US can demand Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky make full repayment of all outstanding loan balances

Ukraine is bankrupt. De facto Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky bankrupted Ukraine.

“Ukraine is in a state of bankruptcy, and when the United States refuses to continuously guarantee payments, the holders of the Square debt will dump these obligations at a certain discount to more aggressive funds that will begin to extort money from the country using judicial mechanisms.” former Prime Minister of Ukraine Mykola Azarov.

Now that Ukraine is bankrupt the US government can recall all loans to Ukraine to mitigate the risk that the Zelensky will not be able to satisfy its debt in the future.

The US government has the legal right to call in loans under certain circumstances. Donald Trump may exercise this option for various reasons, such as missed payments, a breach of contract terms, or if they believe Zelensky’s financial situation has deteriorated to the point where repayment is at risk.

Zelensky’s financial situation has deteriorated to the point where repayment is at risk. Zelensky is constantly begging for financial aid. Zelensky refuses to put up collateral to obtain $billions in financial aid. For that reason EU states and the US have stopped giving Zelensky more money.

Zelensky’s creditors now have the legal right to demand Volodymyr Zelensky make full repayment of all outstanding loan balances. If Zelensky refuses his creditors (US government) can seize Ukrainian assets using judicial mechanisms.

Common situations where creditors may call a loan include:

Missed or late payments
Breaching other terms of the loan agreement
Filing for bankruptcy or showing signs of financial distress
The creditor’s own financial situation changes and they need to recall loans
A change in the creditor’s risk assessment of your ability to repay the loan

Zelensky begging for financial aid means Ukraine is showing signs of financial distress. Zelensky’s begging shows creditors that Zelensky will not be able to repay future loans.

Concealed autonomous weapon system designed to forever change how wars are ended

Wars can be ended as quickly as they begin simply by targeting the leader who initiated the war. NATO Germany’s proxy war in Ukraine can be ended very quickly by targeting NATO Germany’s puppet Zelensky. German Chancellor Scholz is reportedly plotting to eliminate Zelensky before Germany’s snap election in retaliation for causing the abrupt & humiliating collapse of Olaf Scholz’s coalition government. Olaf Scholz eliminating Zelensky now might help Scholz win the election for ending the war in Ukraine.

WWII would have ended sooner if Adolf Hitler was targeted and killed. WWII fighting in Europe ended immediately after news was aired that Adolf Hitler was dead. Julius Caesar’s wars ended after the Roman dictator was assassinated by a group of senators on the Ides of March 44 BC.

“targeting individual leaders is strategically compelling, legally and morally justified & potentially very effective in hastening war termination” Declassified Naval War College paper

Canadians and Americans have yet to realize that the war in Ukraine is a NATO Germany proxy war against Russia. Ukraine President Zelensky is a NATO Germany puppet.

Pope Francis stated immediately after Russia invaded Ukraine that the war was provoked by NATO (Nazism 2.0). Specifically, Germany lead NATO forces.

Since 2014 Pope Francis has repeatedly stated that WWIII is being waged – “fought piecemeal”.

“Even today, after the second failure of another world war, perhaps one can speak of a third war, one fought piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction,”

Francis said that we are going through “World War Three but in installments.” “There are economic systems that must make war in order to survive,”. The economic system that is waging war in Ukraine is Germany’s Fourth Reich EU (Economic Union). Germany is using NATO to wage its WWIII military campaigns against Russia and to expand Germany’s reoccupied Europe.

For those reason concealed autonomous weapon systems were designed & manufactured in Canada to target the NATO (Nazism 2.0) Germany leaders. They are miniature sniper rifles. Codenamed “Concealed assassination devices” (CADs). There are several versions. One uses a shotgun shell to inflict maximum damage. Another utilizes a readily available and obtainable 9mm bullet. Third version uses a rifle bullet to hit a target from a greater distance.

Weapons were designed to be concealed by being embedded in drywalls, doors, ceilings, elevators, etc or mounted on a drone to target the German Chancellor & NATO’s Secretary General. They can be remotely fired or fired autonomously.

Unarmed CADs can be quickly deployed using mail or courier services. Shipped as drone parts or security camera systems. Mercenaries, journalists and diplomats and their aids can also be used to smuggle them into Ukraine, Berlin Germany and Brussels.

Charles isn’t King and can never be recognized as being King because according to UK law he was naturally dead and deemed to be dead May 6, 2023

Published on: Aug 26, 2023

Charles isn’t the UK’s King and he can never be the UK’s King because according to UK law he was naturally dead and deemed to be dead on May 6, 2023.

The Act of Settlement 1701 law prohibits forever any Catholic from becoming the UK monarch. The UK legislation (law) made it clear that no sovereign shall “hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or profess the Popish Religion”.

