Scientists know how to weaken & steer a hurricane. This technology can be used to prevent any hurricane from making landfall. However, it can also cause a hurricane like Fiona to make an “unusual left hook” and slam into Nova Scotia Canada.

Tracking for the storm released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) showed that, once it passed the 40th parallel north, its trajectory appears to veer slightly left, taking it straight to Nova Scotia.

What caused hurricane Fiona to change course?

The UKs Telegraph reported from Washington DC in 2007 on how to steer a hurricane using aircrafts:

“With small changes (in temperature) to this side or that side of the hurricane we can nudge it & change its track (steer it)” MIT Moshe Alamaro

Then in 2010 NASA intensified Tropical Depression Earl into a Category 4 hurricane and steered (altered its path) Hurricane Earl for 11 days in Project GRIP (Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes).

In August 2010 NASA (founded by Germany’s WWII SS officer Sturmbannführer (major) Wernher von Braun) initiated Project GRIP (Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes) – NASA’s quest for the holy grail of hurricane research.

Project GRIP discovered the exact conditions required to kickstart a tropical depression into a hurricane.  Scientists already knew how hurricanes develop and how to steer them but NASA wanted to perfect the processes that intensifies depressions to form into very intense, spinning storms of mass destruction.  NASA was creating a weather modification weapon of mass destruction.

“Hurricane formation and intensification is really the ‘holy grail’ of this field,” Ed Zipser, one of three program scientists helping to lead the GRIP Project.

“We want to see storms that become hurricanes, and we want to see some that don’t become hurricanes, so we can compare the data. The same is true for hurricane intensification.” ~ GRIP Project Manager Marilyn Vasques

NASA used various weather modifying technology to develop, intensify and steer a hurricane. The available technology included a powerful microwave radiometer and a NASA designed and built lidar (laser radar). Globalhawks were used to heat the top edge of a hurricane – to weaken a hurricane and steer them.

One method that could have been used to halt hurricane Fiona has been used and is still being used by the US state of Texas – cloud seeding, a.k.a. chemtrails. The 2007 Telegraph article was a report on cloud seeding being used to steer hurricanes. The article’s image states “How to halt a hurricane”. The aircrafts in that image are seeding a hurricane.

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation’s website unabashedly states their involvement in Cloud Seeding. Texas not only regulates Texas’s cloud seeding/Chemtrail program they are providing state funding for it.

“With more substantive evidence that cloud seeding could invigorate convective clouds—promoting their growth and capacity to produce rainwater—a coordinated, State-funded program began in earnest in the latter half of the 1990s. Today, with drought a pending, if not ever-present, threat to the economy and well-being of Texans, rain enhancement projects flourish within large areas of Northwest, West, and South Texas. In fact, the seven cloud seeding projects today cover about 31 million acres (or about one-sixth of the land area of the state). When a severe drought was a greater threat at the end of the previous century, as many as 51 million acres were included in cloud seeding “target” areas in the state.” Texas Department of Lcensing & Regulation

Kraut Charles III’s first act regarding Canada will be to reimpose arbitrary rule and martial law in and over Canada. Why? Canada doesn’t have a democracy because arbitrary rule and martial law is imposed in Canada by a German (Kraut) monarchy that was forever abolished in 1919. Each successive illegitimate German monarchy has obtained arbitrary rule in and over Canada with the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General of Canada.

Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General of Canada is arbitrary rule obtained by color of law and color of authority. Color of law and color of authority are defined as abuse of power. Power is often said to be arbitrary when it can be exercised according to the ‘will or pleasure’ of the person or group holding that power. Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General states:

“And We do declare Our Will and pleasure”.

The Governor General is appointed, not elected, “Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada” . Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada is a military title.

Arbitrary rule and martial law is established in Canada with the Letters Patent stating:

And We do declare Our Will and pleasure as follows:

I. We do hereby constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada, and appointments to the Office of Governor General and Commander-in-Chief in and over Canada shall be made by Commission under Our Great Seal of Canada.

How can Canada be a democracy when the leader of Canada, Canada’s Parliament and Canada’s Armed Forces and the RCMP “paramilitary” force is appointed, not elected.  Canadian elections are held to conceal the historical and political fact that all Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor General of Canada effectively imposes arbitrary rule and martial law in Canada.  A democracy cannot exist when an unelected Governor General (a general is a military rank) is appointed head of state & commander-in-chief in and over Canada.

A foreign power (1919 abolished German ruler of the UK) effectively overthrows the dully elected and Constitutionally established Government of Canada by appointing an “unelected” high ranking “military officer”, a General, as de facto head of the Government of Canada and Commander-in-chief of all military forces in Canada.

