope Pius XII to manage assets Führer (Father) Adolf Hiltler looted from Jews, Russians and from occupied Europe during Pope Pius II’s ordained Third Reich (Third Holy Roman Empire) WWII.

There is compelling evidence that WWII was waged by Germany and Italy for Pope Pius XII. Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli was crowned on March 12, 1939 on the eve of Hitler’s march into Prague. Six days before his coronation Cardinal Pacelli held a crucial meeting with the German cardinals. The meeting was to affirm Hitler publicly with a letter Pope Pius XII addressed to Adolf Hitler:

To the illustrious, Herr Adolf Hitler, Führer and Chancellor of the German Reich!

Here at the beginning of our pontificate we wish to assure you that we remain devoted to the spiritual welfare of the German people entrusted to your leadership. For them we implore God the Almighty to grant them that true felicity which springs from religion.

We recall with great pleasure the many years we spent in Germany as Apostolic Nuncio, when we did all in our power to establish harmonious relations between Church and State. Now that the responsibilities of our pastoral function have increased our opportunities, how much more ardently do we pray to reach that goal.

May the prosperity of the German people and their progress in every domain come, with God’s help, to fruition!

Given this day, 6th March 1939, in Rome at St. Peter’s in the first year of our pontificate.

Pope Pius XII

The Vatican website provides the most compelling evidence that Germany was recruited by the Pope to wage both WWI and WWII. The Reich Concordat established the WWII war alliance between the Holy See and Germany.

arming themselves against the enemies of God, again resume the task God has laid upon them.”

The Vatican Mafia connection and existence was made abundantly clear when Pope Paul VI’s appointment Mafia don Michele Sindona as the Vatican banker to manage the Vatican’s foreign investments.

The Vatican Mafia operates throughout Canada today as “Crown Corporation”. The Vatican Mafia infiltrated the Canadian government with the aid of our most prominent elected representatives.  Our elected representatives willingly, willfully and underhandedly betray Canada, the Canadian people, their electorates and even their faith by serving the Catholic Church Pope (the Crown).  Our elected representatives willingly, willfully,  underhandedly and illegally have “all” been aiding and abetting the Pope form business-orientated “Mafia Crown Corporations” throughout Canada.  The Mafia Crown Corporations are now accumulating wealth for the Catholic Church Pope by fraudulent business and legal practices and with the aid of our elected representatives.

Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations are being created without public knowledge or consent and all are being funded using public funding they illicitly acquire from our elected representatives.  Justin Trudeau is the current prime servant (minister) of the Vatican Mafia in Canada.  Justin Trudeau is illegally using his political office to steal $billions from public funding to finance the Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations and money launder the illicit funds to the Vatican Mafia godfather in Vatican City.

Rather than openly collect protection money from Canadian businesses and the public sector, as they do in southern cities like Naples and Palermo Italy, our elected representatives form Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations for the Catholic Church Pope and are laundering the proceeds of crime through the various Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations to the Pope.

Justin Trudeau helped the Vatican Mafia, a.k.a. the Crown, become the largest drug cartel in Canada by making the manufacturing, distribution and trafficking of marijuana by the Crown legal. Manufacturing, distribution and trafficking of marijuana by any Canadian or group of Canadians is still illegal. For that reason the Crown is defined as a criminal organization.

The foreign corporate entity, head of state and Canada’s World War I (Vatican Second Reich) and World War II (Vatican Third Reich) enemy, the Crown, uses Crown Corporations to not only extort, steal and money launder $billions from Canadians and their businesses, the Crown also uses Crown Corporations to unlawfully seize and assume control of our governments.  The Crown (since 1855 represents the corporate interests and holdings of the Catholic Church Pope) and his Crown Corporations have infiltrated and subverted all national and provincial government departments and agencies and have assumed control of all major public service enterprises of national importance including; public utilities, mail service, natural resources, transportation, trade and banking as well as complete control (regulates) of firearms, tobacco, alcohol and gambling.

The Pope is unlawfully seizing and assuming control of properties, companies and commercial businesses, that are often not on the market, in which he takes over using public funding gained from criminal sources in our federal and provincial government – the Governor General, PM Justin Trudeau, giving his newly imposed Vatican Mafia Crown Corporation(s) the appearance of legality.