To attend any service of Holy Communion at Westminster Abbey is to hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome and profess the Popish Religion. Charles attendance and receiving communion on May 6, 2023 is a blatant violation of the UK’s Act of Settlement law.

Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith”

Catholics are officially termed as being “naturally dead and deemed to be dead” in terms of succession. This distinction was first legislated in the Bill of Rights 1689. … “the Act of Settlement deems somebody who has been a Catholic for a minute to be ‘dead’ in terms of the succession, and it passes over them ‘as if they were dead’. It is an absolute. If at any moment in their whole life they were in communion with Rome, they are excluded from the throne, deemed to be dead.

Westminster Abbey website has confirmed that Charles held communion with the Church of Rome on May 6, 2023. Excerpt from Westminster Abbey website states:

coronations take place within a Communion service or Eucharist. The monarch is crowned in the name of God, surrounded by prayer, and the first thing that the newly-crowned monarch does is receive Holy Communion as a sign of his dependency on God.

The Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith”

That means Charles did hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or profess the Popish Religion. As a result, Charles isn’t King because Charles was, according to law, naturally dead and deemed to be dead in terms of the succession.

Every one who attended the coronation are material witnesses. They and the mass media witnessed Kraut Charles holding Communion with the Church of Rome and they all heard him profess the Popish Religion.

There’s documented proof. The transcript of the coronation.

Because the ring was blessed before it was placed on the finger of Kraut Charles the ring became an Ecclesiastical ring. There’s no mistake, the moment the ring was placed on the finger of Kraut Charles and it was proclaimed that the ring was the “seal of Catholic faith” Charles was/is a Catholic.

Act of Settlement

“… And it was thereby further enacted That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion F1… should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [Incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance.

Kraut William can never be King either. He was married in the Catholic Church of England – Westminster Abbey.

Again, the Westminster Abbey’s Declaration of Assent states that it, the Church of England, is part of the Catholic Church and that it professes the Catholic faith. Catholic Church parishioners are forever unable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown.

It’s imperative Canadians know that the UK’s monarchy are German (Krauts) and that they are German today despite Kraut George V concealing the historical fact the they are German by assuming the English surname Windsor during WWI, July of 1917.

It is also imperative Canadians know that in 1919 all German monarchies, all German kings, grand dukes, dukes, and princes, were abolished, including Kraut George V’s Saxe-Coburg & Gotha/alias Windsor monarchy.

On August 19, 1919, when the Weimar Constitution went into effect, all the German nobility’s legal privileges and titles were forever abolished. Excerpt from the Weimar constitution:

All German nobility as a legally defined class were forever abolished included Germany’s House of Hanover – the monarchy that all UK monarchies derive their legitimacy from. Because the House of Hanover monarchy was abolished in 1919 no UK monarchy since has had the legal right or authority to be king or queen of/in the UK or Canada.

Abolish means to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : ANNUL

Synonym: void.

In law, void means of no legal effect. An action, document, or transaction which is void is of no legal effect whatsoever: an absolute nullity—the law treats it as if it had never existed or happened.

UK Parliament debate on April 7, 2014 confirms that Charles, who was a Catholic for a minute (during his coronation), is deemed to be dead in terms of the succession:

“The Act of Settlement deems somebody who has been a Catholic for a minute to be dead in terms of the succession, and it passes over them as if they were dead.” Debate between Lord Beith and Jacob Rees-Mogg, Commons Chamber

It is treason to pledge allegiance to and serve Kraut Charles

Novel EV power system design by Paul W Kincaid

Novel EV power system design by Paul W Kincaid of Moncton NB Canada. Concept designed to eliminate EV’s very costly battery packs by generating energy while the vehicle is driven. No need to recharge EVs. Utilizes existing mass produced automotive & energy generating technology.

EVs don’t need thousands of lithium ion batteries. Nikola Tesla proved in the 1930s that electric cars can be powered & driven long distances using just 1 conventional car battery. A single battery was used to produce kVs of energy to power a 80 HP AC electric motor up to 90 mph.

Every US and Canadian automaker & every auto mechanic knows how Nikola Tesla used 1 car battery to produces kVs of power. Nikola Tesla used an ignition coil. An ignition coil’s primary function is to continuously transform the 12 volts of just 1 car battery into 30-40,000 volts (30-40 kVs).

An ignition coil is a vital component of a vehicle’s ignition system. It is responsible for converting the low voltage from a car battery into the high voltage needed to produce sparks at the spark plugs. The ignition coil acts as a transformer, utilizing electromagnetic induction to generate the high voltage required for efficient combustion in the engine. Ignition coils have been used for over a century to power gas combustion engine vehicles. The Model T Ford had them. Each Model T Ford was powered using four coils, one per cylinder.

