The Toronto Police know who had Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed. Toronto Police know it was a contracted murders.
“Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders said he has had to be careful with what he said about the case because he knows “for a fact” that the Shermans’ killers are watching his televised remarks” Toronto Star
Toronto Police investigation files were sealed because Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.
Toronto Police acted on a working theory for the December 13, 2017 “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau‘s Aug 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry & Honey Sherman. Production orders were served on BMO Financial Group, CIBC and TD Bank on Feb 15, 2018. Why? To establish 1) who paid Barry & Honey Sherman’s murderers, 2) who were the murderers and 3) how much were the hitmen paid to target and kill Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraisers.
Production orders served on BMO made Justin Trudeau a viable and a prime suspect. BMO manages “Justin Trudeau’s Blind Trust”.
Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect the day Toronto Police confirmed that Barry and Honey Sherman were indeed targeted. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because Barry and Honey Sherman hosted Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser the Lobbying Commissioner and the RCMP were investigating when Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered. Justin Trudeau was/is a suspect because of an Apotex lawsuit against the Lobbying Commissioner over her and the RCMP’s investigation of Justin Trudeau’s 2015 election campaign fundraiser put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy. RCMP were investigating to determine if Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser was a “prohibited gift or other advantage”. It was because Barry Sherman was a registered in-house lobbyist when he hosted Justin Trudeau’s fundraiser.
“In October 2016, then Commissioner Shepherd received information alleging that Dr. Bernard Sherman, founder of Apotex Inc. and a registered in-house (corporation) lobbyist, was in breach of the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct because of his participation in the organizing and hosting of fundraising events for the Liberal Party of Canada.” Lobbying Commissioner 2017-2018 Annual Report
That means Justin Trudeau violated both the Lobbying Act and the Canada Elections Act. Justin Trudeau faced a slap on the wrist for violating the Lobbying Act. However, Justin Trudeau would have “automatically” lost his seat in the House of Commons after being convicted of accepting a prohibited gift from in-house lobbyist Barry Sherman.
(2) Every person is guilty of an offence that is a corrupt practice who
(h.01) being a candidate, knowingly contravenes subsection 477.9(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage);
Consequences of illegal, corrupt practices
(3) Any person who is convicted of having committed an offence that is … a corrupt practice, during the next seven years, after the date of their being so convicted, not be entitled to
(a) be elected to or sit in the House of Commons
A Government of Canada document (screenshot below) provides prima facie evidence that Barry Sherman was a registered lobbyist when he hosted the August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser for election candidate Justin Trudeau. Barry Sherman registered to lobby the Government of Canada 2 days before the fundraiser on August 24, 2015.
RCMP were involved in the targeted murders because of their ongoing investigation of Justin Trudeau’ and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser. The Lobbying Commissioner confirmed that the RCMP were investigating Justin Trudeau and his August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraiser when Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered.
“In 2017-18, the Office referred two files to the RCMP for investigation” Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada’s Annual report 2017–18
The RCMP investigation no doubt involved the wiretapping of the Sherman residence. RCMP install wiretaps by surreptitious entry or “effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.”
“The power so granted would go much further than authorizing surreptitious entry and would allow the police to act openly and utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or through trickery or coercion. Further, if police acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission” SPREME COURT OF CANADA, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697, Date: 1984-12-20
A person was seen entering and exiting the Sherman residence on December 14, 2017. Toronto Police stated that “the person” was interviewed. However, the person’s identity wasn’t made public because “the person” was a RCMP.
“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,” then Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders
There is evidence that showed responding Toronto Police officers that the crime scene was staged. Staged to make the targeted murders look like it was a murder suicide. The bodies of Barry & Honey Sherman were found propped up. Restraints that were used by their murderers caused restraint markings on the wrist of both Barry and Honey Sherman. The restraints were removed from the bodies and from the crime scene. If the bodies were found with restraints on their wrists the Toronto Police would have conducted a double homicide investigation immediately, on December 15, 2017.
There is evidence that implicates RCMP officers in the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman. No forced entry = surreptitious entry. There is physical evidence that both Barry and Honey Sherman were handcuffed. Both bodies had restraint marks on their wrists. Restraint marks provides evidence that the murderers handcuffed Barry and Honey Sherman but removed the restraints and took them with them.
Crime scene evidence indicates that Honey Sherman’s lip & nose were bloody. Both active and retired police officers know how Honey Sherman’s lip and nose could have been injured. Bloody lip & nose are injuries that are frequently sustained by resisting being arrested/handcuffed by a police officer.
“if police acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission” SPREME COURT OF CANADA, Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 697, Date: 1984-12-20
Toronto Police know who killed Barry & Honey Sherman because of RCMP wiretapping, the Sherman’s own HD video security cameras (image above) and their neighbors’ security cameras recorded the politically motivated assassinations of December 13, 2017. The targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman will likely and intentionally remain a cold case because the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau and RCMP are involved.