How can Canada become a truly sovereign and independent state? By Parliament of Canada legally cutting all ties to the UK’s House of Windsor (alias assumed in 1917 by the UK’s WWI abolished German Saxe-Coburg & Gotha monarchy) or we become a republic and dismantle the Crown.

” … when the Canadian constitution was patriated Canada became a fully sovereign and independent state. While the 1982 patriation ended Canada’s legal ties to Great Britain, the expanded Canadian constitution retained the Crown as the concept of the Canadian state and as ultimate source of sovereign authority in Canada. This fully independent Canadian state could not have the British Crown as the source of its sovereign authority. Nor could it be a shared Crown. The only way Canada could be completely sovereign and independent was to decouple the Canadian Crown from its British counterpart.”

“the Crown is an inherently British entity and Canada cannot claim to be an independent state until our ties to the House of Windsor are cut or we become a republic. … Canada would effectively cease to be a constitutional monarchy if the United Kingdom decided to become a republic. The concept that underlies Canada’s entire system of government, the Crown, could be dismantled by another country.” Maclean’s, 3 February 2013 article ” The Queen of Canada is dead; long live the British Queen”

Advocating abolition of the monarchy is explicitly permitted.

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: McAteer v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONCA 578

DATE: 20140813

DOCKET: C57775

“[N]ot only is advocating abolition of the monarchy explicitly permitted, Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada, supra, but the prospect of separation from the United Kingdom and secession of a province both form the subject of legitimate legal discourse. Reference re Resolution to Amend the Constitution (“Patriation Reference”), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 753; Reference re Secession of Québec, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 217. Moreover, a political party dedicated to constitutional fracture can form Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition in Canada’s Parliament. David E. Smith, Across the Aisle: Opposition in Canadian Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013) at 85-86.” Ontario Court DOCKET: C57775

On Friday 29 April 2011 Prince William of Wales and Miss Catherine Middleton were married in Westminster Abbey. The UK’s Act of Settlement (law) made William, forever incapable to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm because William was married in a Catholic Church.

The Westminster Abbey Declaration of Assent states:

“The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith“

Catholic Church Nicene Creed:

“We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.”

UK Act of Settlement (law) states:

That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion …should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any regall Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance

Communion at the Inauguration of the Tenth General Synod of the Church of England at Westminster Abbey on Tuesday 24th November 2015. Elizabeth II in attendance:

European Parliament report, “Green Money: Reclaiming Quantitative Easing” informed the World what’s the Paris Agreement, Climate Action, Climate Change and carbon tax are all about. The report’s subtitle makes their intent perfectly clear -“Money Creation for the Common Good”

The initiatives were all formed as a direct result of the European Parliament report, “Green Money: Reclaiming Quantitative Easing”. Initiatives were made to save the insolvent Germany EU. The report states that the EU is the sole beneficiary of these money making schemes. All are being used to obtain $billions for the Germany EU under false pretenses. EU Parliament report states:

Europe’s economies have still not recovered from the 2008 financial crash. Austerity policies have failed to secure prosperity and employment opportunities, despite some success in calming the finance sector.

However both the EU and member state governments
have generally proved very reluctant to use significant
government spending on public services, infrastructure,
or welfare benefits as a way out of the crisis. Amongst
the consequences, we still see disastrously high rates of
unemployment in many EU countries, with figures for
Spain and Greece around 25%.

Looked at a different way, this continuing economic crisis could also be seen as an opportunity. The immediate need for economic revival should be put together with the more long-term need to restructure economies to fit them for what has been called “the great transition” – the historic shift from carbon-intensive and resource-intensive industrial production to smarter and greener ways of working and living. …

Proposal 3: The green QE programme operated by the EIB should be funded through the creation of new money by the ECB, together with the central banks of EU states outside the Eurozone.

Perhaps the most politically sensitive question about green QE is where the money would come from. This is in some ways a strange topic, because currently most money is created by banks, which do so without any direct political control over that activity, with their own profit-making objectives in mind rather than any obligation to serve society as a whole. A change in this situation, establishing public control over money creation, would of course not abolish the need to be wary about adding to inflation through creating additional money on an excessive scale: the power to create money has to be used responsibly. This raises some general and larger questions about debt, credit, and the creation of money, which will not be pursued here, although they have become increasingly controversial and relevant following the 2008 financial crash. …

The obvious principal body for the purpose of creating the money necessary for green QE is the European Central Bank, working alongside the central banks of the EU member states outside the Eurozone (which include those of the UK, Sweden, and Poland).

… Green QE is a practical plan to tackle both finance and the global environment together. Doing so would create a more stable, secure and prosperous Europe.