1 battery & several alternators attached to the EV’s electric motor & rear axle can also produce the kVs of energy needed to power an EV. Alternators have been used for over a century to recharge an car battery while the car is driven. Alternators can be used today to charge an EV’s battery while they are driven and they can also power the EV’s electric motor.

If the EV requires more power don’t add bulky and very expensive battery packs. Add more alternators or generator motors. Connect the alternators and/or generators to the EV’s electric motor or rear axle via surpentine belts.

NATO is Canada, the U.S., the U.K. and Europe’s enemy because it is part of Germany’s Fourth Reich EU. NATO is Germany’s new Nazi Waffen SS

A picture is worth a thousand words. This pictures speaks volumes. It is informing you that NATO is part of Germany’s Fourth Reich EU.

NATO is a security organization of conscripts from the world’s most powerful democracies. The conscripts betray their own country by treasonously collaborating with Germany to reoccupy Europe.

NATO is Germany’s new Nazi Waffen SS. NATO is Nazism 2.0. NATO is Europe’s enemy because it is being used to wage war for Germany. Germany is using it to reoccupy and to expand Germany’s Fourth Reich EU.

Reichstag in Berlin displaying NATO Waffen SS flag

Time and again Germany has publicly declared that NATO serves Germany. That NATO is the “signature pillar of Germany’s peace and prosperity”.

The Nazi Germany’s Waffen SS symbol is embedded in the NATO logo. The Swastika is made by the superimposed SS.

NATO’s headquarter building was designed to include the Nazi Germany‘s Waffen SS symbol.

The Waffen-SS (“Armed SS”) was created as the armed wing of the Nazi Party’s Schutzstaffel (“Protective Squadron”; SS). It grew from three regiments to over 38 divisions during World War II, and served alongside the Heer (regular army) but was never formally part of it. By 1945, the Waffen-SS had developed into a multi-ethnic and multi-national military force of Nazi Germany, its divisions manned by volunteers and conscripts from across Europe.

During WWII Germany enlisted 500,000 volunteers and conscripts into its Waffen SS army. Ukraine was one of the first European states to “volunteer” to serve Nazi Germany:

14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Ukrainian)
24th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS
30th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS
- Schutzmannschaft-Brigade Siegling
36th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS
SS-Kampfgruppe “Beyersdorff”

To serve in NATO is high treason. You are assisting Canada’s notorious WWI and WWII enemy, Germany, wage war. Germany’s ultimate goal is World domination via a World government being established under German control. That World government has always been the United Nations Organization (UNO is Italian meaning One) Germany is now using NATO as its new Nazi Waffen SS to wage its wars to achieve World domination by force.

NATO originally formed to protect Europe from Germany aggression

The Brussels Treaty lead to the formation of NATO. Signatories of the Brussels Treaty agreed:

“To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression”.

Germany remained a significant threat post WWII. Other treaties were drafted to ensure Germany didn’t start another war of aggression.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic reaffirm their declarations that only peace will emanate from German soil. According to the constitution of the united Germany, acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war, are unconstitutional and a punishable offence. The Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic declare that the united Germany will never employ any of its weapons except in accordance with its constitution and the Charter of the United Nations.

Justin Trudeau remains the one person who had motive to have Barry and Honey Sherman murdered

September 13, 2022, NCIO

There remains one person who had motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman on December 13, 2017. That person was being investigated by the RCMP for the Lobbying Commissioner at the time of the targeted murders. That person took extraordinary steps on the day of the murders to attempt to quash 2 ongoing investigations involving himself.

Who had the most to gain by the “targeted” murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Justin Trudeau did. Justin Trudeau would have lost his seat in House of Commons as a result of a Court Order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary ordering the Lobbying Commissioner to “unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants”. The Court Order was part of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner – Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review.

At the time of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau’s 26 Aug 2015 election campaign fundraiser for the Lobbying Commissioner, as required by the Lobbying Act“

Advice to peace officers

(7) If, during an investigation under this section, the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, the Commissioner shall advise a peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence and immediately suspend the Commissioner’s investigation.

Investigation continued

(9) The Commissioner may not continue an investigation under this section until any investigation or charge regarding the same subject-matter has been finally disposed of.

The Lobbying Commissioner and Justin Trudeau were unable to quash the Apotex lawsuit court order dated 10 NOV 2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary before Justin Trudeau was convicted of violating federal laws on December 20, 2017. An attempt was made by Justin Trudeau to quash/end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his 26 August 2015 fundraiser and the court order by replacing the Lobbying Commissioner.

On December 13, 2017, the day Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, Justin Trudeau had both the Lobbying Commissioner and the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner removed and appointed new ones. Link to December 13, 2017 video of the House of Commons appointments … “on division” – ParlVu

Both Commissioners were removed during ongoing investigations by the 2 Commissioners into Justin Trudeau’s wrongdoings. Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the removed Commissioners for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” while campaigning in the 2015 federal election.