Crown Corporations are without a doubt organized criminal organizations. Vatican Mafia business enterprises which are set up for one purpose.  To defraud Canadians and the Canadian private sector for the Vatican Mafia and its godfather – the Pope.

Today, Rome has imposed a Latifundia (Mafia) economic and social system in and throughout Canada with a hierarchy of personnel and a system of taxation that solely benefits the Vatican and its self-proclaimed godfather head of state – the Pope.

The Pope’s mafia hierarchy personnel in Canada includes the Governor General, Prime Minister (minister means servant) Justin Trudeau, the Governor of the Crown Corporation Bank of Canada, the Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer of the Canada Revenue Agency, the Commissioner of the RCMP – the Vatican Mafia’s soldiers, the Director of CSIS, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canada Post Crown Corporation, … and all Vatican Mafia Crown Corporation heads and their employees.

Our elected representatives, courts and law enforcement personnel are either unable or unwilling to perform their civic, administrative, legal and patriotic duty and act in the interest of the Canadian people or in the national interest. All are negligent in their duty to serve, protect and defend Canada and the Canadian people against all unlawful acts and omission against Canada and its people by a foreign organized criminal syndicate – the Pope and his Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations.

Your hometown boys and girls in government, the judicial system, the military or law enforcement might have wanted to became a politician, judge, lawyer, soldier or law enforcement officer with the intent on doing good or to serve, protect and defend Canada and Canadians but that isn’t what they’ve become or what they now do. All have become agents and soldiers for the Catholic Church and its Vatican Mafia in Canada.  They serve, protect and defend the “corporate” interests and polices of the Vatican Mafia godfather – the Pope.  Most are forced to work for or are unaware that they are actually working for an organized criminal syndicate or that they have betrayed their faith by serving the Catholic Church.

A few of your mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, brothers and sister or friends have gotten where they are as Prime Minister, Premier, Minister, Commissioner, Governor, Attorney General, Supreme Court judge, Director or  Chief Executive Officer, not because of any dedicated hard work or honorable deed they have done in the service to their country and fellow citizens.  They got there because they sold out their country, their fellow Canadians, their faith and their soul to the Crown (Catholic Church Pope), for a worthless expiring title. Some have simply taken monetary bribes from the Crown and have since stolen $billions, subverted government and the rule of law for the Crown.

The ones who have willfully and knowingly betrayed Canada and its people for a temporary position of authority and/or title in government or Vatican Mafia Crown Corporation are not only traitors and criminals they are the dumbest people in Canada.  They implement and enforce the defrauding policies of the Crown only to be subject to those very same thieving and extortionate policies throughout their tenure and after they are voted out of or leave office or retire.  When they are no longer Prime Minister, Premier, Minister, Commissioner, Governor, Attorney General, Supreme Court/ Crown judge, Director, Chief Executive Officer, lawyer, mayor, Crown serving soldier or police officer, all will be forced, for the rest of their lives, to owe and pay taxes to the thieving foreign corporate entity, the Crown.  All who once served the Crown, will, for the rest of their lives, be unlawfully denied their rights and freedoms, be unlawfully regulated and abused by the Crown and have their “private” property and all of their savings taken by the Crown.

The traitorous agents of the Crown’s Mafia in Canada become victims the moment they no longer actively serve the Crown as Prime Minister, Premier, Minister, Commissioner, Governor, Attorney General, Supreme Court/ Crown judge, Director, Chief Executive Officer, lawyer, mayor, soldier or police officer.  Their arrogance, greed and betrayal will cost them dearly, in the end.  Not only do they become victims of the Crown after they leave office, all of their family members, friends and neighbors become victims of the fraudulent and thieving policies they implemented for the Crown.

What our elected representatives, judges, and law enforcement agencies are doing to illegally accumulate wealth and further the business interests of the foreign corporate entity called the Crown violates the laws of Canada and causes detrimental harm to the national security and economic prosperity of Canada and all Canadians.  Isn’t it about time we put the Crown and his Vatican Mafia Crown Corporations out of business?