“Providing food or refreshments at a reception constitutes a gift.” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

Justin Trudeau’s actions on the day of the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers made Justin Trudeau a prime suspect. Justin Trudeau being convicted of violating ethics laws days later on December 20, 2017 made Justin Trudeau the one person to have motive to conspire to murder Barry and Honey Sherman to:

end the ongoing RCMP investigation of his August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
dismiss the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
prevent a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”

A conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act Section 502(2) (h.01) meant Justin Trudeau would lose his seat in the House of Commons for “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage”.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016.

“A few days before the fundraiser, an investigator from the commissioner’s office visited Apotex headquarters in Toronto, where Sherman agreed to a tape-recorded interview. During the conversation, he openly discussed the other fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Sherman said his wife Honey organized the logistics, that the guest list was somewhere between 100 and 150 people and that he believed the proceeds were split between the Liberal Party of Canada and Levitt’s electoral district association. A ticket reportedly cost $1,500.” Macleans

Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. The Apotex lawsuit is Federal Court Number T-761-17 APOTEX INC. ET AL v. KAREN SHEPHERD ET AL. Nature of the proceeding S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review

Why would Justin Trudeau fear the Apotex lawsuit, not the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s Aug 26, 2015 campaign fundraiser? Parliament of Canada standing committee meeting involving Karen Shepherd informs you why:

The Apotex lawsuit posed a serious threat to Justin Trudeau’s political career. If Apotex was successful the lawsuit would have provided compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau had violated the Canada Elections Act – Accepting a prohibited gift or other advantage.

Prohibition

477.9 (1) No candidate shall accept any gift or other advantage that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence them in the performance of their duties and functions as a member of the House of Commons if the candidate were to be elected, during the period that

(a) begins on the day on which they are deemed to have become a candidate; and

gift or other advantage means

(a) an amount of money if there is no obligation to repay it; and

(b) a service or property, or the use of property or money, that is provided without charge or at less than its commercial value.

Corrupt practice

(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who

(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);

Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices

(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is an illegal practice or a corrupt practice under this Act shall, in addition to any other punishment for that offence prescribed by this Act, in the case of an illegal practice, during the next five years or, in the case of a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to

(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons; or

Highlights of the Federal Court Proceeding T-761-17 provides compelling evidence that the Apotex lawsuit was the primary motive for the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Murdered because the Lobbying Commissioner couldn’t defeat the court order of Prothonotary Kevin Aalto “requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants“. Court order issued 1 month before the December 13, 2017 targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. Court order dated 10-NOV-2017 rendered by Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary. 16 days after Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed the Lobbying Commissioner tried December 29, 2017 to keep the redacted evidence implicating Justin Trudeau from being made public. Filed a motion for “Setting aside portions of the order of Prothonotary Aalto dated November 10, 2017 … those portions of the Order Under Appeal which preserved redactions contained in the Rule 318 Record and requiring the Commissioner to unredact the Preserved Redactions and to deliver such redacted materials to the Applicants;”

Justin Trudeau paid the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 (used Federal funding) in December 2017 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman/Apotex lawsuit.

“In December 2017, the Office received access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for third party legal fees associated to legal challenges. … An unanticipated court action against the Office resulted in unplanned legal costs of almost $300,000 in 2017–18. These additional costs have been paid through access to a special purpose allotment of $400,000 for litigation.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017–18 Departmental results report

According to the T-761-17 Federal Court documents (PDF backup of T-761-17 made available on NCIO website) a court hearing was to be held 08-FEB-2018 to address the Lobbying Commissioner refusing to comply with the decision of Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary dated 10-NOV-2017 that “redacted” documents that detail the (audio) taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The Prothonotary order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau’s name from material evidence in the ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Kevin Aalto, Prothonotary order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from OCL transcripts in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau was being investigated by the RCMP for violating the Lobbying Act. The RCMP investigation began with this statement:

The Canadian Jewish News reported August 21, 2015, 5 days before Barry and Honey hosted the 2015 election campaign fundraiser for Justin Trudeau that:

Sherman said he spent an hour with Trudeau last week, discussing various issues, including Israel. He felt Trudeau fully appreciates the threats facing Israel, including “the existential war facing the west from extremists.”

A reasonable person would conclude that private interests of Justin Trudeau (redacted) were discussed/advanced prior to Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 pay-for-access election campaign fundraiser.

Justin Trudeau is a prime suspect in the targeted murders of his 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman because of the Apotex lawsuit – Federal Court Number T-761-17 and because of what transpired the day Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered, December 13, 2017. Justin Trudeau had Karen Shepherd removed as Lobbying Commissione, effective December 30, 2017.

“resolution of the House of Commons dated December 13, 2017, the Senate and House of Commons have approved the appointment of Nancy Bélanger as Commissioner of Lobbying … on the recommendation of the Prime Minister … effective December 30, 2017” Order in Council PC Number: 2017-1564

The Lobbying Commissioner was removed during an ongoing Apotex lawsuit pertaining to an active RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. Toronto Police Services stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were in fact “targeted”. That means the murders were planned and deliberate and if the police found evidence that money was payed to have the Shermans murdered the murders was “contracted murder”.

“murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.” Criminal Code of Canada 231 (3)

The planned and deliberate murders of Barry and Honey Sherman resulted in:

ending the ongoing RCMP investigation of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser,
the dropping/dismissal of the Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser and
preventing Justin Trudeau from losing his seat in the House of Commons for a conviction for violating the Canada Elections Act – “accepting prohibited gift or other advantage” from registered government lobbyist Barry Sherman/Apotex.

In a homicide criminal investigation that’s motive.

Government document provides compelling evidence that Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser violated the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act

The US and UK governments knew in 1944 that Germany would start World War III

Published on: July 8, 2023

The US government initiated a “Program To Prevent Germany From Starting a World War III”. The program was discussed during the 1944 Quebec Conference. The first measures that were discussed to prevent Germany from starting WWIII was the demilitarization of Germany.

Section II of the top secret US briefing book revealed that to prevent Germany from starting WWIII Germany couldn’t be allowed to gain financial control of Europe.

The US government recommended that a program of large-scale reparations must be rejected for the following reasons:

2. If liberated Europe becomes economically dependent on Germany for reparations, her economic dependence cannot be broken off when reparations cease. The rest of Europe would continue to be dependent on Germany as a source of supply and as a market. These economic ties would also mean political ties. Germany would be right back where she was in the Thirties when she was able to dominate the rest of Europe economically through her industrial power and to exert her economic power to achieve political domination.

3. An economically powerful Germany ipso facto constitutes a military threat to world security.

The US government knew that soon after Germany gained economic control of Europe Germany would resume a policy of aggression.

“A long range program should be put into effect for the purpose of controlling the strategic elements in the German economy for a prolonged period .. It is essential that the foregoing strategic elements in the German economy be controlled lest through their use, the Germans once again proceed to build up various aspects of their industrial and economic structure for future militaristic and aggressive purposes.”

(1)The Nazi regime is essentially the culmination of the unchanging German drive toward aggression.

(a) German society has been dominated for at least three generations by powerful forces fashioning the German state and nation into a machine for military conquest and self-aggrandizement. Since 1864 Germany has launched five wars of aggression against other powers, each war involving more destruction over larger areas than the previous one.

(b) As in the case of Japan, the rapid evolution of a modern industrial system in Germany immeasurably strengthened the economic base of German militarism without weakening the Prussian feudal ideology or its hold on German society.

(c) The Nazi regime is not an excrescence on an otherwise healthy society but an organic growth out of the German body politic. Even before the Nazi regime seized power, the German nation had demonstrated an unequalled capacity to be seduced by a militarist clique offering the promise of economic security and political domination in exchange for disciplined acceptance of its leadership. What the Nazi regime has done has been to systematically debauch the passive German nation on an unprecedented scale and shape it into an organized and dehumanized military machine integrated by all the forces of modern technique and science.

(2) The dissolution of the Nazi Party will not, therefore, by itself ensure the destruction of the militaristic spirit instilled into the German people over generations and given an overwhelming impetus in the last decade. This will of necessity be an arduous process, and for a long time to come it would be gambling with the very destiny of civilization to rely on an unproven German capacity for self-regeneration in the face of its proven capacity for creating new weapons of destruction to be used in wars of aggression. Therefore, in addition to disarming and weakening Germany as a military power, the interests of world security will best be promoted by:

(a) Forcibly reducing Germany’s industrial capacity so that she will cease to be a major economic, military and political power.

(b) Strengthening all Germany’s neighbors politically and economically relatively to Germany. The more powerful her neighbors, the more likely she is to realize the futility of the militarist philosophy from which aggression ensues.

Germany has done what Roosevelt and Churchill tried to prevent. Germany has gained financial control of Europe via the EU and Germany has started WWIII by instigating the Ukraine Russia war. Germany instigated the Ukraine Russia war to force NATO states to wage WWIII as Germany’s new Waffen SS military forces.

Other nations knew that the defeated Germany still posed a significant threat after WWII. Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, signed the Brussels Treaty to create a collective defense alliance. Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg anticipated that Germany would one day resume a policy of aggression. The Brussels Treaty lead to the formation of NATO. Signatories of the Brussels Treaty agreed:

“To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression”.

Other treaties were drafted to prevent Germany from starting another war of aggression.

Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

September 12, 1990

ARTICLE 2

Germany provoked the Ukraine Russia war by attempting to obtain nuclear weapons grade uranium from Ukraine

MP Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum to assist Germany bribe foreign public officials

Published on January 30, 2023

MP Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum as a member of the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees. She attended with the intent to assist Germany and its proxy the World Economic Forum bribe foreign public officials. Germany used the venue to recruit foreign public officials for Germany and the WHO’s planned and lead COVID-19 bioterrorism attack.

Chrystia Freeland attended a meeting of the World Economic Forum Board of Trustees on January 24, 2020. Above screenshot of Chrystia Freeland’s itinerary for January 24, 2020 is provided as prima facie evidence. Chrystia Freeland attended as a Board of Trustees member.

Government documents provides convincing evidence that Chrystia Freeland gave Germany and it’s proxy the World Economic Forum $billions to assist Germany bribe foreign public officials who were in attendance. Germany and the WHO knew beforehand that world leaders weren’t going to assist Germany and the WHO wage the COVID-19 bioterrorism attack without being compensated financially.

The Government of Canada’s “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020” report provides material evidence that Germany obtained $billions to finance the COVID-19 bioterrorism attack from German sympathizer/collaborator Chrystia Freeland.

The Government of Canada’s “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020” report states:

“The Department of Finance Canada announced today that Canada’s official international reserves increased by an amount equivalent to US$1,175 million during January to US$86,472 million. This was driven by reserves management funding operations (US$566 million). … Notes. During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond”

The report states in Notes that the US$566 million was cross-currency swaps. Cross currency swap refers to an agreement between two parties to trade currencies. One party (Trudeau government) is essentially loaning another party (Germany government) money.

The “Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020” report also states in Notes that in January 2020 Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland government “issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond“.

A bond is a fixed income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental). A bond could be thought of as an I.O.U. between the lender and borrower that includes the details of the loan and its payments.

Both the US$566 million cross-currency swaps and the 5-year US$3 billion global bond were made when Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum and a meeting of the World Economic Forum Board of Trustees.

Chrystia Freeland is in a conflict of interest and breach of public trust by being an active World Economic Forum Board of Trustee member and a member of Parliament of Canada.

The board of trustees will be responsible for holding “in-trust” the funds, assets, or property that belong to others with a fiduciary duty to protect them.

All MPs have a fiduciary duty to represent the interests of their constituents, not a foreign government or its proxy, the World Economic Forum. The House of Commons states:

“The obligation members have to represent the interests of their constituents is truly at the heart of the mandate of a member of parliament. Without constituents to represent there would be no role for MPs to play in our current system of government, there would be no need for an oath of office, there would be no system of representative democracy to uphold, there would be no need for parties to effect change or safeguard the status quo. The obligations members have flow from the power they gain from the citizenry.”

Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum as a Board of Trustee member. Chrystia Freeland misappropriated federal funding (US $3.6 billion) to assist Germany and it’s proxy bribe foreign public officials at the 2020 World Economic Forum. Her actions is defined as a criminal offences – Bribery of Foreign Public Officials and Breach of trust by public officer.

Foreign bribery under Canadian law is governed by the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (“CFPOA”) which makes it an offence to: i) directly or indirectly give, offer or agree to give or offer any form of advantage or benefit to a foreign public official to obtain an advantage in the course of business; or ii) engage in certain accounting practices where those practices are employed for the purpose of bribing a foreign public official or concealing a bribe.

Breach of trust by public officer

s. 122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction

The World Economic Forum provides the most compelling evidence to support the assertion that Chrystia Freeland didn’t attend the 2020 World Economic Forum to represent Canada. She wasn’t on the list of political leaders taking part in the 2020 World Economic Forum. She attended as a World Economic Forum Board of Trustees member. Chrystia Freeland billed the Canadian people for her flights to and from Switzerland and for her luxurious accommodations.

It’s important Canadians and America know and understand that the WHO publicly stated “that the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in China peaked and plateaued between 23 January and 2 February 2020, and had been declining steadily since then” CNBC report. SARS-CoV-2 didn’t become a pandemic. So an act of bioterrorism was perpetrated by Germany, the WHO and the World Economic Forum to coerce World leaders to invest in/buy vaccines.

Germany’s proxy, the World Economic Forum holds all of its annual meetings in Switzerland because of the Swiss banks and their numbered accounts. An investigation would uncover that every time the World Economic Forum meets new numbered accounts are opened and bribe money is deposited. A financial warrant would uncover which foreign public officials Germany bribed during the 2020 World Economic Forum.

Revenue Canada has the means to uncover which Canadian public official(s) received bribe money from Germany during the 2020 World Economic Forum. The Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) standard has been adopted by much of the western world, including Switzerland. Its implementation began in Canada in 2018. AEOI gives Revenue Canada access to information about accounts held by Canadian residents in Switzerland, including account balances and beneficial ownership.

Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum to assist Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy wage a bioterrorism attack against the World’s civilian population pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy – Germany and the World Health Organization’s global vaccine agenda. Freeland’s actions constitutes financing of terrorism. Financing of terrorism is providing the financial means to carry out terrorist activities.

“the Anti-terrorism Act introduced provisions into the Criminal Code and another piece of legislation to address terrorist financing …

the Act introduced new offences into the Code that prohibit the provision of any assistance to terrorist groups or in support of terrorist activities, including monetary assistance, property or services, and regardless of whether the assistance is provided directly or indirectly” Parliament of Canada

According to s.83.03 of the Code, if you help finance a terrorist enterprise, you can be jailed for up to 10 years.

MP Chrystia Freeland continues to blatantly violate federal conflict of interest and breach of trust laws

Published: April 2, 2024

Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland is in a conflict of interest. While serving as a member of Parliament Chrystia Freeland became and continues to be an active member of the Board of Trustees for Germany’s proxy the World Economic Forum (WEF).

An apparent conflict of interest exists when there is a reasonable apprehension, which reasonably well-informed persons could properly have, that a conflict of interest exists.

As of June 30, 2024 the World Economic Forum’s website still lists Chrystia Freeland as an active member of WEF’s Board of Trustees – a foreign agent.

“She is a member of the Forum’s Board of Trustees.” World Economic Forum

MP Chrystia Freeland has been blatantly violating Canada’s federal law, the Conflict of Interest Act, since January 2019.

“Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 25 January 2019 – The World Economic Forum announces that Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, … join its Board of Trustees.” …

“The Board of Trustees serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum’s mission and values”

Similar to a board of directors, board of trustees play a strong role in governance, tasked with strategic planning and providing oversight and accountability for the organization. … The board of trustees’ primary responsibility is to uphold their fiduciary duties.

MP Chrystia Freeland becoming and continuing to serve as an active member of the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees isn’t just a conflict of interest offence her actions is a criminal offence – Breach of trust by public officer.

Regardless of whether specific rules of government ethics have been adopted, public officials have a broad fiduciary duty to carry out their responsibilities in a manner that is faithful to the public trust that has been reposed in them.

All MPs have a fiduciary duty to represent the interests of their constituents, not a foreign government or its proxy, the World Economic Forum.

The House of Commons states:

“The obligation members have to represent the interests of their constituents is truly at the heart of the mandate of a member of parliament. Without constituents to represent there would be no role for MPs to play in our current system of government, there would be no need for an oath of office, there would be no system of representative democracy to uphold, there would be no need for parties to effect change or safeguard the status quo. The obligations members have flow from the power they gain from the citizenry.”

Even if no ethics code has been adopted, or if no code provision is on point, public officials must act in a manner that comports with their common law fiduciary duty obligations.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Actus Reus

A “breach of trust” can include “any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office as a senior civil servant of the Crown.”

Chrystia Freeland becoming and continuing to serve as an active member of the Board of Trustees for the World Economic Forum, is contrary to the fiduciary duties imposed upon her as a member of Parliament (MP).

MP Chrystia Freeland being Canada’s Minister of Finance and an active Board of Trustees member for Germany’s proxy is defined by Canada’s criminal code as a Criminal breach of trust:

336 Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Reasonable suspicion MP Chrystia Freeland is using her office pursuant to or in furtherance of the World Economic Forum’s missions.

One of the board of trustees’ primary responsibilities is to uphold the fiduciary duty to protect all of the organization’s assets and funds in trust. The overarching fiduciary duty includes the duties of care, obedience, and loyalty, which means that a trustee must place the organization’s interests above their own when making decisions on behalf of the organization.

The board of trustees has a fiduciary responsibility to manage the organization’s funds in the best interest of all stakeholders. Managing WEF’s funds includes obtaining funding for the World Economic Forum.

Chrystia Freeland attended the 2020 World Economic Forum in January of 2020 as a Board of Trustee member. Coincidentally in January of 2020 the Trudeau government made a very large transfer of funds – transfered $3.6 billion as a US$556.7 million cross-currency swap and a US$3 billion Global bond.

Government of Canada’s financial reports – “Monthly Official International Reserves” provides compelling evidence that Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland committed the offence of Criminal breach of trust by misappropriating $3.6 billion for the benefit of Germany’s proxy the World Economic Forum.

“During January, Canada issued a 5-year US$3 billion global bond” Official International Reserves – February 5, 2020

The Government of Canada website and the World Economic Forum provides the most compelling evidence to support the assertion that Chrystia Freeland didn’t attend the 2020 World Economic Forum to represent Canada.

She wasn’t on the list of political leaders taking part in the 2020 World Economic Forum. She attended as a World Economic Forum Board of Trustees member. Chrystia Freeland no doubt billed the Canadian people for her flights to and from Switzerland and for her luxurious accommodations.

Chrystia Freeland continues to attend the World Economic Forum Annual meetings. The Chrystia Freeland and WEF meetings were “Closed to media”. Means Chrystia Freeland’s meetings with the World Economic Forum are clandestine.

Purpose of the World Economic Forum’s annual meetings:

Influencing global agendas & decision making, lobbying for public-private cooperation.

Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act defines the World Economic Forum’s influencing activities as threats to the security of Canada.

threats to the security of Canada means:

(b) foreign influenced activities within or relating to Canada that are detrimental to the interests of Canada and are clandestine or deceptive or involve a threat to any person,

Broadly speaking, foreign interference includes attempts to covertly influence, intimidate, manipulate, interfere, corrupt or discredit individuals, organizations and governments to further the interests of a foreign country.

The World Economic Forum is a proxy for the German government. WEF and it’s founder and Board of Trustees furthers the interests of Canada’s WWI and WWII enemy – Germany.

The Ukraine Russia war is the start of Germany’s WWIII military campaign

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are guilty of high treason – levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto. The Trudeau government and Canada’s intelligence community know that the Ukraine Russia war was instigated by Germany to force NATO member states to wage Germany’s WWIII military campaign as Germany’s new Waffen SS.

Pope Francis stated publicly that Germany lead NATO forces provoked the Ukraine war.

A few months before Russia invaded Ukraine – to prevent Germany from obtaining nuclear weapons grade PU-239 from the neo-Nazi Ukrainian government, Germany threatened to use US nukes against Russia.

In an interview with Deutschlandfunk Germany’s Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer (Christian Democrats, CDU) said, “We have to make it very clear to Russia that in the end … we are ready to use such means [nuclear weapons].”

“Ukraine was allegedly making plans to produce 8-10 nuclear bombs with the available plutonium with support from certain foreign powers, sources indicated to ET. Plutonium-239 is an isotope of plutonium. Plutonium-239 is the primary fissile isotope used for the production of nuclear weapons.” India’s Economic Times, February 26, 2022

Least we forget, never forget that Germany was Canada’s enemy in 2 World Wars. Both Germany and Ukraine were Canada’s enemy in WWII. Germany began to wage WWII in Eastern Europe. Germany waged WWII and committed atrocities (war crimes) against and in Poland, Ukraine and the USSR with the assistance of Ukraine.

Thousands of Ukrainians joined the Nazi Germany’s Waffen SS “Galacia” in WWII to help Germany wage WWII & occupy Europe. Ukrainians helped Germany commit atrocities in Poland, in the Soviet Union and in their our country during WWII. They volunteered to serve Nazi Germany as Waffen SS “Galacia” soldiers. Ukrainians served as guards in Germany’s death camps in Poland. Ukrainians soldiers and police who served Germany’s 14th Waffen SS mass murdered Polish, Ukrainian and Soviet civilians and Germany’s prisoners of war.

Canadians need to remember that both Ukraine & Germany were Canada’s enemies in WWII. In 1943, Germany established the Waffen SS Galacia, which was composed of thousands of Ukrainians. In April 1943, 5000 Ukrainian policemen joined/assisted Germany mass murder Ukrainians & Poles.

The Government of Canada has containers of material evidence that shows that Ukraine & Ukrainians did in fact serve Nazi Germany and Ukrainians did commit war crimes during WWII.

Government of Canada Archives contain files on Ukrainians’ war crimes. WAR CRIMES including THE UKRAINIAN 14TH WAFFEN-SS DIVISION SERIES

Containers 7, 33, 35, 36 contains material evidence that shows that Ukraine was an enemy of Canada during WWII. Container files prove Ukrainians waged WWII as Nazi Germany’s 14th Waffen – SS Volunteer Grenadier Division.

Container 35, files 13, 16, 18 contain material evidence on the atrocities committed by Ukrainians who served Nazi Germany in the Ukrainian 14th Waffen SS Division.

Container 36, file 5 contain “list of (Ukrainian) participants in the mass execution of Jews in Slavuta in 1942, now living in Canada and the U.S.”

One Ukrainian who assisted Germany commit mass murder in Poland and Ukraine is the grandfather of Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland. Freeland’s grandfather wrote propaganda articles for Nazi Germany that were written to trick Polish and Ukrainian Jews into boarding trains that were used to transport Jews to Germany’s death camps in Poland. Freeland’s grandfather was classified and investigated by the RCMP as a war criminal when he came to Canada. Canadian government “Commission of Inquiry” document “War Criminals in Canada” recorded that “war criminals were collaborators”. Collaborators like Chrystia Freeland’s grandfather were war criminals because they participated in or facilitated Germany’s war crimes during WWII. The members of the Ukrainian SS Galicia Division were war criminals.